Title: Project Financing LNG Projects
1Project Financing- LNG Projects
- John D. WhiteBaker Botts, London
- Successfully Managing Project Finance in the
GCCEmirates Towers Hotel, Dubai23 May 2005
2Overview
- Amount of Financing Required
- Financing Challenges
- Financing Objectives
- Drivers for Successful LNG Project Financing
- Sponsor Objectives
- Project Risk Identification/Allocation/Mitigation
- Conclusions
- Questions
3Amount of Financing Required
- Currently 141 MTA of Global LNG export capacity.
- Additional 168 MTA of Global LNG export capacity
is planned by 2010. - Huge new investment in shipping, regasification,
pipeline and related infrastructure is needed. - International Energy Agency estimates over 250
billion will be spent by the gas industry over 30
years for LNG projects.
4Financing Challenges
- Preferences for
- Simplicity
- Transparency in cash flows
- Equity
- Corporate finance
- Strategic assets
- Collateral
- Amortisation
- Aversion to
- Complexity
- Merchant risk
- Certain indexes
- Leverage
- Contingent equity
- Distributions
- Structured finance
- Single asset deals
- Ratings triggers
- Refinancing risk
5Financing ObjectivesWhether any LNG financing
is successful depends on its fit with sponsors
objectives
- Sponsor constraints
- Credit rating
- Legal and contractual
- Limited/full recourse
- Credit pooling/severality
- Cost and tenor
- Equity requirements
- Accounting
- Off-balance sheet
- Financing covenants
- Collateral
- Rating
- Appetite for completion/ operating and other
risks - Political risk
- Refinancing risk
- Tax
- Financing source
6Financing SourcesCertain markets are better for
particular objectives and assuming certain risks.
- Sponsor equity
- Lending
- Traditional bank
- Private placement
- Mezzanine
- Shipper finance
- ECA/IFI
- Public equity markets
- Private equity
- Public and 144A debt markets
- Islamic finance
- Lease
- Tax-exempt /industrial revenue
- Securitisation/Receivables financing
- Combinations of the above
7Drivers for Strong Projects
- Strong sponsors
- Competitive costs and compelling economics
- Strategic product
- Well-crafted contractual arrangements
- Operating track record
- Highly rated host country
8Integrated Finance Model
- Financing all across value chain theoretically
makes sense. - For majors, LNG projects are all about accessing
upstream reserves. - Profits taken over LNG chain.
- Vast investment in each link in LNG chain.
- Strategic importance may drive success in each
link in chain. - May support multiple markets.
9Integrated Finance Model (cont'd)
- Integrated model faces numerous practical
problems - Exposure to multi-jurisdictional, varied risks
familiar to Big Oil, but lenders wary of
resulting complexity, bankruptcy and legal risks. - Difficulty maintaining alignment across LNG
chain. - Hard to attain transparent contractual
arrangements that forge integration across LNG
chain. - Interdependency of links manifests itself in
weak link theory. - Many majors averse to project financings unless
required by their partners (which may not be
invested in all links) or for political risk
mitigation.
10Project Risk Identification/Allocation/Mitigation
- Sound LNG project financing requires evaluation
and allocation of risks and rewards and
mitigation, including - Completion
- Operating
- Gas Supply
- Liquefaction
- LNG and Gas Offtake
- LNG Shipping
- Regasification
- Pipeline Transportation
- Others
- This list is not nearly exhaustive.
- Risks compounded by project-on-project risk.
11Completion Risk
- Risk that the project will not be completed on
time or within budget, and will not perform as
expected. - Engineering, design, procurement, physical
completion and start-up of the project. - Includes legal, regulatory, financial and other
aspects. - As segments of LNG chain are financed as separate
projects, interdependency of links introduces
project-on-project risk.
