Title: Prsentation PowerPoint
1Report of the SEWG on Gas balance and Fuel
retention
T Loarer with contributions from S Brezinsek, C
Brosset, G Esser, J Likonen, M Mayer, Ph Morgan,
B Pegourie, V Philipps, V Rohde, J Roth, M Rubel,
J Strachan, E Tsitrone EU TF on PWI and JET
EFDA contributors
2Outline and objectives of the SEWG (2008)
- Gas balance analysis (plasma operation)
- Experiments performed to built a reference data
base in Carbon in JET? Understanding DT results
(97-98) and quantify the benefit (?) in Be/W - QMBs to assess the contribution of the ELMs on
erosion-retention - AUG? Gas balance in pure W (prior to
boronisation) - Post mortem analysis
- Laser desorption in TEXTOR to quantify locally
the retention - JET ? Completion of the MKII-SRP divertor
retention and deposition on mirrors - Tore Supra ? Progress on tile analysis and
comparison with gas balance - AUG ? From Carbon to full Tungsten
- Overall objective
- Understand and evaluate how much T retained,
where (role of the material).
3Built a reference data base in Carbon
- Repetitive pulses to avoid history effects
- Regeneration of divertor cryopump before and
after session - Long Term retention
- Injected Regenerated
- (regeneration about 60 min after last shot)
- Repeat the pulses in Be/W to quantify the benefit
(?) on the retention
4Impact of limiter phase
- Mode D standard X-point (9s of limiter
start-up phase) 70534 - - Mode B Early X-point (1.3s of limiter
start-up phase) 73654 - Except the limiter phase ? Comparable plasma
parameters - Ip, BT, ne, ICRH, Gas rate, recycling
Ip/BT2.0MA/2.4T, 1.8MW ICRH only
5Retention in L and H-mode
- Impact of the limiter phase in the fuel retention
experiments with an early X-point (1.2s of
limiter phase) and late X-point formation (8-10
s of limiter phase) is moderate. Normalisation
Divertor vs. Heating time - Retention closely linked to the carbon source
6Carbon production and scenario
J Strachan et al. Nuc. Fus. 2003
7G Esser et al.,
8DT experiments in JET
- Retention by implantation and co-deposition
D TFTR
Same retention although different scenario
9Implantation and co-deposition
Injection
Retention deduced from Cryo regeneration
JET DT experiments - Implantation dominates in
phase 1 (L mode) - Co-deposition main process
in phase 2 (High power H mode)
10 Pure W w/o boronisation
V Rohde et al.,
11- Carbon (blue and pink)
- No wall saturation
- 20 retained after pulse
- Up to 10 removed by HeGD and day scale
outgassing - Good agreement with probes
- Tungsten (Green and red)
- Wall saturation reached
- No gas retained within error bars
- Up to 10 removed by HeGD and day scale
outgassing - Good agreement with probes
V Rohde et al.,
12Outline and objectives of the SEWG (2008)
- Gas balance analysis (plasma operation)
- Experiments performed to built a reference data
base in Carbon in JET? Understanding DT results
(97-98) and quantify the benefit (?) in Be/W - QMBs to assess the contribution of the ELMs on
erosion-retention - AUG? Gas balance in pure W (prior to
boronisation) - Post mortem analysis
- Laser desorption in TEXTOR to quantify locally
the retention - JET ? Completion of the MKII-SRP divertor
retention and deposition on mirrors - Tore Supra ? Progress on tile analysis and
comparison with gas balance - AUG ? From Carbon to full Tungsten
13Laser desorption on ALT limiter tile
? Analysis of fuel retention in carbon materials
and deposits
Deposition
Erosion
ALT limiter tile Exposed 2004- 2008 Total shots
8534, 43473 s (12h)
V Philipps et al.,
14Laser desorption on ALT limiter tile
6 x1021 H,D/m2
Retention,erosion area 4-6 1017D/cm2
total 8.5 x 1019 D/tile Deposition area
up to 3-1919D/cm2 5 x 1020
D/tile 228 tiles 1.4 1023 H,D 0.3g H,D
Significant fuel retention in erosion areas (4-6
1021/m2 at fluencies of 2-4 1026H,D/m2 and temp.
of 150- 250C , (somewhat underestimated in past
analysis)
V Philipps et al.,
15Toroidal distribution of D on ALT-II Limiters
from TEXTOR
Analysis of 8 tiles from the ALT-II belt pump
limiter 14100 s (4h00)
Aim To check toroidal uniformity of deposition
and retention.
- Main Results
- Deposition pattern is the same on all analysed
tiles. - Carbon-rich co-deposits contain 8-10 of
deuterium and around 10 B. - Other impurities Si, Ni, Cr, Fe, Mo and traces
of W, Hf, Ti. - Layer thickness in the deposition zone 40 50 mm
as checked with SEM for the detached flakes.
