Title: Gender and Educational Access among Chinas Youth: Evidence from Recent Censuses and Surveys
1Gender and Educational Access among Chinas
Youth Evidence from Recent Censuses and Surveys
- Emily Hannum, University of Pennsylvania
- Jennifer Adams, Stanford University
- Meiyan Wang, Chinese Academy of Social Science
2Main sources for this presentation
- Hannum, Emily and Jennifer Adams. (2007)
Choices, Hopes, and Expectations Does Gender
Still Shape Access to Basic Education in Rural
Northwest China? In Exclusion, Gender and
Education Case Studies from the Developing
World , edited by Maureen Lewis and Marlaine
Lockheed. Washington D.C. Brookings. - Hannum, Emily, Jere Behrman, Meiyan Wang, and
Jihong Liu. (2007) Education in the Reform
Era. Forthcoming in Chinas Great Economic
Transformation, edited by Loren Brandt and Thomas
Rawski, Cambridge University Press. - Hannum, Emily, Meiyan Wang, and Jennifer Adams.
(2007). Urban-Rural Disparities in Access to
Primary and Secondary Education under Market
Reforms. Manuscript prepared for One Country,
Two Societies? Rural-Urban Inequality in
Contemporary China, edited by Martin Whyte
(manuscript).
3Enrollment and attainment among youth in China
- To what extent does girls educational
disadvantage persist in China? How do gender gaps
compare with (and relate to) other sources of
educational inequality? - What do large-scale surveys and the most recent
census indicate about the nature of gender
disparities? Sources Census (2000), CHNS (1989,
1991,1993, 1997, 2000, 2004) - Does gender shape educational persistence and the
educational plans of rural children and their
parents in one of Chinas poorest provinces?
Sources GSCF (2000, 2004)
4Educational Change across Cohorts, 2000 China
Census
Source 2000 Census Micro Sample
5Educational Composition of the Population Ages
25-34 by Demographic Characteristics, 2000
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12Gansu, Sample Counties Marked
13The Gansu Survey of Children and Families (GSCF)
- Waves in 2000 and 2004 (and 2007-8)
- Multi-stage cluster sample of 2000 rural children
aged 9-12 in the year 2000 (oldest younger
sibling in 2004) - Linkable secondary samples of mothers, fathers,
teachers, school administrators, and village
heads (local health facility surveys in 2004) - Census of primary school teachers and
administrators in sample villages (JHS schools
and teachers in 2004 and 2007)
14Design of the GSCF
- School classroom resources
- Economic resources infrastructure (finance,
materials, facilities) - Human capital (teacher principal
characteristics) - Social composition environment (socio-economic
composition of peers in schools classrooms,
social cohesion/disruptions) - Academic environment (academic press, attitudes
expectations of teachers regarding teaching
learning the students abilities trajectories)
- Family resources
- Material resources (wealth, expenditures, home
physical environment, food security) - Human social capital (family educational
attainment work patterns, family kinship
structure networks, family interactions
psychological profile) - Home environment for learning (parents
educational aspirations, attitudes practices,
educational materials, time competition)
- Childrens outcomes
- Academic achievement
- Grade repetition attainment
- Engagement with the schooling process
- Psycho-social physical health
- Community resources
- Economic resources infrastructure (income
levels sources, transportation infrastructure,
availability of basic health, education social
services, presence of rural enterprises) - Socio-cultural composition environment
(educational occupational composition of the
population, cohesion, cultural facilities)
15Outcomes
- Enrollment status (2004)
- Own educational aspirations (among enrolled
students, 2004) - Mothers and fathers educational expectations
(2004)
16Strategy for each outcome
- Main effects models to test for gender
differences and identify factors conducive to
better outcomes (staying enrolled, high
aspirations, high parental expectations) - Interaction models to test whether the effects of
wealth, performance, teacher quality and
classroom experiences differ for boys and girls.
17Main Findings, Rural Gansu Analysis
- The majority of children in rural Gansu who had
entered schoolgirls and boys, wealthy and poor
were still in school at ages 1316. Boys retained
a modest enrollment advantage. - Continued enrollment for all children was
associated with higher socioeconomic status, math
performance, and early high expectations of
mothers and teachers. - Boys and girls had similar educational
aspirations. - Parents had higher expectations for boys than for
girls, but parents average expectations for both
girls and boys were higher than the educational
outcomes the system is likely to provide.
Parents expectations varied more by wealth than
by gender of the child.
18Percent Not Enrolled by Sex, GSCF, Ages 9-12 in
2000 and 13-16 in 2004
1913-16 Year-Olds Not Enrolled (2004) by Sex and
Wealth Quintile (2000)
20Main Points Compulsory Education
- A vast majority of urban and rural compulsory age
boys and girls in China are now enrolled. - 2000 Census the gender gap is vanishing in urban
areas it is very modest in rural areas and among
rural minorities. Rural minorities are at
highest risk of non-enrollment. - Among the few children who remain locked out of
access to compulsory education, the vast majority
are rural minority children and children in
western regions are disproportionately
represented and girls are slightly
overrepresented. - As the pool of children excluded from schooling
narrows, the composition of this group is
increasingly tilted toward children who face
multiple barriers to education.
21Main Points Compulsory Education (contd)
- A vast majority of urban and rural compulsory age
boys and girls in China are now enrolled. - CHNS Gender gaps in enrollment and years of
schooling were closing by the late 1990s. - GSCF In one of Chinas poorest communities,
girls disadvantage in enrollment is small. The
educational expectations of girls themselves and
of their parents are not a barrier to further
advancement.
22Main points post-compulsory education
- At secondary ages.
- 2000 Census The gender gap in enrollment is
nearly gone in urban areas, and quite modest in
rural areas (whether for majority or minority
populations). - There are substantial urban-rural and
majority-minority differences in enrollment
rates. - CHNS Girls disadvantage in enrollment and years
of schooling disappeared over the 1990s. By
2004, provisional findings suggest an advantage
for girls. - GSCF There is a high stated demand for
post-compulsory education among girls, boys, and
their parents, even in some of Chinas poorest
rural communities.
23Conclusions
- To what extent does girls educational
disadvantage persist in China? How do gender gaps
compare with (and relate to) other sources of
educational inequality? - Nationally, gender gaps in access to basic and
secondary education are small. Urban-rural gaps,
ethnic gaps, and socio-economic gaps are more
persistent problems. - Small disadvantages for girls, added to
disadvantages associated with rural residence and
minority status, mean that rural minority girls
remain highly vulnerable. - Implications
- Targeting initiatives that focus on expanding
access to the most vulnerable groups of children,
not just girls, would address remaining pockets
of gender-related disparity and address other
serious inequalities in Chinese education.
24Sex Ratios in China by Age Group (Boys per 100
Girls)
Sources Calculated from UN Common Database and
China Statistics Yearbooks (Various Years)
25(No Transcript)