Reinsurance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 52
About This Presentation
Title:

Reinsurance

Description:

A transaction between insurance companies to distribute loss between them ... reinsurance reinsurer quotes the price for reinsurance (catastrophes) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1504
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 53
Provided by: defau720
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reinsurance


1
Reinsurance
  • The Role, Importance, Functions of Reinsurance

2
What is Reinsurance?
  • A transaction between insurance companies to
    distribute loss between them
  • In return for a consideration (premium) an
    insurer transfers some of its loss exposure to a
    reinsurer
  • Reinsurer agrees to indemnify the insurer for
    losses falling within the agreement

3
Readings
  • An introduction to reinsurance
  • Reinsurance a systemic risk?
  • Both are Sigma Swiss Re. articles in the readings
    package

4
What is Reinsurance?
  • Reinsurance agreement is a separate contract
    between insurer and reinsurer
  • A response to losses arising under the original
    contract between insurer and policyholder

5
Reinsurance Defined
  • The transfer of part of risk that an insurer
    assumes via legal contract to a second insurance
    carrier
  • That carrier (the reinsurer) has no direct
    contractual relationship with the insured

6
Reinsurance Markets
  • Insurance companies (top 4 companies have 39 of
    volume)
  • Professional reinsurance companies
  • Exchanges
  • Reinsurance pools
  • Captive insurance companies

7
Why the need?
  • Increasing industrialization produced
    concentrations of value
  • Demand for insurance grew
  • Insurers needed to transfer their growing risk
  • Demand for reinsurance cover grew

8
Licensed vs. Unlicensed
  • Licensed reinsurers are under supervision of both
    federal and provincial regulations
  • Benefits of regulation
  • Unlicensed reinsurers are not regulated
  • Not necessarily unsatisfactory

9
Licensed vs. Unlicensed
  • Reasons for providing unlicensed reinsurance
  • Substantial investment required to become
    licensed
  • Reasons for buying unlicensed reinsurance
  • Specialized reinsurance
  • Availability of greater limits

10
Functions of Reinsurance
  • Four key functions, serving as important keys to
    the role of reinsurance are
  • Financing
  • Stabilization
  • Capacity
  • Resource protection

11
Balanced Unbalanced Portfolios
  • Balanced - Consisting of many similar and
    equivalent risks, which collectively balance
    losses
  • Unbalanced one-off exposures nuclear or
    aviation coverage
  • Huge loss exposure

12
Concerns with Financial Stability
  • Exposure of reinsurers in credit capital
    markets is cause for concern
  • Reinsurance lacks transparency and creates a
    possible source of systemic risk
  • Result zero cover bankrupt primary insurers
    bankrupt lenders

13
Defining Systemic Risk
  • The danger that an event will trigger a loss of
    economic value and/or confidence in the financial
    system
  • Will have significant adverse effects of the real
    economy
  • Bank run poorer countries
  • Bank run cannot occur with reinsurers

14
Financing
  • For business growth and progress, both short and
    long-term
  • Reinsurance can be used to improve the
  • Ratio of assets to liabilities ratio
  • Ratio of net premiums written to capital and
    surplus
  • Indirectly is the equivalent of providing
    additional financing

15
Financing cont
  • Solvency regulations are vital in Canada
  • Assets to Liabilities ratio (must equal each
    other plus a margin calculated by regulators)
  • Unearned Premium Reserve and O/S Loss Reserve
    funds protection for insured
  • Minimum Asset Test

16
Financing cont
  • Example
  • An insurer has unearned premiums reserves of
    50,000,000 and outstanding loss reserves of
    55,000,000.
  • An additional amount of margin required by the
    regulators for the MAT is 15 of liabilities

17
Financing cont
  • Therefore,
  • Unearned Prem. 50,000,000
  • Loss reserve 55,000,000
  • Total Liabilities 105,000,000
  • 15 Margin required 15,750,000
  • Liability Margin 120,750,000
  • Total Assets 115,000,000
  • Deficit (5,750,000)

18
Financing cont
  • Insurer needs to raise additional capital to the
    tune of 5,750,000!
  • Alternatively, insurer arranges a Quota Share
    reinsurance transaction to cede 30 of its
    business in return for a premium of 25 of
    unearned premiums

19
Financing cont
  • Quota Share Transaction
  • 30 of Unearned Premium 15,000,000
  • Less 25 Reins. Commission
  • 3,750,000
  • Balance 11,250,000
  • 30 of Loss Reserve 16,500,000
  • Payment to reinsurer 27,750,000

