Estimating the Discount Rate

1 / 52
About This Presentation
Title:

Estimating the Discount Rate

Description:

... comparing a European automobile manufacturing firm with a U.S. automobile firm. ... Estimating Synthetic Ratings ... Coverage Ratios, Ratings and Default ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Estimating the Discount Rate


1
Estimating the Discount Rate
  • P.V. Viswanath
  • Based on Damodarans Corporate Finance

2
Inputs required to use the CAPM
  • According to the CAPM, the required rate of
    return on an asset will be
  • Required ROR Rf b (E(Rm) - Rf)
  • The inputs required to estimate the required ROR
    are
  • (a) the current risk-free rate
  • (b) the expected market risk premium (the premium
    expected for investing in risky assets over the
    riskless asset)
  • (c) the beta of the asset being analyzed.

3
The Riskfree Rate
  • For an investment to be riskfree, i.e., to have
    an actual return be equal to the expected return,
    there must be
  • No default risk this usually means a
    government-issued security but, not all
    governments are default free.
  • No uncertainty about reinvestment rates.
  • In practice, therefore, the riskfree rate is the
    rate on a zero coupon government bond matching
    the time horizon of the cash flow being analyzed.
  • Theoretically, this means using different
    riskfree rates for each cash flow - the 1 year
    zero coupon rate for the cash flow in year 1, the
    2-year zero coupon rate for the cash flow in year
    2 ...
  • Practically, if there is substantial uncertainty
    about expected cash flows, it is enough to use a
    single riskfree rate for all flows.

4
The Bottom Line on Riskfree Rates
  • Using a long term government rate (even on a
    coupon bond) as the riskfree rate on all of the
    cash flows in a long term analysis will yield a
    close approximation of the true value.
  • For short term analysis, it is appropriate to use
    a short term government security rate as the
    riskfree rate.
  • If the analysis is being done in real terms
    (rather than nominal terms) use a real riskfree
    rate, which can be obtained in one of two ways
  • from an inflation-indexed government bond, if one
    exists
  • set equal, approximately, to the long term real
    growth rate of the economy in which the valuation
    is being done.

5
Measurement of the risk premium
  • The risk premium is the premium that investors
    demand for investing in an average risk
    investment, relative to the riskfree rate.
  • As a general proposition, this premium should be
  • greater than zero
  • increase with the risk aversion of the investors
    in that market
  • increase with the riskiness of the average risk
    investment

6
Estimating Risk Premiums in Practice
  • Survey investors on their desired risk premiums
    and use the average premium from these surveys.
  • Surveying in practice is difficult because there
    is no way to ensure that the numbers that
    participants provide are the ones they use in
    their own decision making.
  • Assume that the actual premium delivered over
    long time periods is equal to the expected
    premium - i.e., use historical data
  • Estimate the implied premium in todays asset
    prices.

7
The Historical Premium Approach
  • This is the default approach used by most to
    arrive at the premium to use in the model
  • In most cases, this approach does the following
  • it defines a time period for the estimation
    (1926-Present, 1962-Present....)
  • it calculates average returns on a stock index
    during the period
  • it calculates average returns on a riskless
    security over the period
  • it calculates the difference between the two
  • and uses it as a premium looking forward
  • The limitations of this approach are
  • it assumes that the risk aversion of investors
    has not changed in a systematic way across time.
    (The risk aversion may change from year to year,
    but it reverts back to historical averages)
  • it assumes that the riskiness of the risky
    portfolio (stock index) has not changed in a
    systematic way across time.

8
Historical Average Premiums for the United States
9
What is the right historical premium?
  • Go back as far as you can, so as to reduce the
    standard error of the estimate. The standard
    error is roughly equal to
  • Standard Error in Risk premium Annual Standard
    deviation in Stock prices / Square root of the
    number of years of historical data
  • With an annual standard deviation in stock prices
    of 24 and 25 years of data, for instance, the
    standard error would be
  • Standard Error of Estimate 24/ v25 4.8
  • Be consistent in your use of a riskfree rate --
    if you use the T.Bill(T.Bond) rate, use the
    spread over the T.Bill (T.Bond) rate.
  • Use arithmetic averages for one-year estimates of
    costs of equity and geometric averages for
    estimates of long term costs of equity.

