Title: Conceptual Foundations of Radical Behaviorism
1UNIT 4 Conceptual Foundations of Radical
Behaviorism Chapters 4 5
2Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Defining Behavior
- John B. Watson
- First to use the term behaviorism and cognate
terms such as behaviorist and behavioristic - We should mean by response the total striped and
unstriped muscular and glandular changes which
follow upon a given stimulus - Categories
- External, overt, explicit
- Internal, covert, implicit
- Learned, habit
- Innate, heriditary
3Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Defining Behavior
- John B. Watson
- Watsons responses, including implicit ones,
involved the whole organism casting behavior as
a product of one or another component of an
organisms physiology was to risk invoking the
mind or soul as the initiator of behavior - Viewed behavior as an ongoing pattern of
adjustment and adaptation to the environment
behavior was a form of interaction between the
organism and environment
4Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Defining Behavior
- B.F. Skinner
- Early definition (1938) Behavior is what an
organism is doing or more accurately, what it
is observed by another organism to be doing - Skinner later rejected the observed by another
organism criterion private events, observable
only to the behaving organism, counted as
behavior
5Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Defining Behavior
- B.F. Skinner
- Early definition (1938) the term stimulus
must refer to a class of events, the members of
which possess some property in common, but
otherwise differ rather freely, and the term
response to a similar class showing a greater
freedom of variation but also defined rigorously
with respect to one or more propertiesThe
members of the class are quantitatively mutually
replaceable in spite of their differences.
6Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Defining Behavior
- B.F. Skinner
- Early on, Skinner advocated treating stimuli and
responses as members of classes, rather than
isolated instances - The classes were defined functionally, rather
than on the basis of their topographical or
physical properties - By emphasizing generic, functional classes of
stimuli and responses, Skinner was able to better
deal with the apparent variability and
spontaneity of behavior
7Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Defining Behavior
Generalized S-R Reflex Model
S1
R1
cool
S1
R2
R1
not cool
not cool
S2
R1
not cool
VARIABILITY
SPONTANEITY
8Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Defining Behavior
Mediational S-O-R Model
S1
R1
O
cool
Mediating Variable1
S1
R2
R1
S2
R1
VARIABILITY
SPONTANEITY
cool
cool
9Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Defining Behavior
Skinners Objection to Mediational S-O-R Model
S1
R1
O
cool
Mediating Variable1
Many of these variables are themselves better
regarded as responses or behaviors the
dependent variables of psychology, not the
independent variables
These are typically not manipulable variables
to say they mediate or cause behavior does
not help us control, influence, or change behavior
10Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Defining Behavior
Operant, Functional Class Model
S1
R1
S
ANTECEDENT
CONSEQUENCE
11Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Defining Behavior
- Despite tendencies toward physicalistic
definitions (e.g., Johnston Pennypacker),
response classes in behavior analysis are defined
according to their function, not the physical
topography of their members - The task of defining behavior is not to specify
a Platonic or metaphysical essence that when
present means some activity counts as behavior,
and when absent means it does not.
12Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Defining Behavior
- Categories of behavior are distinguished by the
environmental variables and relations of which
they are a function, rather than any supposed
essence or quality of the behavior
13Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Defining Behavior
- Behavior may be viewed as an event wherein a
causal relation exists between (a) the
functioning of one or more of an organisms
neural or muscular systems responsible for
movement or posture (including standing still)
and (b) the environment. - The environment is that which is outside
behavior, not necessarily outside the skin
14Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Defining Behavior
- Behavior is an interaction between organism and
environment that has particular properties as a
result of certain functional relations that
obtain between the features of the behavior and
features of the environment. The interaction may
have developed phylogenically or ontogenically,
and represents a central characteristic of the
organism as it progresses through its life
cycle.
15Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Two Questions in a Science of Behavior
- How is an organisms behavior functionally
related to its environment? - How do an organisms neural, muscular, and
hormonal systems participate in those functional
relations?
