MONDO Consulting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

MONDO Consulting

Description:

MONDO Consulting – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:139
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: Tos
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MONDO Consulting


1
MONDO Consulting Training
www.mondo-consulting.ro Tel./Fax. (0040) 21 327
51 20 (0040) 21 325 13 23 e-mail
mondo_at_mondo-consulting.ro mondo_cons_at_yahoo.com
ROMANIA
2
Romania - Quick Facts
3
Short Presentation
Area 237,500 sq. km (91,780 square
miles) Population aprox. 22 million, 55 lives
in urban areas
  • 89.4 ethnic Romanians, orthodox
  • 7.1 Hungarian
  • 3.5 other minorities

Location South-Eastern part of EuropeNorth of
the Balkan Peninsula
Capital Bucharest - the biggest business and
financial centre of the country
Ranking 11th place among European nations in
terms of size.It is the largest country in
Central and Eastern Europe, after Poland.
Neighbours Hungary on the North-WestUkraine on
the NorthRepublic of Moldova and the Black Sea
on the EastBulgaria on the SouthYugoslavia on
the South-West
4
Official Language Romanian Latin
alphabet. It is part of the Romance language
family.
Widely spoken languages English, French, German,
Hungarian.
Education mandatory from ages 6 to 14
State education system includes -
primary - secondary - higher education
Romania has always had a strong reputation in
science and engineering. Private education
system, developed after 1990.
5
Welcome to the LLW Project Meeting !
6
Lets see who initiated the project !
Language Learning Ware (LLW) project has been
initiated by Global Input, Italy, in consortium
with the American University in Bulgaria MONDO
Consulting Training, Romania Centro de
Estudios Ponce de Léon, Spain and
Euro-Projectservis s.r.o., Slovakia.
7
Which is the main idea of the project?
The Language Learning Ware project envisages the
idea that same language is used in many different
situations in life, and each situation has its
specific ways to be described and dealt with. So
is the process of teaching and learning of the
language. LLW project, therefore, intends to
discuss and formulate a set of interactive tools
for didactical learning and training of foreign
languages, so as to expose the learner to the
different uses and applications of the same
language in everyday life situations.
8
The Development of the project
The aim of this project is to gather
research and discuss ideas from various
participating partners of European countries in
the planning stages of a didactical language
teaching and learning system. These modules
are to be complimented by developed final exams
certified by the European Union. This system
is to be designed to maximize the learners
participation in the various mental processes
involved in learning. Each partner is to be
selected in response to the individual aspects of
the material to be designed.
9
The testing sesion took place at DIMITRIE LEONIDA
Collegium
  • The 22 students chosen for this project are in
    the 11th grade, advanced level of English. They
    worked in pairs for most of the tasks, but they
    did group work, too.
  • The material uses a simple language (normal for a
    preliminary level) and it is structured in a very
    simple way, in five sections that have gradual
    difficulty and deal with different types of
    exercises multiple choice, short answers,
    true/false, full sentence answers and writing
    messages. The revision test gives the students a
    self-assessment and make them aware of their weak
    points. Furthermore, each of the five sections
    has a completed example so that the students
    should be acquainted with their tasks

10
Here there are the persons who participated in
the testing phase The teacher, Ms. Ioana Manta
11
How did the students reacted?
  • At first, the students were surprised to see a
    model and considered the completed example as
    being useless. They also tended to skip this
    part, being eager to answer the questions in
    their example. Yet they got used to this new
    method and finally agreed that a training level
    as they called it, using a term from computer
    games was not a waste of time.
  • Also, being given the students age and the
    novelty of this project, their impatience was
    normal. Therefore the fact that they were
    supposed to follow some stages while doing the
    tasks seemed a little boring. But when the
    students understood that some of their wrong
    answers were due to not having looked at the
    picture or not having read the questions
    carefully, they reconsidered those steps and
    began to pay more attention to what they were
    doing.
  • In the first section, Multiple choice, the
    students had to choose the best answer of the
    three given. This type of exercise was not a new
    one for them and they didnt have much difficulty
    in accomplishing the task. Even if they didnt
    understand some words or they werent sure which
    the best answer was, they were able to leave out
    the wrong items.
  • As for the second section, Short Answers, there
    were some problems at the beginning, because the
    students tended to give full answers and to add
    farther information that had not been required.
    This section, together with section four, Full
    Sentence Answers, helped the students realize the
    difference between the two concepts. It was quite
    an exercise of discipline, since the students
    had to do exactly what they had been asked for,
    nothing less, nothing more.

12
Here are the students
13
The True or False Session
  • For the True/False section, the students were
    supposed to read the conversation carefully and
    look for specific information.
  • If multiple choice exercises, deciding whether a
    statement is true or false or giving short/long
    answers to some questions were not new tasks for
    the students, section five Message Writing made
    them acquainted to writing a memo or an e-mail.
    The latter was known and used by most of them on
    the Internet, while the former was a real
    novelty, both as name and as concept. Their task
    here consisted in having to decide what kind of
    information they should include, what style and
    tone they should use when writing a memo or an
    email, but it was also an exercise that checked
    their spelling and punctuation. They were
    supposed to carefully read the conversations at
    first for general understanding and after that
    for specific information and details.

