Title: Decision Making in Groups
1The mob has no judgment, no discretion, no
direction, no discrimination, no
consistency. Cicero madness is the exception in
individuals but the rule in groups.
Nietzsche When "a 100 clever heads join a group,
one big nincompoop is the result.
Carl Jung
Decision Making in Groups
2People often questions the value of groups
- Why do people so frequently use groups to make
decisions? - Are groups decisions superior to individual
decisions? - How do people, and groups, even make decisions
are they rational or irrational? - Should decisions be made carefully or
intuitively?
3Why Work in Groups?
- more people more information
- more people to do more work
- more people means people can do what they are
best at - groups can discuss, process information (check
for errors, etc.) - groups have standards for deciding (e.g.,
majority rules) - people are more likely to follow through if part
of a group that decided
4Why Not?
- sometimes the group doesn't recognize the correct
problem, even if proposed - groups oversample shared information
- sometimes work done by just a few
- discussion can be manipulated
- groups sometimes make riskier decisions
- groups sometimes make horrible decisions when
very cohesive (groupthink)
5Functional Model of Decision Making
Orientation
- Orientation
- Development of shared mental model
- Tendency to skip this step
6Remembering Information
Discussion
Exchanging Information
Processing Information
- Remembering information
- collective memory Cross-cueing and transactive
memory - weakness in group memory Importance of keeping
records - Exchanging information Acquiring and sharing
data - Processing information Collective review of
information
7 Decision
- Decision Social decision schemes
- Delegation
- Statistical aggregation
- Voting
- Consensus (discussion to unanimity)
- Random choice
8Decision Reached
- Implementation
- Evaluating the decision
- Adhering to the decision Coch and French (1948)
- Vrooms normative model of decision making
- Types of procedures Autocratic, consultative,
group - Procedure must fit the problem to be solved and
the decision to be made
Implementation
Evaluating the Decision
Adhering to the Decision
9Denver Airport
Enron
Abilene paradox
1.7 billion 300 million
Which is not to say that groups always make good
decisions
10What Problems Undermine the Effectiveness of
Decision-Making Groups?
- Group discussion pitfalls
- Group discussion pitfalls
- Information processing limitations leveling,
assimilation, sharpening - Poor communication skills
- Decisional avoidance (procrastination,
bolstering, satisficing)
11What Problems Undermine the Effectiveness of
Decision-Making Groups?
- Shared information bias
- Oversampling shared information leads to poorer
decisions when a hidden profile would be revealed
by considering the unshared information more
closely. - Factors that increase (leadership style) and
decrease (using a GDSS) the bias - Judgment errors and heuristic biases
- Sins of omission and commission
- Sins of imprecision Heuristics
12Polarization and Risk
- Group polarization A shift in the direction of
greater extremity in individuals' responses
13Why Do Groups Make Riskier Decisions than
Individuals?
- Social comparison theory
- Persuasive-arguments theory
- Risk-supported wins social decision scheme
14Groupthink
- Janiss theory of groupthink
- Example Kennedys advisory group planning the
Bay of Pigs covert op
15Groupthink
- The theory identifies symptoms, causes, and
possible cures
Symptoms
Causes Cohesion, etc
Concurrence Seeking
Defective Decision Making Strategies
Fiasco
16Symptoms
- Overestimation of the group (illusions of
invulnerability, illusions of morality) - Close-mindedness (rationalizations, stereotypes
about the outgroup) - Pressures toward uniformity (self-censorship, the
illusion of unanimity, direct pressure on
dissenters, self-appointed mindguards). - Pluralistic ignorance and the Abilene Paradox
(Harvey, 1988) - Entrapment and sunk costs
- Defective decision-making processes
17Causes
18How Can Groupthink Be Prevented?
- Limiting premature seeking of concurrence
- Open style of leadership
- Devils advocate, subgroup discussions
- Correcting misperceptions and biases
- Using effective decision-making techniques