Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives AMAO for NCLB Title III - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives AMAO for NCLB Title III

Description:

Framework for Setting Kentucky's English Language Proficiency AMAO for: ... Years in US Schools. Cohort. Formal Schooling - Progress Goals for 2005-2006 & Beyond ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Bin48
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives AMAO for NCLB Title III


1
Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAO)
for NCLB Title III
  • Division of Assessment Implementation
  • Office of Assessment and Accountability
  • Kentucky Department of Education

2
 
Framework for Setting Kentuckys English Language
Proficiency AMAO for
  • The annual percentage of LEP students making
    progress as demonstrated by movement from one
    proficiency level to the next .
  • The annual percentage of LEP students attaining
    English language proficiency as demonstrated by
    Attained level .

 
3
Rationale for Developing Annual Measurable
Achievement Objectives (AMAO) for Progress
  • Generally, the lower the students entry level,
    the more proficiency levels he/she has to
    progress through, and the longer (more years of
    instruction) it takes to attain English language
    proficiency (Attained).
  • Formal Schooling versus Limited or No Formal
    Schooling. LEP students who have had limited or
    no formal schooling require more time to
    demonstrate progress and attainment of English
    language proficiency than LEP students who have
    had prior formal schooling experiences.

 
4
K1214 FormalBaseline Data
  • Cohorts
  • Start 1 2 3 4 5
  • 10 Ad Ad Ad/At At
  • 24 UI UI/Ad Ad Ad/At At
  • 26 LI LI/UI UI Ad Ad/At At
  • 40 B B/LI LI UI Ad At
  • Progress 45 50 83 65 53
  • Attainment 0 5 17 25 53

Actual
5
KY Performance Levels Matched up with ACCESS PLs
  • Beginner(B) ENTERING
  • Lower Intermediate(LI) BEGINNING
  • Upper Intermediate(UI) DEVELOPING
  • Advanced(Ad) EXPANDING
  • Attained(At) BRIDGING

6
Formal Schooling Cohorts
7
Limited / No Formal / Schooling Cohorts
8
Formal Schooling - Progress Goals for 2005-2006
Beyond
  • The Progress Goal for every Cohort is 59. This
    was computed by taking all of the individual
    Cohort goals (4550836553) added together and
    divided by the 5 Cohorts. Thus accounting for
    all of the gains the students can make as they
    progress.
  • Attainment Goals were not changed.
  • Limited or No Formal Schooling goals were not
    changed.

9
Progress Calculation
  • The Progress achieved by the students will be
    credited for all proficiency levels gained from
    the past years level to this years level. This
    can cause a percentage of progress more than
    100, so the limit has been set to 100. For a
    value of 100, the confidence interval will be
    shown as .

10
Confidence Intervals
 
  • Because NCLB requires a states evaluation of AYP
    to be statistically sound, the United States
    Department of Education (USDOE) allows
    construction of a confidence interval (CI) or
    error band around percentages of students.
  • Confidence intervals for student cohorts of
    sufficient size (10 or more students in the
    cohort) will be constructed using a single sample
    t-test. The confidence interval or CI provides a
    test for whether or not the observed percent
    increase or percent proficient is statistically,
    significantly different from the AMAO at the 99
    confidence level.
  • Note that the t-test is a two-tailed t-test
    alpha (error) level set at .01 which creates a
    statistical test at the 99 confidence interval.
    Only the positive (upper) range of the confidence
    interval is used for AYP determination.

 
11
Now to the AMAO REPORT
  • Three styles
  • State
  • District
  • Consortium
  • Basic layout is the same for all three.

12
Report Title
  • Title III English Language Proficiency
  • Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAO)
  • 2006-2007
  • State Report
  • 2006-2007
  • District Report- nnn-Some District Name
  • 2006-2007
  • Consortium Report CL_Some Consortium Name

13
Table Header
  • K-12 14 LEP Students with Formal Schooling
  • K-12 14 LEP Students with Limited or No Formal
    Schooling

14
AMAO REPORT Content - PROGRESS
15
AMAO REPORT Content - PROGRESS
16
AMAO REPORT Content - ATTAINMENT
17
AMAO REPORT Content - Footnotes
Not meeting AMAOs for one or more cohorts for
progress or attainment is considered not having
met AMAOs for the State District
Consortium. Confidence Level is not
computed when Progress Percent is 100. Progress
levels achieved may be a higher count than the
number of students participating Progress
Percent is limited to 100.
18
AMAO REPORT Content - Notification
19
Questions?
  • Contact Edgar Adams
  • Office of Assessment and Accountability
  • (502) 564 - 9853
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com