Title: PROPULSION
1PROPULSION
- Final Design Report
- March 10, 2004
2Propulsion -- Choices
- Electric Propulsion
- Electrothermal (Lack of thrust/altitude control)
- Electromagnetic (High power requirement)
- Electrostatic (For outer space missions)
- Air-Breathing
- Atmosphere Restrictions
- Propeller
- Further Investigation
- Chemical Propulsion
- Further Investigation
3Propulsion
- Propellers
- Pros
- Controlled Flight
- Constant Flight Velocity
- More Reliable
- Longer Duration
- Ease of measurement
- Constant velocity constant height
- Cons
- Power Requirement
- Rockets
- Pros
- More Acceleration
- Higher Absolute Velocity
- Cons
- Stability
- Need more controls for height and measurements
- Possibility of explosion (low temperature
behavior) - Weight
4Propulsion
5Propulsion
- Propeller Design
- Number of blades 3
- Advantages
- Optimizing between efficiency, weight, and thrust
- Produces more thrust than a 2-blade propeller
- More efficient and lighter than a 4-blade
propeller - Position Pusher
- Advantages
- For low density flow, will not disturb the air
prior to generating lift
6Propulsion- Calculations
- Drag Coefficient
-
- where CDP Parasite Drag
- CDI Induced Drag
- CDC Compressibility (neglected)
7Propulsion- Drag Calculations
- Assume minimum value of Re
- Use MACexp, the exposed main aerodynamic chord,
to find wing dimensions CR root chord length,
s taper ratio - Product of wing platform ratio (s), exposed area
of wing (wet)
8Propulsion- Drag Calculations
- From constants k and Cf (roughness based on Re),
- Induced Drag, CDI
- Total Drag
9Propulsion
- Assuming a safety factor of 1.2
- Tcapable 3.77 N
- Tflight D 3.14 N for level flight
- Find V(l/Dmax) 130m/s
- Assume propeller efficiency 95
-
- Running power of engine 430 W
- Brake horsepower (max power of engine) 489.84 W
0.675 hp
10Propulsion- Propeller Design
- Propeller Diameter
- Keep tip helical speed of propeller lt M0.85
- (velocity 195 m/s)
- Solving for n
11Propulsion- Propeller Design
n is approximately 20 rev/sec D 2.27 m Thrust
Coefficient Power Coefficient Advance
Ratio Propeller Efficiency
12Propulsion- Propeller Design
- Blade Design
- Spinner will be incorporated, to make up 10 of
total diameter - Want high aspect ratio
- Elliptical-shaped blade will give the best
results - Airfoil design
- Optimum airfoil thickness 15-18 near the root
- Thins to 10 at the tip
- Propeller tip
- Rounded to increase efficiency
13Propulsion- Propeller Design
- Fixed pitch
- Climb Propeller (lower pitch)
- Cruise Propeller (higher pitch)
- Variable/controllable pitch
- Pilot controls pitch setting
- Not feasible
14Propulsion- Motor Specifications
- Motor Specs
- Power requirement 0.67 hp
- 1200 rpm
- Must fit in cylinder casing of 0.1 m diameter
(structure limitations) - Lightweight
15Propulsion
- Flight Duration 1.43 hours
- Power 430 W
- Propulsion System Total Weight 7 kg
- Battery weight 4.2 kg
- Motor weight 1.8 kg
- Shaft Propeller weight 1 kg
- Distance 670 km
- Average Velocity 130 m/s
- Carbon Fiber Material
16Propulsion
- We will not be determining the following
- Concerning propeller blade
- Shape
- Twist
- Exact pitch
- Airfoil selection
Propellers are essentially a rotating wing, with
varying Reynolds number along the length of the
blade this exceeds our expertise and time
available.