Title: Presentation to FWACC 25th October 2000
1Award of 3.4 GHz and10 GHz Licences
FWACC 13th December 2000
2Steve Jones Introduction
3Introduction
- www.radio.gov.uk
- 26th January 2001
4James Kinsley Overview
5Today.
- Overview of Programme to Date.
- Scenarios modelled
- Summary of preliminary findings
- Markets/Revenue Report
- Technical/Costs Report
- Financial/Valuation Report
- Economic Report
- Way forward
6Basic Programme
steering group
Analysis (Stage 2)
Analysis (Stage 4)
Late February!
Industry group
7Licence Scenarios
- Look at a range of business cases
- 48 licence scenarios !!
- Defined generic licence types
- New and existing operators
8Main Licence Scenarios x 6
City
Regional
National
New Venture
Existing operator
9Main Licence Scenarios
- City 9 cities combined area of 4,500 km2
- Regional rest of the country - City area of
240,000 km2 - National City Regional
10Licence Scenarios
- Defined generic licence types
- New and existing operators
- 4 cellular configurations
11Licence Scenarios x 24
City
Regional
National
A B C D
A B C D
A B C D
New Venture
A B C D
A B C D
A B C D
Existing operator
12Licence Scenarios
- Defined generic licence types
- New and existing operators
- 4 cellular configurations
- Basic and optimistic (lucky break) cases
13Licence Scenarios x 48
City
Regional
National
Basic
Basic
Basic
A B C D
A B C D
A B C D
New Venture
Lucky
Lucky
Lucky
Basic
Basic
Basic
A B C D
A B C D
A B C D
Existing operator
Lucky
Lucky
Lucky
14Preliminary Findings (1)Limiting factors
- Size of spectrum - this dictates
- subscriber density that is supportable (i.e.
market share is not really limited by competition
from other access technologies or by subscriber
take-up), and therefore. - ..nature of overall usage (i.e.
infill/complementary) - ..initial targeting of customers
(cherry-picking, because demand is likely to
exceed supply). - upgradeability - an increased hunger for
bandwith from the customer base over time will
effect overall viability of the business case of
the spectrum on offer - number of licences per region (i.e. 1-2)
- Backhaul costs - these are high, unless you use
microwave
15Preliminary Findings (2)Limiting Factors
- Rural areas unattractive to operators
- Banks cautious about lending to sector
- FSA letter sent to banks following review by FSA
of 34 banks exposure to telecoms sector. (FT
8/12/00) - Banks are capping the amount of exposure to this
sector (FT 8/12/00) - banks expect conditions to improve in about 6 - 9
months
16Preliminary Findings (3)City vs Regional vs
National
- Regional licences (i.e. assuming no rural
roll-out) and national licences are viable. - Regional licence is more attractive than National
licence. - City licence is not viable
- high capital costs (i.e. more base stations)
associated with smaller cell radius - assumption of no microwave backhaul
17Preliminary Findings (4)Cellular configurations
- 4 cellular configurations - allows us to model
the relative impact on the main business case
scenarios of different cell radii - lower (infrastructure) costs and lower
(subscriber) revenues - vs
- higher (infrastructure) costs and higher
(subscriber) revenues - NB A B are more profitable than C D
18Preliminary Findings (4)New vs Existing
Operators
- Business cases for new operator and existing
operator are broadly comparable - new operator will have more ambitious aspirations
than existing operators, thus revenues will be
higher, especially in the early years - ...new operator will have a higher cost base,
which goes someway to redress their advantage in
terms of higher revenues
19Preliminary Findings (6)Licence Configuration
- This is clearly critical to the success of the
award programme. - No business case for a combined City licence
- Licence configuration based on (artificial)
geographical boundaries/regions is
inappropriate. - configuration based around a detailed knowledge
of potential subscriber locations, is critical - Further discussion on configuration of licences
later in this presentation.
20Bérangère Mira-Smith Qualitative Market Research
21Progress
- Interviewed a further 10 companies
- Operators
- Eurobell, Internet Central, Balloon-A-Gram
- Manufacturers
- Adaptive broadband, PipingHot Networks,
Tandberg TV - Banks
- Royal Bank of Scotland, Citibank, Deutsche
Bank, and Bank of America
22Industry ViewsServices and target market
- Services
- Always-On/Fast link to the Internet
- Voice telephony
- Market share expectations
- Large operators 10-15
- Small operators 00s or 000s of subscribers
- Target markets
- Primarily SMEs and SOHOs
- High-end residential market
23Industry ViewsOverview of Access Technologies
24Industry ViewsLocation of target market
- Prime location is suburban areas of cities, towns
and business parks - strong competition in city centres (fibre, copper
and in July 2001 ULL) - need to target densely populated areas to achieve
base station fill factor and adequate return - No business case to roll out in rural areas
25Industry ViewsOperators strategies (1)
- For large operators the spectrum will be
complementary to existing portfolio - e.g ASDL other spectrum e.g at 28GHz or 2GHz
and support overall strategy do not put all your
eggs in one basket - Smaller operators will only have FWA
26Industry ViewsOperators strategies (2)
- Rollout approach will
- Start from existing points of presence
- Go where demand/population density is highest
- But above all go where competition is not strong
to establish footprint
27Industry ViewRegulatory licensing matters (1)
- Large operators want a national licence
- Small operators want a regional licence (but
wasteful at boundaries) - The amount of spectrum can only support one
licence holder - Licence duration needs to be 15-20 years
28Industry ViewRegulatory licensing matters (2)
- Some licence clauses would be acceptable, e.g.
