Changes in Soil Properties - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Changes in Soil Properties

Description:

Changes in Soil Properties – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: pedo8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Changes in Soil Properties


1
Changes in Soil Properties of Heavily Grazed
Meadows After Ten Years of Grazing Exclusion.
Hillary Talbott
2
Study Sites
3
Eastern Cascade Ecosystem
  • Mosaic of Ponderosa Pine and Douglas Fir forest
    with common upland and riparian meadows
  • Frequent fire return interval (10-24 years) and
    low-severity fire regime
  • Xeric moisture regime with annual precipitation
    800mm

4
Importance of Meadows
  • Highly productive systems
  • Important habitat
  • Source of forage for wildlife
  • Integral part of mosaic ecosystem
  • Act as buffers and sponges

5
Grazing on Forest Service Land
  • Permitted use of forests since 1906
  • Eastern Cascades grazed by sheep and cattle
  • Meadows and open forest stands provide most of
    forage

6
Heavy Grazing Effects on Soils
Consumption of vegetation
Trampling of vegetation and soils
Loss of plant cover, litter, and soil organic
matter
Soil Erosion
Increased soil compaction and disturbance
Reduced infiltration
Deteriorated soil structure
Based on Belsky Blumenthal 1997
7
Meadows are being overused.
8
(No Transcript)
9
FF
JO
HP
MM (8km)
10
Four meadow sites
Jumpoff Meadow (JO)
Fish Flats (FF)
Tyler Meadow (HP)
Minnie Meadow (MM)
11
Experimental Design
  • Split-plot design with 2 treatments
  • -Grazing exclusion
  • -Fertilizer application in fall of 92 and fall
    of 93

No grazing
Elk only
ElkCattle (Control)
12
NPKS
NPS
PKS
NKS
0
50
75
100
Fertilizer Rates in kg/ha
125 150
175 200
250
N
P
K
S
125
13
Meadow Properties
14
Dominant Vegetation
15
  • After three years of grazing exclusion and two
    fertilizer applications
  • Root biomass increased in all fertilized plots.
  • Bulk density decreased slightly in no-grazing
    plots.

16
Research Questions
  • Has grazing exclusion had any effect on soil bulk
    density, hydrologic properties, or root biomass?
  • Has fertilizer application affected soil bulk
    density, hydrologic properties, or root biomass
    through changes in plant productivity?

Photo courtesy of PNW research lab.
17
Sampling
  • Sampled NPKS fertilizer plot in each grazing
    treatment at 0 and 125kg rates
  • 3 sample points per fertilizer plot

18
NPKS
NPS
PKS
NKS
0
50
75
100
Fertilizer Rates in kg/ha
125 150
175 200
250
N
P
K
S
125
19
Sampling
  • At each sample point
  • 1 permeameter reading
  • 1 root biomass core
  • 2 bulk density cores
  • 1 SMC core
  • 1 scoop for composite sample

20
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Root Biomass
Guelph permeameter
0-10cm
10-20 cm
20-30 cm
Photo courtesy of PNW research lab.
21
Bulk Density and SMC
Gosh, drop hammers are so fun!
22
Separating roots using the hydropneumatic
elutriation system.
Cleaned root samples
23
Determination of Soil Moisture Characteristic
Tempe Cells Pressure Plates
24
Soil Moisture Characteristic
  • Van Genuchten Equation
  • ? 1 m
  • 1a(-?)n
  • Where
  • ? is relative water content
  • ? is matric potential
  • a and n are empirically derived constants
  • m is 1/1-n

25
Pore Size Distribution
  • Pore size distribution
  • r(-2s cos?/P)
  • where
  • r is the radius of largest water-filled pore
  • s is the surface tension of water
  • ? is the contact angle on the porous solid
  • P is the absolute pressure applied

26
Observed Differences
  • Differences between elk only and elkcattle very
    slight.
  • In JO and MM, no-grazing plots have more
    extensive gopher activity.
  • Above ground biomass is greater in no-grazing
    plots.
  • No-grazing plots are softer and more diggable.

27
Intrinsic Permeability
28
Dry Root Biomass, Top 10 cm
29
Bulk Density
30
Pore Size Distribution Curves
Blue ElkCattle Red Elk Only Green No
Grazing
31
Thin Sections, HP
Elk Cattle
No Grazing
32
What all this means
  • Results point to a very slight recovery of soil
    properties.
  • Meadow recovery takes place slowly.
  • An increase in plant cover doesnt mean soil has
    recovered.
  • Meadows with gophers show greater recovery.

33
  • So What?
  • Carl Davis, USFS Soil Scientist

34
Management Implications
  • After extended heavy grazing, soil can take a
    long time to recover.
  • Simple cessation of grazing is not an effective
    short-term fix.
  • Repeated fertilization of meadows may be required
    to see a long term effect on recovery.
  • Dont discourage gophers. They help to loosen
    the soil.

35
If I knew then what I know now...
  • Sample over a wider area within each exclosure.
  • Take much larger root biomass samples.
  • Sample when soil is more moist.
  • Measure aggregate stability and soil strength.
  • Think twice before using a previously designed
    experiement.

36
Thanks to USDA PNW Forest Research Lab Wenatchee
National Forest Committee Dr. Paul McDaniel,
Dr. Markus Tuller, Dr. Jeff Braatne. Anita
Falen Mark Williams
Photo courtesy of PNW research lab.
37
Special thanks to Jason Jimenez for heroic feats
of fieldwork!
38
Any Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com