Public School Choice and Supplemental Educational Services - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Public School Choice and Supplemental Educational Services

Description:

Criteria that an LEA Must Meet to Spend Less than its 20-Percent Obligation ... 1. To spend less than the amount needed to meet its 20-percent obligation, an ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:230
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: ca008
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Public School Choice and Supplemental Educational Services


1
Public School Choice and Supplemental
Educational Services
  • Federal Programs
  • Committee of Practitioners
  • December 17, 2008

2
Agenda
  • School Improvement Timeline for Title I Schools
  • Overview of Public School Choice (PSC) and
    Supplemental Educational Services (SES)
  • SES Evaluation
  • Monitoring of SES Providers
  • New Title I Regulations for PSC and SES

3
School Improvement Timelinefor Title I Schools
4
Improving Status
  • Improving - The school has made AYP for one
    year after being identified for improvement,
    corrective action, or restructuring.
  • PSC and SES are still required.
  • Two years to get into improvement, two years to
    get out.

5
Public School Choice
  • High Priority Title I schools identified for
    improvement, corrective action, or restructuring
  • Eligible students All enrolled students

6
Supplemental Educational Services (SES)
  • Supplemental Educational Services tutoring in
    reading/language arts and math to students
    outside the regular school day.
  • Eligible students low-income students attending
    Title I schools identified in school improvement
    2 or beyond.

7
Who can be an SES provider?
  • For-profit agencies
  • Non-profits (including community and faith-based
    organizations)
  • Public, charter, and private schools
  • School districts (not identified as High
    Priority)
  • Institutions of higher education

8
Update Approval Process for SES Applications
  • Application window
  • Opens February 16, 2009
  • Closes March 27, 2009
  • Technical Assistance Web Ex presentations
    tentatively scheduled January 2009.

9
Update Evaluation of Providers
  • Center for Research in Educational Policy,
    University of Memphis
  • Measures of effectiveness (data analyses)
  • Quality of services (perception surveys)
  • http//state.tn.us/education/fedprog/doc/SES0607E
    valRpt.doc

10
(No Transcript)
11
State Level Results2006-07
  • Student Achievement
  • One provider yielded statistically significant
    positive effects on students tutored in
    mathematics.
  • One provider showed significantly negative
    effects on reading test scores.

12
SES Monitoring Process
  • Desk Top Monitoring
  • NCLB Compliance
  • SES Application Compliance
  • On-Site Monitoring
  • Site specific compliance requirements
  • On-Site Observation
  • Observation of actual tutoring session

13
SES PROVIDERSCODE OF ETHICS
  • General guidelines for ethical behavior
  • Marketing
  • Incentives

14
Regulations Regarding Public School Choice and
Supplemental Educational Services (SES)
15
Public School Choice and SES
  • New regulatory requirements related to
  • Timely and Clear Notification to Parents
  • Parent outreach for public school choice and SES,
  • States responsibilities for SES, and
  • Funding for choice-related transportation and
    SES.

16
Public School Choice Notification
  • LEAs must notify parents of eligible students
    about public school choice options sufficiently
    in advance of, but no later than 14 calendar days
    before, the start of the school year
    200.37(b)(4)(iv) 200.44(a)(2).
  • Requirement applies beginning with the 2009-10
    school year.

17
Table Talk
  • How can a school district plan in the spring to
    notify parents about the public school choice
    option14 days prior to the start of school?

18
SES Notification
  • The notice of the availability of SES must
  • Explain how parents can obtain SES for their
    child 200.37(b)(5)(i),
  • Identify each approved SES provider available
    within the LEA or in its general geographic
    location, including providers that are accessible
    through technology, such as distance learning
    200.37(b)(5)(ii)(A),
  • Describe briefly the services, qualifications,
    and evidence of effectiveness for each provider
    200.37(b)(5)(ii)(B),

19
SES Notification (Continued)
  • The notice of the availability of SES must
  • Include an explanation of the benefits of
    receiving SES 200.37(b)(5)(ii)(C)
  • Be clear, concise, and clearly distinguishable
    from other information sent to parents on school
    improvement 200.37(b)(5)(iii) and
  • Include an indication of those providers who are
    able to serve students with disabilities or LEP
    students 200.37(b)(5)(ii)(B).
  • Requirement applies beginning with the 2009-10
    school year.

20
SES Notification (Continued)
  • An LEAs notice should describe the procedures
    and timelines that parents must follow in
    selecting a provider to serve their child. For
    example
  • Where and when to return a completed application,
  • When and how the district will notify parents
    about enrollment dates and start dates, and
  • LEA contact information
  • If an LEA anticipates that it will not have
    sufficient funds to serve all eligible students,
    it should also include information on how it will
    set priorities in order to determine which
    eligible students receive services.

