Title: Dental Tissues and their Replacements
1Dental Tissues and their Replacements
2Issues
- Dental decay
- Periodontal disease
- Movement of teeth (orthodontics)
- Restorative treatments
- Thermal expansion issues related to fillings
- Fatigue and fracture of teeth and implants
3(No Transcript)
4Marshall et al., J. Dentistry, 25,441, 1997.
5Tissue Constituents
- Enamel-hardest substance in body-calcium
phosphate salts-large apatite crystals - Dentin-composed largely of type-I collagen
fibrils and nanocrystalline apatite
mineral-similar to bone - Dentinal tubules-radiate from pulp
- Pulp-richly vascularized connnective tissue
- Cementum-coarsely fibrillated bonelike substance
devoid of canaliculi - Periodontal Membrane-anchors the root into
alveolar bone
6ENAMEL
- 96mineral, 1 protein lipid, remainder is water
(weight ) - Minerals form Long crystals-hexagonal shape
- Flourine- renders enamel much less soluble and
increases hardness - HA Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2
40 nm 1000 nm in length
7DENTIN
- Type-I collagen fibrils and nanocrystalline
apatite - Dentinal tubules from dentin-enamel and
cementum-enamel junctions to pulp - Channels are paths for odontoblasts
(dentin-forming cells) during the process of
dentin formation - Mineralized collagen fibrils (50-100 nm in
diameter) are arranged orthogonal to the tubules - Inter-tubular dentin matrix with nanocrystalline
hydroxyapatite mineral- planar structure - Highly oriented microstructure causes anisotropy
- Hollow tubules responsible for high toughness
8Structural properties
Park and Lakes, Biomaterials, 1992 and Handbook
of Biomaterials, 1998
9Structural properties
Note remodeling is primarily strain driven
Park and Lakes, Biomaterials, 1992 and Handbook
of Biomaterials, 1998
10Dental Biomaterials
- Amalgams/Fillings
- Implants /Dental screws
- Adhesives/Cements
- Orthodontics
11Materials used in dental applications
- Fillings amalgams, acrylic resins
- Titanium Ti6Al4V dominates in root implants and
fracture fixation - Teeth Porcelain, resins, ceramics
- Braces Stainless steel, Nitinol
- Cements/resins acrylate based polymers
- Bridges Resin, composite, metal (Au, CoCr)
12Motivation to replace teeth
- Prevent loss in root support and chewing
efficiency - Prevent bone resorption
- Maintain healthy teeth
- Cosmetic
-
13Amalgams/Fillings
- An amalgam is an alloy in which one component is
mercury (Hg) - Hg is liquid at RT- reacts with silver and tin-
forms plastic mass that sets with time - Takes 24 hours for full set (30 min for initial
set).
14Thermal expansion concerns
- Thermal expansion coefficient
- ? ?L/(Lo?T)
- ? ? ?T
- Volumetric Thermal expansion coefficient
- V 3?
15Volume Changes and Forces in Fillings
- Consider a 2mm diameter hole which is 4mm in
length in a molar tooth, with thermal variation
of ?T 50C - ?amalgam 25x10-6/C ?resin 81x10-6 /C
?enamel 8.3 x10-6 /C - E amalgam 20 GPa E resin 2.5 GPa
- ?V Vo x 3? x ?T
- ?Vamalgam p (1mm) 2 x 4mm x 3 (25-8.3) x10-6 x
50 - 0.03 mm3
- ?Vresin 0.14 mm3
- (1-d) F E x ?? x Afilling
- F E (?T ) ?(?amalgam/resin -
?enamel ) x p/4D2 - F amalgam 52 N S F/Ashear2.1 MPa
- F resin 29 N S 1.15 MPa
- Although the resin expands 4x greater than the
amalgam, the reduced stiffness (modulus) results
in a lower force
16Volume Changes and Forces in Fillings(cont.)
- F amalgam 52 N S F/Ashear2.1 MPa
- F resin 29 N S 1.15 MPa
- Recall that tensile strength of enamel and dentin
are - sf,dentin35 MPa (worst case)
- sf,enamel7 MPa (distribution)
- From Mohrs circle, max. principal stress S
- -SF3.5! (What is SF for 3mm diameter?)
- - Is the change to resin based fillings
advisable? What are the trade-offs? - - We havent considered the hoop effect, is it
likely to make this worse? - - If KIc1 MPam1/2 , is fracture likely?
