Title: The Impact of the Low Cost Revolution
1(No Transcript)
2(No Transcript)
3The Impact of the Low Cost Revolution
AOA Annual Conference
Professor Rigas Doganis Rigas Doganis and
Associates Visiting Professor Cranfield
University
14 November 2006
4EUROPEAN LOW COST CARRIERSAnnual Growth in
Pass-Kms 2000-2004
Geographical Europe plus domestic N.B. 2003
growth includes purchases of Go (easyJet) and
Buzz (Ryanair)
5Operating Profit or Loss 2005 Intra-European
and domestic operations
6Cost Advantage of European Low-Cost Carriers on
short-haul routes
- Cost Cost
- Reduction per Seat
- CONVENTIONAL SCHEDULED CARRIER 100
- LOW-COST CARRIER
- Operating advantages
- Higher seating density -16 84
- Higher aircraft utilisation - 2 82
- Lower flight and cabin crew costs - 3 79
- Cheaper secondary airports - 4 75
- Outsourced maintenance/Single aircraft type -
2 73
Source Rigas Doganis Airline Business in the
21st Century, pub. Routledge, 2005
7AVERAGE DAILY UTILISATION Airbus 319(2005 Year
Round)
- i.e. 4 easyJet aircraft do the work of 5 BA
aircraft or 5.5 Alitalia
8Pushing the limits Ryanair's five B 737-800s
at Rome Ciampino - 2005
Average utilisation 5 aircraft 1356 hours per
day
9Short-haul pilot productivity - Europe 2002
Network average, short-haul pilots AF, BA, IB,
LH and SK Low-cost average for Buzz, DBA,
easyJet, Germania and Ryanair Source Compiled
using data from European Cockpit Association
10Cost Advantage of European Low-Cost Carriers on
short-haul routes
- Cost Cost
- Reduction per Seat
- CONVENTIONAL SCHEDULED CARRIER 100
- LOW-COST CARRIER
- Operating advantages
- Higher seating density -16 84
- Higher aircraft utilisation - 2 82
- Lower flight and cabin crew costs - 3 79
- Cheaper secondary airports - 4 75
- Outsourced maintenance/Single aircraft type -
2 73
Source Rigas Doganis Airline Business in the
21st Century, pub. Routledge, 2005
11Cost Advantage of European Low-Cost Carriers
(continued)
Cost Cost per Reduction Seat
CONVENTIONAL SCHEDULED CARRIER 100 LOW
COST CARRIER (operating advantages) -
27 73 Product/Service Features Minimal
station costs/outsourced handling - 7 66
No free in-flight catering - 6 61
Marketing differences No agents
commissions - 6 55 Reduced
sales/reservation costs - 3 52 Other
advantages Smaller administration -
3 49 Assumes 100 per cent direct sales and
none through agents
12Total Operating Costs on Intra-European Services
in 2005
13Unit Costs (Euro cents per ASK) on European plus
Domestic Services of Scheduled Airlines 2005
14Impact of Seat Factor on Unit CostsIntra-Europea
n Services 2005
15Revenue advantages of low-cost carriers
- Simple fare structure and sales in only one or
two currencies facilitates yield management - All revenue in advance - if 100 direct sales
- No yield dilution from multi-sector tickets
- No refunds for cancellations
- High ancillary revenues from
- on board food sales
- ticket changes
- cross sales on website (e.g. hotel commisions)
- e.g. 2004-05 Ryanair ancillary profits Euro
7.55 per pax or c 40 of profits
BUT no freight revenue or costs!
16easyJet's yield management London (Luton) -
Nice in January 2005
N.B. Fares did not include taxes which were
14.50 for a round trip
17Market stimulation Mature market
London to Barcelona Scheduled Traffic
(1997-2005)
Ryanair (STN-GRO, LTN-GRO, LTN-REU, STN-REU)
easyJet (LTN,LGW,STN-BCN)
Iberia
British Airways
Source UK CAA
18Market stimulation Secondary market
London to Valencia Scheduled Traffic (1997-2005)
Ryanair (STN-VLC)
easyJet (STN,LGW-VLC)
Iberia
British Airways
Source UK CAA
easyJet started STN-VLC on 3 November 2004,
LGW-VLC on 1 March 2005
19(No Transcript)
20IMPACT OF "LOW COSTS" on PRICINGe.g. Return Fare
on London-Toulouse (US)(Prices requested 6
weeks before)
operated by British European
21Airline Shares London-Italy Markets 2005
Ryanairs Share London Italy was 43
Alitalia only flies LON-Rome Milan 18 by
third LCC
22 Total scheduled seats to other EU states
or domestic offered by low-cost carriers - Sept
2006
23What Low-Cost Carriers need from Airports
- ?Fast turn-rounds require
- efficient uncongested taxiway system and
operations - pre-boarding zones for fast boarding
- dedicated gates and high gate utilisation
- Rapid ground-handling with competing providers
- Grab and go shopping concept
- No airbridges short walk to aircraft
- ?LCCs Do not require
- airline lounges
- in-flight catering
- baggage/pax transfer system
- large airline lounges
- Old airports are over-designed
- But low airport charges critical
-
24Risks to the Low Cost Model in Europe
- ? Increasing face-to-face competition between
low cost carriers - ? Too rapid growth leads to over-capacity
- ? Charter airlines hit back - "dynamic
packaging"? - Upward pressure on costs?
- as airlines increase in size
- as labour/airport agreements unwind
- Pax become more demanding!
- need for product improvements
25What can Conventionals learn from Low-Cost
Carriers?
Product Simplify fare structure Sell direct -
mainly via internet Single class cabin No free
meals -- but sell on board eg Iberia Operations
Higher seat densities on short haul Reduce
aircraft types in fleet, e.g. Aer
Lingus Simplify network reduce hubbing Faster
turn-rounds More flexible labour
practices Minimum cabin crew Maximise pilot
hours More out-sourcing fewer suppliers
26Can legacy carriers reduce the unit cost
advantage of LCCs?
Network Model imposes higher costs Two-class
cabin Connecting passengers and bags More ground
staff Passenger lounges Slower turn-rounds More
expensive airports Higher Staffing
levels Out-dated work rules More expensive
distribution (e.g. agents and GDSs) Some
in-flight catering Mixed fleets
27Can legacy carriers respond to low-cost threat?
- Four choices
- Match LCC costs - but difficult to close gap eg
Aer Lingus - Transform themselves into LCC
- i.e. Independence Air, US Air/America West, Duo
- Spin off a low-cost subsidiary, e.g. Jetstar,
(Qantas)or Tiger (SIA), but few succeed Buzz ,
Go, Snowflake, Song - Refocus on long-haul markets and
reduce/outsource short-haul
28Southwest dominates its major markets
- Largest carrier in 90 of SW's top 100 OD markets
- 65 share of its top 100 OD markets (second
largest American with 7) - 77 share of intra-Texas traffic
- 71 share of intra-California traffic
Will Europe , India and S.E.Asia go same way?
Source Debbie Ackerman Geneva Aviation Forum,
February 2004
29Future Shape of European Airline Industry ???
- ? 3-5 Long-haul Network Dominators
- ? Low-cost Service Providers
- - No Frills (2 to 3 majors)
- - Charters (2 to 3 majors in Europe)
- ? Niche Carriers
- - Regional or national
- - Cargo and Integrators
30 For these and other current issues see new 2006
edition of The Airline Businessby Rigas
Doganis Publisher Routledge, UK, and
available throughwww.amazon.co.uk