Principles of Grant Writing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Principles of Grant Writing

Description:

Thus, a number of factors in plasma are potentially involved in regulating ... Must look up expenses of your major supplies such as glassware, cells, enzymes, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: afmr
Learn more at: https://afmr.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Principles of Grant Writing


1
Principles of Grant Writing
Allison B. Reiss, M.D. Head, Inflammation
Section Winthrop University Hospital
2
Getting Started
  • Find a mentor
  • Select an area of interest
  • Read the literature in the field
  • Ask questions
  • Look for gaps in knowledge
  • Come up with a novel idea
  • Generate a meaningful hypothesis
  • Secure collaborators for areas in which you lack
    experience/training

3
Being a Credible Candidate- Your CV
  • Gather preliminary data
  • Publish with your mentor
  • Write review articles or book chapters
  • Present abstracts
  • Attend scientific meetings in the field
  • Network
  • Join committees
  • Follow NIH biosketch format

4
Choosing a Starter Grant
  • Start modestly and expect criticism
  • Local societies such as LI Chapter of Arthritis
    Foundation or American Heart Association
  • Fellowship grants with mentor
  • R03- small grants for new investigators
  • Small specialized foundations
  • Always adhere to the requirements of the grant
    solicitation.

5
Getting Organized
  • If it is your first time start 3 months ahead!
  • Read the instructions for the specific
    application
  • Be sure that you qualify- stage of training,
    academic appointment, degree necessary,
    citizenship requirements
  • Be sure that your grant fits the stated
    objectives of the program
  • Make a checklist of all the things you need to
    accomplish- you can have the body of the grant
    completed, but without the ancillary paperwork
    you will miss the deadline!

6
Title
  • Come up with an attention-grabbing title that
    communicates the key points and focus of the
    application. This is your FILM and you want to
    win the Oscar for best picture!!
  • Reviewers may have to judge their ability to
    review an application based solely on the title.
    They are often asked to rate their expertise from
    1 (this is my field) to 5 (I am clueless) based
    on title alone or title and abstract
  • You do not want your application to be read by
    someone who will not be able to understand and
    appreciate your ideas.

7
Sections of the Grant
  • Abstract
  • Specific Aims
  • Background and Significance
  • Preliminary Data
  • Research Design and Methods
  • Other (depends on grant)
  • Human subjects
  • Vertebrate animals

8
Specific Aims
  • These are the objectives of your research
    proposal
  • Most important- set the tone for the whole grant
  • First thing reviewers evaluate
  • Should be driven by a strong hypothesis
  • Usually two or three per application
  • Should be focused and coherent

9
Specific Aims- Format
  • State the aim in bold type- be succinct
  • Add a sentence or two describing the rationale
    for the aim and the methods to be used.
  • The Specific Aims should not take up more than
    one page.
  • Do not be diffuse- aims should be feasible and
    relate directly to hypothesis
  • Do not turn the aims into a list of experiments
    or your grant will be triaged!

10
Specific Aim Example from NIH-Funded Application
entitled Immunological Mechanisms in Premature
Atherosclerosis
  • Examine the impact of immune reactants in the
    circulation of SLE patients on cholesterol
    homeostasis in cells relevant to atherogenesis.
    Effect of SLE patient plasma on expression of
    proteins involved in cellular cholesterol uptake
    and excretion (27-OHase, ABCA1, ABCG1, LOX1, LDL
    receptor, scavenger receptor) is assessed
    (Western blot, Quantitative real-time reverse
    transcription-polymerase chain reaction
    QRT-PCR) in the THP-1 human monocytes and human
    arterial endothelium. Relative contribution of
    IC-C1q and IFN-gamma present at elevated levels
    in SLE patient plasma to? the decrease in
    27-OHase message is evaluated by exposing cells
    to SLE plasma with/without specific
    immunoneutralization (achieved by pre-incubation
    with anti-C1q receptor antibody, anti-IFN-gamma
    antibody and anti-IFN-gamma receptor antibody).

11
Background and Significance
  • Your chance to set the stage- be convincing,
    compelling, succinct, thorough.
  • State problem to be investigated and rationale
    for proposal. Logical persuasion.
  • The scientific question- what has been published
    by others in the field? Show that you have a good
    command of the current and ongoing research in
    your field.
  • What is not known and why is it important to fill
    in the gaps or resolve discrepancies?
  • How will your proposed study advance knowledge
    and resolve issues in the field- groundbreaking?

12
More on Background and Significance
  • Demonstrate that accomplishing your aims will
    provide new information that fills in crucial
    holes.
  • Have you already made contributions?
  • Emphasize the innovative nature of the work and
    impact you have made or will make.
  • Be sure to reference prominent scientists in the
    field- they may be reviewing your application!
  • Dont write a review article- you need to save
    space for your methods section.