M Rubel et al.,
16Co-deposits on metal mirrors (Mo and steel)
M Rubel et al.,
17D/C ratio and retention
D/C ratios JET 2001-2004
0.02
0.14
- Injected 1800g (5.381x1026D)
- In the divertor area
- Total D 66 g 3.7 of Ginj
- (2.2x1020Ds-1)
- Retention 70 Inner 30 Outer
0.42
0.11
0.15
0.91
0.25
0.12
0.08
0.17
0.79
J Likonen et al
18Retention at First wall
(JET MkII-SRP, 2001-2004)
- Total D retention 0.3g (0.02) - Outer
poloidal limiters have a minor contribution to D
retention
J Likonen et al
19Experimental campaign Tore Supra
- Carbonisation (13C) boronisation ? markers
- Repetitive long pulses (2 minutes) ? load the
vessel walls with D
- 5 hours of plasma w/o conditionning (1 year of
operation in 2 weeks) - ? pre-campaign inventory x 4
2040 Tiles extracted for analysis
DITS CFC structure PFCs IR Detritiation
- ? 10 tiles selected out of 40
- 5 erosion zone
- 2 thin deposits
- 3 thick deposits
B Pegourie et al.,
21Tile analysis NRA average D/C profiles
Erosion zone 200C
Thin deposits 120C
Thick deposits 500-600C (up to 1000C close to
the tangency point)
Gaps lt 400C
Poloidal gaps
Top of the tiles
B Pegourie et al.,
22Tile analysis Thermodesorption
2g/m2
0.4g/m2
B Pegourie et al.,
23D-inventory effect of time
Decrease of the D-content between end of
operation and analysis
Estimated TPL D-inventory at the end of plasma
operation 7.2 g if CFC and deposits concerned
(70 of total) 5.4 g if only CFC concerned
(55 of total)
B Pegourie et al.,
24DITS Gas balance and post mortem
B Pegourie et al.,
25Deuterium inventory in AUG From C to W
4940 s
C-dominated campaign 2002/2003 D on divertor
tiles 0.9 1.3 g D below roof baffle 0.4
g in 3000 s
M Mayer et al.,
26AUG divertor Evolution of D inventory
- Carbon dominated machine
- Total D-inventory dominated by inner divertor
and remote areas
- All-W machine
- Boronizations result in high D-inventory,
co-deposition with B (2005/2006 campaign) - D-inventory dominated by trapping in
VPS-layers at outer strike point - Decrease of total D-inventory by factor 5 10
from C-dominated to all-W
M Mayer et al.,
M Mayer et al.,
27Fuel retention studies in MAST
- Fuel retention studies will focus on gas balance
calculations in the near-term - supported by a detailed interpretive modelling
effort - full Langmuir probe and Da measurements, soon
- maybe some campaign-averaged post-mortem
analysis during the next engineering break
- Plans for post-mortem analysis of well
characterised samples, but only preliminary
work in 2009 - Divertor Science Facility, midplane materials
probe
S Lisgo et al.,
28Summary
- Gas balance
- Long term retention for C machine depends on
Plasma scenario - As far as C source exists ? co-deposition
dominates, increases with C production recycling,
ELMs (AUG, JET, TFTR, TS) and a to pulse
duration. - Carbon machine ? Dominated by co-deposition
divertor and limiter machines and associated to
erosion (Scenario, ELMs) - Full W shows a significant drop of the retention
1.
- Post Mortem analysis
- Evaluation of the retention by laser
desorption?Retention in erosion area not
negligible ? TEXTOR and TS (DITS) - In carbon? AUG-JET (3-4 in the divertor area)
- Significant drop of the retention below 1 in
AUG with full W configuration - Effect of time can be significant (up to factor
of 2)
- Gas balance and post-mortem are Complementary
and reliable methods - Results are consistent ? DITS project and DT
experiments at JET! - ? Both methods are necessary to know where and
how to remove the tritium?