- Use It or Lose It
- Rollout clauses with deadlines penalties
- No backhaul on band
- Service clauses would make the licence
unattractive
29Industry ViewsAuction vs Comp. Selection
- Comparative selection is the preferred award
mechanism - auctions might be clear cut but take money out of
the industry - comparative selection has the means to ensure
that the licence will be used - the banking community would not support an auction
30Nicholas Blades Market Scenarios
31Market Revenue Model
- Objectives
- addressable market sizing based on three
geographic areas - cities nine UK urban centres modelled as one
whole - regional remaining UK suburban areas
- coverage assumptions consistent with cost model
- revenues generated
- telephony, Internet access value added
- service take-up tailored to match max. subscriber
density - focus on most profitable subscribers / services
32Model Outputs
- Series of revenue forecasts
- city, regional, whole UK licence
- Consistent assumptions with cost model
- Opex
- interconnect, other CoGS (e.g. CPE
installation) - marketing, SGA costs
- Subscriber forecast for input into cost model
33FWAs Position in the Market
- FWA is small component of overall broadband
market - limited spectrum
- large number of competing service providers
- over 100 service providers for DSL
- cable modem available to 50 of households
34Sensitivities
- Spectrum usage and build assumptions
- limits the services and subscribers which can be
addressed - restricts market share aspirations
- Rollout impact
- denser networks take longer to rollout
- revenues come on stream later
- impact on return?
35Nat - Sensitivity to Build Assumptions
Half spectrum per cell - baseline cell size
Full spectrum per cell - baseline cell size
Half spectrum per cell - reduced cell size
Full spectrum per cell - reduced cell size
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
36Result of Spectrum Allocation
- Lack of spectrum limits the maximum subscriber
density achievable - spectrum driven subscriber density below the
market share objectives assumed for most
scenarios - operators will focus on the highest margin
customers - lower likelihood of small businesses and
residential customers being addressed
37Abdul Ladak Infrastructure Rollout Cost Model
38Stage 2 Work
- Outline Planning and Dimensioning
- Outline Design
- Infrastructure and Rollout Costing
- Radio Modelling
- Further Work - Stage 4
39Outline Planning and Dimensioning
UK Footprint (1991 Census Data) 20,000 Sq. Km
56 Population therefore reasonable to
assume 40,000 Sq. Km 70 Population
40Capacity Planning
Half Spectrum
Full Spectrum
F 7 MHz (3.4 GHz) or 14 MHz (10 GHz)
F 3.5 MHz (3.4 GHz) or 7 MHz (10 GHz)
41Cell Capacity
Assuming 4QAM or QPSK
42Traffic and Services
43Design Models
44Subscribers
45Outline Design ArchitectureDesign Model A
46Outline Design ArchitectureDesign Models C and D
47Lucky Break
- 3.4 GHz and 10 GHz Site Sharing
- Low Site Acquisition Overheads
- Maximised Economies of Scale
- Rock Bottom Equipment Prices
- Increased Microwave Backhaul
- No Dark Fibre Lease
- Discounted Rate for Backbone Bandwidth
48Backhaul Proportions
Normal
Lucky Break
49Radio Modelling - ITU-R 525/526/530
High Resolution (2m) 3D Data City Suburban
Region 1 Suburban Region 2
50Radio Coverage - City
City Centre - Building Height 100m
3.4 GHz
10 GHz
51Radio Coverage - Region
Suburban Region 1 - Building Height 35m
3.4 GHz
10 GHz
52Radio Coverage - Region
Suburban Region 2 - Building Height 32m
10 GHz
53The Way It WorksConceptually
54Radio Modelling - Interference ITU-R 452
3.4 GHz Class 1 Subscriber Antenna
Mask Back-to-Front Ratio or Side and Back Lobes
Reduced by- 0 dB 81 Interference 10
dB 54 Interference 20 dB 2 Interference
55Conclusions and What Next ?
- Cell structure D works.provided..
