Title: Lecture Eleven
1Lecture Eleven
- More on Minsky
- Modelling endogenous money/debt deflation
2Brief HET of Minsky
- Parents met at a Communist Party social function
- No prizes for guessing early formative
influences! - Fought in US Army in WWII, decamped post-war to
do a degree - Educated during McCarthyist communist witch
hunt periodno mention ever of Marx in his
research, for obvious reasons - Began with degree in mathematics, attempted to
build mathematical model of trade cycle based on
Hickss difference equation model, extended by
Kaleckis principle of increasing risk (last
lecture)
3Brief HET of Minsky
- Kalecki argued investment restrained by
increasing risk (uncertainty-style!) as capital
grows - Minsky used this at macro level to give an
otherwise explosive model of trade cycle a
turning point - Model was
- Where Minsky made b a variable dependent on
financial conditions - b declines as economy grows, thus giving turning
point to upward explosive movement - "the accelerator coefficient ... is in part based
on the productive efficiency of investment, but
it is also related to the willingness of
investors to take risks and the terms in which
investors can finance their endeavours..."
(Minsky 1965 261)
4Brief HET of Minsky
- Model went nowhere, but Minsky began to explore
implications of finance for economic behaviour - Initially tried to do this from conventional
understanding of Keynes - If we make the Keynesian assumption that
consumption demand is independent of interest
rates, but assume that investment demand, and
hence the b coefficient, depends on interest
rates, then a rising set of interest rates will
lower the b coefficient. (Minsky 1965, 1982
262) - Also got nowhere
- Then, one day, by chance, he read Keyness 1937
papers
5Brief HET of Minsky
- In 1969, Minsky states that his own ideas about
uncertainty "seem to be consistent with those of
Keynes" (1969a, 1982 191, footnote 6), citing
Keynes 1937 - Eventually concludes
- capitalism is inherently flawed, being prone to
booms, crises and depressions. This instability,
in my view, is due to characteristics the
financial system must posses if it is to be
consistent with full-blown capitalism. Such a
financial system will be capable of both
generating signals that induce an accelerating
desire to invest and of financing that
accelerating investment. (Minsky 1969b 224)
6Brief HET of Minsky
- Basic model outlined in previous lecture from
now on, consider how to produce economic
(mathematical) model of process Minsky describes - First, some mathematical preliminaries
- Minskys model essentially dynamic, and therefore
cannot be modelled either using equilibrium tools
or static drawings - Basic tool of dynamic analysis is the
differential equation - Quick introduction to this, then
- Graphical tools for simulating dynamic processes
- Insights from endogenous money argument
7Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Dynamic systems necessarily involve time
- Simplest expression starts with definition of the
percentage rate of change of a variable - Population grows at 1 a year
- Percentage rate of change of a variable x is
- Slope of function w.r.t. time (dx/dt)
- Divided by current value of variable (x)
- So this is mathematically
- This can be rearranged to
- Looks very similar to differentiation, which you
have done but essential difference rate of
change of x is some function of value of x itself.
8Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Dependence of rate of change of variable on its
current value makes solution of equation much
more difficult than solution of standard
differentiation problem - Differentiation also normally used by economists
to find minima/maxima of some function - Profit is maximised where the rate of change of
total revenue equals the rate of change of total
cost (blah blah blah) - Take functions for TR, TC
- Differentiate
- Equate
- Easy! (also wrong, but thats another story)
- However differential equations
9Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Have to be integrated to solve them
Rearrange
Integrate
Solve
Take exponentials
- Constant is value of x at time t0
10Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Simple model like this gives
- Exponential growth if agt0
- Exponential decay if alt0
- But unlike differentiation technique (most
functions can be differentiated) - Most functions cant be integrated no simple
solution can be found and also - Models can also be inter-related
- x can depend on itself and y
- y can depend on itself and x
- Models end up much more complicated
11Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Simple example relationship of fish and sharks.
- In the absence of sharks, assume fish population
grows smoothly - The rate of growth of the fish population is a
p.a.
Rearrange
Integrate
Solve
Exponentials
12Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Simulating gives exponential growth if agt0
13Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Same thing can be done for sharks in the absence
of fish - Rate of growth of shark population equals c p.a.
- But here c is negative
- But we know fish and sharks interact
- The rate of change of fish populations is also
some (negative) function of how many Sharks there
are
- The rate of change of shark population is also
some (positive) function of how many Fish there
are
14Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Now we have a model where the rate of change of
each variable (fish and sharks) depends on its
own value and the value of the other variable
(sharks and fish)
- This can still be solved, with more effort (dont
worry about the maths of this!)