21
SES Notification (Continued)
  • What does it mean for the SES notice to be
    clearly distinguishable?
  • If the SES notice is included in the same mailing
    with other information about school improvement,
    information about SES must be easily
    recognizable.
  • An LEA is not required to send an SES notice that
    is separate from its school improvement notice.

22
LEA Web Site
  • An LEA must prominently display on its Web site,
    in a timely manner
  • The number of students who were eligible for and
    the number of students who participated in public
    school choice and SES, beginning with data from
    the 2007-08 school year and each subsequent
    school year.
  • For the current school year, a list of SES
    providers approved by the state to serve the LEA
    and the locations where services are provided.
  • For the current school year, a list of available
    schools to which students eligible to participate
    in public school choice may transfer
    200.39(c)(1).

23
LEA Web Site (Continued)
  • If an LEA does not have its own Web site, the
    state must include the information for the LEA on
    its Web site 200.39(c)(2).

24
Allowance for Parent Outreach and Assistance Costs
  • An LEA may count in the amount the LEA is
    required to spend for choice-related
    transportation and SES (20 percent obligation,
    i.e., an amount equal to 20 percent of its Title
    I, Part A allocation) its costs for parent
    outreach and assistance.
  • An LEA may count up to an amount equal to one
    percent of the 20-percent obligation
    200.48(a)(2)(iii)(C).

25
Allowance for Parent Outreach and Assistance
Costs (Continued)
  • What costs for parent outreach and assistance may
    an LEA count toward meeting the 20-percent
    obligation?
  • An LEA has discretion in determining the most
    effective means of providing outreach and
    assistance to parents of eligible students.
  • Examples of allowable costs
  • Parent notices,
  • Communication through the media, Internet, and
    community partners,
  • Displaying information on the LEAs Web site, and
  • Parent fairs.

26
Table Talk
  • How can a school district use the 1 of the
    required 20 reservation to improve parent
    outreach and assistance in enrolling their
    students in SES?

27
State Responsibilities Regarding SES
  • Transparency for Parents and the Public
  • SES Provider Approval Process
  • SES Provider Monitoring
  • Monitoring LEAs
  • Implementation Timeline

28
Transparency for Parents and the Public
  • For each LEA, states must post on their Web sites
    200.47(a)(1)(ii)(B)
  • The amount of funds available for choice-related
    transportation and SES as required in
    200.48(a)(2) (the 20 percent obligation i.e.,
    an amount equal to 20 percent of the LEAs Title
    I, Part A allocation).
  • The per-child amount for SES as calculated under
    200.48(c)(1).
  • States must indicate on the list of approved
    providers those SES providers that are able to
    serve students with disabilities or who are
    limited English proficient 200.47(a)(3)(ii).
  • Before the start of the 2009-10 school year.

29
SES Provider Approval Process
  • A state must ensure that each provider it
    approves
  • Has a demonstrated record of effectiveness in
    increasing student academic achievement.
  • Is capable of providing instructional services
    that are
  • Consistent with the instruction provided and the
    content used by the LEA and the state,
  • Aligned with state academic content and student
    academic achievement standards,
  • Of high quality, research-based, and designed to
    increase student academic achievement, and
  • Secular, neutral, and non-ideological
    200.47(b).

30
SES Provider Approval Process (Continued)
  • A state must ensure that each provider it
    approves
  • Is financially sound 200.47(b)(1)(iii), and
  • Will provide SES consistent with applicable
    federal, state, and local health, safety, and
    civil rights laws 200.47(b)(2)(iii).

31
SES Provider Approval Process (Continued)
  • Additionally, a state must consider, at a
    minimum
  • Information from the provider on whether it has
    been removed from any states approved provider
    list 200.47(b)(3)(i),
  • Parent recommendations, or results from parent
    surveys, if any exist, regarding the success of
    the providers instructional program in
    increasing student achievement 200.47(b)(3)(ii)
    , and
  • Evaluation results, if any exist, demonstrating
    that the providers instructional program has
    improved student achievement 200.47(b)(3)(iii).
  • Beginning with the states next approval cycle.

32
SES Provider Monitoring
  • To monitor the quality and effectiveness of
    services offered by an approved provider in order
    to inform the renewal or the withdrawal of
    provider approval, a state must examine, at a
    minimum, evidence that the providers
    instructional program
  • Is consistent with the instruction provided and
    content used by the LEA and state
    200.47(c)(1)(i),
  • Addresses students individual needs, as
    described in students SES plans
    200.47(c)(1)(ii),
  • Has contributed to increasing students academic
    proficiency 200.47(c)(1)(iii), and
  • Is aligned with the states academic content and
    student academic achievement standards
    200.47(c)(1).

