Title: SOUTH AFRICAN ASSOCIATION OF WATER UTILITIES
1 SOUTH AFRICAN ASSOCIATION OF WATER
UTILITIES
PRESENTATION TO THE PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO
COMMITTEE OF WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY ON THE
IMPACTS OF THE DIVISION OF REVENUE ACT (DORA) AND
FREE BASIC WATER (FBW) ON WATER UTILITIES 04
JUNE 2003
2SAAWU BACKGROUND
- The South African Association of Water Utilities
- An Association not for gain, representing public
sector water service providers in SA. - Represents 18 water boards and 5 other public
sector institutions involved in water services
provision. - Water boards are organs of state.
- Principal objective of SAAWU is to
- Ensuring access to water services by all South
Africans by promoting the need for efficient and
effective public sector regional water utilities
and ensuring effective integration, co-operation
and mobilisation of resources and capacity within
the water services sector.
3(No Transcript)
4SAAWU BACKGROUND (Continued)
- SAAWU and its members have played an active and
leading role in providing inputs into the Draft
white Paper on Water Services. In particular we
support moving toward greater regionalisation of
water services and building off the
established/existing institutional capacity to - To establish regional water utilities offering a
full range of water services and water service
delivery solutions, in support of municipal water
service authorities, so that they are able to
meet their water service delivery obligations. - SAAWU will be requesting an opportunity to give a
detailed presentation to the Portfolio Committee
highlighting its views on the essential policy,
legislative and implementation issues that should
direct initiatives for regionalisation .
5IMPACT OF THE DIVISION OF REVENUE ACT (DORA) ON
WATER UTILITIES 04 JUNE 2003
6IMPACTS OF THE DIVISION OF REVENUE ACT (DORA) ON
WATER UTILITIES
- SAAWU fully understands and accepts that the
authority function for water services delivery
is that of the appropriately delegated Municipal
entity that is proclaimed as the Water Service
Authority (WSA) for that area. - In terms of existing legislation (Water Services
Act and Municipal Structures and Systems Acts),
water boards and other water utilities who are
members of SAAWU are water service providers to
the WSA. - The existing water boards/utilities provide a
range of water services such as bulk potable
water, retail water, bulk waste water and retail
waste water services in support of
municipalities.
7IMPACTS OF THE DIVISION OF REVENUE ACT (DORA) ON
WATER UTILITIES
- Many water utilities also operate and maintain a
number of DWAF owned water supply schemes (both
bulk and retail) on behalf of DWAF, or the
municipal authorities who have been
targeted/identified to receive transfer of these
assets from DWAF. - These arrangements exist in most instances where
the WSA (municipal authority) lacks the capacity
and resources to provide the service themselves. - In many instances these arrangements are not
formalized in terms of appropriate contacts or
agreements. - In many of these cases where the water utilities
act in support of municipalities they receive a
direct subsidy from DWAF for the operation and
maintenance of these schemes.
8IMPACTS OF THE DIVISION OF REVENUE ACT (DORA) ON
WATER UTILITIES
Some water utilities provide services to
primarily the rural poor (in ex-homeland areas
and others in a more urban environment) where
existing municipalities simply do not have the
capacity or resources to deliver the services.
In these instances most consumers are unable to
pay for services and water utilities are reliant
on subsidies from DWAF to cover operating and
maintenance costs and for financial survival.
9IMPACTS OF THE DIVISION OF REVENUE ACT (DORA) ON
WATER UTILITIES
- Section 8 of the DORA makes it clear that An
organ of state in the national or provincial
sphere of government may only provide funds for a
municipal service to the relevant municipality
directly. - The understanding of SAAWU is that in term of
DORA the subsidies currently paid to water
utilities directly by DWAF for water services
provided to communities will , in future, be
directed to the local municipal authority.
10IMPACTS OF THE DIVISION OF REVENUE ACT (DORA) ON
WATER UTILITIES
- In a significant number of situations where water
utilities are providing services to consumers
this arrangement is consequent to agreements
between DWAF and the utility. - In these instances there are NO contractual
agreement in place between the municipality (WSA)
and the water utility as the WSP. Given these
circumstances the practical reality of complying
with Section 8 (2) of DORA is considered remote.