10
Implied Equity Premiums
  • If we use a basic discounted cash flow model, we
    can estimate the implied risk premium from the
    current level of stock prices.
  • For instance, if stock prices are determined by
    the simple Gordon Growth Model
  • Value Expected Dividends next year/ (Required
    Returns on Stocks - Expected Growth Rate)
  • Plugging in the current level of the index, the
    dividends on the index and expected growth rate
    will yield a implied expected return on stocks.
    Subtracting out the riskfree rate will yield the
    implied premium.

11
Implied Equity Premiums
  • This is a market neutral approach to estimate the
    implied spread, i.e., it assumes that the current
    level of the market is correct)
  • For instance, if the SP 500 is at 1100, expected
    dividends next year on the index is 33 and the
    expected growth in the earnings/dividends is 7
  • 1100 33/(r - .07)
  • Solving for r, we find r 10
  • If the treasury bond rate is 7, the implied
    Equity Premium 10 - 7 3
  • The problems with this approach are
  • the discounted cash flow model used to value the
    index has to be correct.
  • the inputs on dividends and expected growth have
    to be correct
  • it implicitly assumes that the market is
    currently correctly valued

12
In Summary...
  • The historical risk premium is 6.6, if we use a
    geometric risk premium, and much higher, if we
    use arithmetic averages.
  • The current implied risk premium is much lower.
    Even if we use liberal estimates of cashflows
    (dividends stock buybacks) and high expected
    growth rates, the implied premium is about 4 and
    probably lower.
  • Implied risk premium using the SP 500 Index
    value is 1!
  • We will use a risk premium of 5.5, because
  • The historical risk premium is much too high to
    use in a market, where equities are priced with
    with premiums of 4 or lower.
  • The implied premium might be too low, especially
    if we believe that markets can become overvalued.

13
Estimating Beta
  • The standard procedure for estimating betas is to
    regress stock returns (Rj) against market returns
    (Rm) -
  • Rj a b Rm
  • where a is the intercept and b is the slope of
    the regression.
  • The slope of the regression corresponds to the
    beta of the stock, and measures the riskiness of
    the stock.

14
Estimating Performance
  • The intercept of the regression provides a simple
    measure of performance during the period of the
    regression, relative to the capital asset pricing
    model.
  • Rj Rf bj (Rm - Rf)
  • Rf (1-bj) b Rm ........... Capital Asset
    Pricing Model
  • Rj aj bj Rm ........... Regression
    Equation
  • If aj gt Rf (1-bj) ..Stock did better than
    expected during reg period
  • aj Rf (1-bj) ..Stock did as well as
    expected during regr period
  • aj lt Rf (1-bj) ..Stock did worse than
    expected during reg period
  • Jensen's alpha, a measure of stock performance,
    is measure as aj - Rf (1-b)

15
Firm Specific and Market Risk
  • The R squared (R2) of the regression provides an
    estimate of the proportion of the risk (variance)
    of a firm that can be attributed to market risk.
  • The balance (1 - R2) can be attributed to firm
    specific risk.

16
Setting up for the Estimation
  • Decide on an estimation period
  • Services use periods ranging from 2 to 5 years
    for the regression
  • Longer estimation period provides more data, but
    firms change.
  • Shorter periods can be affected more easily by
    significant firm-specific event that occurred
    during the period
  • Decide on a return interval - daily, weekly,
    monthly
  • Shorter intervals yield more observations, but
    suffer from more noise.
  • Noise is created by stocks not trading and biases
    all betas towards one.
  • Estimate returns (including dividends) on stock
  • Return (PriceEnd - PriceBeginning
    DividendsPeriod)/ PriceBeginning
  • Included dividends only in ex-dividend month
  • Choose a market index, and estimate returns
    (inclusive of dividends) on the index for each
    interval for the period.

