The staying power of the public corporation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

The staying power of the public corporation

Description:

Based on the article. By Alfred Rappaport. Harvard Business Review, Jan Feb, 1990 ... New information sources, sophisticated valuation techniques and the growing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:129
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: vedp3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The staying power of the public corporation


1
The staying power of the public corporation
  • Based on the article
  • By Alfred Rappaport
  • Harvard Business Review, Jan Feb, 1990

2
The future of public companies remains bright
  • Public companies are inherently flexible and
    capable of renewal.
  • Leveraged Buyouts (LBOs) should not be viewed as
    substitutes for public companies.
  • The heavy use of debt by LBOs can increase costs
    and reduce flexibility.
  • And flexibility holds the key in a fast changing
    environment.

3
The future of public companies remains
bright(cont)
  • The act of going private also does away with the
    single best source of information about the
    performance of the company, the daily stock
    price.
  • There is no better barometer of a companys long
    term prospects than the share price.

4
Limitations of LBOs
  • LBOs have a limited market and a limited life.
  • LBOs apply only to industries where long term
    growth prospects are limited, internally
    generated funds exceed profitable investment
    opportunities and downsizing is the most
    appropriate long term strategy.
  • Investors have limited appetite for LBOs since
    investments in securities without objectively
    determined market prices are not easy to
    evaluate.
  • By design, the buyout is a transitory form of
    organization.
  • Sponsors return it to its earlier status as a
    public company or sell out to a new group of
    investors.

5
The case for public companies
  • A flourishing market for corporate control exists
    to impose discipline on management.
  • New information sources, sophisticated valuation
    techniques and the growing number of talented MA
    professionals have combined to create a powerful
    infrastructure for corporate control.
  • Public companies too undergo restructuring from
    time to time.
  • The only thing is that restructuring in the 1980s
    was largely driven by a transactional approach.

6
The case for public companies (Cont..)
  • What is needed is a more institutionalized
    shareholder value program, which incorporates
    four guiding principles
  • Find the highest valued use for all assets
  • Managers must develop monitoring systems that
    regularly evaluate each business unit as if it
    were a publicly traded entity and then assess
    whether there are buyers willing to pay a
    meaningful premium over its estimated value.
  • Limit investment to opportunities with credible
    potential to create value.
  • Mangers must not subsidise low return businesses
    with cash from high return businesses and not
    over invest in declining core businesses.
  • It is also best to avoid a single hurdle rate for
    all investment decisions.
  • A single hurdle rate overstates the risk of low
    risk units and understates the risk of high risk
    units.
  • - -

7
The case for public companies (Cont..)
  • Return cash to shareholders when value creating
    investments are not available.
  • Public companies must return cash to shareholders
    when value creating investment opportunities are
    not available.
  • This can be done through stock purchase, higher
    dividends and special one time dividends.
  • Establish incentives for managers to focus on the
    drivers that create value.
  • Incentives must be created for managers and
    employees to focus on the critical drivers that
    create value.
  • The most direct way to persuade managers to act
    like shareholders is to increase their equity
    stake, putting a substantial portion of their
    personal net worth at risk in the process.

8
Conclusion
  • Institutional investors, the driving force
    behind LBOs, should not write off the long term
    viability of the public corporation.
  • What is needed is a governance system that
    provides effective monitoring of managers and
    imposes the necessary checks and balances.
  • Large institutional investors can become directly
    involved in governance by having their nominees
    on the board.
  • But a better way of monitoring managers is by
    using their collective influence to promote a
    governance process that holds managers and
    directors to a higher standard of accountability.

9
Conclusion (Cont..)
  • Institutional shareholders can use their
    collective power to build a shareholder voting
    system that gives investors a stronger voice.
  • But it could be wrong to lay too much emphasis on
    governance to facilitate the renewal of the
    public company.
  • It is better to ensure that managers are
    motivated around the right performance measures.
  • The major forces in the coming years will be the
    market for corporate control, more aggressive
    ownership incentives and compensation linked to
    shareholder value creation.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com