Title: Chapter Fifteen: In Search of Homeland Security
1Chapter FifteenIn Search of Homeland
Security
2Defining Homeland Security
3Defining Homeland Security
- Issues surrounding homeland security
- Issues surrounding homeland security are confused
because the country is dealing with a new
concept, a new meaning of conflict, and a change
in the procedures used to defend the United
States - Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
- DHS is responsible for protecting the borders and
the countrys interior
4Defining Homeland Security
- Mission and understanding
- Mission and understanding mean the same thing,
but there are many different understandings of
homeland security because many agencies have
differing missions - Policy
- The policy guiding homeland security in the
United States has not been fully developed, and
executives are not quite sure of the way that all
the missions of various agencies fit together
5Defining Homeland Security
- Civil defense
- Homeland security also involves civil defense,
that is, citizens engaged in homeland security - A major portion of security is a civic
responsibility
6Clausewitz, Sun Tzu, and Views of War
7Clausewitz, Sun Tzu, and Views of War
- Democrats and Republicans
- Republicans tend to see terrorism as a military
issue - Democrats tend to see terrorism as a criminal act
8Clausewitz, Sun Tzu, and Views of War
- Before the time of growing terrorism
- Before the time of growing terrorism, War was an
extension of politics fought within the legal
framework of the Constitution - The Constitution states that only Congress has
the power to declare war, and Congress declares
whether America is in a state of war or of peace - Terrorism is changing the nature of conflict
9Clausewitz, Sun Tzu, and Views of War
- Carl von Clausewitz
- Prussian general and military philosopher, Carl
von Clausewitz, came to believe that the French
Revolution created a new type of war - The strength of the French came from their
ability to place the nation in arms, that is, to
rally the people to the belief that all citizens
of a nation are potential soldiers or supporters
of the military - Clausewitzs On War is a philosophical treatise
on the nature of total, nationalistic wars
10Clausewitz, Sun Tzu, and Views of War
- Victor Hansons criticism of Clausewitz
- Hanson criticizes Clausewitz and the Western way
of battle, claiming the West is consumed with the
way war was fought in Ancient Greece. According
to this line of thought, the purpose of military
action is to seek a decisive engagement. - Terrorism is designed to produce the opposite
effect, seeking to avoid direct confrontation
with force
11Clausewitz, Sun Tzu, and Views of War
- Sun Tzu
- Chinese philosopher, Sun Tzu, produced a treatise
on the paradoxes of war - Sun Tzu saw war and peace as two sides of the
same coin - War and politics were psychological forces held
together by the belief in power
12Clausewitz, Sun Tzu, and Views of War
- Asymmetry
- Terrorism is based on Sun Tzus concept of
strength-to-weakness - In modern military parlance this is called
asymmetry- competing forces are out of balance - Terrorists tend to be true believers who
sacrifice lives, and they are willing to attack
while avoiding social conventions and societal
norms - The purpose of terrorism is to give the
impression that powerful economic, military, and
political forces cannot protect ordinary people
going about their daily routines - Military forces must cope with this change, but
criminal justice agencies become involved in
homeland security precisely because terrorists
fight outside the rules
13Pearl Harbor and 9-11 Two Different Worlds
14Pearl Harbor and 9-11 Two Different Worlds
- December 7, 1941
- The purpose of the Japanese attack on Pearl
Harbor was to destroy U.S. military capabilities
in the Pacific
15Pearl Harbor and 9-11 Two Different Worlds
- September 11, 2001
- The 9-11 attacks were designed for drama. They
were a tragedy performed on a subnational level,
with the purpose of murdering thousands of people
to create an aura of fear - The goal of the September 11 terrorists was not
one of conventional military strategy. Its
purpose was to create so much feat that Western
institutions would change their behavior - The terrorists of September 11 were attacking
globalization while America was defending state
power
16Pearl Harbor and 9-11 Two Different Worlds
- The new style of conflict
- Jihadists are not attacking state power they are
attacking the idea of Western, and particularly
American culture - Modern terrorism is aimed at the infrastructure
of everyday life and the symbols that define that
structure
17Redefining Conflict, Defense, and
Intelligence
18Redefining Conflict, Defense, and Intelligence
