Pennsylvania BANNER Users Group 2006

About This Presentation
Title:

Pennsylvania BANNER Users Group 2006

Description:

In July of 2004 Records & Gift Processing (RGP) at Bucknell University converted ... All three are cross-trained to do biographic and pledge/gift processing. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 61
Provided by: ISR1
Learn more at: http://pabug.org

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pennsylvania BANNER Users Group 2006


1
Pennsylvania BANNER Users Group2006
  • Bucknells Gift Processing-Finance Relationship
    in BANNER

2
General Announcements
  • Please turn off all cell phones/pagers
  • If you must leave the session early, please do so
    as discreetly as possible
  • Please avoid side conversations during the
    session
  • Questions will be answered at the end of the
    session
  • Thank you for your cooperation

3
Introductory Remarks
  • Bucknell University
  • Located in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania
  • Student Enrollment (FTE) 3,600
  • Annual Operating Budget 193 million
  • 2006 Total Endowment 522 million
  • 2006 Gift Revenue 21.2 million
  • 19.8 million spendable gifts
  • 1.4 million deferred giving

4
Background
  • In July of 2004 Records Gift Processing (RGP)
    at Bucknell University converted to the BANNER
    system to join the rest of its campus. This
    conversion also brought an awareness to other
    offices as how their vested interests would be
    impacted, as RGP would now have a working
    relationship with all BANNER modules.

5
Background
  • Before joining BANNER, RGP and Finance identified
    reconciling issues in gift revenue between what
    RGP recorded in its stand-alone database and what
    Finance had in BANNER. With RGP converting to
    BANNER, we immediately recognized the
    opportunity to reduce, and even possibly
    eliminate, these reconciling issues.

6
Background
  • RGP has five full-time staff members. With one
    direct supervisor, the staff has one person
    primarily responsible for gift entry, a second
    person for biographic entry, and a third person
    for pledge and biographic entry. All three are
    cross-trained to do biographic and pledge/gift
    processing. A fourth person is primarily
    responsible for gift receipt, secondary
    acknowledgement, and pledge reminder processes.

7
Background
  • What is a reconciling issue and what caused it?

8
Background
  • Reconciling issues were identified at the
    designation/fund level and also broader reporting
    levels, where Advancement and Finance showed
    different amounts of money. This was a problem!

9
Background
  • Reconciling issues were due primarily to gift
    adjustments that were not always recorded the
    same way in both systems. BANNER promised to
    alleviate these headaches.

10
Background
  • Prior to BANNER, approximately a third of one
    person in the Finance Office was dedicated to
    gift processing with clean-up at the end of the
    year.
  • Now, the Finance Office staff has divide and
    conquer approach to gift accounting. The process
    is split between the Accountant for daily
    reconciliation of clearing accounts, Associate
    Controller and Controller for oversight of
    gift/pledge processing in BANNER-Finance. In
    total, approximately half to three quarters of
    one person dedicates their time to gift
    accounting.

11
The Goal
  • If, for example, Finance says it has 1,000,000
    total in the general ledger, RGP wants 1,000,000
    total in gifts (and pledge payments) recorded in
    the Advancement module and to have each
    designation/fund show equal amounts in the
    Finance and Advancement modules.

12
Building the Relationship Outside BANNER
  • During conversion, RGP and Finance got to know
    each other and learn respective office outcomes
    but also agreed to commit to the overarching
    common goal of having equal charitable
    contributions recorded in both modules.

13
Building the Relationship Outside BANNER
  • Advancement produces the VSE report through an
    adhoc report and do not use the VSE coding in
    BANNER.
  • Wouldnt it be really cool if the total for VSE
    was the same, to the penny, as what the gift
    revenue is in the financial statements?!

14
General Operation
  • All charitable contributions received by Bucknell
    are processed by RGP and fed to Finance using
    ADPFEED.
  • Currently, pledges are NOT fed to Finance.
  • After gifts are entered in BANNER and fed to
    Finance (daily), paper gift reports are produced
    and sent by RGP to Finance along with checks,
    cash, etcfor deposit to the bank.

15
Building the Relationship Outside BANNER
  • Our relationship outside BANNER is continuous.
    As gifts and pledges are secured for new
    purposes, the offices (along with Finance),
    regularly communicate how (and sometimes if) a
    new fund can, or should, be created within the
    Universitys budget structure and considering
    donor intent.