17Environment for implants
- Chewing force can be up to 900 N
- Cyclic loading Large temperature differences (50
C) - Large pH differences (saliva, foods)
- Large variety of chemical compositions from food
- Crevices (natural and artificial) likely sites
for stress corrosion
18Structural Requirements
- Fatigue resistance
- Fracture resistance
- Wear resistance
- Corrosion resistance
- While many dental fixtures are not inside the
body, the environment (loading, pH) is quite
severe
19Titanium implants
- Titanium is the most successful implant/fixation
material - Good bone in-growth
- Stability
- Biocompatibility
20Titanium Implants
- Implanted into jawbone
- Ti6Al4V is dominant implant
- Surface treatments/ion implantation improve
fretting resistance
- Osseointegration was coined by Brånemark, a
periodontic professor/surgeon - First Ti integrating implants were dental
(1962-1965)
21Titanium Biocompatibility
- Bioinert
- Low corrosion
- Osseointegration
- Roughness, HA
22Fatigue
- Fatigue is a concern for human teeth (1 million
cycles annually, typical stresses of 5-20 MPa) - The critical crack sizes for typical masticatory
stresses (20 MPa) of the order of 1.9 meters. - For the Total Life Approach, stresses (even after
accounting for stress concentrations) well
below the fatigue limit (600 MPa) - For the Defect Tolerant Approach, the Paris
equation of da/dN (m/cycle) 1x10-11(DK)3.9 used
for lifetime prediction. - Crack sizes at threshold are 1.5 mm (detectable).
23Fatigue Properties of Ti6Al4V
24(No Transcript)
25Structural failures
- Stress (Corrosion) Cracking
- Fretting (and corrosion)
- Low wear resistance on surface
- Loosening
- Third Body Wear
26(No Transcript)
27Design Issues
-
- Internal taper for easy fitting
- Careful design to avoid stress concentrations
- Smooth external finish on the healing cap and
abutment - Healing cap to assist in easy removal
28Surgical Process for Implantation
- Drill a hole with reamer appropriate to
dimensions of the selected implant at location
of extraction site
29Temporary Abutment
- Place temporary abutment into implant
30Insertion
- Insert implant
- with temporary abutment attached into prepared
socket
31Healing
- View of temporary abutment after the healing
period (about 10 weeks)
32Temporary Abutment Removal
- Temporary abutment removal after healing period
- Implant is fully osseointegrated
33Healed tissue
- View of soft tissue before insertion of permanent
abutment
34Permanent Crown Attached
- Abutment with all-ceramic crown integrated
- Adhesive is dental cement
35Permanent Abutment
- Insert permanent abutment with integrated crown
into the well of the implant
36Completed implant
- View of completed implantation procedure
- Compare aesthetic results of all-ceramic
submerged implant with adjacent protruding metal
lining of non-submerged implant
37Post-op
- Post-operative radiograph with integrated
abutment crown in vivo
38Clinical (service) Issues
- The space for the implant is small, dependent on
patient anatomy/ pathology - Fixation dependent on
- Surface
- Stress (atrophy)
- Bone/implant geometry
- Simulation shows partial fixation due to design
- (Atrophy below 1.5 MPa)
Vallaincourt et al., Appl. Biomat. 6 (267-282)
1995
39Clinical Issues
- Stress is a function of diameter, or remaining
bone in ridge - Values for perfect bond
- Areas small
- Fretting
- Bending
40Clinical Issues
- Full dentures may use several implants
- Bending of bridge, implants
- Large moments
- Fatigue!
- Complex combined stress
- FEA!
FBD
41Clinical Issues
- Outstanding issues
- Threads or not?
- More surface area, not universal
- Immediately loaded
- Drilling temperature necrosis
- Graded stiffness
- Material or geometry
- Outcomes 80-95 success at 10-15 yrs.
- Many patient-specific and design-specific problems
42Comparison with THR
43Comparison with THR
- Compare
- Stress shielding
- Graded stiffness/ integration
- Small bone section about implant
- Modular Ti design
- Morbidity
- Contrast
- Small surface area
- Acidic environment
- Exposure to bacteria
- Multiple implants
- Variable anatomy
- Complicated forces
- Cortical/ trabecular
- Optional