Dr' Jerri Lynn LippertFrances Doyle - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Dr' Jerri Lynn LippertFrances Doyle

Description:

What are effective instructional leadership practices and dispositions for ... coaches can effectively use to coherently support and facilitate the district's vision? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: gpoli3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dr' Jerri Lynn LippertFrances Doyle


1
Student Success Leadership Matters
  • Dr. Jerri Lynn Lippert-Frances Doyle
  • 2008-2009 Coaching Launch Training
  • September 4th 5th, 2008

2
Guiding Inquires
  • What are effective instructional leadership
    practices and dispositions for principals and
    coaches and district leaders? What evidence
    would you show that effective instructional
    leadership practices are in place?
  • What are tools, routines and social practices
    that curriculum coaches can effectively use to
    coherently support and facilitate the districts
    vision?
  • What are tools, routines and social practices
    that curriculum coaches can effectively use to
    continue to improve teaching and learning and
    monitoring district instructional initiatives to
    support student success?
  • What is the role of central office leaders in
    supporting effective instructional leadership
    practices of coaches and their schools?
  • What tools, routines and practices do central
    office leaders use to assist schools in
    developing coherency of district academic
    initiatives and monitoring continuous instruction
    improvement to advance student learning?

2
3
Learning Intentions
  • How can coaching capacity be advanced through
    understanding curriculum content and the tools
    and practices supporting each content area that
    advance teaching and learning?
  • How can coaching capacity be advanced through
    understanding a coherent professional development
    cycle and the tools and practices supporting
    professional development in each content area?

3
4
In May
  • The District in partnership with the PFT revised
    the PPS Content-Focused Coaching Model
  • Take five minutes to review the revised coaching
    model. Then,
  • Turn to your elbow partner and discuss the
    reasons for the revised model
  • And
  • 3 significant changes under the revised model

4
5
Refocusing and Reframing Our Work
  • Coach feedback from the DL Retreat provided a
    lens for reframing the CFC Model.
  • Need more common planning time in the building
  • Need more time in the school to plan with
    teachers
  • Teachers and coaches need more PD, specifically
    on curriculum writing/development and DL
  • Maybe coaches could teach half day in the
    morning and coach in the afternoon
  • This would afford coaches authentic practice
    with curriculum and programs initiatives
  • This would also allow coaches to use their room
    as a laboratory classroom for teachers to
    observe
  • ALA Grass Roots Committee 2/18/08
  • How can we work together to get ½ day release
    time a month for PD?
  • Teachers will have 2 additional half days of
    curriculum-based professional development
    experiences in their building.
  • October 8, 2008
  • April 3, 2008

5
6
Refocusing and Reframing Our Work
  • 100 coaches is an annual investment of
    8,551,000.00
  • The CFC Model is the most costly of all reform
    efforts focused specifically on improving math
    and ELA teaching and learning
  • Content-Focused Coaches will
  • teach or co-teach the district core curriculum
  • provide a model/laboratory classroom to be used
    as a professional development opportunities for
    teachers
  • facilitate professional development to meet
    content teacher needs
  • provide insight into the necessary revisions to
    the curriculum provide access to a curriculum
    specialist at the building level

6
7
The Content-focused Coaching Model
  • Content-focused Coaching SM is a professional
    development model designed to promote student
    achievement by
  • Engaging teachers in regular, on-going
    examination of classroom practice in a specific
    content area
  • Assisting teachers in understanding and using a
    set of cognitive tools as the framework for
    designing, enacting and reflecting on rigorous
    instruction
  • Providing teachers with an opportunity to learn
    from each other and become reflective
    practitioners
  • Contributing to the development of a
    collaborative learning community

