Title: Making Good Decisions
1Making Good Decisions
- Douglas M. Stewart, Ph.D.
- Anderson Schools of Management
- University of New Mexico
2Lecture Overview
- Common Decision Making Biases
- Dealing with Uncertainty
- Motivation
- Escalation of Commitment
- Note This lecture and many of the examples are
drawn from Bazerman, Max, Judgment in Managerial
Decision Making, 5th Ed., John Wiley Sons New
York, 2002, and Hammond, Keeney and Raiffa, Smart
Choices A Practical Guide to Making Better Life
Decisions, Broadway books, New York, 1999.
3Human Beings are Quasi-Rational
- Bounded rationality
- Bounded willpower
- We place greater weight on present concerns than
on future concerns - Bounded self-interest
- We care about the outcomes of others
- Sowe use heuristics.
4Common Biases
- Availability
- Representativeness
- Anchoring and Adjustment
- Confirmation Bias
- Hindsight and the Curse of Knowledge
5Availability Example 1
- Which of the following lists was the cause of
more premature deaths in the United States in
1999? - (a) Tobacco use, obesity/inactivity, and alcohol
- (b) Cancer, heart disease, and auto accidents
6Availability What this Means
- List (a) are the 3 leading causes. Auto
accidents are 8th. - Vividness and recency (ease of recall of
instances of an event) tend to make us
overestimate its likelihood.
7Availability Example 2
- In four pages of a novel (about 2,000) words),
how many words would you expect to find that have
the form _ _ _ _ _ n _ (seven-letter words that
have n in the 6th position)? - 0
- 1-2
- 3-4
- 5-7
- 8-7
- 11-15
- 16
8Availability Example 2 (cont.)
- In four pages of a novel (about 2,000) words),
how many words would you expect to find that have
the form _ _ _ _ i n g (seven-letter words that
end with ing)? - 0
- 1-2
- 3-4
- 5-7
- 8-7
- 11-15
- 16
9Availability (2) What this Means
- People tend to have higher estimates for _ _ _
_ i n gthan for _ _ _ _ _ n _ - Memory structures make some information easier to
recall. - Why are multiple gas stations at the same
intersections? - Why do upscale retailers want to be in the same
mall? - Why are most of the restaurants in a city often
located within a few blocks of each other?
10Availability Example 3
- Is marijuana use related to delinquency?
- Are couples who get married under age 25 more
likely to have bigger families?
11Availability (3) What this Means
- People typically try to recall instances of
delinquent marijuana users (or couples who
married young and had large families), and if you
know a lot such people you assume that the
relationship is stronger than it may actually be. - Availability of perceived co-occurring instances
in our minds leads to higher probability of
future co-occurrence. - You actually need to consider 4 groups in
assessing any two dichotomous events - Marijuana users who are delinquents
- Marijuana users who are not delinquents
- Delinquents who do not use marijuana
- Non-delinquents who do not use marijuana
12Representativeness Example 1
- Mark is finishing his MBA at a prestigious
university. He is very interested in the arts
and at one time considered a career as a
musician. Is he more likely to take a job - (a) in arts management
- (b) with a technology company
13Representativeness (1) What this Means
- Did you ask yourself How likely is it that a
person working in the management of the arts
would fit Marks description? - You should have asked How likely is it that
someone fitting Marks description will choose
arts management? - But what about the base rate?
- People use base-rate data correctly when no other
information is provided. - Life savings and the base-rate of business
failures. - Pre-nuptials and the divorce base-rate
- Why are do my neighbors with the smaller houses
drive all of the nice cars?
14Representativeness Example 2
- A certain town is served by two hospitals. In
the larger hospital about 45 babies are born each
day and in the smaller hospital about 15 babies
are born each day. As you know, about 50 percent
of all babies are boys. However, the exact
percentage varies from day to day. Sometimes it
may be higher than 50 percent, sometimes lower.
For a period of 1 year, each hospital recorded
the days in which more than 60 percent of the
babies born were boys. Which hospital do you
think recorded more such days? - (a) The larger hospital
- (b) The smaller hospital
- (c) About the same (that is within 5 of each
other)
15Representativeness (2) What this Means
- Most people choose C.
