Title: Economics of food safety
1Economics of food safety
- Lecture 36
- Economics of Food Markets
- Alan Matthews
2Key question
- Do the benefits of growing food regulation
outweigh their cost? Could we deliver a
particular level of food safety more efficiently? - Issues
- the market for food safety
- the rationale for public intervention
- types of intervention
- economic evaluation of interventions
3Readings
- DEFRA 1999, Mitchell. Henson (just up to Section
4) - Antle, Crutchfield
- USDA ERS web resources
4The market for food safety
- Assuming full information, the consumer demand
for food safety is downward sloping - The supply of food safety is upward sloping as
the marginal cost of delivering additional units
of food safety increases - Policy implication is that attempting to achieve
zero risk is misguided. Zero risk is rarely
desired by individuals who are aware of the
implications of their choices and have the pay
the costs of achieving them.
5The problem of imperfect information
- Quality characteristics such as food safety can
be of three kinds - Search characteristics quality can be
ascertained by buyer at the time of purchase - Experience characteristics quality can only be
ascertained after purchase. Gives rise to the
lemons problem familiar in the used car market.
Food safety will be undersupplied. - But market solutions may exist (if repeat
purchases, supplier has incentive to invest in
reputation)
6The problem of imperfect information
- Quality characteristics
- Credence characteristics consumer will never be
able to ascertain the quality on his or her own,
but relies on the judgement of others - Examples include the production process for a
fruit (organic apples) or, in case of food
safety, where there is a long time lag between
ingestion and effect. Will be difficult for firms
to establish reputations for quality. - Government regulation may be justified
- Consumers may not be best judge of their
interests when it comes to assessing risk
7Externality arguments for public regulation
- On the production side, one rogue producer who
fails to meet adequate food standards can put the
reputation of an entire national food industry at
risk - On the consumption side, an infectious food-borne
illness imposes wider costs on society that
transcend those incurred by the individual
consumer
8Systems of food safety control
Public Public Private Private
Direct regulation Product liability Self-regulation Certifica-tion
9Food standards
Degree of intervention Degree of intervention Degree of intervention Degree of intervention Degree of intervention
Information (labelling) Standards Standards Standards Prior approval
Information (labelling) Target Performance Specification Prior approval
10Evaluation of food safety interventions
- Literature associated with regulatory impact
assessment based on benefit cost analysis
initiated by Demsetz 1969 makes four points - Market mechanisms can often be employed and these
incentive-based approaches are more likely to
allow consumers to choose the optimal level of
food safety - Regulations are justified only if they pass a
benefit cost test issue of who should do this?
11Evaluation of food safety interventions
- Informed individual choice of food safety level
is preferred to statutory safety standards when
risk preferences are heterogeneous (T-bone steak,
steak tartare, unpasteurised cheeses) - Even when regulation is justified, the costs of
regulation can be minimised by the appropriate
design of regulation (performance standards
preferred to specification standards)
12Benefit cost analysis
- Requires ability to measure the value of
reductions in morbidity and mortality associated
with consuming foods that could be contaminated - For exporting countries, there may also be market
benefits in terms of access to higher priced
export markets
13Estimated annual costs in US of food-borne
pathogens
Source Henson, 2003
14Benefit cost analysis
- Several approaches to valuing health risks
- Cost of illness
- Willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid illness
- The value of a statistical life
- Contingent valuation studies to estimate WTP for
food safety - Distinction between tangible and intangible costs