17
Choosing the Parameters Boeing
  • Period used 5 years
  • Return Interval Monthly
  • Market Index SP 500 Index.
  • For instance, to calculate returns on Boeing in
    May 1995,
  • Price for Boeing at end of April 27.50
  • Price for Boeing at end of May 29.44
  • Dividends during month 0.125 (It was an
    ex-dividend month)
  • Return (29.44 - 27.50 0.125)/27.50
    7.50
  • To estimate returns on the index in the same
    month
  • Index level (including dividends) at end of April
    514.7
  • Index level (including dividends) at end of May
    533.4
  • Dividends on the Index in May 1.84
  • Return (533.4-514.71.84)/ 514.7 3.99

18
Boeings Historical Beta
Boeing versus SP 500 10/93-9/98
10.00
Regression
line
5.00
Returns on Boeing
0.00
-25.00
-20.00
-15.00
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
-5.00
Beta is slope of this line
-10.00
-15.00
Each point represents a month
of data.
-20.00
Returns on SP 500
19
The Regression Output
  • ReturnsBoeing -0.09 0.96 ReturnsS P 500
  • R squared29.57
  • Intercept -0.09
  • Slope 0.96

20
Analyzing Boeings Performance
  • Intercept -0.09
  • This is an intercept based on monthly returns.
    Thus, it has to be compared to a monthly riskfree
    rate.
  • Between 1993 and 1998,
  • Monthly Riskfree Rate 0.4
  • Riskfree Rate (1-Beta) 0.4 (1-0.96) .01
  • The Comparison is then between
  • Intercept versus Riskfree Rate (1 - Beta)
  • -0.09 versus 0.4(1-0.96) 0.01
  • Jensens Alpha -0.09 -(0.01) -0.10
  • Boeing did 0.1 worse than expected, per month,
    between 1993 and 1998.
  • Annualized, Boeings annual excess return
    (1-.0001)12-1 -1.22

21
Breaking down Boeings Risk
  • R Squared 29.57
  • This implies that
  • 29.57 of the risk at Boeing comes from market
    sources
  • 70.43, therefore, comes from firm-specific
    sources
  • The firm-specific risk is diversifiable and will
    not be rewarded

22
Estimating Expected Returns December 31, 1998
  • Boeings Beta 0.96
  • Riskfree Rate 5.00 (Long term Government Bond
    rate)
  • Risk Premium 5.50 (Approximate historical
    premium)
  • Expected Return 5.00 0.96 (5.50) 10.31

23
How managers use this expected return
  • Managers at Boeing
  • need to make at least 10.31 as a return for
    their equity investors to break even.
  • this is the hurdle rate for projects, when the
    investment is analyzed from an equity standpoint
  • In other words, Boeings cost of equity is
    10.31.
  • What is the cost of not delivering this cost of
    equity?

24
Fundamental Determinants of Betas
  • Type of Business Firms in more cyclical
    businesses or that sell products that are more
    discretionary to their customers will have higher
    betas than firms that are in non-cyclical
    businesses or sell products that are necessities
    or staples.
  • Operating Leverage Firms with greater fixed
    costs (as a proportion of total costs) will have
    higher betas than firms will lower fixed costs
    (as a proportion of total costs)
  • Financial Leverage Firms that borrow more
    (higher debt, relative to equity) will have
    higher equity betas than firms that borrow less.

25
Determinant 1 Product Type
  • Industry Effects The beta value for a firm
    depends upon the sensitivity of the demand for
    its products and services and of its costs to
    macroeconomic factors that affect the overall
    market.
  • Cyclical companies have higher betas than
    non-cyclical firms
  • Firms which sell more discretionary products will
    have higher betas than firms that sell less
    discretionary products

26
Determinant 2 Operating Leverage Effects
  • Operating leverage refers to the proportion of
    the total costs of the firm that are fixed.
  • Other things remaining equal, higher operating
    leverage results in greater earnings variability
    which in turn results in higher betas.

