Functional Competencies Can Improve Organizational Capabilities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Functional Competencies Can Improve Organizational Capabilities

Description:

Frequency, time spent. Required at entry. Differentiate peformance ... Case Study: Results. Five years after this work was done: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:430
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: nancya3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Functional Competencies Can Improve Organizational Capabilities


1
Functional Competencies Can Improve
Organizational Capabilities
  • Nancy E. Abrams, Ph.D.
  • The Partnering Group, Inc.

2
Introductions
  • Me
  • You
  • Jurisdiction
  • Agency
  • Your job
  • Expectations for this presentation

3
Functional Competencies Can Improve
Organizational Capabilities
  • Introductions
  • Job Analysis The Traditional Approach
  • General Competency Modeling
  • Functional Competencies
  • Competency Modeling with General Functional
    Competencies
  • Case studies

4
Job Analysis
5
Why do we do Job Analysis?
  • To understand the work and worker needed to do
    work
  • To establish the job relatedness/validity of a
    selection procedure
  • To fairly compensate individuals
  • To appropriately assess job performance
  • To train and develop in areas that will improve
    job performance
  • To plan for the development of capabilities
    required in the future

6
Traditional Job Analysis
  • Collect background information
  • Gather information from Job Experts
  • Duties Work Focused
  • Tasks Work Focused
  • Knowledge, Skills, Abilities, Personal (Other)
    Characteristics Worker Focused
  • Ratings
  • Importance (Criticality)
  • Frequency, time spent
  • Required at entry
  • Differentiate peformance
  • Narrow the list to focus appropriately

7
How successful are we in using our traditional
job analyses for all of these purposes at one
time?
8
General Competency Modeling
9
What are Competencies?
  • Not one answer
  • SIOP tried to answer this question
  • See report of task force
  • Schippmann, J.S. et al. Personnel Psychology,
    2000.
  • Some common elements
  • Knowledge, skills, abilities, personal (other)
    characteristics
  • Broader than traditional KSAPs often look more
    like constructs
  • Focused on workers rather than work
  • Associated with high levels of job performance or
    job success

10
Where did competencies come from?
  • In 1973, David McClelland called for
    organizations to test for competence rather than
    intelligence.
  • Focused on those factors that lead to success
  • In 1990, Prahalad Hamel published an article in
    Harvard Business Review
  • Called for people-embodied skills necessary to
    building core competence for an organization

11
Why have competencies become so popular?
  • As compared to the knowledge, skills, abilities
    and personal (other) characteristics identified
    in traditional job analysis, they tend to be
    broader apply to more jobs.
  • Most competency models have been designed to
    capture how the organization, as a whole, defines
    success or the roadmap to success
  • Reflect organization values

12
General Competency Models
  • Competency models often define a conceptual view
    of leadership for the organization
  • Apply to all parts of the organization
  • Provide a common terminology for communicating
    people capabilities across all parts of the
    organization
  • Serve as the basis for the entire Human Resource
    system
  • Define multiple proficiency levels
  • Often with behavioral indicators

13
Human Resource Management Revolves Around
Competencies
Organizational Competency Development
JOB
Competencies
Reward Recognition
Recruitment Selection
Performance Management
Succession Planning
Training Development
14
Sample General Competencies
  • Problem Solving - Identifying and solving
    problems, using and adjusting tactics as
    appropriate to the situation.
  • Interpersonal Communication - Communicates
    effectively both orally and in writing to ensure
    complete support and understanding

15
Sample General Competency with Proficiency Levels
Problem Solving Identifying problems and
developing and implementing logical solutions
consistent with business objectives.
16
Limitations of General Competency Models
  • Usually not linked to work behaviors in the
    traditional job analysis sense
  • May be difficult to use as the basis for content
    validation
  • Because they are very general, they often miss
    some key aspects of particular jobs or groups of
    jobs, e.g. knowledge and skills.
  • Often come from pre-existing, off-the-shelf
    models

17
Functional Competencies
18
What are Functional Competencies?
  • Competencies associated with success in one part
    of the organization, department, group of
    departments or job family associated with high
    levels of job performance or job success.
  • Do not apply broadly across the organization or
    are of less importance in other parts of the
    organization.
  • Usually broad knowledge and skills.

19
Competency Modeling Incorporating General
Functional Competencies
20
The Process
  • Identify the scope
  • Job Family
  • Department
  • Agency, etc.
  • Identify competencies
  • Keep focused on most important
  • Keep list contained, e.g. 10-15
  • Avoid overlap

21
The Process (continued)
  • Define competencies to provide common
    understanding and language
  • Identify proficiency levels (usually 3-5)
  • Define proficiency levels
  • Identify behavioral indicators for each
    proficiency level Competency Dictionary
  • Link jobs to competencies proficiency levels

22
Sample Competency Dictionary Page
Product and Category Knowledge Understanding of
the tire industry, categories, brands, portfolio
of products and related consumer insights.

23
Sample Competency Job Linkage
24
Competency Modeling Case Studies
25
Case Study The Situation
  • Private Sector not all problems may apply to
    your situation
  • Problems
  • Lack of clear understanding of job performance
    expectations
  • Focused on results not how to get them
  • Lack of clarity on how career advancement could
    be achieved
  • Lack of alignment of training to real needs

26
Case Study The Situation (continued)
  • Was using broad Leadership Competency Model 67
    competencies!!!
  • Sales needed to know what worked for their area
  • More focus for General Competencies
  • Addition of Functional Competencies

27
Case Study What was done
  • Identified and defined 13 competencies
  • Four levels of proficiency
  • Undeveloped to expert
  • Each defined for each competency
  • Behavioral indicators for each
  • Linkage of competencies and proficiency level
    expectations to each job

28
Case Study How Competencies were used
  • Individuals were assessed through manager
    assessment of behaviors observed
  • Other clients have used assessment centers or
    written tests
  • Comparison of proficiency level observed to that
    expected in job
  • Where level was below expectation Competency Gap
  • Four of five Competencies with largest gaps were
    Functional

29
Case Study Changes Made
  • New hires given 90 day development plan based on
    competencies required for job
  • Performance assessed against competencies
  • Competency proficiency level definitions used as
    the basis for discussions
  • Competency-based career paths established
  • Training focused on competency development
  • Development plans focused on competencies
  • More demand for training
  • Managers focused on both remedial training and
    preparation for advancement

30
Case Study Results
  • Five years after this work was done
  • Sales went from 6,133 million to 7,867 million
  • Net earnings per share went from 1.28 to 2.16
  • Obviously not all because of this work
  • Employee engagement rating went from 51 to 76

31
Results Across Clientsn733
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com