A CrossLayer Layer 2 3 Handoff Management Protocol for NextGeneration Wireless Systems By Shantidev - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 55
About This Presentation
Title:

A CrossLayer Layer 2 3 Handoff Management Protocol for NextGeneration Wireless Systems By Shantidev

Description:

A Cross-Layer (Layer 2 3) Handoff Management Protocol for. Next ... the GFA for intrasystem and HA for intersystem, this avoids the ping-pong effect. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:167
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 56
Provided by: syy8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A CrossLayer Layer 2 3 Handoff Management Protocol for NextGeneration Wireless Systems By Shantidev


1
A Cross-Layer (Layer 2 3)Handoff Management
Protocol forNext-Generation Wireless
SystemsByShantidev Mohanty and Ian F. Akyildiz,
Fellow, IEEE
  • Presentation By
  • Muhammed Syyid

2
NGWS
  • Next Generation Wireless System
  • Multiple kinds of wireless systems deployed
  • UMTS (WAN)
  • 802.11 (WLAN)
  • Bluetooth (PAN)
  • Satellite (Global)
  • Unification of systems to provide optimal data
    availability

3
NGWS
4
NGWS Design Goals
  • Support for the best network selection
  • Mechanism to ensure high-quality and security
  • Seamless inter-system mobility
  • Scalable architecture (any of wireless systems)
  • QoS provisioning

5
Mobility Management
  • Location Management
  • Track Location of users between consecutive
    communications
  • Handoff Management
  • Keep connections active while moving between base
    stations

6
Handoff in NGWS
7
Handoff in NGWS
  • Horizontal Handoff
  • Link Layer Handoff
  • IntraSystem Handoff
  • Vertical Handoff
  • InterSystem Handoff

8
Current Status
  • Link Layer Handoff
  • Efficient algorithms available in literature
  • InterSystems and IntraSystems Handoff
  • Signaling Delay
  • Packet Loss

9
Goals for Seamless Handoff
  • Minimize Handoff Latency
  • Minimize Packet Loss
  • Limit Handoff Failure
  • Minimize False Handoff Initiation

10
Handoff Protocols By TCP/IP Layer
  • Network Layer
  • Mobile IP
  • Transport Layer
  • TCP-Migrate
  • MSOCKS (Split proxy TCP SPLICE)
  • Modification of SCTP (Stream Control Transmission
    Protocol)
  • SIP

11
Mobile IP
  • Issues
  • Triangular Routing
  • High Global Signaling Load
  • High Handoff Latency
  • Reasons for handoff latency
  • Handoff Requirement Detection
  • Registration at New Foreign Agent (NFA)
  • Proposed Solutions in Literature
  • Triangular Routing
  • Route Optimization
  • High Global Signaling Load / Registration at NFA
  • Hierarchical Mobile IP (HMIP)
  • Cellular IP
  • IDMP
  • HAWAII

12
  • Solution to Handoff Latency due to Requirement
    Detection
  • Use Link Layer Information
  • Calculate probability of Handoff
  • Factors affecting handoff signaling delay
  • Traffic Load on the network
  • Wireless Link Quality
  • Distance between user and home network
  • Users Speed

13
Analysis of Current Systems
  • RSS Received Signal Strength
  • BS Base Station
  • MT Mobile Terminal
  • OBS Old Base Station
  • NBS New Base Station
  • FA Foreign Agent
  • OFA Old Foreign Agent
  • NFA New Foreign Agent
  • Sth The threshold value of RSS to initiate
    handover
  • Sath The Adaptive threshold value of RSS to
    initiate handover
  • Smin The minimum value of RSS required for
    successful communication
  • a Cell Size
  • d Cell Boundary
  • v Speed of MTs movement
  • ? Handoff signaling delay

14
Movement during Handoff
15
Handoff Scenario
  • MT moves with speed v
  • RSS of the OBS decreases continuously
  • RSS drops below Sth at the point P marking cell
    boundary d.
  • RSS lt Sth triggers registration for NFA.
  • Pre-registration messages sent through OBS to NFA
    (must be completed before signal drops below
    Smin)

16
False Handoff
  • At point p, it can move in any direction ? with
    equal probability
  • F(?)1/2? where -? lt ? lt ?
  • Handoff possible only when
  • ??(- ?1, ?1)
  • Where
  • ?1arctan(a/2)/(d)arctan(a/2d)
  • Probability of False Handoff Initiation is

17
  • Using SVt (DistanceVelocity X Time) i.e.
  • tS/V or td/v
  • The largest possible distance to cover while
    travelling to NBS is ?(a/2)2(d)2
  • As velocity increases the time to cover distance
    will decrease
  • When the time to leave the cell falls below the
    handoff signaling delay, handoff will fail
  • Therefore Pf 1

