Green - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 58
About This Presentation
Title:

Green

Description:

Green – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:232
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 59
Provided by: shel63
Category:
Tags: aelp | green

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Green


1
Green Sustainable Building PolicyCase Study
Analysis for Public Decision Makers
  • Prepared for
  • Mithun Architects Designers Planners
  • Prepared by
  • Scott Andrews
  • Mabel Boateng
  • Shelly Fank
  • Christina Hoefsmit
  • Hillary Smith

2
Objectives include
  • Address issues of financial feasibility and
    scalability.
  • Overall cost/benefit analyses (initial cost vs.
    lifecycle cost)
  • Penalty vs. Incentive enforcement (Stick vs.
    Carrot)
  • Conclusions about effective enforcement and
    incentive strategies to better integrate LEED (or
    other sustainable building standards)
  • Community level sustainable building regulation
    programs for various community models (different
    population size, geographic and climate
    characteristics)

3
Potential Users
  • Architects, designers, and planners educating
    clients about sustainable building practices
  • Municipalities, agencies and public decision
    makers to create a Green Building incentive and
    regulation plan for their community.
  • NGOs to lobby for sustainable communities
  • Photo by Church Mission Society, UK

4
Nomads Tent Morocco
  • Photo by Tadd_Debbie

5
Igloo Ice Dwelling
6
Thatched Houses
  • Wales, photo by welshlady
  • Thailand, photo by luce_beaulieu

7
Alaskan Sod house
8
Mali, Africa Brick Making
  • Photo by Desfilhesjm

9
Adobe Pueblo
10
Cave Dwelling
  • Cappadocia, Turkey

Cappadocia, Turkey, photo by Jeff_Werner Anasazi
Palace, Colorado, photo by Trev vG
11
Log Cabin North America
12
SOLAR AND LOW ENERGY ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN
IDEAL HOME SOLAR HOUSE Milton KeynesDesigned
for Interbuild in the late 1970s, showing all
novel means of harvesting renewable energies
13
U.S. Energy Consumptionby Sector
  • Currently less than 1 of new buildings uses
  • sustainable building technologies.

14
  • http//www.greencarcongress.com/2005/05/us_mayors_
    striv.html

15
www.usgbc.org
16
Lifecycle analysis
  • Average payback time of a green building 12-24
    months
  • Average payback over building lifetime (vs.
    standard to code building methods) 20
  • Average cost premium for building green (vs.
    standard methods) 1-2

17
  • Energy Use Trends in the Built Environment
  • U.S. buildings consume 48 of all energy used.
  • 76 of this energy is created from polluting coal
    fuel.
  • IPCC reports that by 2035 75 of the U.S. built
    environment will be new or renovated

18
(No Transcript)
19
Economic Benefits
Reduced operational costs Reduced electricity
costs (decrease in mechanical systems like
heating and air conditioning in favor of passive
or renewable resources like solar or geothermal
energy) Reduced water bills (conservation and
reuse) Improved resale value Increased worker
productivity Less maintenance Greater durability,
longer life cycle
  • Photo by Ceoln

20
Social Benefits
  • Decreased use of natural resources (e.g. trees)
  • Increased sense of pride
  • Increased safety
  • Increased comfort
  • Improve the look of a city
  • Photo by Richat

21
Health Benefits
  • Increased indoor air quality
  • No solvent adhesives used
  • Increased ventilation
  • Decrease in products containing formaldehyde
  • Natural light (studies state that natural light
    makes people happier)
  • Photo by the jof

22
Environmental Benefits
  • Use less natural resources
  • Using recycled materials
  • Density encouraged
  • Avoid building on untouched lands
  • Reduce CO2 emissions
  • Energy reduction
  • Clean, alternative energy
  • Concentrate on local sources for material
  • Reduce water use
  • Decrease storm water run off
  • Decrease processing costs
  • Encourage Green Roofs so cleaned on site
  • Encourage cleanup of brownfields
  • Use less Hazardous Waste
  • Use low toxic materials
  • Using less volatile carbons
  • Using no ozone depleting CFC-based refrigerants