27
Measures of Operating Leverage
  • Fixed Costs Measure Fixed Costs / Variable
    Costs
  • This measures the relationship between fixed and
    variable costs. The higher the proportion, the
    higher the operating leverage.
  • EBIT Variability Measure Change in EBIT /
    Change in Revenues
  • This measures how quickly the earnings before
    interest and taxes changes as revenue changes.
    The higher this number, the greater the operating
    leverage.

28
A Look at The Home Depots Operating Leverage
29
Reading The Home Depots Operating Leverage
  • Operating Leverage Change in EBIT/ Change
    in Sales
  • 34.94/ 32.58 1.07
  • This is similar to the operating leverage for
    other retail firms, which we computed to be 1.05.
    This would suggest that The Home Depot has a
    similar cost structure to its competitors.

30
A Test
  • Assume that you are comparing a European
    automobile manufacturing firm with a U.S.
    automobile firm. European firms are generally
    much more constrained in terms of laying off
    employees, if they get into financial trouble.
    What implications does this have for betas, if
    they are estimated relative to a common index?
  • European firms will have much higher betas than
    U.S. firms
  • European firms will have similar betas to U.S.
    firms
  • European firms will have much lower betas than
    U.S. firms

31
Determinant 3 Financial Leverage
  • As firms borrow, they create fixed costs
    (interest payments) that make their earnings to
    equity investors more volatile.
  • This increased earnings volatility which
    increases the equity beta

32
Equity Betas and Leverage
  • The beta of equity alone can be written as a
    function of the unlevered beta and the
    debt-equity ratio
  • ?L ?u (1 ((1-t)D/E)
  • where
  • ?L Levered or Equity Beta
  • ?u Unlevered Beta
  • t Corporate marginal tax rate
  • D Market Value of Debt
  • E Market Value of Equity
  • The unlevered beta measures the riskiness of the
    business that a firm is in and is often called an
    asset beta.

33
Effects of leverage on betas Boeing
  • The regression beta for Boeing is 0.96. This beta
    is a levered beta (because it is based on stock
    prices, which reflect leverage) and the leverage
    implicit in the beta estimate is the average
    market debt equity ratio during the period of the
    regression (1993 to 1998)
  • The average debt equity ratio during this period
    was 17.88.
  • The unlevered beta for Boeing can then be
    estimated(using a marginal tax rate of 35)
  • Current Beta / (1 (1 - tax rate) (Average
    Debt/Equity))
  • 0.96 / ( 1 (1 - 0.35) (0.1788)) 0.86

34
Boeing Beta and Leverage
  • Debt to Debt/Equity Beta EffectCapital
    Ratio
    of Leverage
  • 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.00
  • 10.00 11.11 0.92 0.06
  • 20.00 25.00 1.00 0.14
  • 30.00 42.86 1.10 0.24
  • 40.00 66.67 1.23 0.37
  • 50.00 100.00 1.42 0.56
  • 60.00 150.00 1.70 0.84
  • 70.00 233.33 2.16 1.30
  • 80.00 400.00 3.10 2.24
  • 90.00 900.00 5.89 5.03

35
Betas are weighted Averages
  • The beta of a portfolio is always the
    market-value weighted average of the betas of the
    individual investments in that portfolio.
  • Thus,
  • the beta of a mutual fund is the weighted average
    of the betas of the stocks and other investment
    in that portfolio
  • the beta of a firm after a merger is the
    market-value weighted average of the betas of the
    companies involved in the merger.