- Think about it
- What is more likely getting 6 heads on 10 flips
of a coin, or - Getting 6,000 heads on 10,000 flips of a coin?
- Sample size is rarely part of our intuition.
People think how representative it would be for
60 of babies to be born boys in a random event. - Consider in advertising Four out of five
dentists surveyed recommend sugarless gum for
their patients who chew gum.
16Representativeness Example 3
- You have started buying stocks on the internet,
beginning with five different stocks. Each stock
goes down soon after your purchase. As you
prepare to make a sixth purchase, you reason that
it should be more successful since the last five
were lemons. After all, the odds favor making
at least one successful pick in the six
decisions. The thinking is - (a) Correct
- (b) Incorrect
17Representativeness (3) What this Means
- The sixth stock is independent of the performance
of the first five. - The Gamblers Falicy - We have an inappropriate
tendency to assume that random and non-random
events will balance out. - After holding bad cards on ten hands of poker,
the player believes he is due for a good hand. - After winning 1,000 on the New Mexico Lottery, a
woman changes her regular number (after all, how
likely is it that that number will come up
twice.) - Play a slot machine that someone has put a lot of
money into without winning any big payouts
18Representativeness Example 4
- You are a sales forecaster for a department store
chain with nine locations. - The chain depends on you for quality projections
of future sales in order to make decisions on
staffing, advertising, information system
developments, purchasing, renovations, and the
like. - All stores are similar in size and merchandise
selection. The main difference in their sales
occur because of location and random
fluctuations. - Sale for 2004 are show on the next slide.
19Example 4 Continued
- Your economic forecasting service has convinced
you that the best estimate of total sales
increase between 2004 and 2005 is 10 (to
99,000). - Your task is to predict 2005 sales for each
store. Since your manager believes strongly in
the economic forecasting service, it is
imperative that your total sales equal 99,000.
20Example 4 Continued
21Representativeness (4) What this Means
- Most people increase the sales at each store by
10. - Are 2004 sales perfectly correlated with 2005
sales? No. - People tend to neglect regression to the mean.
- Forecast should be somewhere between a perfect
correlation forecast and a un-correlated forecast
of 11,000 for each store.
22Representativeness Example 5
- Linda is 31 years old, single, outspoken, and
very bright. She majored in philosophy. As a
student, she was deeply concerned with issues of
discrimination and social justice, and she
participated in antinuclear demonstrations. - Rank order the following eight descriptions in
terms of the probability (likelihood) that they
describe Linda
23Example 5 continued
- (a) Linda is a teacher in an elementary school
- (b) Linda works in a bookstore and takes yoga
classes - (c) Linda is active in the feminist movement.
- (d) Linda is a psychiatric social worker.
- (e) Linda is a member of the League of Women
Voters. - (f) Linda is a bank teller
- (g) Linda is an insurance salesperson.
- (h) Linda is a bank teller who is active in the
feminist movement
24Representativeness (5) What this means
- Look at where you ranked these issues
- (c) Linda is active in the feminist movement.
- (f) Linda is a bank teller
- (h) Linda is a bank teller who is active in the
feminist movement - Most people rank h f c (which is strong on
representativeness. - This is a conjunction fallacy.
- So why are we willing to buy insurance for death
by airline crash, at a higher cost than term life?
25Anchoring Example 1
- A new internet company recently made its initial
public offering, becoming publicly traded. At
its opening, the stock sold for 20/share. The
companys closest competitor went public one year
ago, also at a price of 20/share. The
competitors stock is now priced at 100/share. - What will the new firm be worth one year from now?
26Anchoring (1) What this means
- How would you have responded if the other firm
was now worth only 10/share? - We tend to develop estimates by starting from an
initial anchor, and adjusting from there to yield
a final answer. This adjustment is usually
insufficient. - Different starting points yield different
answers, even if the anchor is ignored as being
rediculous. - A child is tracked by a school system that may
categorize them at a certain level of performance
at an early age. - Employers often ask applicants to reveal their
current salaries. Why? - What are the implications for negotiation?
27Anchoring Example 2
- Which of the following appears most likely?