- Clausewitzs factors on the changing nature of
military action - Sometimes wars are fought on frontiers against
irregular armies - War is an extension of politics. The only reason
a nation fights is to win a political victory
19Redefining Conflict, Defense, and Intelligence
- Preparing for the new type of war
- The Pentagon prepared to fight state-to-state
battles during the 1990s - Terrorists do not fight in field engagements
therefore, military forces must transform their
structures to take the fight to terrorists
20Redefining Conflict, Defense, and Intelligence
- Vice admiral Arthur Cebrowsky
- Cebrowsky believes that America needs to create a
new defense culture that permeates all levels of
society and that breaks down barriers between
organizations - The United States needs forces that thoroughly
understand American culture and the cultures of
our enemies and friends
21Redefining Conflict, Defense, and Intelligence
- Martin van Crefeld
- Crefeld argues that war has changed violence is
the purpose - Crefeld illustrates his thesis by using the
French-Algerian War as an example. The Algerian
nationalists of the National Liberation Front
(FLN) fought for the communitys survival. As
long as they fought, they were succeeding
22Redefining Conflict, Defense, and Intelligence
- Barnetts thesis
- Barnett implies that military forces must change
for future battles - A force fighting to impose political will
operates differently from a force fighting for
existence - The purpose of power is to create a new set of
international rules in which all nations are
included in economic development, prosperity, and
peace - When nations are excluded, violent terrorists
have no incentive to play within the rules
23The Role of Symbols and Structures
24The Role of Symbols and Structures
- Symbolic targets
- Asymmetrical war is waged against symbolic
targets, and homeland security is designed to
secure symbols - Attacks against symbols disrupt support
structures and can have a high human toll
25The Role of Symbols and Structures
- Grenville Byford
- Byford points out that symbolic attack may simply
be designed to inflict massive casualties that
is, killing people has a symbolic value - Rather than engaging in political rhetoric about
morality, Byford concludes, it is more productive
to understand that Americans represent symbolic
targets of military value
26The Role of Symbols and Structures
- Ian Lessers three forms of terrorism
- Symbolic terrorism is a dramatic attack to show
vulnerability - Pragmatic terrorism involves a practical attempt
to destroy political power - Systematic terrorism is waged over a period of
time to change social conditions - Terrorists use symbolic attacks or attacks on
symbols to achieve pragmatic or systematic results
27The Role of Symbols and Structures
- The key to security
- Offer protection without destroying abstract
meanings - Enhance protection while maintaining openness
- The irony is that every added security measure
increases the feeling of insecurity
28Law Enforcements Special Role
29Law Enforcements Special Role
- Preemptive, offensive policing
- If law enforcement simply responds, it will have
little impact on the prevention of terrorism
30Law Enforcements Special Role
- Results if state and local agencies shift to
offensive thinking and action - Police contact with potential terrorists will
increase - This, however, increases the possibility of
negative stereotyping and the abuse of power - Proactive measures demand increased intelligence
gathering, and much of the information will have
not relation to criminal activity
31Law Enforcements Special Role
- Offensive action in the private sector
- Offensive action begins in the local community
- The weakness in local systems occurs because
state and local police departments do not
frequently think beyond their jurisdictions, and
they do not routinely take advantage of potential
partnerships inside their bailiwicks
32Building Intelligence Systems
33Building Intelligence Systems
- The most important aspect of security
- Information that guides security forces
- Information is crucial for day-to-day operations
34Building Intelligence Systems
- Information gathering
- While academic in nature, information gathering
is directly applicable to gathering intelligence - Applied intelligence involves gathering basic
information about a target and real-time
information about current events - The practical application of this process comes
through organizing structures aimed at
collecting, analyzing, and forwarding information
35Building Intelligence Systems
- President Jimmy Carter
- Carter wanted to protect Americans from their
government - The government began to limit the power of
