Title: Household Food Security in the United States
1Household Food Security in the United States
2History of the Food Security Measurement Project
3Definitions of Food Security Before 2006
4Nutrition Security
- The provision of an environment that encourages
and motivates society to make food choices
consistent with short and long term good health.
5Food Security
- Assess by all people at all times to sufficient
food for an active and healthy life. Food
security includes at a minimum the ready
availability of nutritionally adequate and safe
foods, and an assured ability to acquire
acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways.
6Food Insecurity
- a household had limited or uncertain availability
of food, or limited or uncertain ability to
acquire acceptable foods in socially acceptable
ways (i.e., without resorting to emergency food
supplies, scavenging, stealing, or other unusual
coping strategies).
7Hunger
- The uneasy or painful sensation caused by a lack
of food. - Involuntary hunger that results from not being
able to afford enough food - The recurrent and involuntary lack of access to
food - May produce malnutrition over time.
8Food Insecurity and Hunger in the United States
An Assessment of the Measure.(IOM 2006)
- Recommended that USDA continue to measure and
monitor food insecurity regularly in a household
survey - Affirmed the appropriateness of the general
methodology currently used to measure food
insecurity - Suggested several ways in which the methodology
might be refined (contingent on confirmatory
research). Research on these issues is currently
underway at ERS
9Changes in Definitions IOM 2006
- Food insecuritya household-level economic and
social condition of limited or uncertain access
to adequate food. - Hunger is an individual-level physiological
condition that may result from food insecurity -
should refer to a potential consequence of food
insecurity that, because of prolonged,
involuntary lack of food, results in discomfort,
illness, weakness, or pain that goes beyond the
usual uneasy sensation." - To measure hunger in this sense would require
collection of more detailed and extensive
information on physiological experiences of
individual household members than could be
accomplished effectively in the context of the
CPS.
102006, New Definitions
112006, Food Security Continuum
- High food securityHouseholds had no problems, or
anxiety about, consistently accessing adequate
food. - Marginal food securityHouseholds had problems at
times, or anxiety about, accessing adequate food,
but the quality, variety, and quantity of their
food intake were not substantially reduced. - Low food securityHouseholds reduced the quality,
variety, and desirability of their diets, but the
quantity of food intake and normal eating
patterns were not substantially disrupted. - Very low food securityAt times during the year,
eating patterns of one or more household members
were disrupted and food intake reduced because
the household lacked money and other resources
for food.
12(No Transcript)
13http//www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/FoodSecurity/tren
ds.htm
142005 Survey, VL Food Security (4.4 million
households)
- 98 percent reported having worried that their
food would run out before they got money to buy
more. - 96 percent reported that the food they bought
just did not last and they did not have money to
get more. - 94 percent reported that they could not afford to
eat balanced meals. - 96 percent reported that an adult had cut the
size of meals or skipped meals because there was
not enough money for food 86 percent reported
that this had occurred in 3 or more months. - 44 percent reported having lost weight because
they did not have enough money for food. - 31 percent reported that an adult did not eat for
a whole day because there was not enough money
for food 22 percent reported that this had
occurred in 3 or more months.
15(No Transcript)
16Food Insecurity with Hunger
2002-2004 3.9
4.3 11 2003-2005 3.8
3.9 30
4.0
3.5
2005-2007
34
171999
18(No Transcript)
19State-Level Predictors of Food Insecurity and
Hunger Among Households With Children, 2005
- Used hierarchical modeling to identify contextual
dimensions of food insecurity - Availability and accessibility of federal
nutrition assistance programs - Policies affecting wellbeing of low income
families - States economic and social characteristics
http//www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/CCR13/
20Important Protective Factors
- Food stamps and summer meals programs
- Tax policies that support low income families
- Job opportunities/strong labor market
- Robust relationship between median rent and
food insecurity - Residential stability and social capital
21Its not just poverty
- Some states have high rates of food insecurity,
but lower rates of poor families and families
headed by a single adult. - Propose concept of excess food insecurity to
determine which states may benefit from
strengthening the food security infrastructure.
22Why did Washingtons rates improve?
- Increased participation in federal programs
- Between 2001 and 2004 there was a 59 increase in
food stamp participation. - In 2002 56 of eligible families received food
stamps in 2005 68 received food stamps. - WA state legislature increased funding for school
lunch, breakfast and summer meals