Title: Nanotechnology and its Impact on the SH
1Nanotechnology and its Impact on the SHE
Profession
- Presented by Robert C. Adams, MS, CIH, CSP
- ENVIRON International Corporation
- Princeton NJ
2Overview
- Nanotechnology a primer
- Applications for nanomaterials
- Types of engineered nanomaterials
- Managing Uncertainty The concern for
nanoparticles - Toxicological studies
- Health issues
- Safety issues
- Environmental issues
- Engineering, PPE and administrative controls
- Current thinking on traditional control methods
- Moving forward with SHE management what to do
now
3Nanotechnology
- Terminology
- Nano - A prefix meaning one billionth
(1/1,000,000,000) - Nanotechnology
- Research and development of materials at the
atomic, molecular or macromolecular levels, - Approximately 1 - 100 nanometer range.
- Embraces a wide range of applications and
products - Little agreement on the terminology
- Nanomaterial any material that contains a
certain proportion, or is composed entirely of,
nanoparticles
4Nanotechnology
- Terminology (cont)
- Nanoparticle - nanometer-scale particles that are
initially produced as aerosols or colloidal
suspensions - Nanotubes
- single-wall carbon nanotube
- multi-wall carbon nanotubes
5Nanotechnology
- Terminology (cont)
- Nanowires
- Small conducting or semi-conducting nanoparticles
with a single crystal structure and a typical
diameter of a few 10s of nanometers and a large
aspect ratio. - Quantum Dots
- Nanoparticles made up of hundreds to thousands of
atoms that behave like a single gigantic atom.
6Source Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office
of Science, U.S. Department of Energy
7Materials used as light-emitting diodes with the
color determined by the size of the quantum
dots Source Phillips
Carbon Nanotubes Source BBC News July 29, 2004
8Model of a C-60 Buckminster Fullerene (Buckyball)
Silver nanowire 50nm thick, 100nm wide and 5µm
long Source Quantronics
9Nanotechnology
- Purposely engineered materials and devices that
demonstrate new, unique and non-scalable
properties and behavior due to their size and
configuration - Will use nanoparticle in all further discussions
10Why Nanoparticles?
- Nanoparticles follow classical laws of physics
- Follow quantum physics
- Can assume different physical, optical,
electrical or magnetic properties - Nanoparticles have greater ratio of surface area
to mass - Greater reactivity with other substances
11Applications for Nanoparticles
- Nanotechnology is in the pre-competitive stage
but - Nanoparticles are here now!
- Bumpers on cars
- Paints and coatings
- Stain-free clothing and mattresses
- Burn and wound dressings
- Ink
- Protective and glare-reducing coatings for
eyeglasses and windshields - Metal-cutting tools
- Sunscreens and cosmetics
- Longer-lasting tennis balls and light-weight,
stronger tennis racquets
12Managing Uncertainty
- What do we know about these nanoparticles?
- What dont we know?
- Does the nature of nanoparticles present new
safety and health risks? - What are the potential risks and what is the
magnitude? - We know very little about health effects (though
many are laying the foundation)
13Managing Uncertainty
- What are (or could be) the
- Occupational health effects
- Safety hazards and
- Environmental impacts?
14Managing Uncertainty
- What can be expected concerning regulating
nanotechnology risks? - There are no laws in the US currently regulating
nanotechnology - What additional pressures will drive SHE efforts
- Insurance
- Investors
- Litigation
- Moral and ethical obligations to the workforce
and community
15Managing Uncertainty
- What prudent steps are needed to manage the
uncertainty? - Currently, SHE programs are in the early stages
of development - Now is the time to define needs
16Managing Uncertainty
- Bottom Line
- Can we achieve the promises of nanotechnology
while minimizing potential risks?
17Workplace Issues
- Current workforce mixed
- RD operations
- Technology-based
- Large numbers of small facilities and labs
- Universities and small enterprises
18Workplace Issues
19Workplace Issues
- Explosive growth projected in commercialization
of nanotechnology - Hundreds of thousands of new and redefined jobs
- Increasing shift toward piloting and ramping-up
production operations - Full-scale production is projected to take years
20Workplace Issues
- Employees in all areas will have potential for
exposure - Workforce is on the front line
- Appropriate controls available?
- Methods to measure exposure?