16
Building the Relationship Inside BANNER
  • The relationship inside BANNER between RGP and
    Finance comes together through five data areas
  • 1. Designations (ADADESG)/Funds
  • 2. Gift/Payment Types (ATVGIFT)
  • 3. Pledge/Vehicle Codes (ATVPGVE)
  • 4. Pledge Category Codes (ATVPCAT)
  • 5. Pledge Conditions (AGAPCON)

17
Designations/Funds
  • Designations/Funds
  • Funds are created first by Finance in the
    general ledger, and then the designation is
    created in ADADESG for RGPs use.

18
Designations/Funds
  • The designation field only allows 10 characters.
    Bucknells format is that the first character is
    a letter to represent the nature of the fund,
    such as unrestricted (U), designated (D),
    restricted (R), endowed (E), other (O), etc. The
    next six characters is the six-digit fund number
    created by Finance. The last three characters,
    if needed, as a suffix.

19
Designations/Funds
  • For example, our Annual Fund is coded U110011000,
    where U means Unrestricted, 110011 is the fund
    number created by Finance as part of the FOAPAL.
    The last three characters, 000, are used but are
    not necessary to further define the designation,
    i.e., 001, 002, 003.

20
Designations/Funds
  • Use of the six-digit fund number helps in
    communication between offices. When Finance has
    a question about fund number 110011, RGP can
    quickly and easily identify the fund in ADADESG
    and see both the designation code and description.

21
Designations/Funds
  • An example of when we use a three-digit suffix
    within the designation code would be for our
    gifts-in-kind. All GIK designations begin with
    K126499. The three-digit suffix is then used to
    further define the purpose of the GIK.
  • For example, a GIK for the Art Gallery would be
    entered to K126499001, a GIK to the Chemistry
    Department would go to K126499002, a GIK to
    Residential Life would go to K126499003, etc
  • Since GIKs are fed to Finance but do not impact
    the ledger totals, we are able to record all GIKs
    to one fund number (126499).

22
Designations/Funds
  • GIKS, along with Volunteer Services gifts, do not
    effect BANNER-Finance ledgers, via ADPFEED,
    because these two gift types are controlled
    through a Rule Class code on each gift type in
    ATVGIFT (Gift/Payment Types). The rule code will
    credit an account code while debiting an account
    code within the same FOAPAL thus having no effect
    to the ledger

23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
Designations/Funds
  • Once the designation is created, then a campaign
    code is assigned.
  • The gift/pledge can now be entered in BANNER.

26
Gift/Payment Types (ATVGIFT)
  • Gift Type codes are stored in the ATVGIFT table,
    a table owned by Finance.
  • Bucknell uses 63 different Gift Types.
  • Many Gift Types were developed based on a
    combination of how a gift can be made (check,
    credit card, cash, securities) and Vehicle Codes
    (ATVPGVE). Which is all driven by VSE reporting.

27
Gift/Payment Types (ATVGIFT)
  • At Bucknell, it was decided early in the
    conversion process that Finance will own this
    table.
  • The reason for this decision was that this table
    will manage how every transaction in
    BANNER-Alumni feeds into BANNER-Finance using the
    rule codes assigned to each gift type. Thus
    directly impacting Bucknells Financial
    Statements.

28
Gift/Payment Types (ATVGIFT)
  • For example, we have a Gift Type code of CK for
    check but also a code of AK for gift
    annuity/check for VSE reporting.
  • We also have specific codes for payroll deduction
    and matching gift as specifically defined by
    BANNER-Alumni.

29
Gift/Payment Types (ATVGIFT)
  • One advantage of the exploded gift types is
    that Finance can assign a Rule Code for correct
    recording to the general ledger for each
    combination.
  • Since the Rule Code code plays such a significant
    role in the Advancement-to-Finance feed process.
    (Again, ATVGIFT is owned by Finance.) Any
    additions, deletions or changes to the table are
    done as a joint effort between Finance and
    Advancement.

