Dental Tissues and their Replacements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Dental Tissues and their Replacements

Description:

While many dental fixtures are not 'inside' the body, the environment (loading, ... Adhesive is dental cement. Permanent Abutment ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:307
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: lisap4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dental Tissues and their Replacements


1
Dental Tissues and their Replacements
2
Issues
  • Dental decay
  • Periodontal disease
  • Movement of teeth (orthodontics)
  • Restorative treatments
  • Thermal expansion issues related to fillings
  • Fatigue and fracture of teeth and implants

3
(No Transcript)
4
Marshall et al., J. Dentistry, 25,441, 1997.
5
Tissue Constituents
  • Enamel-hardest substance in body-calcium
    phosphate salts-large apatite crystals
  • Dentin-composed largely of type-I collagen
    fibrils and nanocrystalline apatite
    mineral-similar to bone
  • Dentinal tubules-radiate from pulp
  • Pulp-richly vascularized connnective tissue
  • Cementum-coarsely fibrillated bonelike substance
    devoid of canaliculi
  • Periodontal Membrane-anchors the root into
    alveolar bone

6
ENAMEL
  • 96mineral, 1 protein lipid, remainder is water
    (weight )
  • Minerals form Long crystals-hexagonal shape
  • Flourine- renders enamel much less soluble and
    increases hardness
  • HA Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2

40 nm 1000 nm in length
7
DENTIN
  • Type-I collagen fibrils and nanocrystalline
    apatite
  • Dentinal tubules from dentin-enamel and
    cementum-enamel junctions to pulp
  • Channels are paths for odontoblasts
    (dentin-forming cells) during the process of
    dentin formation
  • Mineralized collagen fibrils (50-100 nm in
    diameter) are arranged orthogonal to the tubules
  • Inter-tubular dentin matrix with nanocrystalline
    hydroxyapatite mineral- planar structure
  • Highly oriented microstructure causes anisotropy
  • Hollow tubules responsible for high toughness

8
Structural properties
Park and Lakes, Biomaterials, 1992 and Handbook
of Biomaterials, 1998
9
Structural properties
Note remodeling is primarily strain driven
Park and Lakes, Biomaterials, 1992 and Handbook
of Biomaterials, 1998
10
Dental Biomaterials
  • Amalgams/Fillings
  • Implants /Dental screws
  • Adhesives/Cements
  • Orthodontics

11
Materials used in dental applications
  • Fillings amalgams, acrylic resins
  • Titanium Ti6Al4V dominates in root implants and
    fracture fixation
  • Teeth Porcelain, resins, ceramics
  • Braces Stainless steel, Nitinol
  • Cements/resins acrylate based polymers
  • Bridges Resin, composite, metal (Au, CoCr)

12
Motivation to replace teeth
  • Prevent loss in root support and chewing
    efficiency
  • Prevent bone resorption
  • Maintain healthy teeth
  • Cosmetic

13
Amalgams/Fillings
  • An amalgam is an alloy in which one component is
    mercury (Hg)
  • Hg is liquid at RT- reacts with silver and tin-
    forms plastic mass that sets with time
  • Takes 24 hours for full set (30 min for initial
    set).

14
Thermal expansion concerns
  • Thermal expansion coefficient
  • ? ?L/(Lo?T)
  • ? ? ?T
  • Volumetric Thermal expansion coefficient
  • V 3?

15
Volume Changes and Forces in Fillings
  • Consider a 2mm diameter hole which is 4mm in
    length in a molar tooth, with thermal variation
    of ?T 50C
  • ?amalgam 25x10-6/C ?resin 81x10-6 /C
    ?enamel 8.3 x10-6 /C
  • E amalgam 20 GPa E resin 2.5 GPa
  • ?V Vo x 3? x ?T
  • ?Vamalgam p (1mm) 2 x 4mm x 3 (25-8.3) x10-6 x
    50
  • 0.03 mm3
  • ?Vresin 0.14 mm3
  • (1-d) F E x ?? x Afilling
  • F E (?T ) ?(?amalgam/resin -
    ?enamel ) x p/4D2
  • F amalgam 52 N S F/Ashear2.1 MPa
  • F resin 29 N S 1.15 MPa
  • Although the resin expands 4x greater than the
    amalgam, the reduced stiffness (modulus) results
    in a lower force

16
Volume Changes and Forces in Fillings(cont.)
  • F amalgam 52 N S F/Ashear2.1 MPa
  • F resin 29 N S 1.15 MPa
  • Recall that tensile strength of enamel and dentin
    are
  • sf,dentin35 MPa (worst case)
  • sf,enamel7 MPa (distribution)
  • From Mohrs circle, max. principal stress S
  • -SF3.5! (What is SF for 3mm diameter?)
  • - Is the change to resin based fillings
    advisable? What are the trade-offs?
  • - We havent considered the hoop effect, is it
    likely to make this worse?
  • - If KIc1 MPam1/2 , is fracture likely?