23
Selected NationalExamples of Environmental
Building Rating Systems
  • Up to the mid 1990s there were more than 20 U.S.
    rating systems
  • Home Energy Rating Systems (HERS) US EPA DOE
    initiated 1992 with several state cooperatives,
    new and existing home rating system used to
    qualify for Energy Efficient Mortgages. Star
    based rating system can be tailored to fit local
    needs. Participating states include Alaska,
    California, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Ohio, Nevada
    and Vermont
  • Energy Star U.S. EPA and DOE initiated in 1993,a
    voluntary product efficiency rating system for
    products including appliances and homes.
  • Model Energy Code (MEC) Council of American
    Building Officials 1995
  • Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
    (LEED) National Research Defense Council and U.S.
    Green Building Council initiated green building
    rating system that was designed to guide and
    distinguish high-performance commercial and
    institutional projects, with an initial focus on
    office buildings. 1994-1998 (ongoing refinement)
  • Living Building Challenge U.S. Green Building
    Challenge December 2006
  • 2030 Challenge/ 2010 Imperative Ed Mazria
    February 2007, Carbon Neutral building Plan for
    the year 2030

24
Selected InternationalExamples of Environmental
Building Rating Systems
  • UNESCOs Man and the Biosphere Programme Launched
    in the early 1970s, it notably targets the
    ecological, social and economic dimensions of
    biodiversity loss and the reduction of this loss.
  • International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
    issued by the U.S. DOE in 1998, frequently
    updated. Formerly Council for American Building
    Code Officials Model Energy Code.
  • EPD Directive January 2003 Directive of the
    European Congress on the Energy Performance of
    Buildings
  • Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
    (LEED) U.S. National Research Defense Council and
    U.S. Green Building Council initiated green
    building rating system that was designed to guide
    and distinguish high-performance commercial and
    institutional projects, with an initial focus on
    office buildings. 1994-1998 (ongoing refinement)
    Adapted for use in 28 countries including Canada,
    Mexico, and India.
  • BREEAM British Building Research Establishment
    Environmental Assessment Method 1988, first
    established international environmental building
    assessment tools Adapted to national performance
    rating systems for many other countries including
    Australia, Canada, India, Korea, and Hong Kong.
  • Green Globes BREEAM based rating system used in
    the U.K., U.S., and Canada
  • International Organization for Standardization
    ISO 14001 an internationally accepted
    specification for an environmental management
    system (EMS) including building site and
    operations.
  • Other Nationally Based Systems
  • France HQE Haute Qualité Environnementale High
    Quality Environmental standard 1992
  • Korea Korean Green Building Standard
  • Singapore Green Mark
  • Japan CASBEE
  • Taiwan Ecology, Environment, Waste Reductions and
    Health
  • Switzerland MINERGIE Standard
  • Finland SIMBAD
  • Netherlands National Packages Sustainable
    Building Netherlands
  • Germany Niedrigenergiehaus and Passivhaus
  • Denmark EDIP
  • Sweden EcoEffect