21Toxicological Issues
- Properties of nanoparticles that will influence
toxicity - Particle size
- Key factor in where particles deposit in the lung
- May influence ability of nanoparticles to
translocation to other organs - Composition/Structure
- Presence of heavy metals (nickel, beryllium,
aluminum, etc.) - Carbon nanotubes may exert different effects than
carbon nanoparticles
22Toxicological Issues
- Properties of nanoparticles that will influence
toxicity (cont) - Solubility
- Soluble particles can dissolve in moist tissues
- Insoluble particles may be cleared from the lungs
or may translocate to other organs - Surface area/structure
- Smaller particles greater surface area
- More chemical reactivity
- More sites for cell/protein interaction
- Oxidative stress?toxicity, DNA damage, tumors
23Toxicological Issues
- Scientific basis of toxicology, epidemiology
(exposure assessment and risk evaluation) lagging
behind - Inherently slower
- Long-term effects subject to long latency periods
- Production could outpace protections
- Not all materials will be problematic
24Toxicological Risks
- Potential for increased absorption?
- Increased absorption and penetration of
biological barriers - Ability to reach deep airways
- Systemic distribution
- Penetrate blood-brain barrier
- Potential for new toxicities from engineered
nanomaterials?
25Toxicity Research
- Relatively few studies on engineered
nanomaterials - In vitro, isolated cells or tissues
- Short-term animal studies, mostly rodents
- Direct introduction to the lungs
- Studies on related materials
- Metal fume
- Ultrafine particulates (esp. beryllium)
- Mineral fibers
26Toxicity Research
27Limitations of Current Data
- No studies greater than 3 months duration
- No dose-response data
- No developmental/reproductive studies
- No chronic bioassays
- Not possible to set health protective limits
without assumptions about toxicity relative to
that of the same macro-scale material
28Industrial Hygiene Issues
- Exposure Metrics
- Exposure Monitoring
- Ventilation Control
- Personal Protective Equipment
- Respiratory Protection
29Exposure Metrics
- Nanoparticles may not be suitable for comparison
to traditional exposure metrics - Mass based metrics may understate exposures
- Particle number and/or surface area metrics may
be a more reliable indicator of exposure
30Exposure Metrics
- Some consideration of particle size fractions may
be relevant - Number of particles less than 100 nm 50 nm 10
nm - One type metric may not be suitable for all
31Exposure Metrics
- Current research related to beryllium exposure
and prevalence of disease indicates traditional
metrics (mass per unit volume) may not be
protective - Alternative metrics based on particle size,
particle number, or particle surface area may be
more indicative of risk
32Exposure Monitoring
- If traditional exposure metrics are not
applicable, traditional monitoring methods will
not be viable to assess exposure - What Do You Measure?
33Exposure Monitoring
- There are limited air sampling methods
- Real time particle counters / particle sizers
- Cascade impactors in the nanoparticle range
- High resolution TEM
34Three stage nanoparticle cascade impactor capable
of proving three particle size fractions - 32,
18 and 10 nm. Source MSP Corporation
Condensation particle counter capable of
measuring particles to 10 nm. Source TSI
35Exposure Monitoring
- Traditional filter/gravimetric methods cannot be
used - 1 µm particle weighs 1,000,000 times more than a
10 nm particle - Larger particles mask the weight of nanoparticles
- Mass concentration must be inferred from measured
size distribution number concentration
36Exposure Monitoring
- An ideal sampler would be able to measure
particle surface area and particle number within
several size fractions - Such a sampler is not currently available
- Most likely monitoring will require using
combinations of instruments - Costs are significant
37Exposure Monitoring
- Personal sampling techniques not readily
available - Current research on cutting edge beryllium
sampling methods may lead to methods that may
have application to nanoparticles - Additional study is needed to more fully
characterize and validate the sampling
methodologies
38Considerations for Control
- Nanoparticle behavior will influence control
approaches - Behave more like gases
- migrate from areas of highest concentration
- May agglomerate
- Gravitational settling much slower than other
particle types - May widely disperse
- Re-suspension may be a concern
39Considerations for Control
- Ultrafine particles in mixtures have been a
concern for SHE professionals - Diesel exhaust fumes
- Welding fumes
- Carbon black
- Dust created in the destruction of the WTC
(including asbestos and silica)
40Considerations for Control
- Applications of exhaust ventilation
- Nanoparticles may present the following
challenges - Effectiveness of filtration
- Design of hoods and enclosures
- Capture and transport velocities
- Current thinking is that conventional local
exhaust ventilation approaches should work - Design must consider both gaseous and particulate
behavior
41Considerations for Control
- Design and installation of ventilation systems
based on controlling gas and particulate will
provide prudent first steps for worker protection - E.g. fine wood dust particulates, welding fumes
and vapors from stationary sources - Application of design principals based on ACGIH
Ventilation Manual
42Considerations for Control
- Use of respiratory protection
- Nanoparticles may present the following
challenges - Filtration of ultrafine particulates
- Criticality of facial seal for negative pressure
respirators - Effectiveness of positive pressure respirators
- Appropriateness of fit factors or protection
factors
43Considerations for Control
- Current thinking is that modern respiratory
protection technology is sufficient, but more
research is needed - New filter media? New materials of construction?