15Dynamic modellingan introduction
- But for technical reasons, this is the last level
of complexity that can be solved - Add an additional (nonlinearly related)
variablesay, seagrass levelsand model cannot be
solved - But there are other ways
- Mathematicians have shown that unstable processes
can be simulated - Engineers have built tools for simulating dynamic
processes.
16Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Express model as vector equation
- Provide values for constants a,b,c,d, initial
values for Fish, Shark numbers (ratio a/b gives
equilibrium for sharks, c/d for fish)
17Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Express as vector differential equation and
simulate using Runge-Kutta algorithm (like
sophisticated Taylors expansion)
18Dynamic modellingan introduction
- A far from equilibrium model with just 2
variables and constant coefficients - System will never reach equilibrium
- (What odds that the actual economy is in
equilibrium)
19Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Thats the hard way now for the easy way
- Differential equations can be simulated using
flowcharts - The basic idea
- Numerically integrate the rate of change of a
function to work out its current value - Tie together numerous variables for a dynamic
system - Consider simple population growth
- Population grows at 2 per annum
20Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Representing this as mathematics, we get
- Next stage of a symbolic solution is
- Symbolically you would continue, putting dt on
the RHS but instead, numerically, you integrate
- Read it backwards, and its the same equation
- Feed in an initial value (say, 18 million) and we
can simulate it (over, say, 100 years)
21Dynamic modellingan introduction
- MUCH more complicated models than this can be
built
22Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Models can have multiple interacting variables,
multiple layers for example, a racing car
simulation
23Dynamic modellingan introduction
- System dynamics block has these components
- And this block has the following components
24Dynamic modellingan introduction
- This is not toy software engineers use this
technology to design actual cars, planes,
rockets, power stations, electric circuits
25Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Lets use it to build the Fish/Shark model
- Start with population model, only
- Change Population to Fish
- Alter design to allow different initial numbers
- This is equivalent to first half of
- To add second half, have to alter part of model
to LHS of integrator
26Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Sharks just shown as constant here
- Sharks substract from fish growth rate
27Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Shark population declines exponentially, just as
fish population rises - (numbers obviously unrealistic)
- Now add interaction between two species
28Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Model now gives same cycles as seen in
mathematical simulation.
- Now to apply this to endogenous money!
29Dynamic modellingan introduction
- Some general principles
- Dynamic models can (usually do) have unstable and
multiple equilibria - Systems often remain in permanent but changing
disequilibrium - Nonlinear relations essential for interesting
results (cycles without breakdown), but - Nonlinearity can arise naturally (e.g., price
times quantity gives nonlinear results) rather
than out of arbitrary assumed nonlinear
behaviours
30Recap on principles of endogenous money
- (1) Kydland and Prescott rule out deterministic
causes of business cycles on grounds that - "Theories with deterministic cyclical laws of
motion may a priori have had considerable
potential for accounting for business cycles but
in fact they have failed to do so. They have
failed because cyclical laws of motion do not
arise as equilibrium behaviour for economics with
empirically reasonable preferences and
technologiesthat is, for economies with
reasonable statements about people's ability and
willingness to substitute." (KP 5) - BUNKUM! Cant rule out far-from-equilibrium model
on basis of behaviour of a different equilibrium
model! - On the othe hand
31Recap on principles of endogenous money
- Circuitist results from Kaleckian algebra
- Money prices independent of quantity of money,
etc - But Kaleckian identities presume equilibrium
while model of money formation required
disequilibrium otherwise level of money in
economy falls to zero - An assumption is therefore required for the
existence of a money stock, namely that
wage-earners spend their money incomes gradually
over time It is a necessary assumption if we do
not want money to disappear altogether from the
system. (6) - Need base model that generates cyclical,
far-from-equilibrium behaviour
32Recap on principles of endogenous money
- KP working from the data (rather than
theoretical leanings, as earlier) - "This finding that the real wage behaves in a
reasonably strong procyclical manner is counter
to a widely held belief in the literature." (KP
13-14) - Income distribution dynamics form part of the
trade cycle
33Recap on principles of endogenous money
- Model has to give credit a key role in cycles
- "The fact that the transaction component of real
cash balances (M1) moves contemporaneously with
the cycle while the much larger nontransaction
component (M2) leads the cycle suggests that
credit arrangements could play a significant role
in future business cycle theory. Introducing
money and credit into growth theory in a way that
accounts for the cyclical behaviour of monetary