25
Selected Examples of Environmental Building
Product Rating Systems Tools
  • Energy Star U.S. EPA and DOE initiated in 1993,a
    voluntary product efficiency rating system for
    products including appliances and homes.
  • BEES tool by NIST (Building for Environmental and
    Economic Sustainability) software developed by
    NIST (National Institute of Standards and
    Technology) and building and Fire research
    Laboratory as an environmental decision making
    tool. Uses consensus standards to weight and
    compare building products. Updated 2007.
  • Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards (WELS)
    Australia. The WELS Scheme labels products for
    water efficiency.
  • Energy Source Home Labels Energy performance of
    the home is rated and certified. Developed by
    Iris Communications, Inc. in 1989 for utilities,
    rating organizations and government agencies.
  • EnergyGuide all home appliances, including water
    heaters, dishwashers and clothes washers, display
    a prominent yellow-and-black label developed by
    the Federal Trade Commission, which provides
    estimated energy consumption range for similar
    modelsand estimated yearly operating cost based
    on national average.
  • ASHRAE/ IESNA 90.1 American Society of Heating,
    Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers
    standards for both its members and others
    professionally concerned with refrigeration
    processes and the design and maintenance of
    indoor environments. Updated 2004.
  • GAMA/ IBR Gas Appliance manufacturers
    Association certification program for the
    independent testing, rating, and verification of
    U.S. energy performance metrics for residential
    and commercial space and water heating equipment.
  • ARI Performance Certified Air Conditioning and
    refrigeration institute seal, ARI verifies
    manufacturers' performance ratings meet ARI
    Standards through continuous and extensive
    laboratory testing. For manufacturers who
    voluntarily participate in the certification
    program
  • Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) Lumber and wood
    product certification of responsible harvesting
    practices Third party audit verified.
  • Pharos U.S. Green Building Council 2007,
    holistic product rating system with voluntary
    participation and moderated wiki system of update

26
Sample Matrix for Assessing Sustainable Building
Decisions

27
LEED Certification in the U.S.
28
LEED versions
29
LEED Certification
  • Sustainable Sites
  • Water Efficiency
  • Energy and Atmosphere
  • Materials and Resources
  • Indoor Environmental Quality
  • Innovation and Design

30
Of the first 148 projects certified, the credits
in Water Efficiency and Innovation Design are
most often earned
31
Materials and Resources
  • Recyclables
  • Building Reuse
  • Construction Waste Management
  • Materials Reuse
  • Recycled Content
  • Regional Materials
  • Rapidly Renewable Materials
  • Certified Wood

32
Sustainable Sites
  • Construction Activity Pollution Prevention
  • Site Selection
  • Density Community Connectivity
  • Brownfield Redevelopment
  • Alternative Transportation, Public Transportation
    Accessibility and Resources
  • Protect or Restore Habitat
  • Maximize Open Space
  • Stormwater Management (quantity and quality)
  • Heat Island Effect Management re roof style
  • Light Pollution Reduction
  • Fukuoka, Japan 1994 and Millennium Park Chicago,
    U.S. 2004, http//www.greenroofs.com/index.html

33
Water Efficiency
  • Water Efficient Landscaping Reduce or eliminate
    potable water irrigation
  • Innovative Wastewater Technologies
  • Water Use Reduction
  • Rainwater Harvesting System by
    http//www.hydro-international.biz
  • and Living Machine Las Vegas, NV photo by Kor
    Bras

34
Energy and Atmosphere
  • Proper Commissioning of the building Energy
    Systems Minimum Energy Performance
  • Eliminate CFC refrigerants in HVAC system
  • Optimize Energy Performance
  • On-Site Renewable Energy
  • Measurement and Verification
  • Green Power

35
Indoor Environmental Quality
  • Minimum Indoor Air Quality (IAQ)
  • Ventilation Performance
  • Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control
  • IAQ management during construction through
    occupancy
  • Low-Emitting Materials and Indoor Chemical
    Pollutant controls
  • Lighting control
  • Thermal comfort design, control, and verification
  • Daylight and Views

36
LEED Certification Levels
  • Certified
  • formerly Bronze
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Platinum

37
Certification of First 148 LEED projects
  • http//www.rexelarchive.com/drupal-4.4.2/node/view
    /201

38
Cost Premium by LEED Level
  • Average cost premium for building green (vs.
    standard methods) 1-2

39
LEED Certified
  • General Services Administration
  • Howard M. Metzenbaum U.S. Courthouse Cleveland,
    Ohio Remodel completed June 2005
  • LEED NC Certified v2.0
  • Improved Energy performance 15
  • Demand ventilation with CO2 monitoring
  • 32 water use reduction
  • Maintained 95 of existing shell and 59 of
    interior elements
  • Brownfield redevelopment through the abatement of
    hazardous materials
  • www.ca6.uscourts.gov/
  • www.eere.energy.gov/
  • http//archrecord.construction.com Van Dijk
    Westlake Reed Leskosky

