Title: HIV/AIDS Financing and Health Policy in South Africa
1HIV/AIDS Financing and Health Policy in South
Africa
- By
- Chrystelle TSAFACK TEMAH
-
2Background
- Abolition of apartheid and election of the
government of National Unity in 1994 with
adoption of the Reconstruction and Development
Plan - Â Render health care unified and accessible to
all South Africans - District health system and free primary health
care - Mid 90s HIV/AIDS reaches epidemic dimension
- Highest absolute number of infected people in the
world - Highest number of deaths due to AIDS and AIDS
orphans - End 2003 Adoption of a national roll-out plan to
provide free ARV to all people in need - 711,000 people in need, but only 225, 000 were
received treatment in 2007
3Motivation
- Despite its gravity, HIV/AIDS, it is only one of
the many public health issues in South Africa - South Africa is still dealing with infectious
diseases, infantile mortality and malnutrition - Growing toll of chronic diseases (obesity,
cardiovascular diseases, diabetus, etc) - Two questions addressed in this paper
- How does HIV/AIDS financing fit into the overall
health policy in South Africa? - Are the resources allocated to the fight against
HIV/AIDS in the country used efficiently?
4Overview
- South African health System
- HIV/AIDS Financing
- Efficiency of HIV/AIDS Financing
5South African health System
- Post-apartheid health reforms
- Free primary health care, free care to pregnant
women, nursing mothers and children under 6. - District health system services offered
according to local conditions and health
problems. Financed through conditional grants and
equitable shares. - Health financing
- Public sector 40 of THE and accounts for 80 of
population. Financed through tax collection and
user fees - In 2000, private sector was spending 91 per
patient, opposed to 6,75 in the public sector.
Financed through prepaid plans and OOPE
6Table 1 Trend of Indicators of health
expenditure in SA (1998- 2005)
 1998 2000 2002 2005
Total expenditure on health as of Gross domestic product 8,4 8,4 8,7 8,7
General government expenditure on health as of Total expenditure on health 44,8 42,4 40,6 41,7
Private sector expenditure on health as of Total expenditure on health 55,2 57,6 59,4 58,3
General government expenditure on health as of General government expenditure 11,5 11 10,7 9,9
Social Security funds as of General government expenditure on health 4 3,3 3,8 4,1
Prepaid and risk-pooling plans as of Private sector expenditure on health 74,7 75,6 77,7 77,3
Private households' out-of-pocket payment as of Private sector expenditure on health 23,6 22,8 20,9 17,4
External resources on health as of Total expenditure on health 0,2 0,4 0,3 0,5
Total expenditure on health per capita at exchange rate 261 244 206 437
Total expenditure on health per capita at international dollar rate 585 625 689 811
General government expenditure on health per capita at exchange rate 117 103 84 182
General government expenditure on health per capita at international dollar rate 262 265 280 338
7HIV/AIDS Financing
- National sources of financing
- Conditional grants (10) ring-fenced funds
allocated to health, education and social
development sectors. Allow to ensure that
national priorities will be sufficiently
resourced in provincial budgets - Equitable shares (86.5) means found by the
government to correct distorsion due to
differences in provincial tax revenues. Allow
discretionary spending by the provinces
8HIV/AIDS Financing (ctd)
- External sources of financing
- The Global Fund 4 main projects funded at the
end of 2005 - LoveLife initiative (2003) 12,000,000.