as well as real aggregates is an important open
problem in economics." (17) - Credit and debt go hand in hand
- Credit money carries with it debt obligations
(whereas fiat or commodity money does not),
therefore debt dynamics are an important part of
the monetary system
34Recap on principles of endogenous money
- Blowout in inside to outside money ratios,
but Debt to broader money measures (M2, M3)
fairly constant - Debt a proxy for credit
(Dip in M2,3/M1 rise in Debt/M2,3 ratios due to
bailout activities in post-87/9 slump)
35Recap on principles of endogenous money
- Empirical work by Fama and French (Efficient
Markets Hypothesis proponents) finds - Debt seems to be the residual variable in
financing decisions. Investment increases debt,
and higher earnings tend to reduce debt. (1997) - The source of financing most correlated with
investment is long-term debt These correlations
confirm the impression that debt plays a key role
in accommodating year-by-year variation in
investment. (1998)
36Recap on principles of endogenous money
- Key activity in capitalist system is
accumulation - Marx sees market economy as dominated by desire
of capitalists to accumulate wealth - Accumulate! Accumulate! That is Moses and the
prophets! (Capital I, Ch 24.3 p. 558 Progress
Press) - Store of value and unit of account crucial here
what matters to capitalists is not consumption
per se, but accumulation. Abstract unit by which
to measure accumulation therefore vital - Accumulation of assets (bank balances, productive
capital) key activity in capitalism
37Recap on principles of endogenous money
- Key Circuitist insight cannot collapse banks and
firms into one sector - Banks and firms must be considered as two
distinct kinds of agents. Firms are present in
the market as sellers or buyers of commodities
and make recourse to banks in order to perform
their payments banks on the other hand produce
means of payment, and act as clearing houses
among firms. In any model of a monetary economy,
banks and firms cannot be aggregated into one
single sector. (Graziani 4) - Need to separate bank activities accumulation
from firm activities accumulation
38Recap on principles of endogenous money
- Fisher key role of excessive debt and falling
prices on economic processes - Theory nonequilibrium in nature
- argues that we may tentatively assume that,
ordinarily and within wide limits, all, or almost
all, economic variables tend, in a general way,
towards a stable equilibrium - but though stable, equilibrium is so delicately
poised that, after departure from it beyond
certain limits, instability ensues (Fisher 1933
339). - Key roles of accumulation of debt and price
dynamics out of equilibrium
39Recap on principles of endogenous money
- Minsky on impact of Big Government?
- Anti-cyclical spending and taxation of government
enables debts to be repaid - Renewal of cycle once debt levels reduced
- Stability is not avoidance of cycles, but
avoidance of complete breakdown
40Recap on principles of endogenous money
- Can blend all these insights into model of
financial instability - Cyclical model of real economy Goodwins
predator-prey model - Driven by Phillips curve
- Add debt as source of investment credit (a la
Fama French) - Debt as proxy for credit (endogenous money
component, accommodating as per Moore) - Government counter-cyclical spending as
stabiliser a la Minsky - Markup price dynamics (commodities) and
expectation price dynamics (assets) as further
destabilisers
41Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- First stage Goodwins predator-prey model of
Marxs cyclical growth theory provides
foundation of cyclical economy with
far-from-equilibrium dynamics (Fishers
Circuitist insights) - a rise in the price of labor resulting from
accumulation of capital implies ... accumulation
slackens in consequence of the rise in the price
of labour, because the stimulus of gain is
blunted. The rate of accumulation lessens but
with its lessening, the primary cause of that
lessening vanishes, i.e. the disproportion
between capital and exploitable labour power. The
mechanism of the process of capitalist production
removes the very obstacles that it temporarily
creates. The price of labor falls again to a
level corresponding with the needs of the
self-expansion of capital, whether the level be
below, the same as, or above the one which was
normal before the rise of wages took place...
42Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Marxs model
- High wages--gtlow investment--gtlow growth--gtrising
unemployment--gtfalling wage demands--gtincreased
profit share--gtrising investment--gthigh
growth--gthigh employment--gtHigh wages cycle
continues - Goodwin draws analogy with biology
predator-prey models - Rate of growth of prey (fish--gtcapitalists!)
depends ively on food supply and -ively
interactions with predator (shark--gtworkers) - Rate of growth of predator depends -ively on
number of predators and ively on interactions
with prey - OK now lets build it. First, the maths
43Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- First stage Goodwins predator-prey model of
Marxs cyclical growth theory - Causal chain
- Capital (K) determines Output (Y)
- Output determines employment (L)
- Employment determines wages (w)
- Wages (w?L) determine profit (P)
- Profit determines investment (I)
- Investment I determines capital K
- chain is closed
accelerator
Chain is closed
productivity
Rate of change terms vital
Phillips curve
Investment function
Depreciation
44Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- So how does that look in flowcharts?