7
8
Content Focused Coaching Model
Establishment of laboratory classrooms to
enhance and facilitate implementation of core
programs and curriculums a way to model high
level implementation for content teachers
80 of time focused on teaching and
learning Establishment of laboratory classrooms
will provide visitation days for teachers to
observe and learn teaching strategies for
implementation of the core curriculum or core
program and subsequent teacher actions from
observation of coach teaching
Coaches will be supervised jointly Establishment
of laboratory classrooms will provide
feedback Coaches work closely with principal to
establish model Classroom visitation days for
teachers
Follow-up by the coach to support teachers
application of observed teaching strategies into
the classroom is necessary and must be supported
by the principal Principal must support the
coaching model and application of content
specific professional development provided by the
coach into the classroom.
8
9
Cooperative Planning
  • With key aspects of the revised coaching model
    in mind, discuss your progress on the below
    questions with a partner
  • How has your principal supported you working
    deeply with the math and/or ELA teachers around
    the curriculum?
  • What is your schedule? What class(es) will you
    teach or co-teach and what was the rationale for
    that decision?
  • How will you and your ITL work together to
    maximize instruction?
  • How will the assistant principal support you and
    instruction?
  • How has your principal removed barriers for you
    to effectively enhance classroom instruction? And
    what barriers were removed?
  • Based on your schools data, what are some of
    your key professional development focus points
    and why?

9
10
Refocusing and Reframing Our Work
  • In May, we promised to
  • Put structures, practices, routines and supports
    in place to maximize the 8,551,000.00 coaching
    investment to improve teaching and learning
  • In order to focus the work of the coach more
    precisely on effective implementation of core
    curriculum in math/ELA and to support effective
    and coherent professional development that
    results in improved instructional quality and
    student outcomes

10
11
Refocusing and Reframing Our Work for
2008-2009Going Deeper
  • To that end, we have
  • Developed a professional development cycle of
    coaching for work with teachers
  • Created tools to facilitate the work
  • Developed practices and protocols for coaching
    work with teachers and for supervisors working
    with coaches
  • Refined the cadre and coaching lab protocols
  • Developed a coaching handbook and coaching log to
    guide the revised model implementation and
    articulate the practices and tools to support the
    model

11
12
Cycle of Professional Development
Content that ? student learning
Student Needs Data
Self-Reflection Self-Assessment
Content Context Process
Directed Professional Growth Inquiry-Based
Collaboration
Characteristics Of Effective Coherent PD
Process that results in SUSTAINED school
improvement
12
13
Professional Development
  • Teachers in both weak and strong professional
    learning communities benefit from intensive,
    sustained professional development focused on
    content instruction (Cohen Hill, 2001).

13
14
Characteristics of Coherent and Effective
Professional Development
  • Is rooted in the content to be taught and where
    possible, uses actual curricular materials
  • Occurs close to the classroom - todays learning
    are accessed for tomorrows teaching
  • Engages teachers in and give them an opportunity
    to analyze, the actual processes or a simulation
    of those in which they will engage students
  • Has a consistency of focus each session builds
    on the previous one, thereby taking the learning
    deeper
  • Is distributed over time so deepening learning
    and reflection can occur
  • Includes both transformative and additive
    professional development
  • Models approaches to instruction that are
    situated in a cognitive perspective
  • Provides the opportunity for teachers to acquire
    the skills and knowledge needed to meet the needs
    of individual students
  • Is resourced and supported by district leadership
  • Is related to district goals and the standards
  • Is based on the analysis of data that is used to
    determine next steps in learning
  • Is planned and implemented across and for all
    educators in the system, all professionals must
    be learners as part of their everyday practice

14
15
Characteristics of Coherent and Effective
Professional Development
  • Is related to attainment of the Pennsylvania
    Academic Standards and high quality instruction
  • Is planned in response to a need of the school
    entity and its professional employees, that have
    been identified for a target audience
  • Has clear and concise, written content and
    skill-based competencies
  • Includes content and instructional methods that
    are appropriate for the intended competencies to
    be mastered
  • Is planned and conducted by personnel who have an
    academic degree or other education and experience
    appropriate to the subject matter being taught
  • Is research-based, data-driven and contributes to
    measurable increases in student achievement
  • Provides sufficient support and resources over
    time to enable individuals to master new skills
  • Contributes to building learning communities and
    continuous improvement.
  • Requires that participants demonstrate attainment
    of the competencies
  • Is evaluated by the participants

15
16
Coaching Model Teaching and LearningProfessional
Development Cycle
Awareness Study
  • Determine Areas for Growth and Set Focus of PD
  • Student data
  • Feedback from TL Teams
  • Student work analysis
  • Teacher Identified needs

Process is Collaborative,
Data Driven, Cyclical Focused on Student
Achievement
Learning Studying
Application
  • Intense Work with the Coach
  • Group Learning
  • Lab Classrooms
  • Classroom Demonstrations
  • Conferencing, Observing Conferring
  • Independent Practice
  • Reflection
  • Full Implementation of Teaching Practices
    Strategies
  • Application of Professional Learning
  • Student Work Analysis
  • T L teams on Learning Walks
  • Formal Observations encouraged

16
17
Coaching Model PD Cycle
  • Take 10 minutes and review the Coaching Model
    Teaching and Learning Professional Development
    Cycle
  • As you read, reflect and write responses to the
    following
  • How does the coaching model cycle support
    effective and coherent professional development?
  • What are key aspects of each of the three phases
    in the cycle?
  • What do you like about the cycle?
  • What questions do you have about the PD cycle?

