draft-polk-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-02 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

draft-polk-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-02

Description:

To create a new (simple) DHCP Option for delivery of a LbyR URI. 0 1 2 3 ... Will expand this section on advice from Apps AD. Next Steps ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: ietfOr
Learn more at: https://www.ietf.org
Category:
Tags: advice | dhcp | draft | geopriv | lbyr | option | polk | uri

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: draft-polk-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-02


1
draft-polk-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-02
  • IETF70 Vancouver
  • James Polk

2
... Its been a hell of a week!!
...obviously this is all in jest (NOT!!)
3
The Requirement
  • The WG in Prague agreed to create a
    lower-layer-than-L7 solution to provide an
    endpoint with an appropriate LbyR URI for that
    endpoint.
  • This doc creates a DHCP Option to deliver an LbyR
    URI to a client
  • either dereference its location or
  • hand out to other entities to learn this clients
    location (which is now the Target)

4
The Proposal
  • To create a new (simple) DHCP Option for delivery
    of a LbyR URI

0 1 2
3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 ------------
--------------------
Code XXX Option Length Valid-for
(NEW) ------------------
--------------
Location URI
------------------------
-------- /
.... \ \
....
/ -----------------------
--------- Location
URI (cont'd)
------------------------
--------
5
Whats Changed between -01 and -02
  • Added a Valid-For field, indicating (in seconds)
    this URI should be considered valid
  • A refresh will resolve this
  • Make it clear a DHCP may or may not be co-located
    with a LIS
  • Communication between these entities out-of-scope
  • BTW target rules are not communicated over DHCP
  • Made it clearer this doc does not address whats
    done outside DHCP
  • Started section about harmful URI types
  • Will expand this section on advice from Apps AD

6
Next Steps
  • The WG hummed (in Prague) for an IETF,
    lower-than-L7 solution
  • Does this doc meet that WG request?
  • If so, I ask this become a WG doc to progress
  • Obviously will incorporate consensus reaching
    suggestions into doc
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com