- Lets do the rates of change first
- If we stick to Goodwins capitalists invest all
their profits, the investment to capital relation
is easy
45Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Next step is easyoutput is capital stock divided
by the accelerator
- Output divided by labour productivity gives the
necessary employment level - Employment divided by the available workforce
gives us the rate of employment - So we need a productivity component and a
population component
46Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Constant rate of growth of productivity means
exponential growth over time
47Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Output divided by labour productivity gives
needed number of workers
48Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Workforce divided by population gives rate of
employment
- Now things get a bit messy, so we hide bits we
know about in compound blocks
49Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- The same model, with internal complexity
simplified by compound blocks
- Now we need a wage change blockemployment rate
determines rate of change of wages - Wage change function more complicated because
involves Phillips curve (Phillips researched
the stats in the first place to build a model
like this) - Next component is generalised exponential
function set to reproduce same fit as Phillips
curve
50Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Feed in
- minimum rate of change (-4)
- (x,y) coordinates for one point (.96,0)
- Slope at this point (2)
- And you get the exponential curve that fits these
values
- In flowchart form, this is
51Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Sometimes an equation is easier to read, isnt it?
- Nonetheless, if we feed the employment rate in
one end, we get the wage change out the other
- Now we need to multiply this by the current wage
to get the rate of change of wages
52Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- So now the whole system is
53Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Now we need to work out profit
- Profit Output Wages
- Wages Wage Rate times Employment
54Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Since in the simple Goodwin model, capitalists
invest all their profits, we simply need to link
profit to capital (whose input is investment) and
we have built the model
55Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Testing this out by adding some graphs if it
works, we should get cycles in the employment
rate
56Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Voila! Now to tidy things up a bit using compound
blocks
57Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Now at last we have the basis on which to build a
Minsky model
58Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Essential step to introduce Minsky/endogenous
money is debt - For debt, essential that (at least) capitalists
wish to invest more than they earn - Debt seems to be the residual variable in
financing decisions. Investment increases debt,
and higher earnings tend to reduce debt. (Fama
French 1997) - The source of financing most correlated with
investment is long-term debt These correlations
confirm the impression that debt plays a key role
in accommodating year-by-year variation in
investment. (Fama French 1998) - A nonlinear investment function needed for firms
investment to be a function of rate of profit
Lowinvest nothing Mediuminvest as much as
earn Highinvest more than earn
59Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Important (normal) feature of dynamic modelling
increasing generality of model makes it more
realistic - No need for absurd assumptions to maintain
fiction of equilibrium, coherent micro/macro
behaviour - Use same exponential form as for Phillips, but
with different parameters - InvestmentProfit at profit rate of 3
- InvestmentgtProfit at profit rate gt 3
- InvestmentltProfit at profit rate lt 3
- Slope of change at 32
- Minimum investment 1 output (depreciation
easily introduced)
60Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Makes no substantive difference to model
behaviour
61Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- But prepares the way for introducing debt to
finance investment when investmentgtprofits - Rate of change of debt is investment minus
profits - Profits now net of interest on outstanding debt
62Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Investment increases debt profit decreases it
- Debt rises if investment exceeds profits
- Debt also increases due to interest on
outstanding debt
- Profit is now net of both wages and interest
payments
63Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Notice debt becomes negative
- Capitalists accumulate
- Equilibrium is stable in Fishers sense
64Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- we may tentatively assume that, ordinarily and
within wide limits, all, or almost all, economic
variables tend, in a general way, towards a
stable equilibrium (Fisher 1933 339) - BUT
- This stability is also of the kind Fisher
describes, that it is so delicately poised that,
after departure from it beyond certain limits,
instability ensues (Fisher 1933 339). - Start further from equilibrium, and the system
becomes unstable
65Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Higher initial level of unemployment leads to
disaster
- Technical reason requires advanced maths to
explain, but
66Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Technical reason is that nonlinear model can be
- Locally stable around equilibrium (where linear
component of system dominates) but - Globally unstable past a certain range, higher
power forces overwhelm linear component - Just as below one, a3 is less than a2 is less
than a - But above 1, a3 is bigger than a2 is bigger
than a - So if you start too far from equilibrium, you
will suffer a debt-induced collapse - How do you get far from equilibrium? Tendency
Minsky outlined for euphoric expectations to
lead capitalists into excessive
investment/optimism during a boom
67Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- CAVEAT!