11IMPACTS OF THE DIVISION OF REVENUE ACT (DORA) ON
WATER UTILITIES
- SUMMARY OF KEY IMPACTS OF DORA ON WATER UTILITIES
- The arbitrary re-direction of all national
government (DWAF) subsidies to the relevant
municipal authority could have a significant
impact on the provision of water services to vast
numbers of primarily rural South Africans in
that - The continued viability of service delivery
where this is provided by water utilities will be
subject to the municipality providing the
requisite subsidy to water utilities. - Current experiences with the allocation of a
portion of the equitable share to fund water
services do not support optimism in this regard
and the financial viability of some water
utilities will be severely impacted.
12IMPACTS OF THE DIVISION OF REVENUE ACT (DORA) ON
WATER UTILITIES
- SUMMARY OF KEY IMPACTS OF DORA ON WATER UTILITIES
- The capacity and willingness of municipalities to
enter into formal agreements with water utilities
for the provision of water services is a
significant constraint to effective
implementation of DORA. - (SAAWU and SALGA are currently developing a model
WSP contract and guidelines for contracts between
water utilities and municipalities and it is
hoped that this will help resolve some of the
immediate contractual problems.) - There is an urgent need to put in place a
practical and rational phasing process or
mechanism that will enable a viable and
sustainable transition to the situation where
national an provincial subsidies for water
service are directed through municipalities.
13IMPACTS OF THE DIVISION OF REVENUE ACT (DORA) ON
WATER UTILITIES
EXAMPLES OF SUBSIDIES PAID BY NATIONAL GOVERNMENT
TO WATER UTILITIES FOR WATER SERVICE RENDERED ON
BEHALF OF MUNICIPALITIES
Lepelle Northern Water R20.2 million 20.9 of
revenue Sedibeng/North West Region R22.4
million Sedibeng/Qwa Qwa R18.3 million
14IMPACT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FREE BASIC WATER
(FBW) ON WATER UTILITIES 04 JUNE 2003
15IMPACTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FREE BASIC WATER
(FBW) ON WATER UTILITIES
- THE FREE BASIC WATER (FBW) POLICY
- SAAWU fully supports the principle of FBW as an
initiative to improve the quality of life of
South Africans, specifically the indigent and
rural poor. - SAAWU supports the principal of municipal
authorities being the most appropriate
institutions to implement FBW, supported,
wherever possible by other spheres of government.
16IMPACTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FREE BASIC WATER
(FBW) ON WATER UTILITIES
- POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTIONS BY WATER UTILITIES TO THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF FREE BASIC WATER (6kl) - Many Water Utilities have expertise that can be
mobilised to support Municipal Authorities in the
implementation of FBW such as - Water loss management
- Technical and financial management
- Water demand management
- Customer management and credit control
- Operation and maintenance of services
17IMPACTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FREE BASIC WATER
(FBW) ON WATER UTILITIES
- POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTIONS BY WATER UTILITIES TO THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF FREE BASIC WATER (6kl)
(Continued) - Water Utilities can
- Be used as a regional/sub-regional vehicle for
cross subsidisation in some areas due to the fact
that they do operate over provincial and
municipal political boundaries. - Where they act as water service providers to
municipal authorities,they can implement and
manage the FBW for the municipal authority. - Can provide financial, technical and management
expertise for low (basic) level water schemes in
rural areas, ie boreholes, hand pumps, flow
limiting technology etc. - Can act as implementing agents for new
infrastructure provision.
18IMPACTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FREE BASIC WATER
(FBW) ON WATER UTILITIES
- CURRENT CHALLENGES TO FBW IMPLEMENTATION
- Municipal demarcation has not significantly
improved the economic viability of all municipal
areas (especially rural district municipalities). - Many municipalities have also applied for a
review of their boundaries. - The equitable share and other resources are used
to supply free basic water to those who are
already benefitting from the receipt of services
at the expense of the un-served - Universal metering and full cost recovery above
6kl is critical for municipal financial
viability, ongoing FBW implementation and the
viability of the entire water sector. This
requires significant additional capital
investment.
19 IMPACTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FREE BASIC WATER
(FBW) ON WATER UTILITIES
- CURRENT CHALLENGES TO FBW IMPLEMENTATION
(Continued) - Unauthorised/illegal connections continue to
destroy the viability of schemes and undermine
FBW provision in many areas. - The process of allocation of funding to capital
projects is unwieldy. - Many municipalities lack the capacity/resources
to implement FBW effectively. - Full cost recovery for water services in most
rural and some urban environments is not taking
place.
20IMPACTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FREE BASIC WATER
(FBW) ON WATER UTILITIES
- CURRENT CHALLENGES TO FBW IMPLEMENTATION
(Continued) - The reality is that water is not free and someone
has to pay for the 6kl of FBW supplied to
consumers. - In municipal areas where there is not a healthy
mix of high volume urban users to low level rural
users, cross subsidisation of FBW via the
consumer tariff is not viable. - Most parts of rural South Africa fall into this
category. - In these areas the only source of revenue to
cover the costs of FBW is the equitable share.
21IMPACTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FREE BASIC WATER
(FBW) ON WATER UTILITIES
CURRENT CHALLENGES TO FBW IMPLEMENTATION
(Continued)
- The allocation (quantum) and discretionary use of
the equitable share does not guarantee that
sufficient funding is made available by
municipalities to cover FBW implementation costs
to the rural/urban poor. - Where cross subsidisation is implemented there is
a critical requirement for reasonableness to
prevail, failing which, the negative impacts
will cause industrial, commercial and domestic
users to consider other alternatives. - Most rural water supply schemes run by water
boards on behalf of DWAF or municipalities have
effectively been rendered non viable by the FBW
implementation.
22IMPACTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FREE BASIC WATER
(FBW) ON WATER UTILITIES
CURRENT CHALLENGES TO FBW IMPLEMENTATION
(Continued)
- Municipalities currently owe water utilities more
than R 200 million for water services rendered
that have not been paid for. In many cases these
are municipalities with a large rural base who
are unable to get full cost recovery for services
provided to consumers. - In some areas water utilities are supplying water
services directly to consumers due to the fact
that municipalities lack the capacity and
resources to undertake this function. In most
cases these services are not paid for and the
water utility relies on subsidies from DWAF in
order to cover the costs of delivering the FBW
and basic water services.
23IMPACTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FREE BASIC WATER
(FBW) ON WATER UTILITIES
- CHALLENGES ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF THE
EQUITABLE SHARE ALLOCATION TO MUNICIPAL
AUTHORITIES TO FUND FBW - It is an unconditional allocation to municipal
authorities. - Use of funds is largely discretionary.
- Administrative capacity is not always sufficient
at municipal level. - Equitable share allocations are in-sufficient to
meet all service needs. - A portion of the equitable share is not always
used by municipalities to pay water service
providers for services rendered.
24 IMPACTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FREE BASIC WATER
(FBW) ON WATER UTILITIES
- SUMMARY OF THE IMPACTS OF FBW ON WATER UTILITIES
- The challenge now is to ensure that sufficient
revenue is available through cross subsidies via
the tariff or the allocation of the equitable
share to enable municipal authorities/water
service providers to recover the full costs of
water service provision. - It is critical that all consumers pay for all
services received that exceed the BFW limit of 6
k/lt per house hold per month. - The entire water sector is dependent on the
revenue from the consumer for services rendered. - If municipalities do not pay water utilities who
are acting as the service provider for the
service rendered the water utilities will
ultimately fail along with the rest of the water
service sector.
25IMPACTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FREE BASIC WATER
(FBW) ON WATER UTILITIES
- CONCLUSION
- The impact of FBW implementation on water
utilities are primarily financial. - This impact is, however, not insurmountable but
will require rational and resolute decision
making, total commitment and the cooperation of
all role players and stakeholders. - SAAWU and individual water utilities pledge their
full support, capacity and skills to assist in
ensuring the successful implementation of the
Free Basic Water Policy.
26IMPACTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FREE BASIC WATER
(FBW) ON WATER UTILITIES
Some examples of arrears owed to water utilities
operating in significant rural areas Amatola
Water R8,057,000 Magalies Water
R6,535,703 Midvaal Water R4,778,759 Lepelle
Northern Water R26,300,826 Sedibeng Water
R3,451,152 Rand Water R285,012,283 City of Cape
Town R2,227,025 Bloem Water R24,193,201
27IMPACTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FREE BASIC WATER
(FBW) ON WATER UTILITIES
Thank You for Your Time and Attention.