20
Financing cont
  • Net Premiums Written to Capital Surplus Ratio
  • Generally, net premiums should not exceed the
    amount of capital and surplus by more than a
    certain factor acceptable to regulators (3X)
  • Quota Share Treaty can reduce (cede) volume to a
    reinsurer to lower this ratio

21
Financing cont
  • Advantages
  • Readily available
  • Filing with securities authorities is not
    required
  • No dilution of shareholders equity
  • Simple to administer
  • Negotiable terms for repatriation on a flexible
    basis
  • Provides time to study long-term needs

22
Financing cont
  • Disadvantages
  • A volume of business is given away
  • Cost to the insurer is generally high

23
Stabilization
  • Corporate planning needs stability
  • Management wants predictable results
  • Fluctuations add uncertainty and make steady
    progress a difficult task
  • Reinsurance is an important tool for stabilizing
    an insurers results

24
Stabilizing Crises
  • Claims from 9/11 were 40 billion
  • Reinsurance sectors withstood without any major
    defaults in payments etc.
  • Proved the system works
  • Proved the capacity was not at risk

25
Reinsurance to Stabilize
  • Working Excess of Loss Treaty
  • When insurer expects claims activity
  • Loads work/claims on reinsurer (expected)
  • aka Spread Loss Cover
  • Surplus Treaty
  • smoothes a portfolio removes peaks

26
Reinsuring to Stabilize
  • Facultative
  • Peaks can be removed on an individual basis
  • Catastrophe Excess of Loss Treaty
  • Disasters
  • Protects against infrequent but potentially
    harmful claims
  • Stop Loss Treaty
  • Designed to limit insurers loss to a specific
    of GWP

27
Capacity
  • Most insurers are required to insure amounts
    larger than their own resources can provide
  • To attract business (big clients/premiums)
  • To compete with the big dogs for competitive
    reasons
  • To cater to the needs of its agents

28
Capacity cont
  • Surplus Treaty
  • Provides capacity in multiples of the insurers
    net
  • Facultative
  • Easy way to add substantial extra capacity
  • May be costly, though

29
Capacity cont
  • Quota Share
  • increases retention via a multiplier effect on
    surplus treaty
  • Per Risk Excess of Loss Treaty
  • Casualty classes
  • Enables insurer to write larger amounts

30
Resource Protection
  • Protection is sought for resources such as
  • Capital and surplus
  • ELR - results
  • Investments
  • Protects vs. disaster/catastrophe
  • Choice higher retention, less costly
  • Insurers purchase a great deal of reinsurance
    protection spread of risk

31
Methods of Reinsurance
  • Proportional (Pro-Rata)
  • A of the risk is transferred to the reinsurer
  • Reinsurer receives the same of the original
    premium and each loss incurred
  • Process of transferring the risk is termed,
    ceding
  • Amount of risk ceded is the cession

32
Methods of Reinsurance
  • Non-Proportional Reinsurance
  • Retention is agreed upon in specific terms
  • Insurer pays all losses up to a predetermined
    amount (priority excess point, attachment point,
    deductible, retention)
  • Insurer covers majority of small claims
  • Aka Excess of loss or XL reinsurance

33
Methods of Reinsurance
  • Non-Proportional Reinsurance cont
  • Premium charged will be part of the original
    insurance premium but not proportional to the
    amount of loss the reinsurer might be called upon
    to pay

34
Non-Proportional An Example
  • Assume a reinsurer agrees to pay the part of a
    loss which exceeds the retention of 500,000 up
    to an amount of a further 1,000,000
  • Total loss 300,000
  • Insurer pays 300,000, reinsurer pays 0
  • Total loss 750,000
  • Insurer pays 500,000, reinsurer pays 250,000
  • Total loss 1,350,000
  • Insurer pays 500,000, reinsurer pays 850,000

35
Types of Reinsurance
  • Facultative
  • Placed on an individual risk/policy basis
  • Each party has absolute free-choice in arranging
    the reinsurance
  • Can be either proportionate or excess of loss
    basis
  • Normally a small proportion of the total
    reinsurance of any insurer
  • Usually involves large risks

36
Facultative cont
  • Costly due to negotiation of one-off risk
  • Non-prop can be placed in multiple layers (into
    excess layers on top of the insurers retention)
  • Can be placed with one or more insurers (similar
    to standard subscription policies)
  • Info to be provided underwriting, processing,
    accounting, claims etc.