- Dynamic modelling can capture many elements of
Minskys theory and endogenous money, BUT - There are elements that cannot be modelled this
way - Evolutionary change in the system
- Non-systemic eventssuch as for example, people
being persuaded by the failure of the system that
the system must be changed - There is a limit to modellinginstitutions and
evolution and human agency must also be
understood - But we do at least get a better handle on the
system by knowing its characteristic dynamics
(even if we ignore that these characteristics can
evolve)
68Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Finally (without bringing in price dynamics),
government - In Minskys view, government spending works by
- providing firms with cash flow they otherwise
would not have during a slump, thus letting them
pay off their debts - Restraining corporate cash flow during a boom,
thus attenuating how euphoric expectations can
get - Both these can be modelled by presuming that the
government pays a subsidy (which can be negative)
straight to firms, where that change in that
subsidy is a function of the rate of employment
- Use same generalised exponential for g(), with
different parameters
69Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- Revised function gives negative exponential slope
- Government
- Keeps subsidy constant if unemployment5
- Increases it gradually if Ugt5
- Reduces gradually if Ult5
- Profit is now net of wages, interest, and
government subsidy
70Modelling Minsky Endogenous Money
- We get cyclical instability (depending on slope
parameter)
71Conclusion
- Essentials of Financial Instability Hypothesis
can be modelled using dynamic tools - Nuances of FIH require evolutionary perspective
- Evolution of financial intermediaries over time
- Still have to add prices (done in mathematical
format) - Result is possibility for the Fisher paradox
- Falling prices increase real debt burden even as
actual debt levels reduced - Wrap up main polemic weakness of debt-deflation
hypothesisinability of proponents (Fisher,
Keynes, Minsky) to develop mathematical
modeleasily overcome with modern dynamic methods
72Conclusion
- So if we can model it, can it happen?
- Japanese experience of
- Bubble economy during 1980s
- Debt-induced downturn with deflation in 1990s,
beginning of 2000s - USA system with obvious (in hindsight for some,
during the event for others!) - Bubble Economy of 1990s
- massive mal-directed investment in
telecommunications, internet - Huge (historically high) debt in both physical
and financial sectors - Appears on brink of debt-deflation now
73Conclusion
- What to do if a debt-deflation happens? Not much!
- Capitalism fundamentally unstable, so escaping
from a collapse therefore no picnic essential
lesson is we should avoid debt deflations in the
first place - by developing and maintaining institutions and
policies which enforce "a 'good financial
society' in which the tendency by businesses and
bankers to engage in speculative finance is
constrained" (Minsky 1977, 1982 69). These
include - close and discretionary supervision of financial
institutions and financial arrangements - non-discretionary countercyclical fiscal
arrangements - a bias towards income equity rather than
inequality. - But if we fail (as we have!) on these fronts?
74Conclusion
- Deliberate inflation
- Problem is one of two price levels
- Asset bubble has given asset price level which is
unsustainable in terms of price level (and hence
profit margins) from sale of commodities - Two ways to get in balance
- Either deflate assets, or
- Inflate commodities
- Former approach exacerbates the problemfalling
asset prices will cause rising debt burden,
declining commodity prices (Fishers paradox) - Latter may right the system, but at short-term
cost to financiers.
75Conclusion
- How to do it?
- Japancomparatively simple
- Japan a creditor nation, vast majority of
(crippling) Japanese financial system debts owed
to Japanese lenders (huge apparent household
savings) - Price inflation via fiscal/monetary stimulus
ineffective - (with good reason!) Super-cautious Japanese
simply increase savings - Post Keynesian theory (no diminishing marginal
productivity) indicates fiscal/monetary stimulus
wont necessarily increase prices anyway - But price inflation via deliberate centralised
wage increase would work
76Conclusion
- America? Tough and highly unlikely
- USA now worlds biggest debtor nation
- International debts a fraction of domestic debt,
but all the same - Economy not as self-contained as Japan
- Cant easily reflate prices internally
- Even more resistant to meddling with price system
than Japan - But more likely to break the rules when all
else fails for many years. - Minsky/endogenous money analysis predicts a
pretty rough start to the 3rd Millenium
77Conclusion
- Increase in wages necessarily causes (lessersay
by 2-3 depending on productivity) increase in
consumer prices - Consumers forced to spend to purchase current
commodities - Inflationary spiral would feed through system for
several years, reducing real debt burden - But policy highly unlikely to be adopted
- Inflation-averse and market-fundamentalist
economists likely to oppose such measures, even
in Japan - Many years more of stagnation likely