Promotion of healthier sexual practices among
adolescents - Institute for Health and Development
Communication (2003) 2,354,000. Producion of
the new series of Soul City - Enhancing the Care of HIV/AIDS infected and
affected patients in resource-constrained
settings in KwaZulu-Natal (2003)12,873,456 - Strengthening and expanding the Western Cape TB
and HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment and care
(2004) 8,282,075 - disbursed a cumulated amount of more than 128
million dollars at the end of 2008 - NGOs and international aid
- PEPFAR, G7, OECD, DFID, EU, USAID, foundations,
private business
9Efficiency of HIV/AIDS Financing
- Crowding-out effect on health sector public
health issues - Burden on health facilities (e.g Kwa-Zulu Natal
provincial health services, Veenstra 2005) - HIV/AIDS stay longer at the hospital, use more
expensive drugs also more lab and radiology
costs associated with HIV/AIDS patients - This difference increases with the reference
level it is higher for regional than for
district hospitals - Millennium Development Goals and major public
health issues - Treating 6.000 patients on ART costs just as much
as providing full immunization coverage against
measles and tetanus for all children in South
Africa. Assuming cost per patient per year 1,000
USD - Treating 12.000 HIV/AIDS patients with ART costs
as much as providing clean water to all people in
need and ORT to all children aged 0-4 infected
with diarrhoeal diseases
10 Decomposing resources allocation Expenditure
as shares of budget
Trends in expenditure by functional area
and GDP
(R million, real
2003 prices)
 99/00 01/02 02/03 05/06 Annual change ()
Hospitals 21Â 958 22Â 861 21Â 572 23Â 580 1.2
PHC 4Â 906 5Â 295 5Â 701 6Â 346 4.4
HIV/AIDS 83 104 750 880 48.2
Nutrition 617 673 760 833 5.1
EMS 911 942 1Â 362 1Â 507 8.7
Admin 1Â 244 1Â 377 1Â 427 1Â 574 4.0
Total 32Â 212 34Â 589 35Â 117 3.0 3.1
 2000/1 2004/5 Change
 2000/1 2004/5 ()
Health as of total budget 11.56 11.33 Â
Health as of total budget 11.56 11.33 Â
Health as of total budget 11.56 11.33 -1,98
Health as of GDP 2.96 3.06 Â
Health as of GDP 2.96 3.06 Â
Health as of GDP 2.96 3.06 3,37
HIV/AIDS as of total budget 0.09 0.49 Â
HIV/AIDS as of total budget 0.09 0.49 Â
HIV/AIDS as of total budget 0.09 0.49 444
HIV/AIDS as of total health budget 0.67 3.86 Â
HIV/AIDS as of total health budget 0.67 3.86 Â
HIV/AIDS as of total health budget 0.67 3.86 476
11Efficiency of HIV/AIDS Financing (ctd)
- Justification for HIV/AIDS financing
- Burden of diseases and death
- 5, 700 infected people at the end of 2007
- HIV/AIDS was responsible of 30 of all deaths in
2000 and 47 in 2007 - Among 15-49 age group, it is responsible of 71
of all deaths - Cost-effectiveness
- Absorption capacity
-
12Efficiency of HIV/AIDS Financing (ctd)
- Cost-effectiveness of ART Comparison of ART to
the status quo (treatment for opportunistic
infections only) in Khayelitsha - ART is efficient in economic terms
- costs R13 754 per QALY versus R14 189 per QALY
for patients who do not receive ART - ART leads to an average gain in life expectancy
of 6.06 years. - Several reports confirm good outcomes of ARV use
in the public health sector
13Percent spent from 2000 to 2003 on HIV/AIDS,
conditional grant allocation
14Conclusion
- Overall, HIV/AIDS financing differs from health
policy in South Africa in three points - ARVs, which are not included in the PHC package
are offered free in the public sector - HIV/AIDS financing is not confined to the health
sector - external funding account for a greater part of
financing in the case of HIV/AIDS - Evidence that HIV/AIDS is highly affecting
health system - In terms of resources allocated
- In terms of utilization of facilities
- In terms of crowding out of public health issues
- Evidence that amount spent on HIV/AIDS financing
is justified - HIV/AIDS has became the top single cause of
deaths in the country - ARVs allow to gain 6 years over the baseline
scenario - Provinces are increasing their ability to spend
HIV/AIDS funds
15Recommendation
- HIV/AIDS is striking people in their most
productive years, thus undermining human capital,
a development pillar. This alone justifies the
amount of money devoted to the epidemic. Yet,
other public health issues, cheaper and more
cost-effective deserve attention and should be
resolved in order to ensure fairness and equity
between patients suffereing from any cause.
16- Thank you for your attention