37
Facultative cont
  • In Property classes
  • Both on a pro rata and excess of loss basis
    (mainly used for large complex risks)
  • Reduces risks for large individual risks
  • In Liability classes
  • Almost exclusively used on an excess of loss
    basis (e.g. what if? pharmaceuticals exposure)

38
Facultative Reinsurance cont
  • Proportional reinsurance terms can be
    negotiated (proportion to be accepted and
    commission rate)
  • Non-Prop. reinsurance reinsurer quotes the
    price for reinsurance (catastrophes)
  • Pro rate costs overhead
  • Adjusting costs
  • Layering
  • More than one reinsurer involved

39
Types of Reinsurance
  • Treaty
  • Entire line (portfolio) is covered by agreement
  • Neither can pick and choose risks
  • Insurer doesnt have freedom to decide whether to
    place reinsurance or which reinsurer to use
  • Reinsurer obligated to accept the reinsurance
    with no option to decline

40
Types of Reinsurance
  • Treaty cont
  • Less costly
  • Both proportional and non-prop.
  • Underwritten via company, management, and results

41
Types of Reinsurance
  • Proportional Treaties
  • Quota Share simplest single fixed
  • Insurer and reinsurer agree that the cessions
    will always be a single fixed of each risk
    included in the portfolio of business reinsured
  • Embraces all business written by an insurer
    therefore it is all-inclusive and rigid
  • Insurer must cede every risk

42
Proportional Reinsurance cont
  • May be restricted to a specific class, a
    specified territory, or a designated broker-force
  • Annual negotiations to determine rates
  • Simpler payments and administration
  • Surplus negotiated one risk at a time
  • Retention line

43
Surplus Treaties
  • Percentage ceded of each risk is not fixed
  • Insurer makes decision about the percentage to be
    ceded one risk at a time
  • Capacity is expressed as lines of insurers
    retention
  • Minimum retention specified for insurer

44
Surplus Treaties
  • Parameters which can allow the insurer to vary
    the cession amount
  • Maximum number of lines
  • Maximum dollar capacity
  • Minimum dollar retention
  • Second Surplus additional capacity
  • First Surplus issued before the Second

45
Surplus Treaties
  • Similar in costing to facultative
  • There are several advantages to insurers
  • More spread of risk
  • Insurer retains more quality (or
    desirable)business

46
Treaties
  • Facultative Obligatory treaty insurer is free
    to decide what to reinsure but once its decided
    theyre obligated to accept the treaty
  • A half half solution
  • Facultative for insurer obligatory for reinsurer
  • Similar to surplus treaty
  • Reduces facultative expenses

47
Surplus Treaties cont
  • Balance via ratio of premiums to maximum capacity
  • Less balanced
  • Net account cover separate calculation
  • Gross account cover all-in-one formula
  • Administration is cheaper quicker
  • Analysis is straightforward
  • Unaffected by quota share changes

48
Non-Proportional Treaties
  • Per Risk Excess of Loss
  • Mainly for Property risks
  • Limits loss to insurers retention of risk
  • Cover applies to each physical risk separately
  • i.e. windstorm damages number of houses in
    community. Total amount exceeds retention, but
    each loss is less than the retention. Reinsurer
    pays nothing. In a Per Risk XL treaty, the
    damage to a single risk must exceed retention
    before reinsurer becomes involved

49
Non-Proportional Treaties
  • Per Risk Excess of Loss
  • Can be used separately or with other treaties
  • Advantages
  • Easier administration
  • Comparable experience
  • Changes to gross account cover are unaffected to
    changes to the Quota Share

50
Non-Proportional Treaties
  • Per Event Excess of Loss Treaty
  • All losses from the same event are aggregated and
    reinsurer will get involved if the aggregate
    exceeds retention
  • Used in both Property Liability classes

51
Non-Proportional Treaties
  • Per Event XL Treaty
  • Catastrophe Excess of Loss Treaty
  • Accumulation of small losses
  • Ultimate net loss
  • Casualty Excess of Loss Treaty
  • Working Layer Treaty claims activity expected
  • Buffer or Shock Layer Treaty retention beyond
    normal expected loss
  • Clash Layer Treaty retention exceeds single
    policy limit

52
Non-Proportional Treaties
  • Stop Loss Treaty
  • Protects annual result of a class of business
  • Retention usually expressed in terms of insurers
    loss ratio
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com