17
18
Going Deeper
  • Share with your table mates your reflections to
    the questions
  • Then, as a table agree on 3 KEY ideas from the PD
    cycle that you would like to share with the
    larger group and chart your 3 Key ideas
  • And, each table should also be prepared to
    summarize the coaching cycle schedule of PD that
    is relevant to their level
  • Elementary Coaching Cycle Schedule
  • K-8 Coaching Cycle Schedule
  • Middle Coaching Cycle Schedule
  • High School Coaching Cycle Schedule

18
19
Key Findings About Adult Learners
  • Adults will commit to learning when the goals and
    objective are considered realistic. Application
    in the real world is important and relevant to
    the adult learners personal and professional
    needs.
  • Adults want to be the origin of their own
    learning and resist learning activities they
    believe are an attack on their competence.
    Professional development must give some control
    to the participants
  • Adult learners need to see that the PD and their
    day-to-day activities are related and relevant
  • Adult learning has ego involved. PD must provide
    support from peers and reduce the fear of
    judgment
  • Adults need feedback. Opportunities must be
    built in to professional development activities
    that allow practice.
  • Adults need to participate in small group
    activities during learning to move them beyond
    understanding to application, analysis synthesis
    and evaluation.
  • Diversity of learners must be accommodated.
  • Transfer of knowledge is not automatic and must
    be facilitated. Coaching and follow-up support
    are needed to help adult learners transfer
    learning into daily practice so that it is
    sustained.

19
20
Teaching and Learning Teams
  • How do the Teaching and Learning Teams support
    the Coaching Model Teaching and Learning
    Professional Development Cycle?

20
21
What Are the Tools to Support The Work of the
Revised Coaching Model and Coaching Cycle
  • Refer to your Coaching Handbook Highlights
    include
  • District and PFT designed guidelines for
    co-teaching in the coaching model
  • PD Cycle and Schedules
  • Coaching Lab Protocol
  • Teaching and Learning Feedback Tools (These
    replace the generic learning walk tools)
    (NON-EVALUATIVE)
  • Coaching Log requirements
  • Review Table of Contents
  • PD assessment and planning tool
  • Lesson plan format for coaches
  • Supervisor-coach observing and conferring tool

21
22
Reflecting on the Learning Intention
  • How can coaching capacity be advanced through
    understanding a coherent professional development
    cycle and the tools and practices supporting
    professional development in each content area?
  • Understanding of the professional development
    cycle of coaching for work with teachers
    (Coaching Model Teaching and LearningProfessiona
    l Development Cycle and Schedules)
  • Understanding of the tools to facilitate the work
    (content-specific teaching and learning feedback
    tools)
  • Understanding of the practices and protocols for
    coaching work with teachers and for supervisors
    working with coaches (content-specific PD
    assessment and planning tools, supervisor-coach
    observing and conferring tool, coaching log)
  • Refined the cadre and coaching lab protocols
  • Developed a coaching handbook and coaching log to
    guide the revised model implementation and
    articulate the practices and tools to support the
    model

22
23
Improving Classroom Teaching Through Managed
Instruction
24
K-5 Curriculum Plan
25
Core Curriculum Plan 6-12
26
CAS Curriculum Plan
27
2008-2009 Summary
  • 32 Total Curriculum Courses
  • 7 ELA courses 6-12
  • 6 math courses
  • 1 algebra lab course
  • 6 science courses
  • 6 social courses AA History
  • CAS Courses 5
  • Other Curriculum Key Initiatives
  • READ 180 6th-9th grades 2008-2009
  • Write Tools Content Writing Portfolios
  • Compass Learning K-12 2008-2009
  • SAT Online students 6-12
  • Response to Intervention K-5 Strategic
    Interventions 6-12
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com