Project Financing LNG Projects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Project Financing LNG Projects

Description:

Amount of Financing Required. Currently 141 MTA of Global ... Financing all across value chain theoretically makes sense. ... Supplement to financing structure ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:516
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: baker
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Project Financing LNG Projects


1
Project Financing- LNG Projects
  • John D. WhiteBaker Botts, London
  • Successfully Managing Project Finance in the
    GCCEmirates Towers Hotel, Dubai23 May 2005

2
Overview
  • Amount of Financing Required
  • Financing Challenges
  • Financing Objectives
  • Drivers for Successful LNG Project Financing
  • Sponsor Objectives
  • Project Risk Identification/Allocation/Mitigation
  • Conclusions
  • Questions

3
Amount of Financing Required
  • Currently 141 MTA of Global LNG export capacity.
  • Additional 168 MTA of Global LNG export capacity
    is planned by 2010.
  • Huge new investment in shipping, regasification,
    pipeline and related infrastructure is needed.
  • International Energy Agency estimates over 250
    billion will be spent by the gas industry over 30
    years for LNG projects.

4
Financing Challenges
  • Preferences for
  • Simplicity
  • Transparency in cash flows
  • Equity
  • Corporate finance
  • Strategic assets
  • Collateral
  • Amortisation
  • Aversion to
  • Complexity
  • Merchant risk
  • Certain indexes
  • Leverage
  • Contingent equity
  • Distributions
  • Structured finance
  • Single asset deals
  • Ratings triggers
  • Refinancing risk

5
Financing ObjectivesWhether any LNG financing
is successful depends on its fit with sponsors
objectives
  • Sponsor constraints
  • Credit rating
  • Legal and contractual
  • Limited/full recourse
  • Credit pooling/severality
  • Cost and tenor
  • Equity requirements
  • Accounting
  • Off-balance sheet
  • Financing covenants
  • Collateral
  • Rating
  • Appetite for completion/ operating and other
    risks
  • Political risk
  • Refinancing risk
  • Tax
  • Financing source

6
Financing SourcesCertain markets are better for
particular objectives and assuming certain risks.
  • Sponsor equity
  • Lending
  • Traditional bank
  • Private placement
  • Mezzanine
  • Shipper finance
  • ECA/IFI
  • Public equity markets
  • Private equity
  • Public and 144A debt markets
  • Islamic finance
  • Lease
  • Tax-exempt /industrial revenue
  • Securitisation/Receivables financing
  • Combinations of the above

7
Drivers for Strong Projects
  • Strong sponsors
  • Competitive costs and compelling economics
  • Strategic product
  • Well-crafted contractual arrangements
  • Operating track record
  • Highly rated host country

8
Integrated Finance Model
  • Financing all across value chain theoretically
    makes sense.
  • For majors, LNG projects are all about accessing
    upstream reserves.
  • Profits taken over LNG chain.
  • Vast investment in each link in LNG chain.
  • Strategic importance may drive success in each
    link in chain.
  • May support multiple markets.

9
Integrated Finance Model (cont'd)
  • Integrated model faces numerous practical
    problems
  • Exposure to multi-jurisdictional, varied risks
    familiar to Big Oil, but lenders wary of
    resulting complexity, bankruptcy and legal risks.
  • Difficulty maintaining alignment across LNG
    chain.
  • Hard to attain transparent contractual
    arrangements that forge integration across LNG
    chain.
  • Interdependency of links manifests itself in
    weak link theory.
  • Many majors averse to project financings unless
    required by their partners (which may not be
    invested in all links) or for political risk
    mitigation.

10
Project Risk Identification/Allocation/Mitigation
  • Sound LNG project financing requires evaluation
    and allocation of risks and rewards and
    mitigation, including
  • Completion
  • Operating
  • Gas Supply
  • Liquefaction
  • LNG and Gas Offtake
  • LNG Shipping
  • Regasification
  • Pipeline Transportation
  • Others
  • This list is not nearly exhaustive.
  • Risks compounded by project-on-project risk.

11
Completion Risk
  • Risk that the project will not be completed on
    time or within budget, and will not perform as
    expected.
  • Engineering, design, procurement, physical
    completion and start-up of the project.
  • Includes legal, regulatory, financial and other
    aspects.
  • As segments of LNG chain are financed as separate
    projects, interdependency of links introduces
    project-on-project risk.

