Understanding WACC and How Best to Determine What Capital Structure is Optimal for your Business - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Understanding WACC and How Best to Determine What Capital Structure is Optimal for your Business

Description:

Understanding WACC and How Best to Determine What Capital Structure is Optimal ... No agreement on what constitutes 'the best or ideal' structure. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:893
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: wal42
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Understanding WACC and How Best to Determine What Capital Structure is Optimal for your Business


1
Understanding WACC and How Best to Determine What
Capital Structure is Optimal for your Business
  • Presented by
  • Rod Hewlett
  • Executive Vice President and Chief Academic
    Officer
  • Walsh College

2
Basic Concepts
  • Capital Components funds provided by investors
    with an expectation of a financial return on
    their investment.
  • Common Forms of Capital Components
  • Common equity
  • Preferred equity
  • Debt
  • The required rate-of-return for each form of
    capital component is called its component costs.
  • The cost of capital associated with capital
    budgeting decisions is typically a weighted
    average of the various components costs
    typically called the weighted average cost of
    capital (WACC)

3
Basic Concept
  • Balance Sheet

4
Basic Concepts
  • The mix of debt and equity is known as the firms
    Capital Structure.
  • Target Capital Structure is the percentage of the
    total capital that firms target to finance the
    firm.
  • An example 20 debt, 10 preferred, 70 common
  • Levels of debt and equity change over time
    however, most firms attempt to stay close to an
    approved target capital structure that is
    designed to maximize a firms value.

5
Determining Cost of Debt
  • Determine rd (cost of debt) the rate of return
    debt holders require.
  • Some companies use fixed, floating, straight and
    convertible debt (with and without sinking fund).
  • Estimate based on long-term debt that will be
    used to fund capital projects. (Note short-term
    debt is typically not used to fund long term
    assets)
  • After tax rd rd(1-T).
  • Determine current yield to maturity (or yield to
    call) for outstanding issues.
  • Adjust for any known credit/risk adjustments
    between now and potential project funding.

6
Determining Cost of Preferred Stock
  • No tax adjustments are required.
  • rps Dps / Pn
  • Where,
  • rps component cost of preferred stock,
  • Dps preferred dividend,
  • Pn price received by the firm after deducting
    flotation costs.
  • A practical issue arises from the use of a
    sinking fund that limits the unlimited life
    feature of preferred stock valuation (calculation
    used above).

7
Determining the Cost of Common Stock
  • New issue or retained earnings.
  • Few mature firms issue new shares of common stock
    according to Brigham and Daves, less than 2
    percent of all new corporate funds come from the
    external equity market (high flotation costs, new
    stock signal, dilution of equity position).
  • 2 estimation methods CAPM or discounted cash
    flow model.

8
Capital Asset Pricing Model
  • Estimate the risk-free rate (see handout on
    CAPM).
  • Estimate the current expected market risk
    premium, RPm.
  • Estimate the stocks beta coefficient, bi , and
    use it as an index of the stocks risk.
  • Substitute the values in the CAPM equation to
    estimate the required rate of return on the stock
    in question.
  • rs rRF (RPm)bi.

9
Estimating Parameters of CAPM
  • According to Bruner, Eades, Harris, and Higgins
    (Best Practices in Estimating the Cost of
    Capital Survey and Synthesis, Financial
    Practices and Education, Spring/Summer 1998,
    13-28), about 2/3 use the rate on long-term
    Treasury bonds for the risk free rate of return.
  • Market Risk Premium
  • RPm rm rRF
  • Use historical Ibbotson Associate data since
    1926 arithmetic average 7, geometric average
    5.4 (some use a 3-7 range if using data since
    1960 Bruner, et al.).
  • Use Fama French estimate (The Equity Premium,
    JOF, 27(2)) estimated in the 2.55 range.
  • Use 60 year average of about 5.7 (Bruner, et
    al).
  • 400 basis points on an actualized basis/or
    investment bankers estimate.
  • Beta, regress the companys stock against SP 500
    (or other appropriate index) for at least 15
    periods and use the slope coefficient (company is
    the dependent variable).

10
Discounted Cash Flow
  • Estimated rs D1 / P0 expected g, where
  • D1 dividend one period hence.
  • P0 current price of the companys stock.
  • g historical income growth rates less
    historical retentions for retained earnings (for
    constant growth). Alternate use consensus
    analysts forecast for growth.

11
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
  • WACC wdrd(1-T) wpsrps wcers.
  • w weights of each component based on
  • Based on accounting values on the balance sheet
    (book values).
  • Current market values of the capital structure.
  • Managements targeted capital structure for the
    future.
  • Firm can control capital structure but cannot
    control level of interest rates, market risk
    premium, tax rates.
  • WACC is the marginal dollar of capital (raising
    new money).

12
Capital Structure Considerations
  • The value of a firm is the present value of its
    expected future free cash flows, discounted by it
    WACC.
  • Firms can thus change value by
  • Affecting free cash flows
  • Adjusting the cost of capital

13
Capital Structure Considerations
  • Sales stability stable cost and revenue may
    allow more fixed (debt) charge.
  • Asset structure firms with assets that can be
    bond or mortgage backed tend to use more debt.
  • Operating leverage firms with less operating
    leverage are better able to employ financial
    leverage due to less business risk.
  • Growth rate firms that are mature and fast
    growing use more debt, firms that face great
    uncertainty typically use more venture or equity
    capital.
  • Profitability firms with high levels of profits
    tend to use less debt (Microsoft, Coca-Cola,
    Intel).
  • High tax firms may benefit from the deductibility
    of debt.