18
  • Using SVt (DistanceVelocity X Time) i.e.
  • tS/V or td/v
  • As velocity increases the time to cover distance
    will decrease
  • While the time to leave the cell is greater then
    handoff signaling delay, handoff will succed
  • When d/v gt ? the handoff will succeed
  • Therefore Pf 0

19
False Handoff Initiation
  • As cell boundary d is increased, the probability
    of false handoff initiation increases (keeping
    cell size a constant)
  • As cell size a is decreased the probability of
    false handoff increases (keeping d constant)
  • Cell sizes are currently trending towards smaller
    size to cope with capacity and improve data
    rates.
  • Hence, value of d must be carefully selected.

20
(No Transcript)
21
Handoff Failure and Speed
  • From the above, handoff failure depends on speed
    (keeping a,d,Sth fixed).
  • As speed increases the probability of failure
    increases
  • For intersystem handoffs the handoff latency is
    higher making it more susceptible to failure

22
  • Increasing the value of d/Sth reduces the
    probability of failure

23
Handoff Failure Signaling Delay
  • The higher the signaling delay the greater the
    probability of failure (over a constant d)
  • The higher the value of d the lower the
    probability of failure for a single value for
    signaling delay
  • Therefore to optimize and minimize handoff
    failure , the distance (and therefore Sth) must
    be adaptive to signaling delay.

24
(No Transcript)
25
Analysis Summary
  • For Fixed value of d(and Sth) handoff failure
    probability increases as MTs speed increases
  • For Fixed value of d(and Sth) handoff failure
    probability increases as handoff signaling delay
    increases
  • Large values of d(and Sth) increase the
    probability of false handoff initiation

26
CHMP
  • Derive information from link layer (2) and
    network layer(3) to create adaptive architecture
  • Titled proposed solution as Cross-Layer (Layer
    23) Handoff Management Protocol or CHMP

27
CHMP Modules
  • Neighbor Discovery Unit
  • Determines BSs neighboring the MTs current BS

28
  • Uses network discovery protocols
  • Speed Estimation Unit
  • Uses VEPSD (Velocity Estimation using the Power
    Spectral Density of RSS) to estimate speed.
  • The doppler frequency is used to determine speed
    v
  • V(c/fc)fm
  • where c speed of light in free space
  • fc carrier frequency of RSS
  • fm maximum doppler frequency
  • Handoff Signaling Delay Estimation Unit
  • Estimates delays associated with
    intra/intersystem handoffs

29
  • Handoff Trigger Unit
  • Collects previously collected and calculated
    information to determine the appropriate time to
    initiate handoff
  • Handoff Execution Unit
  • Triggers the Actual handoff at the appropriate
    time calculated by the Handoff Trigger Unit

30
Operation
31
(No Transcript)
32
Neighborhood Discovery
  • Determine neighbors using the neighbor discovery
    unit.
  • If OBS and NBS have common FA link-layer handoff
    occurs (CHMP is not used)
  • IF OBS and NBS have different FA (intrasystem) or
    belong to different systems (intersystem) CHMP is
    used.

33
Handoff Signaling Delay Estimation
  • Unknown which BS the MT will move to
  • Using the neighborhood discovery step, compile
    list of possible BS/FAs.
  • Send an invalid Authentication Extension message
    to the GFA (for intrasystem) or HA (intersystem).
  • GFA/HA respond with an HMIP Registration Reply
    indicating registration failure.
  • The round trip response time is used to estimate
    the handoff signaling delay.
  • Uses existing HMIP protocol without any extra
    implementation
  • Causes extra signaling overhead but solution
    still improves performance significantly.
  • Alternative delay estimation algorithms available
    in literature if signaling overhead is not
    tolerable.

34
Handoff Anticipation
  • When the RSS continuously decreases, a handoff is
    anticipated
  • Existing movement prediction techniques used to
    estimate the next BS
  • Retrieve estimated signaling delay from the
    Handoff Delay Estimation Unit.