Which appears second most likely? - (a) Drawing a red marble from a bag containing 50
percent red and 50 white. - (b) Drawing a red marble seven times in
succession (with replacement) from a bag
containing 90 red and 10 white. - (c) Drawing at least one red marble in seven
tries (with replacement) from a bag containing
10 red and 90 white.
28Anchoring (2) What this means
- The most common ordering is ba-c
- The correct order is c (52), a (50), b (48).
- We tend to overestimate the probability of
conjunctive (AND) events, and underestimate the
probability of disjunctive (OR) events. - This is a real problem with multi-stage planning.
- Home remodeling always takes longer than
expected. - After 3 years, Doctoral students dramatically
overestimate their ability to complete their
dissertation in 1 year.
29Anchoring Example 3
- Listed on the next slide are 10 uncertain
quantities. Write down your best estimate of the
quantity. Next put a lower and upper bound
around your estimate, so that you are 98
confident that your range surrounds the actual
quantity.
30Example 3 continued
31Anchoring (3) What this means
- Answers
- Wal-marts revenue 405.61 Billion
- Targets revenue 64.95 Billion
- Fords Market Value 8.27 Billion
- MSFT Market Value 166.88 Billion
- CSCO Market Value 97.3 Billion
- Households 77,873,000
- Extinct mammals 22
- Did you have more than 6 of 7 right?
- People tend to be overconfident in the
correctness of their answers. Moreover, the
overconfidence is greater when asked about areas
we know less.
32General Bias Example 1
- The following sequence of numbers follows a rule.
What is the rule? - 2 4 6
- You may present other sequences of numbers and I
will tell you if they follow the rule or not.
33General Bias (1) What this means
- Did you try submitting numbers that do not
conform to your rule? - Answering the questions requires that you attempt
to falsify hypotheses not confirm them. - This is the confirmation trap.
34General Bias Example 2
- You are traveling by car in an unfamiliar area,
and your spouse is driving. When you approach an
unmarked fork in the road, your spouse decides to
go to the right. Four miles and fifteen minutes
later, it is clear that you are lost. Your blurt
out. I knew you should have turned left at the
fork. - A manager who works for you hired a new
supervisor last year. You were well aware of the
choices he had at the time and allowed him to
choose the new employee on his own. You have
just received production data on every
supervisor. The data on the new supervisor are
terrible. You call in the manager and claim,
There was plenty of evidence that he was the
wrong man for the job.
35General Bais (2) What this means
- Sound familiar?
- This is hindsight bias.
- It can keep us from learning from the past and
evaluating decisions objectively.
36Dealing with Uncertainty
- Framing of choices
- Anchors matter
- Pseudocertainty
- Insurance premium vs. Guaranteed loss
- Transactional utility
37Framing of choices Example
- You face the following concurrent sets of
choices - 1. Choose between
- (a) A sure gain of 240
- (b) A 25 chance to gain 1,000 and a 75 chance
to gain nothing. - 2. Choose between
- (c) A sure loss of 760
- (d) A 75 chance to loose 1,000 and a 25
chance to lose nothing.
38Example Continued
- Now choose between
- (e) A 25 chance to win 240, and a 75 chance to
lose 760. - (f) A 25 chance to win 250 and a 75 chance to
lose 750
39Framing of Choices What this means
- Did you chose (a) and (d)? Why not?
- (a)(d)(f) and (b)(c)(e).
- Framing the same problem differently can reverse
the choices.
40Anchors matter Example
- What makes you feel worse
- (a) You receive a letter from the IRS saying that
you made a minor arithmetic mistake in your tax
return and must send them 100. You receive a
similar letter the same day from the New Mexico
Treasurer saying you owe 50 for a similar
mistake. There are no other repercussions from
either mistake. - (b) You receive a letter from the IRS saying that
you made a minor arithmetic mistake in your tax
return and must send them 150. There are no
other repercussions from the mistake.
41Anchors matter What this means
- Most people find the two small losses to be worse
than the single larger loss. - The extra 50 loss is less bothersome from the
point on the utility curve where you have lost
100 than from where you have lost nothing.