14
Capital Structure Considerations
  • Control owners (or owner managers) may desire
    debt to preserve control of the firm.
  • Lender and rating agency attitudes if rating
    agency will take adverse action on more debt,
    equity may be used.
  • Market conditions.
  • Internal conditions/timing picking the right
    time tactically to issue stock based on announced
    higher earnings.
  • Financial flexibility good time (any type) and
    in bad times debt due to the secured position.

15
Capital Structure Theory
  • No agreement on what constitutes the best or
    ideal structure.
  • Tradeoff theory firms seek debt levels that
    balance the tax advantages of additional debt
    against the cost of possible financial distress
    (moderate borrowing by tax-paying firms).
  • Pecking order theory firms will borrow, rather
    than issuing equity, when internal cash flow is
    not sufficient to fund capital expenditures. The
    amount of debt will reflect the firms cumulative
    need for external funds.

16
Capital Structure Theory
  • Free cash flow theory dangerously high debt
    levels will increase value, despite the threat of
    financial distress, when a firms operating cash
    flow significantly exceeds its profitable
    investment opportunities. Designed for mature
    firms that are apt to over invest.
  • MM (1958) in an environment of assumed perfect
    and frictionless capital markets, where financial
    innovation quickly extinguishes deviations from
    predicted equilibrium, the choice between debt
    and equity financing has no material effects on
    the value of the firm or on the cost of
    availability of capital.

17
Risk and Timing Issue with Using WACC
  • In a 1980 article by James A. Miller and John R.
    Ezzell, two key issues are raised
  • Are the estimated cash flows from the proposed
    project, merger, or acquisition at the same risk
    level of the firms historical risk level?
  • Is the use of the WACC as a discount factor
    appropriate for uneven finite cash flows? The
    authors note that it is generally accepted that
    using the WACC as a discount tool for a one-year
    project life or level perpetual project cash
    flows is appropriate.
  • The finding of the analysis is that the critical
    discount factor relates not to project life but
    concerns the financing policy followed by the
    firm.
  • If the amount of leverage differs from target
    or the risks associated with cash flows differ
    from the initial assumption, then the WACC
    discount is not valid for extended life
    discounting. Maintain constant leverage ratio by
    adjusting outstanding debt or maintaining
    constant internal and external risk factors over
    an extended period is difficult (or impossible).
  • The authors suggest using Stewart C. Myers
    Adjusted Present Value (APV) from JOF, 29(1),
    pp. 1-25
  • Miller, J.A. Ezzell, J.R. (1980). The Weighted
    Average Cost of Capital, perfect Capital Markets,
    and Project Life A Clarification, The Journal of
    Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 15(3), pp
    719-730.

18
Myers Adjusted Present Value (APV)
  • The term adjusted present value is used because
    in the optimal solution, the projects direct
    contribution is adjusted for the projects side
    effects on other investment and financing
    options. The side effects occur because of the
    projects effects on the debt capacity and
    sources/uses constraints.
  • Using a WACC discount methodology using MMs
    formula is acceptably accurate if attention is
    restricted to projects that do not shift the
    firms risk class or target debt ratio.
  • Steps to using an APV approach
  • Determine the NPV formula.
  • Estimate the projects contribution to firm debt
    capacity.
  • Determine whether the marginal source of equity
    financing is additional retained earnings,
    additional stock issue, or a reduction in share
    repurchase.
  • Adjust discount factor for risks identified in
    above steps.

19
Best Practices in Estimating the Cost of Capital
  • From Bruner, R. F., Eades, K.M., Harris, R.S.,
    R.C. Higgins, Financial Practice and Education,
    Spring/Summer 1998, pp.13 -27.
  • Survey of 27 highly regarded corporations, ten
    leading financial advisers, and seven best
    selling textbooks and trade books.
  • Findings
  • Close alignment among all groups on the use of
    common theoretical frameworks and on many aspects
    of estimation.
  • Large variation for the joint choices of the
    risk-fee rate, beta, and the equity market risk
    premium, as well as for the adjustment of capital
    costs for specific investment risks.

20
Key Best Practices Findings
  • Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) is the dominant
    investment-evaluation technique.
  • WACC is the dominant discount rate used in DCF
    analyses.
  • Weights are based on market not book value mixes
    of debt and equity.
  • The after-tax cost of debt is predominantly based
    on marginal pretax costs, and marginal or
    statutory tax rates.
  • CAPM is the dominant model for estimating the
    cost of equity. Some firms use APT. No firm cited
    specific modifications of CAPM to adjust for
    empirical shortcomings.
  • See Best Practices handout for detailed findings.

21
Use of EVA
  • Net sales operating expenses taxes capital
    charges EVA.
  • Picks up the relationship between knowledge and
    value added.
  • EVA proxy for RO intellectual capital. (Marchant
    and Barsky, Invisible but valuable, 1997,
    presented paper)

22
Balanced Scorecard
  • Measuring many variables
  • Tool to discern value creation
  • Systematic
  • Not project related
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com