36
The Boeing/McDonnell Douglas Merger
  • Company Beta Debt Equity Firm Value
  • Boeing 0.95 3,980 32,438 36,418
  • McDonnell Douglas 0.90 2,143 12,555
    14,698

37
Beta Estimation Step 1
  • Calculate the unlevered betas for both firms
  • Boeing 0.95/(10.65(3980/32438)) 0.88
  • McDonnell Douglas 0.90/(10.65(2143/12555))
    0.81
  • Calculate the unlevered beta for the combined
    firm
  • Unlevered Beta for combined firm
  • 0.88 (36,418/51,116) 0.81 (14,698/51,116)
  • 0.86

38
Beta Estimation Step 2
  • Boeings acquisition of McDonnell Douglas was
    accomplished by issuing new stock in Boeing to
    cover the value of McDonnell Douglass equity of
    12,555 million.
  • Debt McDonnell Douglas Old Debt Boeings
    Old Debt
  • 3,980 2,143 6,123 million
  • Equity Boeings Old Equity New Equity used
    for Acquisition
  • 32,438 12,555 44,993 million
  • D/E Ratio 6,123/44,993 13.61
  • New Beta 0.86 (1 0.65 (.1361)) 0.94

39
Firm Betas versus divisional Betas
  • Firm Betas as weighted averages The beta of a
    firm is the weighted average of the betas of its
    individual projects.
  • At a broader level of aggregation, the beta of a
    firm is the weighted average of the betas of its
    individual division.

40
Bottom-up versus Top-down Beta
  • The top-down beta for a firm comes from a
    regression
  • The bottom up beta can be estimated by doing the
    following
  • Find out the businesses that a firm operates in
  • Find the unlevered betas of other firms in these
    businesses
  • Take a weighted (by sales or operating income)
    average of these unlevered betas
  • Lever up using the firms debt/equity ratio
  • The bottom up beta will give you a better
    estimate of the true beta when
  • the standard error of the beta from the
    regression is high (and) the beta for a firm is
    very different from the average for the business
  • the firm has reorganized or restructured itself
    substantially during the period of the regression
  • when a firm is not traded

41
The Home Depots Comparable Firms
42
Estimating The Home Depots Bottom-up Beta
  • Average Beta of comparable firms 0.93
  • D/E ratio of comparable firms
    (2002076)/16,232 14.01
  • Unlevered Beta for comparable firms
    0.93/(1(1-.35)(.1401))
  • 0.86
  • If the Home Depots D/E ratio is 20, our
    bottom-up estimate of Home Depots beta is
    0.861(1-.35)(.2) 0.9718

43
Decomposing Boeings Beta
  • The values were estimated based upon the revenues
    in each business and the typical multiple of
    revenues that other firms in that business trade
    for.
  • The unlevered betas for each business were
    estimated by looking at other publicly traded
    firms in each business, averaging across the
    betas estimated for these firms, and then
    unlevering the beta using the average debt to
    equity ratio for firms in that business.
  • Unlevered Beta Average Beta / (1 (1-tax rate)
    (Average D/E))
  • Using Boeings current market debt to equity
    ratio of 25
  • Boeings Beta 0.88 (1(1-.35)(.25)) 1.014

44
From Cost of Equity to Cost of Capital
  • The cost of capital is a composite cost to the
    firm of raising financing to fund its projects.
  • In addition to equity, firms can raise capital
    from debt

45
Estimating the Cost of Debt
  • If the firm has bonds outstanding, and the bonds
    are traded, the yield to maturity on a long-term,
    straight (no special features) bond can be used
    as the interest rate.
  • If the firm is rated, use the rating and a
    typical default spread on bonds with that rating
    to estimate the cost of debt.
  • If the firm is not rated,
  • and it has recently borrowed long term from a
    bank, use the interest rate on the borrowing or
  • estimate a synthetic rating for the company, and
    use the synthetic rating to arrive at a default
    spread and a cost of debt
  • The cost of debt has to be estimated in the same
    currency as the cost of equity and the cash flows
    in the valuation.