12Completion Risk Mitigants
- Proven contractor
- Turnkey contracts
- Fixed cost and scope
- Liquidated damages
- Performance bonds/retainage/LOCs/guarantees
- Sponsor guarantees
- Completion tests
- Proven design
- Insurance/contingency amounts
- Properly vetted permitting process
- Technical, Shipping and Marine studies
13Operating Risk
- Operating risk is the risk that the project, once
complete, will not perform as expected. - Experienced creditworthy service provider
- Safety, security and environmental safeguards
- Permits
- Strong agreements
- Incentives for good performance/penalties for bad
- OM reserves
- Insurance
14Gas Supply
- Availability of Adequate Gas Reserves
- Reserve risks ("Proven" vs. "Probable")
- Development costs
- Dedication to chain
- Transport to Liquefaction Facility
- Gas Quality
- Gas Price
- Operating Risk, including Force
Majeure/Environmental/ Permitting
15Liquefaction
- Delay in Completion
- Production Quantity
- Technology
- Cost Overrun
- Expansion Economics
- Operating Risk, including Force
Majeure/Environmental/ Permitting
16LNG and Gas Offtake
- Volume Purchase Obligations
- Pricing transparency (take or pay/deliver or pay)
- Credit of Offtaker/limits on credit support
- Depth of Market - market studies
- Long-term offtake but flexible terms
- Destination flexibility
- Conditions precedent
- Operations, Link with Shipping/Regas, Force
Majeure
17LNG Shipping
- Requires longer lead time than earlier LNG deals
- FOB v. DES
- Time Charter v. Ownership
- Delay in Construction of Vessels
- Cost Overruns
- Size of Vessels/Economies of Scale
- Operating Risk, including Force Majeure/
Environmental/ Permitting - Destination Flexibility
18Regasification
- Link to LNG supply
- Licensing
- Delay in Construction
- Cost Overrun
- Open Access
- Security
- Distance to Market
- Connection to pipeline system
- Gas meets pipeline specifications -
interchangeability - Operating Risk, including Force
Majeure/Environmental/ Permitting
19Pipeline Transportation
- Adequacy of current/new take-away pipelines
- Delay in Construction
- Distance to major end-use market
- Pipeline transportation agreements
- Terms of service (e.g., firm or interruptible)
- Availability of ancillary services
(balancing/park and loan/load swing) - Force majeure
- Open access/common carrier issues
- Storage
20Project-on-Project Risk
- What links are absolutely necessary to success of
this project? - Construction of completion tests
- Intrusiveness to other projects
- Partial sponsor guarantee fallaway/debt service
reserve/other sponsor support - Effect on debt capacity
- Contamination from other projects
- Alignment
21Expansion Risks
- Could be more robust than a greenfield project
- Economies of scale
- Operating history may mitigate completion and
operating risks - Regulatory regime known
- Government support
- Supplement to financing structure
- but those results depend on front-end planning
with greenfield project - PSC
- Host government agreements
- Permits
22Expansion Risks (cont'd)
- Flexible financing structures
- Excess capacity
- but even best laid plans can succumb to
- Separate financings on trains
- Non-alignment
- Change in circumstances
- Lack of control over service providers/shared
facilities - Priority and coordination of use
- Unforeseen events
23Weak Links
- Successfully financing LNG projects requires
solving weak link theory - Most liquefaction projects are in sub-investment
grade countries - Can project surmount country ratings?
- Weaker counterparties
- Ability to address capital calls and
contingencies - Credit enhancement and liquidity
- Cost recovery/carried interests
- Incentives/penalties
- Dealing with financing delay
24Environmental, Social and Regulatory
- Equator Principles - sustainable development
- Environmental
- Security
- Social and Political
- Archaeological
- Local Content and Employment
- Labour Practices
25Political Risk
- Expropriation
- Political violence
- Currency convertibility/transferability
- Terrorism
26Questions?
John D. WhitePartner Baker Botts 99 Gresham
Street London EC2V 7BA Telephone 44 20 7726
3423 Fax 44 20 7726 3523 E-mail john.white_at_bakerb
otts.com www.bakerbotts.com