30
Gift/Payment Types (ATVGIFT)
  • Given our use of 66 Gift Types and the Rule Class
    assigned, ATVGIFT is the key connection between
    both offices within BANNER.
  • Finally, it is important to note that Bucknell
    decided early not to use the canned rule codes as
    delivered in BANNER. Bucknell developed their
    own rule codes while verifying with the
    action-line and a consultant the actions each
    rule code.
  • (this will be further discussed later in the
    presentation)

31
(No Transcript)
32
Pledge/Gift Vehicles (ATVPGVE)
  • Most of Bucknells Pledge/Gift Vehicle codes
    (ATVPGVE) are for planned giving purposes, such
    as Deferred CGA, Flexible CGA, Charitable Lead
    Annuity Trust (CLAT), Charitable Remainder
    Unitrust (CRUT), etc...
  • We have a specific code for Third Party Pledge
    Payment, since BANNER requires it.

33
Pledge/Gift Vehicles (ATVPGVE)
  • ATVPGVE is a table that is owned by Finance. Any
    additions, deletions or changes to the table are
    done as a joint effort between Finance and
    Advancement.

34
(No Transcript)
35
Pledge Category Codes (ATVPCAT)
  • Bucknell uses three codes for Pledge Category
    Irrevocable, Revocable and Conditional.
  • The use of these three codes is determined by
    input from Finance, Gift Planning and any other
    appropriate fund-raising office.
  • ATVPCAT is owned by Advancement, however changes
    to this table are done with input from Finance.

36
(No Transcript)
37
Pledge Category Codes (ATVPCAT) and Pledge
Conditions (AGAPCON)
  • It is within ATVPCAT that the conditional flag is
    set. At Bucknell, we decided to have a separate
    code for Conditional and check the conditional
    flag.
  • If you use the conditional flag, BANNER requires
    a Condition Type to be entered on Pledge
    Conditions (AGAPCON). We simply use a type of
    Conditional and enter the terms of the condition.
    Advancement can also easily indicate with radio
    buttons on the form if the condition was met or
    not.

38
Pledge Category Codes (ATVPCAT)
  • A special note about Pledge Category codes
  • BANNER requires that one Pledge Category code be
    selected in the Statement of Giving and Pledge
    Rules block of the Advancement Control form
    (AGACTRL).
  • You must enter a Pledge Category code for
    Unconditional Pledge Category Definition. We use
    the code for Irrevocable. Deciding which code to
    use depends on your operation.

39
How does this information feed to BANNER-Finance?
40
Impact to Ledger Gift/Contributions
  • Each contribution that feeds into BANNER-Finance
    has its own rule code as defined on ATVGIFT.
  • As each transaction posts to the BANNER-Finance,
    no transaction will post directly to a cash
    account. Each transaction posts to a clearing
    account to be reconciled at the end of each month.

41
Impact to Ledger - How does the rule code know
what to do?
  • The rule codes are designed to credit/debit a
    transaction in the operating ledger while posting
    the offsetting transaction to a clearing account
    in the general ledger.
  • This is managed by the process codes and
    modifiers that are behind every rule code.
    Again, we did not use the canned rule codes as
    supplied in BANNER.

42
Impact to Ledger - How does the rule code know
what to do?
  • Example
  • 100 cash gift from Mr. Big Shot
  • A) The transaction would be
  • Debit - Cash Awaiting Deposit-Alumni
  • Credit - Annual Fund Gift Revenue
  • B) When the check gets deposited at the bank and
    the deposit slip is returned, then an entry will
    be done is
  • Debit Bank Cash
  • Credit Cash Awaiting Deposit-Alumni

43
Impact to Ledger - How does the rule code know
what to do?
  • Example
  • 10,000 CGA stock gift from Mr. Big Shot
  • A) The transaction would be
  • Debit Stock Clearing-Alumni
  • Credit Big Shot Endowment CGA Revenue
  • B) When the check gets deposited at the bank and
    the deposit slip is returned, then an entry will
    be done is
  • Debit Bank Cash
  • Credit Stock Clearing-Alumni

44
Impact to Ledger - How does the rule code know
what to do?
  • First we will look at the General Ledger

45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
Impact to Ledger - How does the rule code know
what to do?
  • Next the Operating Ledger

48
(No Transcript)
49
Reconciling
  • By having the offset transaction post to clearing
    accounts, each transaction is reviewed at a high
    level for posting correctly.
  • Many transactions are reviewed at a detailed
    level (planned giving contributions, stock gifts,
    athletic gifts, new funds held in trust by
    others, etc.) to ensure proper accounting from
    the point of receipt.