46
Estimating Synthetic Ratings
  • The rating for a firm can be estimated using the
    financial characteristics of the firm. In its
    simplest form, the rating can be estimated from
    the interest coverage ratio
  • Interest Coverage Ratio EBIT / Interest
    Expenses
  • Consider InfoSoft, a firm with EBIT of 2000
    million and interest expenses of 315 million
  • Interest Coverage Ratio 2,000/315 6.15
  • Based upon the relationship between interest
    coverage ratios and ratings, we would estimate a
    rating of A for the firm.

47
Interest Coverage Ratios, Ratings and Default
Spreads
  • Interest Coverage Ratio Rating Default Spread
  • gt 12.5 AAA 0.20
  • 9.50 - 12.50 AA 0.50
  • 7.50 9.50 A 0.80
  • 6.00 7.50 A 1.00
  • 4.50 6.00 A- 1.25
  • 3.50 4.50 BBB 1.50
  • 3.00 3.50 BB 2.00
  • 2.50 3.00 B 2.50
  • 2.00 - 2.50 B 3.25
  • 1.50 2.00 B- 4.25
  • 1.25 1.50 CCC 5.00
  • 0.80 1.25 CC 6.00
  • 0.50 0.80 C 7.50
  • lt 0.65 D 10.00

48
Costs of Debt for Boeing, the Home Depot and
InfoSoft
  • Boeing Home Depot InfoSoft
  • Bond Rating AA A A
  • Rating is Actual Actual Synthetic
  • Default Spread over treas. 0.50 0.80 1.00
  • Market Interest Rate 5.50 5.80 6.00
  • Marginal tax rate 35 35 42
  • Cost of Debt 3.58 3.77 3.48
  • The treasury bond rate is 5.

49
Estimating Market Value Weights
  • Market Value of Equity should include the
    following
  • Market Value of Shares outstanding
  • Market Value of Warrants outstanding
  • Market Value of Conversion Option in Convertible
    Bonds
  • Market Value of Debt is more difficult to
    estimate because few firms have only publicly
    traded debt. There are two solutions
  • Assume book value of debt is equal to market
    value
  • Estimate the market value of debt from the book
    value for Boeing, the book value of debt is
    6,972 million, the interest expense on the debt
    is 453 million, the average maturity of the
    debt is 13.76 years and the pre-tax cost of debt
    is 5.50.
  • Estimated MV of Boeing Debt

50
Estimating Cost of Capital Boeing
  • Equity
  • Cost of Equity 5 1.01 (5.5) 10.58
  • Market Value of Equity 32.60 Billion
  • Equity/(DebtEquity ) 82
  • Debt
  • After-tax Cost of debt 5.50 (1-.35) 3.58
  • Market Value of Debt 8.2 Billion
  • Debt/(Debt Equity) 18
  • Cost of Capital 10.58(.80)3.58(.20) 9.17

51
Choosing a Hurdle Rate
  • Either the cost of equity or the cost of capital
    can be used as a hurdle rate, depending upon
    whether the returns measured are to equity
    investors or to all claimholders on the firm
    (capital)
  • If returns are measured to equity investors, the
    appropriate hurdle rate is the cost of equity.
  • If returns are measured to capital (or the firm),
    the appropriate hurdle rate is the cost of
    capital.

52
Back to First Principles
  • Invest in projects that yield a return greater
    than the minimum acceptable hurdle rate.
  • The hurdle rate should be higher for riskier
    projects and reflect the financing mix used -
    owners funds (equity) or borrowed money (debt)
  • Returns on projects should be measured based on
    cash flows generated and the timing of these cash
    flows they should also consider both positive
    and negative side effects of these projects.
  • Choose a financing mix that minimizes the hurdle
    rate and matches the assets being financed.
  • If there are not enough investments that earn the
    hurdle rate, return the cash to stockholders.
  • The form of returns - dividends and stock
    buybacks - will depend upon the stockholders
    characteristics.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)