40
LEED Silver
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute
Building LEED Silver 2004              
                            Photos courtesy
Vulcan Inc. The 112,000-square-foot SBRI
Building in South Lake Union is Seattles first
LEED-certified speculative building http//www.djc
.com/news/en/11170260.html        
  • Sustainability measures
  • Water system reduces potable water use by 23
    over industry standards, saving more than 186,000
    gallons of water/ year
  • HVAC system recovers lost heat and cool air,
    which reduces energy use by 30 over industry
    standards.
  • Constructed with recycled and salvaged materials,
    including doors and door frames. More than 85
    percent of construction waste was recycled.
  • Large windows with light-filtering roller shades
    that control daylight and electric lights are
    minimized by motion sensors and timers
  • Native and drought-tolerant plant landscaping
    with no permanent irrigation required
  • First silver-level LEED-certified core-and-shell
    lab building.
  • Sustainable building acts as a recruitment tool
    to attract a creative class of employee that
    shares the organization core values
  • BioQuest Science Gallery is a community forum
    featuring artistic exhibits about global health
    projects

41
LEED GoldSolaire Apartments, 2003
  • Reduces potable water use by 50 Recycling
    wastewater for its cooling tower, low flow
    toilets and irrigation
  • Reduce energy grid demand by 35 with auto
    dimming fluorescent lights, daylighting, and
    west-facing photovoltaic panels supplying 5 of
    the building's energy.
  • 93 of the construction waste for the project was
    recycled
  • 60of the building materials were made from
    recycled content.
  • Access to public transportation, on-demand hybrid
    rental cars, bicycle parking and electric vehicle
    charging.
  • Green roof of native plants over 75 percent of
    the roof, helps lower heating and cooling loads.
  • http//www.nrdc.org/buildinggreen/casestudies/defa
    ult.asp

42
LEED Platinum
  • Chicago Center for Green Building
  • Originally built in 1952, it was designated a
    brownfield in 1995 due to illegal dumping
    activities of the previous owners. Designated a
    clean site in 1999, design began of the building
    resulting in the first municipal building as well
    as the first renovation in the county to be
    awarded the highest certification level for green
    building LEED Platinum.

43
Seattle Examples
  • City capital improvement projects over 5,000
    square feet fall under the City's Green Building
    Policy, which sets Silver LEED certification as
    the goal.
  • 13 projects have completed the process. 5 are
    under construction and 20 more are in planning
    and design.
  • http//www.cityofseattle.net/dpd/GreenBuilding/Cap
    italProjects
  • Seattle Central Library by Pat Leahy
  • Seattle City Hall by clappstar

44
Regulation Strategies
45
Denver Regulation Based ExampleDenver Justice
Center
  • Examples of Green Building Techniques Used
  • environmentally-friendly refrigerants
  • minimizing the use of non-renewable resources
    and waste production
  • incorporating natural day lighting and
  • landscaping with drought-tolerant native plants.

46
Scottsdale Regulation Based ExampleArizona State
University Scottsdale Center
  • Water features
  • Bike paths
  • Multi-modal transit center on-site
  • Maximum access to views and daylight
  • Highly flexible column free floor plans
  • Extensive perimeter and interior landscaping
  • Major 1-acre public gathering place with a range
    of additional public and semi-private pen spaces