- Optimum cell radius reduced cell radius
- 16QAM is reasonable
- Target dense subscriber regions
- FDD vs TDD - co-existence
- Access Technologies co-existence
- Spectrum surveys and interference
56Saule Zhonkebayeva Financial Modelling
57Purpose of the financial model
- Examine under what conditions, operators of FWA
licences will have a viable business - Model sensitivities to spectrum allocation
58Financial Modelling
FINANCING Loan repayment term Loan interest
rates Financing Charges
COST DATA Capital Expenditure Licence
Value Operating Costs MARKET
DATA Revenue Direct Costs
FORECAST FINANCIALSTATEMENTS Profit loss
account Balance sheet Sources application of
funds Cash flow
Operating Margin
VALUATION IRR - 18
59Licence Valuation (base case)
City
Regional
National
New Venture
Existing operator
60Licence Valuation (lucky break)
City
Regional
National
New Venture
Existing operator
61Ian Jewitt Economic Analysis
62The Economic Objective
- EV CS PS a x LV
- a gt 0 ?
- Shadow price of funds
- estimated in US at 0.3
- Appropriately Discounted?
- Discount EV at different rate than used in market
and financial models?
63Consumer and Producer Surplus
Price
CS
p
PS
marginal cost
Quantity
q
64Efficient Entry
initial supply
EV ABC
A
P
cost existing
B
C
cost entrant
Q
q1
q2
65Inefficient Entry
initial supply
EV A-B
A
P
cost entrant
B
cost existing
Q
q1
q2
66Modelling Assumptions
- But predicted market shares must be modelled
- Demand and Cost Conditions
- Usual assumptions OFTEL, KPMG, ...
- Linear demand
- Constant Unit Costs
- Strategic Model
- Base model, Cournot competition
67Competition with other means of access.
- The market is for access, it competes with other
products/bandwidth. - Leads to consideration of vertically
differentiated products.
68Number of Licences Competition versus Bandwidth
- Splitting spectrum enhances competition at lower
(bandwidth) end of market. - Possibly at expense of competition at the upper
(bandwidth) end of the market.
69Number of Licences Competition versus Bandwidth
(II)
70Summary of Aims
- Aim to get licences to firms which have lowest
costs of providing access. - To enhance competition.
- Especially in areas where it is currently weak.
- Especially in areas where close substitute
services are not available.
71Nicholas Blades Way Forward and Spectrum Packaging
72Influencing Factors (1)
- Business case
- modelling can point to the key drivers in the
business case - will not cover all of the possible variants
- shows that a business case is possible not that
it will be the one used by any potential bidder - Rollout
- licence clauses and packaging should enable as
wide a roll-out as possible in terms of consumer
coverage, not geographical coverage - avoid sterilising areas containing customer
concentrations that any spectrum package winner
will not address - Spectrum efficiency
- dont break up the licences into too many
packages so that spectrum is wasted
73Influencing Factors (2)
- Market Sentiment
- operators are likely to borrow to pay for both a
licence and the network capex - the level and the terms of lending are critical
to understanding what the financial markets will
support - although analysis may point to one licence value,
this assumes that there is a highly liquid
capital market - Simple and robust process
- the configuration and process should be driven by
the influencing factors - tempered with pragmatic approach to a workable
process - Enhance competition
- not as dominant a requirement in the cities and
suburbs where xDSL and cable modem will provide
choice in the delivery of broadband
74Way ForwardMain Outputs from Stage 5
- Influencing factors
- Inputs from Stage 4 Modelling
Spectrum Package(s)
Delivery Processes
- Allow viable business cases to bid
- Avoid sterilisation of rural areas
- allows rural cases to be explored by the market
Rural White Paper - Efficient spectrum usage
- Simple and robust process
75Five Options for Spectrum Packaging (1)
- National Licences
- one to four depending on whether 3.4 10GHz are
packaged together - Regional (Critical Mass) Licences
- creating areas of critical mass, not just using a
standard regional definition - Hot Spots
- licences for metropolitan areas (cities and
suburbs) have proved viable in the Stage 2
analysis - viability of each hotspot can be tested further
- packages likely to sell? - market test
- further work needed to define approach to rural
areas
76Five Options for Spectrum Packaging (2)
- No sale at present
- reflect market sentiment
- wait until more spectrum is available
- Use for purpose other than FWA
77Stage 4 Modelling
- Model 3.4 GHz and 10 GHz separately
- increase granularity of modelling and focus on a
few likely scenarios, selecting those with
combination of - best business case
- highest EV
- look at impact of inclusion of rural areas, as
well as effect of de-averaged pricing - look at impact of price declines
78Ian Jewitt Award Process
79The Process?
- Variables under consideration are
- Licence Configurations
- Means of Payment
- Conditions on Licences
- Method of Assignment
80The Process? (II)
- Licence Configuration
- National
- Regional
- Other
- Hotspots
- Critical mass
81The Process? (III)
- Means of Payment
- Cash up front?
- Annual fees?
- Royalties?
- Conditions on Licences
- Roll out conditions?
- Penalties
- Credits
- Use-it-or-lose-it?
82The Process? (IV)
- Method of Assignment
- Auction
- pre-qualification?
- sealed tender, ascending open ...
- Comparative Selection
- criteria ...
- Hybrids
- comparative selection with fee as one criteria
- incentives for roll out
- First-come-first-served (in rural areas?)
- Lottery