More on Limited Dependent Variables - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

More on Limited Dependent Variables

Description:

Interpreting the effect of binary response models ... Nevertheless, average partial effect (APE) for the whole distribution of c can ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: economicsa
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: More on Limited Dependent Variables


1
More on Limited Dependent Variables
  • Lecturer Zhigang Li

2
Interpreting the effect of binary response models
  • We are often more interested in the partial
    effect of Xi (the effect on the probability of
    success)
  • The partial effect depends on X and can be easily
    calculated for different values of X.
  • For example, when Xß0, the scaling factor is
    approximately .4 for probit and .25 for logit.
  • Typically, we report the partial effect for the
    sample averages of X. This can be easily obtained
    using the dprobit command of Stata.

3
Specification Issue 1 Neglected (omitted)
Heterogeneity
  • Neglected (omitted) Heterogeneity
  • Omitted variables are independent of the included
    explanatory variables.
  • Consequence
  • Parameters are inconsistent
  • Partial effect for specific value of c would be
    incorrect
  • Nevertheless, average partial effect (APE) for
    the whole distribution of c can be still be
    correctly estimated.

4
Specification Issue 2 Continuous Endogenous
(Explanatory) Variables
  • One possible solution is to estimate a linear
    probability model using 2SLS.
  • Another solution is to estimate a probit model
    use the Rivers-Vuong two-step approach.

5
Rivers-Vuong two-step approach
  • y1z1d1a1y2u1
  • y11y1gt0
  • y2z1d21z2d22v2 zd2v2
  • v2 and u1 may be correlated.
  • Assume v2 and u1 follow a joint normal
    distribution, then u1?1v2e1. e1 is independent
    of v2
  • Step 1 Estimate v2
  • Step 2 Use probit model to regress
  • y1z1d1a1y2 ?1v2e1

6
Unobserved Effects Probit Models under Strict
Exogeneity
  • P(yit1)F(xitßci)
  • A fixed-effect approach that estimates ß and ci
    (like linear fixed-effect model) is infeasible.
  • Solution 1 Estimate a random effect probit model
    (i.e. c and x are independent)
  • Solution 2 (Chamberlains random effects probit
    model) Assume
  • Solution 3 Estimate a fixed effects logit model

7
On Heckman Selection Procedure with Endogenous
Explanatory variables
  • y1z1d1a1y2u1
  • y2 zd2v2
  • y31zd3v3 gt0
  • First estimate the selection equation to compute
    the inverse Mills ratio
  • Estimate the first equation with the inverse
    Mills ratio and z as instrument for y2.
  • At least two elements of z are not also in z1.

8
Sample Selection in Linear Panel Data Models
  • Two issues
  • Endogenously unbalanced panel Units leave and
    enter the sample over time based on factors
    related to disturbance.
  • Incidental truncation Units covered by the
    sample do not change but some variables are
    unobserved for some time periods based on factors
    related to disturbance.

9
Fixed effects Estimation with Unbalanced Panels
  • Sample selection is a problem for fixed effects
    estimation when the selection is related to the
    disturbances.
  • yitxitßciuit
  • sit1 if (xit, yit) is observed
  • Key assumption for consistency
  • Error term is mean independent of si for all t (
    E(uitxi,si,ci)0)
  • Estimates from unbalanced panel and the balanced
    subsample are all consistent.

10
Testing for Sample Selection Bias
  • The Nijman and Verbeek approach
  • Including the lagged or lead selection indicator
    (e.g. si,t-1 or si,t1) to the fixed effects
    model and test its significance.
  • Panel Heckmans test
  • yit1xit1ß1ci1uit1
  • sit21xi?t2vit2gt0
  • Estimate the selection equation using pooled
    probit and calculate the inverse Mills ratio.
  • Include the inverse Mills ratio to the fixed
    effects model and test its significance.

11
Correcting for sample selection bias Incidental
truncation with panel
  • Chamberlains approach
  • Key assumption
  • ci1xip1ft1vit2
  • With inverse Mills ratio, the following
    regression can be estimated consistently
  • yit1xit1ß1xip1?t1?(xi?t2)eit
  • Tobit selection equation

12
Correcting for sample selection bias Attrition
  • Focus on attrition in which units that leave the
    sample do not reenter.
  • Approach Estimate the first-difference model
    with probit selection equation
  • ?yit?xitß?uit
  • sit1witdtvitgt0
  • Key assumptions
  • xit does not affect attrition once the elements
    in wit have been controlled for
  • Strict exogeneity of xit (may be relaxed with IV)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com