50
  • XR1 Current YTD Totals Last
    YTD Totals Dollar Difference
  • ------------------------------
    ----- ----------------------------
    -------------------
  • I. TOTAL RECEIPTS

  • Outright Gifts
    10,732,328.63 15,667,015.92
    -4,934,687.29
  • Pledge Payments
    10,448,361.04 14,798,789.00
    -4,350,427.96
  • Total Receipts
    21,180,689.67 30,465,804.92
    -9,285,115.25
  • II. TOTAL PLEDGES

  • Pledges Due by 6/30
    1,291,759.26 1,856,443.37
    -564,684.11
  • III. TOTAL COMMITMENTS
    22,472,448.93 32,322,248.29
    -9,849,799.36
  • IV. PLEDGES DUE AFTER 6/30
    77,186,434.36 65,693,459.86
    11,492,974.50
  • 1. Bucknell Fund Unrestricted

  • Total Receipts
    4,093,859.41 3,966,285.97
    127,573.44
  • Pledges Due by 6/30
    209,742.76 84,946.39
    124,796.37
  • Total Commitments
    4,303,602.17 4,051,232.36
    252,369.81
  • 2. Designated Funds

  • Total Receipts
    2,358,205.02 2,085,019.49
    273,185.53

51
Reconciling
  • Go to UR to Finance June excel worksheet

52
Reporting Gift Reporting
  • There are many internal and external reports that
    use the gift/contribution information
  • Bucknells Financial Statements
  • VSE Reporting
  • NACUBO Endowment
  • 990 Tax Exempt Reporting
  • Grant/Contract Stewardship
  • Etc

53
Reporting Gift Reporting
  • All reporting is directly related to Bucknells
    Financial Statements. How is that accomplished?

  • Standard monthly report (go to UR to Finance
    June PDF)
  • Relationship of VSE to Financial Statements (go
    to Financial Statements to UR PDF)
  • Relationship of XR1 (internal Advancement report)
    to Financial Statements

54
Reporting Pledges
  • We have discussed in detail the gift reporting
    and reconciliations but have not touched on
    pledge reporting. To refresh our memories
  • No pledges are fed into BANNER-Finance
  • No external reporting is done except on the
    Financial Statements
  • Since we are not in a campaign, no internal
    reporting structure has been defined regarding
    pledges. However, we are in the process of
    defining internal pledge reporting.

55
Reporting Pledges
  • Periodically throughout the fiscal year pledges
    are reviewed for determination if the pledges are
    still valid or collectible. At the end of each
    fiscal year, Finance will ask management to
    review the outstanding pledges.
  • From this review, allowance and discount
    assumptions are determined.

56
Reporting Pledges
  • Go to PDF - 2006 Pledges Receivable
  • Go to FY2006 Pledges Receivable .xls

57
  • Current YTD Totals Last YTD Totals Dollar
    Difference
  • -----------------------------------
    ------------------- -------------------
    -------------------
  • I. TOTAL RECEIPTS

  • Outright Gifts
    10,732,328.63 15,667,015.92
    -4,934,687.29
  • Pledge Payments
    10,448,361.04 14,798,789.00
    -4,350,427.96
  • Total Receipts
    21,180,689.67 30,465,804.92
    -9,285,115.25
  • II. TOTAL PLEDGES

  • Pledges Due by 6/30
    1,291,759.26 1,856,443.37
    -564,684.11
  • III. TOTAL COMMITMENTS
    22,472,448.93 32,322,248.29
    -9,849,799.36
  • IV. PLEDGES DUE AFTER 6/30
    77,186,434.36 65,693,459.86
    11,492,974.50
  • 1. Bucknell Fund Unrestricted

  • Total Receipts
    4,093,859.41 3,966,285.97
    127,573.44
  • Pledges Due by 6/30
    209,742.76 84,946.39
    124,796.37
  • Total Commitments
    4,303,602.17 4,051,232.36
    252,369.81
  • 2. Designated Funds

  • Total Receipts
    2,358,205.02 2,085,019.49
    273,185.53

58
Reporting Pledges
  • Pledges impact Bucknells Balance Sheet by 16.9
    million (after discounting and allowances) versus
    accounts receivable by 4.3 million.

59
Pennsylvania BANNER Users Group2006
  • Open Floor for Other Questions?

60
Pennsylvania BANNER Users Group2006
  • Have a great day!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)