Behavior Analysis
Behavioral Neuroscience
These systems are not environmental stimulation
they are dependent variables, not independent
variables. They reveal physiological structures
that are activated by the environment, or how
those structures have been changed by interaction
with the environment.
16Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Two Gaps in a Behavioral Analysis Addressed by
Behavioral Neuroscience
- The gap within a behavioral event itself, from
stimuli to response (they are separated both
spatially and temporally) - The gap between behavioral events, from one event
to its effects as measured in the future
17Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Contributions of Behavioral Neuroscience
- How physiological systems provide continuity
between stimulus and response within a behavioral
event - How physiological systems are changed by
experience - How the changes in physiological systems persist
through time and influence future behavioral
events - How a changed organism behaves differently in the
future - How the internal biochemical context modulates
stimulating action of the environment
18Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Contributions of Behavioral Neuroscience
- Physiological information that fills the two gaps
(within a behavioral event and between behavioral
events) may suggest new possibilities for
prediction and control - BUT techniques for behavioral control can be
identified and evaluated independently of any
knowledge of physiology - Physiology will not disprove known behavioral
technologies, but rather reveal the mechanisms
inside the skin by which they work
19Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Causality
20Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
Contributions of Behavioral Neuroscience
- Physiology of the behaving organism is a material
cause - The environment is an efficient cause
- Thus, neuroscience and behavior analysis deal
with different kinds of causes - Some of Skinners early objections to
physiological explanations were those that
treated physiological factors as efficient causes
21Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
The Empty Organism
- RB is explicitly concerned with variables and
relations that are inside the organism, but views
them differently from traditional psychology - RB rejects the reductionistic assertion that
behavior cannot be considered to be explained
until the physiological mechanism involved in the
behavior has been identified
22Chapter 4 Behavior as a Subject Matter in Its
Own Right
The Empty Organism
- RB holds that neuroscience and behavior analysis
each deals with a unique subject matter in its
own terms, at a descriptively consistent level - An organisms physiology participates in every
behavioral event - Knowledge of the physiology is available and
potentially relevant for the purpose of
prediction and control, but a complete account
must include the environmental circumstances of
which the behavior is a function
23Chapter 5 Categories of Behavior
Phases for Classifying Behavior
- Assess what variables and relations are in effect
in the current environment - Observe whether instances of the target behavior
become more or less probable - Determine that the change in the probability of
the target behavior is a function of contact with
the relevant relation in the environment (and not
because some other environmental relation is
involved and has been overlooked)
24Chapter 5 Categories of Behavior
Three Operations for Influencing Organisms
- A stimulus presentation operation (eliciting
operation) - A consequential operation
- A signaling operation related to the eliciting or
consequential operations
25Chapter 5 Categories of Behavior
Innate Behavior
- Innate behavior is a function of the stimulus
presentation operation - When behavior is a function of consequential or
signaling operations, it is generally considered
learned or conditioned - Behavior is generally considered innate if it is
more related to the lifetime of the species than
the lifetime of the individual organism
26Chapter 5 Categories of Behavior
Types of Innate Behavior
- Reflex (unconditioned respondent) class of
responses in an isolated muscle, gland, or single
behavioral system that is elicited by the
presentation of a specific stimulus - The topography of a given respondent is
determined by the stimulus involved, and
ordinarily does not vary widely from instance to
instance within a species - Examples salivation to food in the mouth
increased heart rate, breathing, or perspiration
to an electric shock
27Chapter 5 Categories of Behavior
Types of Innate Behavior
- Tropism a change in the orientation of an
organism in response to external fields of force
(e.g., gravity) - Kinesis stimulus produces a change in movement
or orientation, irrespective of the direction of
that movement (e.g., wood louse when in dry
area, it moves about until it reaches a dark,
moist area) - Taxis stimulus produces a change in movement
carried out with respect to an eliciting stimulus
(e.g., egg retrieval by a goose)
28Chapter 5 Categories of Behavior
Types of Taxes
- Different taxes (plural of taxis) result in
response to different types of stimuli. Each of
these forms of taxis can be described by simply
adding a prefix to the word taxis.