14
Key Benefits
  • Summarize the key benefits provided by the
    product, service, or idea being promoted

15
  • Being totally different from what an ordinary
    textbook means, this new type of material has
    drawn the students attention and they have
    become more interested in learning English. The
    pictures and the contexts presented here have
    given them the opportunity to see what business
    means or what a secretarys job is, for example.
    The conversations have taught them when and how
    to use formal or semi-formal language, how to
    deal with critical situations, how to stay calm
    or how to be polite but ferm.
  • Students were encouraged to make suggestions
    concerning the project and to use their
    imagination. They were also encouraged to truly
    act the situations. The pictures and the
    recording show some of these moments, which were
    very funny for all of us. During one lesson, for
    example, since they hadnt agreed whether one
    picture was of an office or of a publishing house
    or of something else, they grouped and organized
    themselves on the spot, according to their
    opinions. They moved their desks, created three
    different companies, chose their jobs in those
    companies and pretended they were working. The
    noise was a problem, but finally it didnt matter
    anymore since they were so excited and serious
    about everything! An important aspect was also
    the fact that they urged each other to use only
    English, which they actually did, forgetting
    about their shyness or inhibitions. They
    obviously made some grammar mistakes but they
    managed to communicate to each other and this was
    most important.

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
  • They acted the conversations, outrunning the
    dialogues and being very spontaneous. They
    laughed a lot trying to speak English with a
    strange accent or exaggerating. They learnt a lot
    of words and expressions, and they discovered new
    things about themselves some of them are very
    patient and good at working with people, others
    are impatient or bossy. It was very interesting
    for them to see how they actually behave in
    certain situations and they even started to think
    of their future careers.
  • Also, they were the ones who decided that the
    pictures are too dull and the next hour they
    brought their coloured pencils and coloured all
    the drawings, some of them even adding some new
    objects (like a bottle of Coke on a desk or a
    picture on the wall) . Beside the funny aspect of
    a classroom like a kindergarten in which some
    teenagers have discovered again the joy of a
    long-forgotten activity, those kids colouring the
    drawings expressed their different personalities.
    A psychologist could definetely tell us a lot
    about these students by seeing their pictures.

19
All in all, the students were very delighted to
take part in this project, they learnt and they
laughed, they improved their English by having
fun.
20
Further development of the project
  • For the testing sessions we have chosen two
    groups in the firs group there were 22 students
    from Dimitrie Leonida Collegium and in the second
    one there were 15 managers.

21
The managers who participated in the testing
session
  • 1. BUTUCEA CAMELIA (From SC CAMELIA
  • 2.COMANEANU ELENA ( From SC IMPEX COMANEANU)
  • 3.GHERGHINA GEORGETA (From SC POEME)
  • 4.IVANESCU ELENA (From SC MONDIAL)
  • 5.MANEA CAMELIA (From SC MIRIANA)
  • 6.GRECU DUMITRA (From SC GREMI TRANS)
  • 7.MANEA CAMELIA( From SC MIRIANA)
  • 8.NISTOR GABRIELA( From SC CUPLUELECTRO)
  • 9.OPRI MIRELA ELENA (From SC MIRELA STYLE)
  • 10.STROILA ALINA( From SC KAROLINE IMPEX)
  • 11.IVANESCU ALEXANDRU (From SC MONDIAL)
  • 12.IVANESCU CEZAR ( From SC MONDIAL)
  • 13.MARINESCU VERGINEL( From SC TURISM PUCIOASA)
  • 14.RADULESCU GEORGIAN (From SC BRIELA)
  • 15.RADULESCU PAUL ( From SC BRIELA)

22
(No Transcript)
23
Opinions about the course
  • The teacher of this course considers that the
    course was a success as the participants acted
    the conversations, outrunning the dialogues and
    being very spontaneous. They learnt a lot of
    words and expressions, and they made some new
    friends and some possible business partners .
  • Also, some of the participants considered that
    this new type of teaching was a very efficient
    one, and they adapted very quickly as if the
    managers were children and were supposed to learn
    in the classrooms again.

24
Some of the managers were very conscientious
they wrote down every unknown word
25
What is the idea of the course ?
  • The course idea is to design and then to expose
    the learner to differing uses and applications of
    the same language from each module/unit. Each
    individual learning aid acts as verification for
    the language studied in the previously used
    learning aid and as preparation for the learning
    aid to be studied next. The conclusion of each
    pre-lesson preparation is in the verification of
    the studied material before the learner enters
    the classroom. This is to be achieved in one of
    three ways
  • Through a website (corresponding to the varying
    mother tongue languages of the participating
    partners)
  • By downloadable material acquired by the learner
  • This material assigned by the course teacher.

26
Which are the target groups ?
  • The LLW (Lingua Learning Ware) project is aimed
    at young and adult individuals of varying
    economical levels and possible limitations that
    have the need to overcome the obstacles of
    communication found in the employment market.
    These are to include
  • Young adults with incomplete education
  • Unemployed young and mature adults
  • Mature adults needing occupational retraining
  • Disadvantaged individuals with language obstacles
    and/or economic limitations.

27
Partners in LLW Project
  • Global Input
  • Italy
  • Centre for European Programmes of the American
    University
  • Bulgaria 
  • Centro de Estudios Ponce de Léon Spain
  • Euro-Projectservis s.r.o.
  • Slovakia
  • MONDO Consulting Training, Romania

28
Thank you very much !Iolanda MihalacheMONDO
Consulting TrainingBucharest11-12 May 2006
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com