Public Concerns About Fire - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Public Concerns About Fire

Description:

Exposed to previous wildfire vs. never exposed. Retired vs babyboomer community ... Where did they reduce wildfire behavior? Protect communities? What ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:197
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Public Concerns About Fire


1
Public Concerns About Fire
2
Fear of Fire
  • 1937 President Roosevelt campaigns to reduce
    human-caused fires.
  • Uncle Sam forest ranger.

Your Forests Your Fault Your Loss
3
WWII Era
  • Americans feared that a fire could destroy forest
    resources when wood products were greatly needed
    for the war effort.
  • Few firefighters in US because so many men in the
    military.
  • Wartime Advertising Council slogans "Forest
    Fires Aid the Enemy," and Careless Matches Aid
    the Axis.

4
Post WWII
5
Bambi
  • In 1944, Walt Disney released the movie Bambi,
    and allowed the Forest Service to use the deer on
    their campaign posters for one year.
  • The Forest Service decided to continue using an
    animal and chose a bear for their fire safety
    mascot.

6
Smokey the Bear
  • Created August 9, 1944
  • Longest running campaign in U.S. history.

7
Todays Smokey
  • Only You Can Prevent WILDfires.

8
Geographics Demographics
  • Where you grew up, how is fire thought of? Is
    prescribed fire used?
  • Are fire perceptions different in forest
    communities vs. urban?
  • Forest fire may interfere with revenue, will it
    be effective in forest matrix
  • Urban disconnected from ecosystem around them
  • Vacation home owner vs. permanent resident?
  • Vacation aesthetics and recreation important
  • Permanent fire protection
  • Lake Tahoe, Malibu, Oakland Hills vs. east
    Arizona, San Bernardino
  • Wealthier property is more replaceable, but also
    more money for fuel reduction around homes
  • Exposed to previous wildfire vs. never exposed
  • Retired vs babyboomer community
  • Retired Arent physically able to clear
    vegetation around homes, less
  • Remote vs. proximate prescribed fires

9
What dont people like about prescribed fire?
10
Prescribed Burning Excuses
  • From Biswell
  • All fires are bad
  • Prescribed fire confused with wildfires
  • Too much danger of escaping control
  • Dislike of smoke
  • Prescribed burning is too costly
  • Let it be an act of God.
  • Too much responsibility
  • We can lose our jobs
  • There is no money for prescribed burning
  • Public wont let us burn
  • There arent enough burn days
  • Negative influence of powerful people
  • We need more research

Citizen response
Manager response
11
Objective Develop a campaign to encourage public
approval of prescribed fire
  • 5 Phases
  • Preplanning
  • Notice,editorial, scoping
  • Public meeting
  • Planning
  • Notice,editorial, scoping
  • Implementation
  • Signs on road, media
  • Post Fire Monitoring
  • Field trips, speaking engagements
  • Refining the plan
  • Public meeting

12
Recommendations from Weldon
  • ? Talk to the public about fire in ecosystems
  • Ecological Facts
  • Develop simple ways to present ecological
    processes
  • Field trips, media, demonstrations, publications
  • Benefits
  • Biological diversity, forest sustainability,
    wildlife habitat
  • Consequences
  • Tradeoffs between prescribed fire and suppression
  • Personal interactions through field trips
  • Proactive management
  • Risks
  • Honest about technical abilities, limits, and
    potential for escapes
  • Explain goals, design and implementation of
    prescribed burns

13
Recommendations from Weldon
  • Listen to public concerns
  • Use to establish the rate of fire restoration
  • Get support early on small projects
  • Answer questions related to the technical aspects
  • Fire behavior, desirable burning conditions
  • Be responsive to public concerns
  • Wood fiber use
  • Consider alternatives, complements (thinning)
  • Smoke
  • Choose good smoke dispersal conditions
  • Plan size, duration and location to minimize
    smoke

14
Tough Issues
  • How much public input is ideal?
  • Delays process
  • SNEF allowed any organization to write
    alternative management strategies, but this
    extended the process 1-2 years.
  • Can be overruled by politics
  • USFS Region Forester or NPS Park Superintendent
    makes final decision.
  • If public is not completely receptive to fire,
    what should managers do?
  • Go ahead with some burning and then promote the
    outcome?
  • Or do they need to get approval first, and then
    build a program?