42Pseudocertainty - Example
- Which of the following do you prefer
- (a) A sure win of 30
- (b) An 80 chance to win 45
43Example continued
- Consider the following 2-stage game. In the
first stage there is a 75 chance to end the game
without winning anything, and a 25 chance of
moving into the second stage. You must choose
(a) or (b) prior to the start of the game. - (a) A sure win of 30
- (b) An 80 chance to win 45
44Example continued
- Which of the following do you prefer
- (a) A 40 to win 30
- (b) An 20 chance to win 45
45Psuedocertainty What this means
- Did you choose the same option in all three
choices (first or second)? - If not, then you have reacted to certainty and
psuedocertainty effects. - The reduction in the probability of an outcome is
more important when the initial state is certain
rather than merely probable - The change in game 2 is due only to the
introduction of uncertainty of reaching the
second state (psuedocertainty.)
46Insurance premium vs. Guaranteed loss
- People are more willing to accept a risk if
certain cost is phrased as an insurance premium
rather than a guaranteed loss.
47Transactional utility Example
- Imagine you are about to purchase a cable modem
for 50. The salesperson informs you that same
product is available on sale at the stores other
branch, located 20 minutes away. What is the
highest sales prices that the product could have
for which you would drive to the other store to
make the purchase.
48Example continued
- Imagine you are about to purchase a television
for 500. The salesperson informs you that same
product is available on sale at the stores other
branch, located 20 minutes away. What is the
highest sales prices that the product could have
for which you would drive to the other store to
make the purchase.
49Transaction Utility
- Did you demand a greater discount in absolute
dollars for the television? Why?
50Dealing with Uncertainty - Summary
- Prospect Theory
- People evaluate rewards and losses relative to a
neutral reference point. - People think about potential outcomes as gains or
losses relative to this fixed, neutral reference
point. - People form their choices based on the resulting
change in asset position as assessed by an
S-shaped value function
51Motivation
- Egocentrism Perceptions and expectations are
biased in a self-serving manner. - If someone sues you and you win the case, should
he pay your legal costs? - (85 say yes)
- If you sue someone and lose the case, should you
pay his costs? - (44 say yes)
- Regret Avoidance We are biased towards
decisions that avoid the opportunity for regret. - We will choose options that shield us from
feedback of foregone alternatives - We will make choices that are likely to compare
favorably to foregone alternatives
52Escalation of Commitment Example 1
- You accept a position with a prestigious
consulting firm, believing that the job offers an
excellent career opportunity in a firm that you
can grow with. - Two years later, you have not progressed as
rapidly as you had expected. Anxious to
demonstrate your worth the company you decide to
invest large amounts of unpaid overtime to get
ahead. Still you fail to get the recognition you
think you deserve. - By now you have been with the organization for
several years and would lose numerous benefits,
including vested interest in the companys
pension plan, if you decide to leave. You are in
your late 30s and feel that you have invested
your best years with the company. - Do you quit?
53Escalation of Commitment (1) What this means
- Do you escalate?
- It appears that the mechanism underlying
escalation is self-justification. - Conditions that lead to escalation
- Failure can be explained away with causes
unrelated to initial decision. - Individuals are more likely to escalate than
groups.
54Auction
- Auctioning a 20 bill.
- Rules
- Minimum 2 independent bidders
- Highest offer gets item at strike price
- Second highest offer must also pay their last bid
price
55Discussion
- Do you see implications
- Negotiations
- Investments
- Professional Services
56Bias Strategies
- Availability
- Examine your assumptions so that you are not
being swayed by memorable distortions. - Try to get statistics. Dont rely on your memory
if you dont have to. - If you dont have direct statistics, try to build
up an estimate with indirect statistics and other
data. - Representativeness
- Dont ignore relevant data, consider base rates
explicitly. - Dont confuse one type of probability with
another. (Probability that an arts manager would
be like Mark with the probability that someone
like Mark would be an arts manager.) - Anchoring
- Always view the problem from different
perspectives, using alternate starting points and
approaches. Then reconcile the differences. - Think about the problem on your own first (to
avoid being anchored by their perceptions.) - Seek opinions from a wide variety of people to
push your mind in new directions. (Be careful not
to share your own estimates lest you anchor them.)
57Bias Strategies (2)
- Confirmation trap
- Get someone you respect to play devils advocate
to argue against the decision you are making (or
build these arguments yourself) - Be honest about your motives. Are you really
gathering evidence to inform your choice or
justify it. - Expose yourself to conflicting information.