47
Austin Regulation Based Example
  • Austin pioneered U.S. green building regulation
    during the late 1980s and early 1990s, and
    developed the Austin Green Building Program
    rating system.
  • Municipal facilities are required to use green
    technologies since 1993, and achieve LEED silver
    since 2000.
  • Austin has the largest U.S. green power grid
    leading in municipal wind power and biodiesel
    production
  • Thought leaders with cooperative relationships
    The Clean Energy Incubator is a confederation of
    business, academic, and state government leaders
    devoted to helping clean-energy companies bring
    technologies to market. City of Austin's
    Sustainable Communities Initiative (SCI) exists
    to help the greater Austin region achieve
    economic prosperity, social justice, and
    ecological health - the highest possible quality
    of life in the best possible environment.
  • All city facilities, fleets and operations will
    be carbon-neutral by 2020, and 100 percent of
    city facilities will be powered by renewable
    energy by 2012 with CO2 caps and reduction plans
    for all utility emissions to comply with the
    Austin Climate Protection Plan.
  • The city is developing residential and commercial
    building codes requiring all new single-family
    homes zero net-energy capable by 2015, and
    increasing energy efficiency by 75 percent in all
    other new construction.
  • IBM Tivoli office building earned a 4-Star rating
    from the Green Building Program and a Certified
    LEED rating. Features include a daylight
    stairwell and water retention ponds.
    http//www.austinenergy.com/Energy20Efficiency/Pr
    ograms/Green20Building/Resources/Case20Studies/c
    omm_ibmTivoli.htm

48
Incentive Based Strategies
49
Denver Incentive Based Example
  • SUCCESSES
  • Over 30,000 houses have implemented green
    building techniques
  • 41 of Denver new home buyers are aware of Built
    Green
  • 139 builders participate in the program
  • 50 sponsors support the program

http//www.builtgreen.org/
50
Scottsdale Incentive Based Example
  • SUCCESSES
  • In 2005, 33 of all single-family residential
    permits adhered to the citys green building
    policies showing a 21 increase permits from the
    previous year.
  • Since 1998, Scottsdale has issued more than 900
    green building permits
  • A survey conducted by the National Association of
    Home Builders found that half of consumers that
    were expecting to buy wanted to incorporated
    green features into their home

51
Oregon Incentive Based Examples
  • Eugene
  • Green Building Advisory Committee provides
  • no-cost consultation on permitting
  • and development review
  • processes through the local and state
  • requirements for which the City
  • has review and approval authority.
  • Waive fees for required pre-application
  • meetings.
  • Expedite the building permit process by
  • completing reviews and providing feedback
  • to the applicant within 14 working days of
  • submittals.
  • Portland
  • 2.5 million in the Green Building Fund
  • Business Energy Tax Credit
  • Wayne L. Morse United States Courthouse
  • Eugenes Courthouse was rated by the AIA
    (American Institute of
  • Architects) association as one of the Top Ten
    Green Projects for 2007.

52
Recommendations
  • Local and state government agencies need to lead
    by example by applying green building practices
    and LEED standards to municipal and publicly
    funded new construction and renovations.

53
Recommendations
  • Local governments should implement incentives
    such as an expedited permitting process for
    buildings designed to achieve LEED certification.

54
Recommendations
  • Updating municipal codes to allow for the use of
    sustainable systems and practices

55
Recommendations
  • Most effective means for green building would be
    at a municipal level to allow for flexibility and
    site specific buildings.

56
Recommendations
  • In order to have a successful residential
    program, educational efforts need to be developed
    to provide information on the advantages of green
    building. (Reduced energy/water costs, increase
    in re-sale value.)

57
Acknowledgements
  • Many thanks to
  • Marshall Foster, Sean Cryan, and Bert Gregory of
    Mithun,
  • Marni Kahn of the Cascadia U.S. Green Building
    Council,
  • Callie Ridolfi and Colin Wagoner of Ridolfi Inc.,
  • Greg Williams of SRG Partnership, Inc.,
  • Dale Morse of the University of Oregon,
  • Ashley Zawrotny with the City of Scottsdale, AZ,
  • Lucia Athens with the City of Seattle, WA,
  • Tracy Mitchell of the Seattle Biomedical Research
    Institute,
  • and David Tetta, Tim Trohimovich, and Jim
    Shellooe with the University of Washington
    Environmental Law and Regulation program.
  • for their generous donation of time and resources

58
Questions?
  • http//www.beirutbeltway.com/photos/uncategorized/
    confused.jpg
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com