15
Public Outreach Programs
  • CDF VMP Program (1981)
  • Cost-sharing program between private landowners
    and CDF to reduce fire-prone vegetation.
  • prescribed burns and mechanical removal
  • Approximately 3.5 million annual budget
  • Burned on average 27,000 acres/year in last 10
    years
  • California FireSafe Councils (1993)
  • 132 councils
  • Goals
  • Provide support and resources for grassroot
    organizations involved in fire safety
  • Distribute fire safe educational materials
  • Evaluate fire safe legislation
  • FireWise
  • Similar goals to FireSafe, but a more national
    scope
  • Federal agency support

16
Defensible Space
Alberta Canada, Timberlines Forest Inventory
Consultants Newsletter
17
(No Transcript)
18
What Can Be Improved?
  • Promote prescribed fire successes
  • Where did they reduce wildfire behavior? Protect
    communities?
  • What strategies made a difference?
  • Vs media coverage of escapes
  • Adaptive management
  • What didnt work? Why did an escape occur and
    how can it be prevented?
  • Quantify the positive effects of fuel reduction
    (wildfire prevention, reduced spead/intensity)
    vs. just saying that fuel reduction was done

19
What Can Be Improved?
  • Promote prescribed fire successes
  • Where did they reduce wildfire behavior? Protect
    communities?
  • What strategies made a difference?
  • Vs media coverage of escapes
  • Adaptive management
  • What didnt work? Why did an escape occur and
    how can it be prevented?
  • Quantify the positive effects of fuel reduction
    (wildfire prevention, reduced spead/intensity)
    vs. just saying that fuel reduction was done

20
What Can Be Improved?
  • Promote prescribed fire successes
  • Where did they reduce wildfire behavior? Protect
    communities?
  • What strategies made a difference?
  • Vs media coverage of escapes
  • Adaptive management
  • What didnt work? Why did an escape occur and
    how can it be prevented?
  • Quantify the positive effects of fuel reduction
    (wildfire prevention, reduced spead/intensity)
    vs. just saying that fuel reduction was done

21
What Can Be Improved?
  • More responsibility to individuals
  • Defensible space around homes
  • Reduce accidental ignitions (Smokey idea)
  • Reduce expectations of local governments
  • Financial support from federal govt and
    communities
  • Remove prescribed fire liability (ex. CDF VMP)
  • Incentives in the wildland urban interface
  • Decrease WUI expansion
  • Zoning, city planning, high insurance premiums
  • Decrease fire susceptibility
  • Tax breaks, community recognition for fire-smart
    landscaping and defensible space

22
New Educational Images?
23
History of Fire Perceptions and Policy
  • 1905 Nationwide fire suppression USFS
  • 1911 Weeks Act federal govt reimburses states
    for suppression costs
  • 1920s Depression ? large labor pool for
    suppression
  • Light burning controversy
  • 1924 CDF adopts fire suppression policy
  • 1929 USFS proposes firebreak along entire
    western Sierra Nevada to protect timber
  • 1933 CCC created Ponderosa Way firebreak 650 mi
    long, 45-60 mi wide
  • 1935 10am policy USFS
  • 1937 Fire prevention ad campaign begins Your
    Forests-Your Fault
  • 1944 Smokey is born
  • 1945 CDF allows landowners to burn brushlands
    for livestock forage
  • 1947 Weather modification investigated
    (lightning suppression, rainmaking)
  • 1950s Biswell studies prescribed fire in CA,
    leads demonstration burns
  • WWII technology, labor and attitude
    transferred to fire suppression
  • 1962 Tall Timbers Research Station established,
    annual fire conferences
  • 1964 Leopold Report/Wilderness Act fire
    allowed to play a natural role

24
History of Fire Perceptions and Policy
  • 1968 Sequoia National Park begins prescribed
    natural fire program
  • 1971 USFS begins to allow prescribed natural
    fires in some areas
  • 1972 Yosemite begins Prescribed Natural Fire
    Program
  • 1975 CA State Parks begin prescribed burning at
    Calaveras Big Trees
  • 1978 USFS 10am policy revoked, fire
    management replaces fire control
  • 1981 CDF Vegetation Management Program
  • 1988 Yellowstone Fires resulted in a fire
    policy review
  • (need for clearer management plans and more
    public education)
  • 1990s Wildland Urban Interface becomes an issue
    of concern
  • Fuel reduction and demonstrations, DFPZs are
    born
  • 1995 USFS Fire Policy Review
  • Public education paramount
  • Natural resources should be equally valued as
    personal property
  • Fuel reduction necessary to deal with hazardous
    fuel conditions
  • 2000 Cerro Grande Fire placed fire moratorium on
    NPS and CA State Parks until contingency
    planning improved.
  • 2003 Healthy Forest Restoration Act
  • Encourages public to determine fuel
    reduction priorities in their communities
  • Streamline the fuel reduction process by
    bypassing some environmental analysis
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com