29Chapter 5 Categories of Behavior
Types of Innate Behavior
- Fixed Action Patter (FAP) a pattern of behavior
in which the response is - Stereotyped within a species
- Released via a specific stimulus, after which it
is relatively independent of immediate
environmental context and feedback - Innate
- Examples feeding mating and reproduction
nesting social activities, rituals fighting,
attacking, aggression
30Chapter 5 Categories of Behavior
Learned Behavior
- Learning is the name used to describe changes in
behavior that occur as a result of particular
post-natal experiences - The changes in behavior are changes in the
topography of a response, the properties of a
response (e.g. force, duration, tempo, rate), or
in the circumstances in which a given response
occurs - The post-natal experiences involve contact with
stimulus events and relations in the environment
31Chapter 5 Categories of Behavior
Questions About Learning for Behavior Analysis
- Why does behavior change?
- Because the organism finds itself in changed
environmental circumstances. Organisms whose
behavior doesnt change when environmental
circumstances change probably wont survive. - What aspects of the environmental circumstances
are functionally related to the changes in
behavior? - Answers to this question comes from a science of
behavior. Indeed, this question virtually sets
the program for a science of behavior.
32Chapter 5 Categories of Behavior
Questions About Learning for Neuroscience
- Why do changed circumstances produce changes in
behavior? - When an organisms behavior changes, its
physiology has presumably changed. Organisms
whose physiology doesnt change when
environmental circumstances change wont survive. - What physiological changes take place in an
organisms body when it is said to have learned - Answers to this question comes from neuroscience.
Indeed, this question virtually sets the program
for neuroscience.
33Chapter 5 Categories of Behavior
Conditioned Respondent Behavior
- Conditioned Respondent produced when a
signaling operation is combined with the stimulus
presentation operation - A stimulus does not originally elicit the
response in question, but comes to do so when it
signals an increased probability that anther
stimulus (which already elicits the response),
will be presented - Respondent Conditioning Classical Conditioning
Pavlovian Conditioning
34Chapter 5 Categories of Behavior
Conditioned Respondent Behavior
stimulus presentation (eliciting) operation
S1
R1
unconditioned stimulus (US)
S2
neutral stimulus (NS)
signaling operation
S1
R1
S2
S2
R1
conditioned stimulus (CS)
35Chapter 5 Categories of Behavior
Operant Behavior
- Operant Behavior operant behavior is a function
of a consequential operation - Instances of a given operant are members of a
class, defined by the common functional property
of producing the same consequence - Specific topography can vary from instance to
instance - Operant Conditioning Instrumental Learning
Skinnerian Conditioning Thorndikian Conditioning
36Chapter 5 Categories of Behavior
Operant Behavior
- Signaling operations (i.e., the use of
discriminative stimuli) are typically combined
with the consequential operation to produce an
operant - A CS is said to elicit a response
- An SD is said to set the occasion upon which
the response will be successful in producing the
consequence in question
37Chapter 5 Categories of Behavior
The Three-Term Operant Contingency
- When a signaling operation is combined with a
consequential operation, an explicit three-term
operant contingency is in effect - If the response occurs in the presence of the
discriminative stimulus, then the consequence
will follow and not otherwise - The three-term contingency is the fundamental
analytic unit of operant behavior
SD
R
consequence
38Chapter 5 Categories of Behavior
Sources of Operant Behavior
- A response must occur in one form or another
before it can produce a consequence and be called
an operant - Sources
- Random behavior
- Shaping
- Respondents (less common)
39Chapter 5 Categories of Behavior
Molar and Molecular Analyses of Behavior
- Molar level of analysis when the independent
and dependent variables are formulated in terms
of large-scale relations, across relatively
extended periods of time in ways that transcend
local relations between the behavioral unit and
the environment - Molecular level of analysis when the
independent and dependent variables are
formulated in terms of smaller-scale operations,
across relatively circumscribed periods of times
in ways the emphasize local relations between the
behavioral unit and the environment