13
Preliminary Data
  • Your opportunity to show that you are technically
    competent to design and carry out meaningful
    experiments.
  • Data from replicate experiments with good
    reproducibility, small error bars, carefully
    analyzed, properly controlled.
  • You must present results clearly, completely and
    objectively.
  • Charts, graphs, tables, statistics are key.
  • It is crucial that your data provide a sound
    basis for the proposed hypotheses.
  • Evidence that the proposed techniques will work
    and that you can perform them.

14
Research Design and Methods
  • Heart of your plan- describe your methods and
    experiments in detail.
  • Correspond methods to each aim in turn.
  • Exactly how results will be collected, analyzed,
    interpreted.
  • Include the results you expect and their
    significance and relationship to your
    aim/hypothesis.
  • Describe what it will mean and what you will do
    if you get unanticipated results.

15
Research Design and Methods contd
  • Discuss potential difficulties and limitations
    and how these will be overcome or mitigated. Need
    alternative approaches.
  • Specify animal models, exposure times, reagents
    and how you will obtain them, statistical
    analysis methods, and other details.
  • Are these the optimal most suitable methods to
    compile the data you need? If possible, discuss
    other methods and justify your choice.
  • Give context- dont just list methods. Are
    methods direct extensions of your preliminary
    data?
  • Include a timeline.

16
Pitfalls and Alternatives
  • The experiments proposed are a logical extension
    of our previous work in which we demonstrated a
    highly significant downregulation of 27-OHase
    mRNA expression in cultured human arterial
    endothelium after 3 hr of exposure to SLE patient
    plasma (see Preliminary Studies). I have
    extensive experience in formulating and executing
    this type of study. The study will be blinded so
    that the person measuring 27-OHase levels will
    not know which human plasma and antibody
    conditions the cells were subjected to. That
    information will be kept confidentially with
    numerical coding.
  • The following difficulties may arise 27-OHase
    downregulation by SLE patient plasma may not be
    blocked by blocking C1q or IFN-gamma. SLE is
    characterized by the production of multiple
    autoantibodies. Although the pathogenesis of SLE
    remains enigmatic, autoantibodies against dsDNA
    and ribonucleoproteins, deposition of IC,
    complement activation, and leukocyte infiltration
    are thought to represent a consequence of immune
    dysregulation in this disease. Thus, a number of
    factors in plasma are potentially involved in
    regulating the 27-OHase. If blocking IFN-gamma
    and IC fails to ablate downregulation, we will
    look at downstream effectors in the complement
    cascade (i.e. complement components C3b, C3bi,
    C5a and their receptors or C5b-9). This will be
    accomplished using antibodies to CR1 and CR3 or
    the receptor for C5a or antibodies to C3b, C3bi,
    or C5a.

17
Research Environment
  • Must establish that the facilities, resources and
    personnel are favorable for execution of the
    project aims.
  • Describe the scientific environment and emphasize
    the features that you need and their ready
    availability.
  • Institutional support- letter from chair/director
  • Collaborators/consultants- get the best. Most are
    approachable and helpful. Their strong CVs will
    enhance you!

18
Human Subjects
  • Can be tricky and sensitive
  • Be sure to stay within HIPAA guidelines
  • Minimal discomfort/risk to patient
  • Confidentiality and privacy of subjects must be
    maintained
  • Informed consent
  • Participation must be voluntary- discuss risks
    and benefits

19
Elements of Human Subject Study
  • Description of population to be studied
  • Description of method by which subjects will be
    identified and recruited
  • Sample size
  • General purpose of the investigation
  • Source of research material
  • Subject inclusion criteria
  • Subject exclusion criteria
  • Duration of study
  • Inclusion of women, minorities
  • Inclusion of children
  • Data and Safety Monitoring Plan

20
Budget
  • You need to know your stuff!
  • Get salary guidance from human resources- many
    grants limit salary
  • Must look up expenses of your major supplies such
    as glassware, cells, enzymes, antibodies, assay
    kits, animals and their chow/care etc
  • Can get this info online or in catalogs or call
    the company.
  • The higher percent effort you can give the better.

21
Grant Killers- Reviewer Turn-offs
  • Significance is unclear So what?
  • No innovation is noted
  • Proposal is not hypothesis-driven, but is a data
    gathering exercise
  • Over-ambitious, dense, diffuse
  • Preliminary data is not convincing/clear-cut
  • No back-up plan
  • Would never pass IRB
  • Lacks statistics, power calculation

22
Proofreading
  • Final draft of a proposal should be proofread by
    someone other than the primary grant writer.
  • Ask other successful investigators to proofread
    your grant and provide feedback. 
  • Make sure your grant is grammatically correct.
  • Check spelling and punctuation.
  • Look for errors in logic or presentation.

23
Submission
  • Check the deadline. Late proposals not
    considered.
  • Make sure font size, margins and length are
    within guidelines.
  • Page limitations
  • Administrative approvals-Sponsored Programs will
    help. Let them know early.
  • Letters from consultants/collaborators
  • Manuscripts/publications
  • Cover letter
  • Electronic or delivery service or both? File
    format.
  • Web sites can get jammed near deadline.

24
Good Luck!!
  • If you need help, you can contact me through AFMR
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com