From Errors to Stereotypes: Different Levels of Cognitive Models in School Algebra - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

From Errors to Stereotypes: Different Levels of Cognitive Models in School Algebra

Description:

... (Math teacher) ... on teachers' diagnosis activity. Stereotypes of students' competence ... To choose learning activities to work on in priority. Student's ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: lium8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: From Errors to Stereotypes: Different Levels of Cognitive Models in School Algebra


1
From Errors to Stereotypes Different Levels of
Cognitive Models in School Algebra
1
  • Élisabeth DELOZANNE (CRIP5 Paris 5)
  • Christian VINCENT (Math teacher)
  • Brigitte GRUGEON-ALLYS, Lalina COULANGE,
    Jean-Michel GELIS (DIDIREM Paris 7),
  • Jeannine ROGALSKI (Paris 8)

E-learn05
2
Overview
  • The Pépite project
  • Studies on teachers diagnosis activity
  • Stereotypes of students competence in algebra
  • Monitoring learning activities
  • Conclusion

3
The Pépite Project
  • Objective
  • To help teachers diagnose student's competence in
    algebra in order to better regulate learning
  • Multidisciplinary project
  • 3 objectives
  • Diagnostic
  • Learning
  • Dissemination of research results among teachers

4
An educational study(Grugeon 1995, Artigue et
al. 2001)
  • A set of exercises to test students
  • 3 kinds of problems
  • Technical, modeling and interpretation
  • An analysis grid to characterize students' usual
    answers
  • Students profiles
  • A quantitative description
  • Success rates on mastered skills
  • A qualitative description
  • Meaning of letters, algebraic calculus,
    translation between representations and types of
    justification
  • A diagram to describe the flexibility between
    representations
  • Algebraic, numerical, geometric, and natural
    language

5
Pépite software
End-users Students
Teachers Researchers
PÉPIPROF
PÉPIDIAG
Checking by a human
Automatic Coding of each exercice
Automatic Analysis of the whole test
6
Example Blandine
7
Example Aliou
8
Teachers diagnostic activity
  • Diagnosis
  • Focused on the class or a group of students
    rather than on individual students
  • Often expressed in categories of students
  • Overall achievement Good quick, average
    quick, average slow, students with many
    difficulties
  • Well-known errors
  • Closely linked with action
  • Especially experienced teachers
  • Pépite interesting but too demanding
  • It reveals "hidden knowledge"
  • Difficulty of computer access, too much time
    required to administer the test, not enough
    support for teachers to capitalize on the results
    of the diagnosis

9
Using Pépite What teachers asked for ?
  • Remediation proposals according to profiles
  • A cognitive geography for the whole class
  • Grouping of students

10
Monitoring learning activities for the whole
class
  • Problem an articulation between
  • Catering for individual students
  • Whole class management
  • Objective Grouping of students
  • Based on an accurate didactical analysis of the
    algebraic competence
  • Supported by technology
  • How to do it?
  • Stereotypes of students profiles
  • Learning situations linked with stereotypes

11
Stereotypes
  • Objective
  • Conceptual tools to articulate personalization
    and whole class management
  • Definition
  • Stereotype a class of students personal
    cognitive profiles
  • How are they used in the project?
  • To present a single students diagnosis
  • The stereotype it belongs to
  • The students personal features
  • To propose adapted learning situations
  • Stereotypes
  • To choose learning activities to work on in
    priority
  • Student's personal features
  • To tune parameters to activities

12
Blandine's Stereotype Personal features
UA3, T3, AC3
13
Anissa'sStereotype Personal features
14
Cognitive geography of the class
15
Stereotypes and teaching strategies
  • Step 1 to destabilize erroneous rules
  • Counter-examples with numbers (T3) or surface
    areas of geometrical figures (T2)
  • Expressions
  • CA3 a²2a 5 3a 8a etc.
  • CA2 a²b² (ab)² etc.
  • Step 2 to re-build knowledge
  • UA3 task of generalization or proof in order to
    make sense of letters
  • UA2 to write equations and to solve them
  • Step 3 to use algebra in different contexts

16
Conclusion
  • Stereotypes
  • Based on an accurate didactical analysis of the
    domain
  • Supported by technology
  • As a way for grouping students and to organize
    learning activities in a classroom that fit to
    the students' personal cognitive profiles
  • Experiments are currently in progress to evaluate
    these teaching strategies
  • We observe that teachers need time to appropriate
    these tools in their daily practices
  • Future design of learning environments
  • Automatically tune the parameters to the
    student's personal features

17
Web sites
  • Software download and research documents
  • http//pepite.univ-lemans.fr
  • Documents for teachers (in French)
  • http//maths.creteil.iufm
  • (formation continue, la compétence algébrique du
    collège au lycée)
  • Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com