- Fit testing methods may require further
improvements
44Considerations for Control
- PPE
- Nanoparticles may present the following
challenges - Small sized particles may easily penetrate
traditional knit clothing - Ocular exposure a concern?
- Modern PPE materials of construction will likely
provide protection from all but the smallest
materials - Ocular protection may present some additional
challenges
45Considerations for Control
- SHE professionals will be challenged to
- evaluate dermal exposure pathways
- utilize published guidance in selection of PPE
ensembles - develop implementation schemes
- assess effectiveness of implementation
46Safety Issues
- Fire / Explosion Hazards
- Composition of nanoparticles
- Increased surface area more easily ignited?
- Nanoparticles may persist for longer in the air
- Risk could be either greater or smaller
47Environmental Issues
- Increased concern about releases beyond immediate
application / manufacturing site - Consider potential releases via
- Take-home exposures
- Transport
- Manufacturing waste streams
- Product waste streams
48Environmental Issues
- Available pathways to air, soil or water
- Little is known about the fate of nanoparticles
in the environment - Will such materials be assimilated
- How mobile and persistent
- What breakdown products may be produced due to
environmental transformation/degradation
49Model for Action
50Scientific Base
- Scientific foundation must be built in parallel
to prudent workplace measures - Societal obligation to generate and publish
scientific findings - Necessary to support policy formulation
51Regulatory Framework
- A realistic regulatory framework will ultimately
be needed - NIOSH is currently in the forefront on workforce
matters - NIOSH is pursuing strategic, multidisciplinary
research that will help practitioners, with
greater certainty, to apply the well-established
principles of occupational safety and health to
workplace exposures involving nanomaterials. - NIOSH is evaluating the unique benefits that
nanotechnology may bring to improving
occupational safety and health.
52Regulatory Framework
- OSHA is only in the formative stages of gathering
information - Standards that would currently be applicable
- Hazard communication 1910.1200
- Occupational exposure to hazardous chemicals in
laboratories. - 1910.1450 - Respiratory protection 1910.134
- Personal protective equipment 1910.132
53Regulatory Framework
- EPA
- TSCA is one of the statutes under which
commercial applications will likely be regulated - Key question - Is a nanoparticle of a chemical
which is intended to impart new chemical and/or
physical properties, to be considered - a new chemical
- a significant new use of an existing chemical
- a modified but not significant new use of an
existing chemical or - none of the above?
54Regulatory Framework
- Most likely, TSCA will apply at some level
- EPA probably will not treat nanoparticles as new
chemical substances - EPA probably will treat each new category of
nanoparticles as a significant new use
55Practical Approaches
- Identify individuals that may be at risk
- Identify others who are at little to no risk, for
comparison - Work in conjunction with other professionals
(toxicologists and epidemiologists)
56Practical Approaches
- Prioritization of issues
- Identifying pragmatic approaches
- Classifying substances
- Performance-based controls
- Adaptations of existing successful approaches
- Potent compounds model (pharma, biotech,
microbiological)
57Practical Approaches
- Not all substances of equal concern
- Unclear which are priority materials
- Understanding is evolving
- Ability to be proactive vs. reactive
- Exposure reduction, control
58Practical approaches
- Engineering control of exposure
- PPE and employee training
- Exposure monitoring
- Health surveillance
- Willing to adjust or pull the plug if necessary
59Conclusions
- Limited available science should not deter
development of effective safeguards - Build on existing models
- Err conservatively
- Multidisciplinary approaches will be needed
60Conclusions
- Objective communication of both risks and safety
critical in an environment susceptible to
sensationalism - Substantiated through science and practice
- Not limited to scientific community
- Nanotechnology will challenge conventional
approaches to addressing occupational safety and
health risk
61Thank You
- badams_at_environcorp.com
- 609.243.9848