29EU-PWI SEWG RETENTION, JULY 2008 INTERPRETIVE
MODELAttempt to fold in post-mortem analysis of
well characterised samples
- Divertor Science Facility (DSF) ? big name,
little probe (3x3 cm) - vacuum-lock probe system commissioned by end of
2008, with luck - need to develop a good scenario so that a
significant fluence can be built-up ? quasi
stationary strike-point, no disruptions - perhaps only local transport studies, i.e. no
input to global retention picture - can also expose samples on an existing outer
midplane probe system
TESTS OF MOCK-UP PROBE HEAD AND SHAFT
30Post mortem sample cutting
TDS top gaps
TDS no gaps
10 tiles ? 7 standard 3 refined cutting (1 in
each zone)
31Post mortem sample extraction
- First analysis campaign 10 tiles
- 5 in erosion zone
- 2 in thin deposits (plasma loaded LFS and
shadowed) - 3 in thick deposits
32Integrated D-inventory
NRA (top lateral faces)
TDS (top) NRA (lateral)
33D-inventory effect of time
Decrease of the D-content between end of
operation and analysis
Estimated TPL D-inventory at the end of plasma
operation 7.2 g if CFC and deposits concerned
(70 of total) 5.4 g if only CFC concerned
(55 of total)
34Carbon deposition on PFCs
C-erosion/deposition JET 2001-2004
- From deposit thickness
- (r 1.0 gcm-3 - 1.8 for the substrate)
- Total C deposition
- Inner 625 g Outer 507 g
J Likonen et al
35Confocal microscopy ongoing work
36A3 exposed finger
Erosion zones evidenced
A3 A4 A5 A6 A7
A4 new finger
A5 new finger !
A6 new finger
T7 T6 T5 T4 T3
T2 T1
37PFCs cleaning after the DITS campaign
- Deposits formed of successive layers
- variable toughness, roughness, density
38Cleaning the gaps
Deposits in gaps between tiles and fingers mainly
in erosion zone
39Scraped deposits
40Tentative C balance (2002-2007)
1000 g (confocal)
Modelling (BBQ) gross erosion 2000
g Suggests low redeposition (50- 60) Refined
modelling estimates from spectro. ongoing
TPL redeposition 145 g (scraping) net erosion
1000 g (confocal)
Bumpers etc redeposition 645 g (scraping)
net erosion missing (glow ?)
Global redeposition 800 g (scraping)
net erosion 1000 g (confocal)
41M4 D2
Examples of data analysis
Mass 19 mainly CD3H
Valves closed before laser shot, recording of all
masses, automatic fit procedure to evaluate mass
signal increase and total hydrogen gas release,
only deuterated species are taken into account
42Poloidal direction (mm)
Additional desorption in second shot from edges
of laser spot, but lt 5 No increased desorption
by increasing laser pulse lengths ( 1.5 ? 3 ms)
and reducing the power by v2 (same surface
temperature, v2 deeper heat propagation ) Maximum
thickness of ALT deposit to be determined,
estimated to about 30 ?m
43Retention in erosion dominated areas
New data points Include long TEXTOR operation
history!
Particle fluence from H? spectroscopy under
evaluation Estimated value (using similar data
from other campaigns) 2 x10 26 H,D /m2
44Type I ELMy H-mode
Ip 2.0 MA, Bj 2.4 T
69260
PTOT (MW) NBIICRH13MW
DWELM 100 kJ 60 Hz
Da (in)
Da (out)
Time (s)
- Short term retention limited to fast
reservoir and recovered in between pulses
(outgasing) - Long term retention Co-deposition
and implantation Slow process compared to short
term over 5-10 sec
45High power discharge in JET
Gas balance on line, w/o regeneration
Ip3.5MA, BT3.2T
ne
Ptot (NBI ICRH) 23-24MW
Wdia9.5MJ
Gas 5.0x1022Ds-1
ELMs?600-700kJ per ELM
46Gas balance High power discharge
- Using the same pumping speed ? Retention as high
as 3.3x1022Ds-1 - Consistent with strong carbon erosion from
recycling and ELMs - Increase by 10 of the retention? To be
confirmed by dedicated exp
47C source for High power discharge
Type I ELMs (600-700kJ)
Type I ELMs (100kJ)
L mode
48Implantation
- JET 200 m2 maximum retained fluence
1021m-2 ? reservoir of 2 1023 T ? consistent
with implantation of particles with incident
energy of 200eV.
JET DT experiments - Implantation dominates in
phase 1 - Co-deposition main process in phase 2
49Carbon production and scenario
J Strachan et al. PSI 2008
Carbon ionisation rate in the SOL as a function
of D ionisation rate
50(No Transcript)
51Deuterium in different carbon materials
NRA spectrum and depth profile for NB41 exposed
in PISCES-A ? 3?1025 D/m2 at Ts 470 K
Experimental set-up (test limiter) at TEXTOR to
study deposition and in-depth D migration into
materials
VR, FZJ, SFA, PISCES
52Co-deposits on metal mirrors (Mo and steel) at JET
General tendency On all divertor mirrors
deposition decreases with the depth in
channel. On the wall mirrors deposition increases
with the depth in channel.
Other results All co-deposits contain C-12, D
and small quantities of Be and 13C. In many
cases, layers are thicker than the information
depth with IBA.
53(No Transcript)