Dont go soft on the disconfirming evidence. - When seeking advice from others, dont ask
leading questions. - Overconfidence
- Try to challenge your own extreme figures. Try
hard to imagine how they might be exceeded. - Challenge an experts estimates in a similar
manner. - Substitute facts for opinion whenever possible.
58Bias Strategies (3)
- Escalation of Commitment
- Never think of the status quo as your only
alternative. Identify other options to use for
comparison. - Ask yourself if you would choose the status quo
if it werent already the status quo. - Avoid exaggerating the cost of switching from the
status quo. - Be sure to compare how the status quo WILL BE not
just how it is now. Things change. - If several alternatives are clearly better than
the status quo, dont default to the status quo
simply because you cannot choose among them. - Seek out and listen to the arguments of people
who werent involved in the earlier decision that
got you here. - Examine why admitting to an earlier mistake
distresses you. - Remember that sunk costs are sunk.
59Thar be process failures ahead
- Most common serious process errors in decision
making - Working on the wrong problem.
- Failing to identify your key objectives.
- Failing to develop a range of good alternatives.
- Overlooking crucial consequences of the
alternatives. - Giving inadequate thought to tradeoffs.
- Disregarding uncertainty.
- Failing to account for risk tolerance.
- Failing to plan ahead when decisions are linked
over time.
60The Decision Making Process
- Define the Problem
- What triggered this decision? Why am I
considering it? - Question the constraints assumed in your problem
statement. - Identify the essential elements of the problem.
- What other decisions hinge on this decision?
- Should related decisions be included? Should the
problem be narrowed? - Ask others how they see the problem.
- Take your time here. A good solution to a well
defined problem is better than an excellent
solution to a poorly defined one.
61Decision Making Process (2)
- Identify your objectives
- Make sure you include the intangible and
subjective. - Write down all of the concerns you hope to
address through your decision. - Convert these concerns to succinct objectives
(verb and object). - Separate the means from the ends. (the 5-Whys.)
The means can stimulate alternatives. The ends
are used to evaluate alternatives. - Clarify what you mean by each objective.
- Test the objectives. Do they seem to lead to
decisions you can live with? Could you use them
to justify decision to others? Or have you
overlooked something important. - Practical advice
- Objectives are personal.
- Different objectives will suit different problems
(dont recycle.) - Butwell thought out objectives for similar
problems should remain relatively stable. - Objectives should not be limited by what data can
be obtained easily. - If a decision sits uncomfortably in your mind,
you may have overlooked an important objective.
62Decision Making Process (3)
- Alternatives
- Dont box yourself in with limited alternatives.
- Default option
- First solution
- Alternatives presented by others
- Use your objectives to ask How?
- Challenge constraints (assumed vs. real)
- Set high asperations
- Do your own thinking first
- Learn from history, but dont be constrained by
it. - Ask others for suggestions
- Give your subconscious time to operate
- Generate first, evaluate later
- Four categories of alternatives
- Process alternatives
- Win-win alternatives
- Information gathering alternatives
- Time-buying alternatives
63Decision Making Process (4)
- Describe the consequences
- Mentally put yourself into the future (when the
consequences will be revealed) - Create a description of the consequences of each
alternative. Compare against objectives. Do
descriptions cover all objectives? Have
objectives been overlooked? - Eliminate any clearly inferior objectives.
- Organize descriptions of the remaining into a
consequences table. - Goal
- Enough precision to make a smart choice, but not
exhausting detail.
64Decision Making Process (5)
- Tradeoffs
- Find and eliminate dominated and effectively
dominated alternatives. - Make tradeoffs using even swaps.
- Make the easiest swaps first.
- Concentrate on the amount of the swap, not the
perceived importance of the objective. - Value an incremental change based on what you
start with. - Make consistent swaps (if AgtB and BgtC then be
sure AgtC.) - Seek out information to make informed swaps.
65Decision Making Process (6)
- When faced with linked choices and uncertainty
- Understand your risk tolerance
- Estimate the probabilities
- Build decision trees.
66Summary
- We are all quasi-rational
- We have in place strong biases in our
decision-making that can cause errors - Awareness, quantitative decision aids, and
counter-strategies can help minimize these errors