12
Completion Risk Mitigants
  • Proven contractor
  • Turnkey contracts
  • Fixed cost and scope
  • Liquidated damages
  • Performance bonds/retainage/LOCs/guarantees
  • Sponsor guarantees
  • Completion tests
  • Proven design
  • Insurance/contingency amounts
  • Properly vetted permitting process
  • Technical, Shipping and Marine studies

13
Operating Risk
  • Operating risk is the risk that the project, once
    complete, will not perform as expected.
  • Experienced creditworthy service provider
  • Safety, security and environmental safeguards
  • Permits
  • Strong agreements
  • Incentives for good performance/penalties for bad
  • OM reserves
  • Insurance

14
Gas Supply
  • Availability of Adequate Gas Reserves
  • Reserve risks ("Proven" vs. "Probable")
  • Development costs
  • Dedication to chain
  • Transport to Liquefaction Facility
  • Gas Quality
  • Gas Price
  • Operating Risk, including Force
    Majeure/Environmental/ Permitting

15
Liquefaction
  • Delay in Completion
  • Production Quantity
  • Technology
  • Cost Overrun
  • Expansion Economics
  • Operating Risk, including Force
    Majeure/Environmental/ Permitting

16
LNG and Gas Offtake
  • Volume Purchase Obligations
  • Pricing transparency (take or pay/deliver or pay)
  • Credit of Offtaker/limits on credit support
  • Depth of Market - market studies
  • Long-term offtake but flexible terms
  • Destination flexibility
  • Conditions precedent
  • Operations, Link with Shipping/Regas, Force
    Majeure

17
LNG Shipping
  • Requires longer lead time than earlier LNG deals
  • FOB v. DES
  • Time Charter v. Ownership
  • Delay in Construction of Vessels
  • Cost Overruns
  • Size of Vessels/Economies of Scale
  • Operating Risk, including Force Majeure/
    Environmental/ Permitting
  • Destination Flexibility

18
Regasification
  • Link to LNG supply
  • Licensing
  • Delay in Construction
  • Cost Overrun
  • Open Access
  • Security
  • Distance to Market
  • Connection to pipeline system
  • Gas meets pipeline specifications -
    interchangeability
  • Operating Risk, including Force
    Majeure/Environmental/ Permitting

19
Pipeline Transportation
  • Adequacy of current/new take-away pipelines
  • Delay in Construction
  • Distance to major end-use market
  • Pipeline transportation agreements
  • Terms of service (e.g., firm or interruptible)
  • Availability of ancillary services
    (balancing/park and loan/load swing)
  • Force majeure
  • Open access/common carrier issues
  • Storage

20
Project-on-Project Risk
  • What links are absolutely necessary to success of
    this project?
  • Construction of completion tests
  • Intrusiveness to other projects
  • Partial sponsor guarantee fallaway/debt service
    reserve/other sponsor support
  • Effect on debt capacity
  • Contamination from other projects
  • Alignment

21
Expansion Risks
  • Could be more robust than a greenfield project
  • Economies of scale
  • Operating history may mitigate completion and
    operating risks
  • Regulatory regime known
  • Government support
  • Supplement to financing structure
  • but those results depend on front-end planning
    with greenfield project
  • PSC
  • Host government agreements
  • Permits

22
Expansion Risks (cont'd)
  • Flexible financing structures
  • Excess capacity
  • but even best laid plans can succumb to
  • Separate financings on trains
  • Non-alignment
  • Change in circumstances
  • Lack of control over service providers/shared
    facilities
  • Priority and coordination of use
  • Unforeseen events

23
Weak Links
  • Successfully financing LNG projects requires
    solving weak link theory
  • Most liquefaction projects are in sub-investment
    grade countries
  • Can project surmount country ratings?
  • Weaker counterparties
  • Ability to address capital calls and
    contingencies
  • Credit enhancement and liquidity
  • Cost recovery/carried interests
  • Incentives/penalties
  • Dealing with financing delay

24
Environmental, Social and Regulatory
  • Equator Principles - sustainable development
  • Environmental
  • Security
  • Social and Political
  • Archaeological
  • Local Content and Employment
  • Labour Practices

25
Political Risk
  • Expropriation
  • Political violence
  • Currency convertibility/transferability
  • Terrorism

26
Questions?
John D. WhitePartner Baker Botts 99 Gresham
Street London EC2V 7BA Telephone 44 20 7726
3423 Fax 44 20 7726 3523 E-mail john.white_at_bakerb
otts.com www.bakerbotts.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com