intelligence operations, unintentionally
hampering their effectiveness
36Building Intelligence Systems
- Time magazine article
- The article stated America needs to learn to spy
again - National security intelligence is crucial, but
law enforcement has a role - The authors of the article also censure
bureaucratic structures for failing to share
information, and they condemn the system for
relying too heavily on machine and electronic
information - Another weak point is the inability to analyze
the information
37Building Intelligence Systems
- New Jersey State Police (NJSP)
- The NJSP Intelligence Service Section is made up
of three divisions - The Intelligence Bureau is the largest division,
composed of six units - The Analytical Unit
- The Casino Intelligence Unit
- The Electronic Surveillance Unit
- The Liaison Computerized Services Unit
- The Service Unit
- The Street Gang Unit
38Building Intelligence Systems
- The central security unit is responsible for New
Jerseys counterterrorist mission. It is a
proactive organization designed to prevent
terrorism through interdiction - The Solid Waste Unit keeps an eye on organized
crime - Recently, NJSP linked its intelligence service
with federal law enforcement, giving it the
potential for greater effectiveness
39Building Intelligence Systems
- California Anti-Terrorism Information Center
(CATIC) - Formed after 9-11, the CATIC is a statewide
intelligence system is designed to combat
terrorism - The center links federal, state, and local
information services in one system and divides
operational zones into five administrative areas - CATIC combines public information with data on
criminal trends and public terrorist activities
40Building Intelligence Systems
- New York City Police Department (NYPD)
- Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly created two new
units - One for counterterrorism
- One for intelligence
41Building Intelligence Systems
- Critics of the FBI and CIA
- The FBI and CIA have been criticized for failing
to gather information before the September 11
attacks and ineffectively analyzing the
information they did have - Civil liberties groups fear growing power in
agencies associated with homeland security, while
others express concern over expanding executive
authority
42Planning for Homeland Security
43Planning for Homeland Security
- Planning is essential
- Planning enhances the gathering, organizing, and
analyzing of information
44Planning for Homeland Security
- The International Association of Chiefs of Police
(IACP) - The IACP believes planning can be guided by
looking for threats inside local communities - Indicators such as an increase in violent
rhetoric, the appearance of extremist groups, and
increases in certain types of crimes may
demonstrate that a terrorist problem is on the
horizon
45Planning for Homeland Security
- Richard Best
- National security differs from law enforcement
- In police work, officers react to information
provided voluntarily - National security intelligence is used to
anticipate threats - Law enforcement should plan and develop two
channels for information - One should be aimed at law enforcement
- State and local police agencies should be
prepared to pass such information along to
defense sources
46Creating a Culture of Information Sharing
47Creating a Culture of Information Sharing
- The National Strategy for Homeland Security calls
for increased information sharing among law
enforcement agencies
48Creating a Culture of Information Sharing
- Information sharing systems
- The Regional Information Sharing System (RISS)
- The RISS is a six-part information network whose
policies are controlled by its members - The High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas
(HIDTAs) - The El Paso Intelligence Center (EPIC)
- The International Law Enforcement Intelligence
Analysts (IALEIA) - Weaknesses in the U.S. system
49Creating a Culture of Information Sharing
- The National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan
- The purpose of the plan is not only to create a
culture of sharing, but to generate the
structures and communications systems to make it
happen - All agencies will communicate in a single network
50Creating a Culture of Information Sharing
- 9-11 Commission Report recommendations
- Recommendations focused on defense, intelligence,
information sharing, homeland security, and law
enforcement - The commission argued that the government was
structured to fight the Cold War, not to counter
terrorism
51Creating a Culture of Information Sharing
- Critics of the 9-11 Commission Report
- The FBIs record of combating terrorism was port,
and there may be no reason to believe that
restructuring will improve its capabilities