Aging - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Aging

Description:

Optimizing Consumer Access, Creating Systems Change. Virginia Dize, NASUA ... and referral system that serves as the virtual doorway to the service system. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: Virgin6
Category:
Tags: aging | create | family | virtual

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Aging


1
Aging Disability Resource Centers (ADRCs)
  • Optimizing Consumer Access, Creating Systems
    Change
  • Virginia Dize, NASUA
  • National Aging and Disability
  • IR/A Symposium
  • June 7, 2005

2
Why organize access to the long term care
system?
  • The coming age wave
  • Increasing demand for institutional alternatives
    from consumers and caregivers
  • Control/reduce Medicaid spending
  • Improve effectiveness and efficiency

3
Efforts to streamline entry to Long Term Care
may include
  • Adoption of no wrong door philosophy
  • Developing a consumer-centered one-stop
    Information Referral /Assistance resource system
  • Bringing together administration of the range of
    long term care service programs, including Older
    Americans Act, Medicaid waiver, state-funded
    HCBS, etc.
  • Obtaining an Aging and Disability Resource Center
    grant
  • Establishment of a single entry point

4
No wrong door philosophy
  • Focuses on seamless access to services no matter
    how or where consumers first encounter the
    service system. Information is the core
    function.
  • Brings together service programs, funding
    streams.
  • Information technology is a key to success.
  • No wrong door philosophy may be applied in an
    information and referral system that serves as
    the virtual doorway to the service system.

5
Consumer-Centered One-Stop Aging Information
System
  • Comprehensive information on the full range of
    services and supports
  • Responsive to ensure consumers have access to the
    information they need to make fully informed
    decisions
  • Coordination Integration - Linkages
  • Knowledge Building harness and share the
    collective knowledge base

6
Administration of the Range of Long Term Care
  • Objectives
  • Respond to the wishes of older people and their
    families
  • Reduce/control Medicaid spending
  • Decrease nursing home use/increase availability
    of HCBS
  • Organized effort to reduce waiting lists

7
Administration of the Range of Long Term Care
  • Hallmarks
  • Consumer-centered and responsive
  • Comprehensive
  • Flexible
  • Efficient
  • Effective

8
Aging Network Role in HCBS
  • In addition to OAA programs, 51 SUAs administer
    state-funded HCBS programs
  • 33 SUAs administer Medicaid HCBS Waiver programs
    (AL, AR, CA, CT, DE, FL, GA, IL, IN, KS, KY, ME,
    MD, MA, MN, MO, NV, NH, NJ, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA,
    RI, SD, TN, UT, VT, WA, WV, WI, WY)
  • AAAs in 23 (of 46 states with AAAs) provide case
    management and/or other Waiver services (AL, AR,
    GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, MD, MA, MI, MS, MO, MT,
    NE, NJ, OH, PA, TN, VT, VA, WA, WI)

9
Aging Network Role in HCBS
  • 23 SUAs have administrative responsibilities for
    2001, 2003 2004 Real Choice/Systems Change
    Grants (AL, AK, AR, CO, CT, DE, GA, IN, KS, LA,
    MN, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, ND, OH, OK, SC, VT, WI,
    WY)
  • SUAs administered 2 of the 3 original Cash and
    Counseling Demonstration Projects (AR, FL) and
    serve as the lead agencies for 5 of the 11 new
    projects (AL, NM, VT, WA WV)

10
Single Entry Points
  • Provide information
  • Streamline application processes
  • Address eligibility
  • Monitor/oversee services

11
Potential Functions of Single Entry Points
  • Information and referral (42)
  • Screening (38)
  • Assessment (41)
  • Functional Eligibility (38)
  • Financial Eligibility (17)
  • Care plan development (43)
  • Service authorization (41)
  • Monitoring (43)
  • Reassessments (41)
  • Protective Services (9)
  • Other resource development advocacy tracking
    waiting lists ombudsman services

12
32 States with 43 SEPs
  • Arizona Maine
  • California Maryland
  • Colorado Massachusetts
  • Connecticut Michigan
  • Delaware Minnesota
  • District of Columbia
  • Florida Missouri
  • Georgia Montana
  • Hawaii Nebraska
  • Illinois New Hampshire
  • Indiana New Jersey
  • Kansas North Carolina
  • North Dakota
  • Ohio
  • Oregon
  • Pennsylvania
  • South Carolina
  • South Dakota
  • Tennessee
  • Vermont
  • Washington
  • Wisconsin

13
Aging Disability Resource Centers
  • Awareness highly visible and trusted resource
  • Information and Assistance - one-stop shop in
    the community to support decision-making
  • Integrated Access - single entry point to
    publicly funded system, streamlined eligibility
    processes, linkages to private pay resources and
    providers

14
Aging DisabilityResource Centers
  • Serve people with disabilities of all ages and
    income levels of identified target groups
  • Shift the institutional bias
  • Meaningful involvement of consumers

15
Aging and Disability Resource Centers
16
Entry Point System Decisions
  • Population served
  • Geographic area
  • Access functions information, application,
    eligibility

17
INFORMATION
  • Can a consumer identify the programs and services
    that she/he may qualify for? Who provides it?
  • Does the public know about programs and options?
  • -Publicity, web sites, brochures, etc.
  • Is information provided to everyone?
  • How easy is it to access information?
  • Is information complete, in clear and
    understandable language, and in alternative
    formats?

18
APPLICATION
  • Is the application process simple and
    coordinated? Who controls it?
  • Can you apply for all services at one site?
  • Must you go to one designated site or can
    multiple sites help you apply for the range of
    service options?
  • What assistance is available to help you complete
    an application?

19
ELIGIBILITY
  • Do eligibility rules support home and community
    based care? Who controls it?
  • Are financial eligibility requirements the same
    for HCBS and nursing home care?
  • Are financial eligibility rules based on
    realistic standards for enabling consumers to
    live in the community and meet their everyday
    needs?
  • Can financial eligibility for HCBS be as easily
    established as nursing home eligibility?
  • Is a standardized assessment tool used to
    determine functional eligibility for HCBS and
    nursing home care?
  • Are the consumers ability to provide self-care
    and preferences regarding the help they need
    taken into consideration in the assessment
    process?

20
References
  • Aging and Disability Resource Centers.
    www.aoa.gov www.adrc-tae.org
  • The Consumer Direction Tool Kit.
    www.consumerdirection.org
  • 40 Years of Leadership The Dynamic Role of State
    Units on Aging. Will be posted at www.nasua.org
  • No Wrong Door A Discussion Paper, by Lee
    Bezanson, susan Reinhard and Darrell Jones.
    Unpublished paper.
  • Single Entry Points Systems State Survey
    Results. www.hcbs.org
  • Vision 2010 and Designing the Aging Information
    Resource System of Tomorrow The Vision 2010
    Self-Assessment Guide. www.nasua.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com