33
Table Talk Student Learning Plan
  • How can a school district develop an individual
    student learning plan in consultation with the
    parent and the provider chosen by the parent?

34
SES Provider Monitoring (Continued)
  • A state also must consider information, if any
    exists, regarding
  • Parent recommendations or results from parent
    surveys regarding the success of the providers
    instructional program in increasing student
    achievement 200.47, and
  • Evaluation results demonstrating that the
    instructional program has improved student
    achievement 200.47(c)(2).
  • Beginning with the states next approval cycle.

35
Monitoring LEAs
  • A state is required to develop, implement, and
    publicly report on the standards and techniques
    it will use to monitor LEAs implementation of
    SES 200.47(a)(4)(iii).
  • Before the start of the 2009-10 school year.

36
Funding for Choice-Related Transportation and SES
  • Criteria that an LEA Must Meet to Spend Less than
    its 20-Percent Obligation
  • LEA Responsibilities to Document and Notify the
    State
  • State Responsibilities
  • Consequences for Non-Compliance
  • Availability of Funds

37
Criteria that an LEA Must Meet to Spend Less Than
its 20-Percent Obligation
  • 1. To spend less than the amount needed to meet
    its 20-percent obligation, an LEA must meet, at a
    minimum, the following criteria
  • Partner, to the extent practicable, with outside
    groups, such as faith-based organizations, other
    community-based organizations, and business
    groups, to help inform eligible students and
    their families of opportunities to transfer or to
    receive SES 200.48(d)(2)(i)(A).

38
Criteria that an LEA Must Meet to Spend Less Than
its 20-Percent Obligation (Continued)
  • Ensure that eligible students and their parents
    have a genuine opportunity to sign up to transfer
    or to obtain SES, including by
  • Providing timely, accurate notice to parents.
  • Ensuring that sign-up forms for SES are
    distributed directly to all eligible students and
    their parents, and are made widely available and
    accessible through broad means of dissemination,
    such as the Internet, other media, and
    communications through public agencies serving
    eligible students and their families.

39
Criteria that an LEA Must Meet to Spend Less Than
its 20-Percent Obligation (Continued)
  • 3. Ensure that eligible students and their
    parents have a genuine opportunity to sign up to
    transfer or to obtain SES, including by
  • Providing a minimum of two enrollment windows,
    at separate points in the school year, that are
    of sufficient length to enable parents of
    eligible students to make informed decisions
    about requesting SES and selecting a provider
    200.48(d)(2)(i)(B).

40
Criteria that an LEA Must Meet to Spend Less Than
its 20-Percent Obligation (Continued)
  • Ensure that eligible SES providers are given
    equal access to school facilities, using a fair,
    open, and objective process, on the same basis
    and terms as are available to other groups that
    seek access to school facilities
    200.48(d)(2)(i)(C).

41
LEAs Responsibilities to Document and Notify
the State
  • To spend less than the amount needed to meet its
    20-percent obligation, an LEA must
  • Maintain records demonstrating that it has met
    the criteria in 200.48(d)(2)(ii), and
  • Notify the state that it
  • Has met the criteria in 200.48(d)(2)(i) and
  • Intends to spend the remainder of its 20-percent
    obligation on other allowable activities,
    specifying the amount of that remainder
    200.48(d)(2)(iii).

42
States Responsibilities
  • Each state must, through its regular monitoring
    process, ensure that an LEA that spent less than
    its 20-percent obligation on choice-related
    transportation and SES met the criteria in
    200.48(d)(2)(i).
  • In addition to its regular monitoring process, a
    state must, by the beginning of the next school
    year, review any LEA that
  • The state determines has spent a significant
    portion of its 20-percent obligation for other
    allowable activities and
  • Has been the subject of multiple complaints,
    supported by credible evidence, regarding
    implementation of public school choice or SES
    200.48(d)(3).

43
Consequences for Non-Compliance
  • If a state determines that an LEA has failed to
    meet any of the criteria in 200.48(d)(2)(i), the
    LEA must
  • Spend an amount equal to the remainder of its
    20-percent obligation in the subsequent year, in
    addition to its 20-percent obligation for that
    year, on choice-related transportation costs,
    SES, or parent outreach and assistance, or
  • Meet the criteria and obtain permission from the
    state before spending less than the required
    amount in that subsequent school year. The state
    must confirm the LEAs compliance with the
    criteria before granting such permission
    200.48(d)(4).

44
On the Bright Side
  • Vision for SES
  • Proactive rather than Reactive approach to the
    provision of SES
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com