35
Handoff Initiation
  • Estimate optimal moment to initiate handoff
  • Estimate Sath using speed and handoff signaling
    delay estimates.
  • Trigger handoff when RSS lt Sath
  • Sath for intrasystems is referenced as Sath1
  • Sath for intersystems is referenced as Sath2

36
  • Pr(x) Received power at point x
  • Pr depends on various factors, including
    frequency, antenna heights, antenna gains etc
  • d0 is known as reference distance
  • Typical values for d0 are
  • 1 km for macrocells
  • 100 m for outdoor microcells
  • 1m for indoor picocells

37
  • ? is the path loss exponent
  • Depends on cell size and local terrain
    characteristics
  • Typical values range between 3-4 for macro and
    2-8 for microcelluar environments
  • ? is a random variable representing variation in
    Pr(x) due to shadowing
  • Typical value is 8dB
  • Pr(x)Pr(d0)(d0/x)? ?
  • Sath10log10Pr(a-d)

38
Handoff Execution
  • HMIP registration started when the handoff
    trigger is received.
  • After registration the MT is switched to the NBS
  • Simultaneous Binding preserved for a limited time
    by binding CoA of both OFA and NFA to the GFA for
    intrasystem and HA for intersystem, this avoids
    the ping-pong effect.
  • Packets are forwarded to both CoAs
  • If the MT returns to the old BS there is no need
    to carry out HMIP handoff again.
  • If the MT does not return to the old BS, it
    deregisters from the old BS

39
CHMP Location
  • Implemented at MT referred to as Mobile Assisted
    network controlled Hand Off (MAHO)
  • MT implemented components
  • Speed Estimation
  • RSS Measurement
  • Handoff Signaling Delay Estimation
  • Network implemented components
  • Handoff Trigger Unit
  • Handoff Execution Unit
  • Implemented at Network referred to as Network
    Assisted mobile controlled Hand Off (NAHO)
  • Network implemented components
  • Speed Estimation
  • RSS Measurement
  • Handoff Signaling Delay Estimation
  • MT implemented components
  • Handoff Trigger Unit
  • Handoff Execution Unit

40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
Types of Handoffs
  • Intersystem
  • Macro-Inter Between a macro-cellular system and
    another macro-cellular system (Inter_MA_HO)
  • Micro-Inter Between a microcellular system and
    another microcellular system (Inter_MI_HO)
  • Macro-Micro-Inter Between a macro-cellular
    system and a micro-cellular system
    (Inter_MAMI_HO)
  • Micro-Macro-Inter Between a micro-cellular
    system and a macro-cellular system
    (Inter_MIMA_HO)

45
  • Usually Microcellular systems are overlapped
    by macrocellular systems. Therefore for
    Inter_MAMI_HO there is no handoff failure
  • Intrasystem
  • Macro-Intra Between two cells of a
    macro-cellular system (Intra_MA_HO)
  • Micro-Intra Between two cells of a microcellular
    system (Intra_MI_HO)

46
Performance Evaluation
  • Relationship between Sath and Speed

47
  • Sath increases as speed increases
  • That is for a high speed MT handoff should be
    initiated early
  • Sath increases as ? increases
  • When ? is large the handoff must start earlier to
    allow time for registration/handoff to complete
  • In order to compensate for Shadow fading and
    errors in estimation, Sath was increased by 10
    percent

48
  • Relationship between Handoff Failure Probability
    and Speed
  • When MTs speed is known, there is a 70-80
    percent reduction in Handoff Failure Probability
    with CHMP
  • With CHMP in use probability of failure becomes
    independent of speed
  • Comparing the figures for fixed RSS thresholds,
    failure probabilities are different for intra and
    intersystem handoffs
  • This further enhances the case for adaptive
    thresholds

49
(No Transcript)
50
(No Transcript)
51
  • Relationship between Handoff Failure Probability
    of CHMP and Handoff Signaling Delay
  • There is a 70-80 percent reduction in Handoff
    Failure Probability with CHMP compared to fixed
    RSS schemes.
  • With CHMP in use probability of failure becomes
    independent of ?
  • Probability of failure is limited to desired
    values irrespective of speed and variation of
    handoff signaling delay

52
(No Transcript)
53
  • Relationship between False Handoff Initiation
    Probability of CHMP and Speed
  • Fixed value of RSS Threshold Sth is calculated
    such that a user with highest speed is guaranteed
    the desired value of handoff failure probability.
  • Comparatively the adaptive CHMP reduces the false
    handoff initiation probability by 5-15 percent
  • CHMP initiates handoff while preventing an early
    handoff (minimizing false handoff initiation) and
    late handoff (minimize probability of failure)

54
(No Transcript)
55
Conclusions
  • When a fixed value of RSS threshold (Sth) is used
    handoff failure probability increases with an
    increase in speed or handoff signaling delays
  • The adaptive CHMP Protocol estimates speed and
    handoff signaling delay of possible handoffs
    creating a dynamic RSS threshold (Sath)
  • CHMP significantly enhances the performance of
    both intra and intersystem handoffs
  • CHMP reduces the cost associated with false
    handoff initiation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com