SPWG Final Report - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

SPWG Final Report

Description:

So far Germany, Cyprus, Korea, Denmark, M xico, Morocco, Norway y Pakistan have ... By the end of 2006 it is expected that Australia, Estonia, Latvia, Sweden, South ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:91
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Raf160
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SPWG Final Report


1
SPWG Final Report
  • 8th. Meeting at Pusan Korea
  • From 2 to 4 May 2006

VII MACHC Meeting October 4th. 2006 Acapulco,
Gro. México
2
SPWG 8 (Final meeting)
  • Regional Commissions represented
  • BSHC, EAHC, EAtHC, MACHC, MBSHC, NHC, NIOHC,
    NSHC, SAIHC, SWPHC and USCHC.
  • individual countries Australia, Brazil, China,
    China Hong Kong, Finland, France, Italy, India,
    Japan, Mexico, Portugal, Singapore, South Africa,
    UK and USA.
  • IHB represented by the President.

3
Ratification Status from MS
  • So far Germany, Cyprus, Korea, Denmark, México,
    Morocco, Norway y Pakistan have ratified the
    Amendments.
  • By the end of 2006 it is expected that Australia,
    Estonia, Latvia, Sweden, South Africa,
    Netherlands and Japan ratify the Amendments.

4
Revision of the Basic Documents
  • The main new topics developed were Article 6
    dealing with the establishment of subsidiary
    organs and subordinate bodies.
  • New Art. 7 to cover inter-organizational bodies.
  • Article 14 was discussed and some editorial
    amendments made, dealing with the procedures of
    selection of Council members.
  • Article 18 of the Rules of Procedure of the
    Council regarding official languages.
  • Minor amendments were made to the texts of the
    other Basic Documents (mainly editorial)

5
Implementation Strategy and SPWG Work Program
  • Mechanism of Assembly timing.
  • Election of the Secretary-General and Directors .
  • Salary Scheme for SG and Directors.
  • Re-structuring of IHO bodies proposed by the CBC
    and CHRIS Chairmen and to take place before the
    ratification procedure is completed
  • To present the implementation strategy to the
    17th. Conference for approval

6
Reports from the CBC and CHRIS Chairmen
  • Some details of CHRIS principles have been added
    to comply with new Articles 6 and 7 of the
    General Regs.
  • Decisions made on CBC
  • General structures for HSSC and IRCCBC were
    approved.
  • IRCCBC went back to its original IRCC.
  • WEND policy matters under IRCC until the council
    is established.
  • Inter-organizational bodies will be governed by
    the new Article 7 of the General Regulations.
  • Amendments to HSSC and IRCC ToR

7
(No Transcript)
8
Legal Advisory Group (LAG)
  • New Article of General Regs
  • Article xx - "Legal Advice
  • When a need arises for legal advice on matters
    relating to the interpretation and application of
    the Convention, IHO basic documents and execution
    of the aims of the IHO as described in the IHO
    Work Program, a Working Group of legal experts
    drawn from all Member States may be established
    by the Assembly or by Member States through
    correspondence."

9
Report from the IHB on proposals from the SPWG
(Salary scheme and acceptance of conversion from
D.C. to S.G. and Directors)
  • A WG has been established to review the salary
    scheme for SG and Ds.
  • Clause of acceptance had been included in the
    application for Directorship.

10
Composition of the future Council
  • Two thirds of seats on the Council for
    representatives from Regional Hydrographic
    Commissions and the remaining one third based on
    the criteria of Hydrographic Interest.
  • Two countries at present not represented in any
    RHC Argentina and Uruguay.
  • Some SPWG members felt that they could apply
    within the 1/3 of Hydrographic Interests
  • SPWG agreed to maintain the system composition of
    the Council approved at the 3rd. EHC
  • Encourage MS to establish or join a RHC
  • MS could make proposals to the 17th. IHC

11
Hydrographic Interests
  • New models proposed by Brazil, France, México,
    Portugal and Tunisia.
  • Tonnage was accepted at the 3rd. EIHC as the
    initial parameter.
  • Any alternative model should be presented at
    least at the second Assembly.
  • SPWG considered several multi-parameter models
    without reaching unanimous acceptance.
  • Lengthy discussions and no consensus.
  • There are more responsibilities than rewards
  • Korea stated that EAHC reached consensus on
    Tonnage.

12
Hydrographic Interests
  • The majority of SPWG agreed to keep Tonnage as a
    starting point
  • The concept of Hydrographic Interests is not
    specified in the Convention and can be revisited
    by the IHO at any time.
  • On-going discussions should consider the
    following possibilities
  • - Establishment of a multi-parameter model.
  • - Reduce the model to two parameters, possibly
    tonnage and charts.
  • - Establish a make your case model which would
    lead to a vote by the Assembly to select the 10
    countries occupying a seat in the Council under
    the one third of Hydrographic Interest.

13
Hydrographic Interests
  • The SPWG agreed
  • To report to the 17th Conference that Tonnage
    seems to be the parameter to allocate Council
    seats for Hydrographic Interest for the time
    being and that no alternative model has been
    found.
  • That when the new structure is implemented,
    experience will be gained and the subject may be
    revisited if needed.

14
Other topics
  • IHO Working program
  • Strategic Plan
  • Performance indicators SPWG concluded that there
    was not a strong justification to propose to the
    Conference the introduction of such Performance
    Indicators

15
Future of the SPWG
  • The Chairman noted that there were no new tasks
    identified that justify the continuation of the
    SPWG.
  • He added that the scheduling of an Extraordinary
    Conference in 2009 made the maintenance of the
    SPWG superfluous and that this was to be
    confirmed by the 17th IH Conference.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com