Threats to Blood Safety Posed by Emerging Protozoan Pathogens - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Threats to Blood Safety Posed by Emerging Protozoan Pathogens

Description:

American Red Cross. and. Department of Microbiology and Tropical Medicine ... 32 red cell recipients = 11 living, 14 deceased, 7 unknown ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:163
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: informat219
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Threats to Blood Safety Posed by Emerging Protozoan Pathogens


1
Chagas Disease From Research to Implementation
David A. Leiby, Ph.D.
Transmissible Diseases Department American Red
Cross and Department of Microbiology and Tropical
Medicine George Washington University
2
Trypanosoma cruzi
  • small flagellated parasite
  • endemic to the Americas, but primarily Latin
    America
  • infections generally asymptomatic and life-long
    with few treatment options
  • transmission
  • vectorial
  • congenital
  • organ transplant
  • blood transfusion

3
T. cruzi Life-Cycle
CDC
4
Vectorial/Natural Transmission
  • triatomine bugs
  • reduviids, kissing bugs, vinchucas
  • parasites passed in feces
  • enter through bite wound or mucosal surface

CDC
5
Congenital Transmission
Leiby et al., Transfusion 199939 310-315
6
Chagas Disease After Organ Transplantation
  • 2001 initial U.S. case
  • single cadaveric donor
  • 3 recipients
  • kidney/pancreas, kidney liver
  • all culture positive
  • one death due to acute Chagasic myocarditis
  • 2006 two recent cases in LA
  • cardiac transplants

Zayas et al., MMWR 200251 210-212 Mascola et
al., MMWR 200655 798-800
7
U.S./Canadian Transfusion Cases
1987 California - Mexican donor 1989 New
York City - Bolivian donor Manitoba -
Paraguayan donor 1993 Houston - unknown
donor 1999 Miami - Chilean donor 2000 Manito
ba - German/Paraguayan donor 2002 Rhode Island
Bolivian donor
8
Immigration and Demographics
9
Los Angeles Seroprevalence Studies
Total no. donations 1,104,030 Yes to risk
question 78,736 (7.1) Number
tested 77,967 EIA repeat reactive
329 Confirmed by RIPA
147 (0.2) Seropositivity rate 1
in 7,500
Leiby et al., Transfusion 200242 549-555
10
Los Angeles Seroprevalence 1996-98
Leiby et al., Transfusion 200242 549-555
11
Changing Donor Demographics Enhanced Minority
Recruitment Efforts Greater Number of At-Risk
Donors More Seropositive Donors Greater Risk of
Transfusion-Transmission
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Nationwide Risk in U.S.
15.0 million donations/year 9.4 million
donors 234,735 at-risk donors 375 seropositive
donors 600 seropositive donations/year 702
potentially infectious components/year
(1/1.6)
(2.5)
(1/625)
(1.6)
(1.17)
15
ARC IND Prevalence Study 8/28/06-1/28/07
  • All sites SoCal Arizona NoCal
  • Donors 189,828 127,053 26,601 36,174
  • Tested 148,969 95,662 23,981 29,326
  • RR 63 (12365) 50 (11913)
    4 (15995) 9 (13258)
  • Confirmed 32 (14655) 25 (13827)
    2 (111,990) 5 (15865)
  • Refusals 40,859 31,391 2620 6848
    (21.5) (24.7)
    (9.8) (18.9)
  • 40,859 refusals/detection rate of 14655 9
    undetected donors!

16
T. cruzi Reactive Donors by State of Residence
(01/29/07 04/10/07)
1
4
1
2
2
7
5
3
9
5
3
2
7
2
5
1
12
4
1
5
4
2
3
3
6
2
34
1
1
11
3
1
3
8
1
1
PR
8
4
5
2
2
3
54
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Test Performance
  • Clinical trial (8/28/06-1/28/07)
  • PPV 32 pos/63 RR51 pos in 2 states
  • RR rate 63/148,969 0.042
  • Prevalence 32/148,969 14655
  • Specificity 148,906 test neg/148,90631 false
    pos99.979
  • Nationwide screening (1/29/07-3/20/07)
  • PPV 27 confd pos/125 RR tested 21.6 pos
    in 10 states
  • 18 of 27 confd pos from 2 states (S CA, FL)
  • RR rate 185 (152 ARC 33 BSI/1,112,644
    donations 0.016
  • Projected prevalence based on 21.6 PPV128,000
  • Specificity (ARC) first week 124,934 test
    neg/124,93428 false pos99.978 (6 pos)

20
Other Testing Results/Procedures
  • IND study
  • Follow up of 26 donors 13 of 32 confirmed pos
  • 1/13 PCR positive 0 to date hemoculture positive
  • Sample handling??
  • IVD testing pending
  • Special Protocol for PCR and hemoculture
  • Increase sensitivity by having regions initiate
    processes
  • Pooling EDTA whole blood samples in
    guanidine/EDTA solnPCR (lyses cells and
    stabilizes kinetoplasts containing mutliple
    copies of DNA) store at 2-8C
  • Pooling heparinized whole blood samples,
    centrifuge/removal of plasma (Ab) mix buffy coat
    and red cells with LIT media store at 2-8C
  • 6 regions with confd pos (including S FL) agree
    to date

21
Cumulative Parasitemia Testing
22
Lookback Results
  • 31 confirmed positive donors during IND
  • 16 repeat donors (allogeneic/directed)
  • 137 prior donations 148 components
  • Of 148 components
  • 6 whole blood (destroyed)
  • 3 platelets (2 destroyed, 1 transfused)
  • 69 red cells (7 destroyed, 32 transfused, 30
    pending)
  • 70 plasma (11 destroyed, 2 transfused, 56 frac, 1
    pending)
  • Of 1, 32 and 2 transfused components
  • 1 platelet recipient deceased 11 days post
    transfusion
  • 32 red cell recipients 11 living, 14 deceased,
    7 unknown
  • 10 recipients tested (transfused 7-36 days) all
    ELISA/RIPA neg
  • 2 plasma recipients deceased

23
Summary
  • Chagas testing implemented across ARC system
  • acceptable test performance to date
  • coverage by other blood agencies varies
  • confirmed positives widely distributed
  • data supports nationwide testing
  • follow-up studies initiated
  • April 26 BPAC Meeting
  • review of issues related to implementation
  • alternative testing approaches?
  • eventual testing mandate?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com