17
Environment for implants
  • Chewing force can be up to 900 N
  • Cyclic loading Large temperature differences (50
    C)
  • Large pH differences (saliva, foods)
  • Large variety of chemical compositions from food
  • Crevices (natural and artificial) likely sites
    for stress corrosion

18
Structural Requirements
  • Fatigue resistance
  • Fracture resistance
  • Wear resistance
  • Corrosion resistance
  • While many dental fixtures are not inside the
    body, the environment (loading, pH) is quite
    severe

19
Titanium implants
  • Titanium is the most successful implant/fixation
    material
  • Good bone in-growth
  • Stability
  • Biocompatibility

20
Titanium Implants
  • Implanted into jawbone
  • Ti6Al4V is dominant implant
  • Surface treatments/ion implantation improve
    fretting resistance
  • Osseointegration was coined by Brånemark, a
    periodontic professor/surgeon
  • First Ti integrating implants were dental
    (1962-1965)

21
Titanium Biocompatibility
  • Bioinert
  • Low corrosion
  • Osseointegration
  • Roughness, HA

22
Fatigue
  • Fatigue is a concern for human teeth (1 million
    cycles annually, typical stresses of 5-20 MPa)
  • The critical crack sizes for typical masticatory
    stresses (20 MPa) of the order of 1.9 meters.
  • For the Total Life Approach, stresses (even after
    accounting for stress concentrations) well
    below the fatigue limit (600 MPa)
  • For the Defect Tolerant Approach, the Paris
    equation of da/dN (m/cycle) 1x10-11(DK)3.9 used
    for lifetime prediction.
  • Crack sizes at threshold are 1.5 mm (detectable).

23
Fatigue Properties of Ti6Al4V
24
(No Transcript)
25
Structural failures
  • Stress (Corrosion) Cracking
  • Fretting (and corrosion)
  • Low wear resistance on surface
  • Loosening
  • Third Body Wear

26
(No Transcript)
27
Design Issues
  • Internal taper for easy fitting
  • Careful design to avoid stress concentrations
  • Smooth external finish on the healing cap and
    abutment
  • Healing cap to assist in easy removal

28
Surgical Process for Implantation
  • Drill a hole with reamer appropriate to
    dimensions of the selected implant at location
    of extraction site

29
Temporary Abutment
  • Place temporary abutment into implant

30
Insertion
  • Insert implant
  • with temporary abutment attached into prepared
    socket

31
Healing
  • View of temporary abutment after the healing
    period (about 10 weeks)

32
Temporary Abutment Removal
  • Temporary abutment removal after healing period
  • Implant is fully osseointegrated

33
Healed tissue
  • View of soft tissue before insertion of permanent
    abutment

34
Permanent Crown Attached
  • Abutment with all-ceramic crown integrated
  • Adhesive is dental cement

35
Permanent Abutment
  • Insert permanent abutment with integrated crown
    into the well of the implant

36
Completed implant
  • View of completed implantation procedure
  • Compare aesthetic results of all-ceramic
    submerged implant with adjacent protruding metal
    lining of non-submerged implant

37
Post-op
  • Post-operative radiograph with integrated
    abutment crown in vivo

38
Clinical (service) Issues
  • The space for the implant is small, dependent on
    patient anatomy/ pathology
  • Fixation dependent on
  • Surface
  • Stress (atrophy)
  • Bone/implant geometry
  • Simulation shows partial fixation due to design
  • (Atrophy below 1.5 MPa)

Vallaincourt et al., Appl. Biomat. 6 (267-282)
1995
39
Clinical Issues
  • Stress is a function of diameter, or remaining
    bone in ridge
  • Values for perfect bond
  • Areas small
  • Fretting
  • Bending

40
Clinical Issues
  • Full dentures may use several implants
  • Bending of bridge, implants
  • Large moments
  • Fatigue!
  • Complex combined stress
  • FEA!

FBD
41
Clinical Issues
  • Outstanding issues
  • Threads or not?
  • More surface area, not universal
  • Immediately loaded
  • Drilling temperature necrosis
  • Graded stiffness
  • Material or geometry
  • Outcomes 80-95 success at 10-15 yrs.
  • Many patient-specific and design-specific problems

42
Comparison with THR
  • Compare
  • Contrast

43
Comparison with THR
  • Compare
  • Stress shielding
  • Graded stiffness/ integration
  • Small bone section about implant
  • Modular Ti design
  • Morbidity
  • Contrast
  • Small surface area
  • Acidic environment
  • Exposure to bacteria
  • Multiple implants
  • Variable anatomy
  • Complicated forces
  • Cortical/ trabecular
  • Optional
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com