Title: MILITARY FAMILY SERVICES PROGRAM GOVERNANCE
1MILITARY FAMILY SERVICES PROGRAMGOVERNANCE
Canadian Forces Family Services Summit II
24 January 2009
2Mission
- Strengthen the Governance of
- Military Family Resource Centres
3System Governance
4 Review
- Consultations with Environmental Chiefs of Staff,
Base/Wing Commanders, and MFRC Board Chairs and
Executive Directors - Review of DMFS audit results, Formal Site Visit
Reports, MFSP Participant Surveys - Review of industry standards related to
governance of not for profit organizations - Review of consultation held at CF Family Services
Summit I (May 2008) - Ongoing web-based dialogue
5Situation
- Each MFRC is a provincially incorporated
not-for-profit organization governed by a
community-elected, volunteer Board of Directors
(BoD) - By mandate, each MFRC BoD is comprised of a
majority representation of civilian spouses of CF
members - The rationale for the current governance
construct was introduced to address documented
barriers in CF family support
6What the Consultations Told Us
- Significant Support for Current Arrangement
- Governance model affords agility, responsiveness
greater flexibility to respond to local
requirements - Provides legitimate opportunity for engagement
and voice of CF families - Greater capacity to advocate/ lobby to meet the
emerging needs of families - Increases confidence in confidentiality of
services received - MFRCs ready and willing to be held to greater
account
7What the Consultations Told Us
- Not Everyone is Happy
- 3rd Party Service Delivery is an abrogation of CF
leadership responsibility MFRCs not accountable
to anyone - Not Responsive to Chain of Command or operational
requirements - Lack of Central Authority MFRC Flexibility
Inconsistent Level of Services - No Protocol for Criticism of Central Policy
- Boards of Directors lack the sophistication/
skills to manage complex issues - CF families should not have to lead and shape
their own services (or fundraise to resource
them) they should be provided by professionals
8What the Consultations Told Us
- Challenges
- Constant turn-over of Boards, Base/Wing
Commanders results in erosion of capacity/
knowledge/ skills - Difficulty in engaging Board members to meet
mandated composition - Lack of resources Fund Raising for Services,
Insufficient Resources for Employee Compensation - DMFS has not fully exercised its authority to
hold non-compliant/non-performing MFRCs to
account - Lack of awareness of current accountability
framework, lack of understanding of non-profit
governance model
9Critical Facts
- Current arrangement assessed twice by Chief
Review Services since inception of MFSP - Current arrangement approved by Treasury Board
- IAW the TB approved Memoranda of Understanding
the leadership, management and control of the
MFSP is within CF Chain of Command - CMP retains authority for the MFSP on behalf of
the Minister, and is accountable to the CDS for
the achievement of its aims. - Collaboration with and responsiveness to the
local BComd/WComd is included. - CMP has authority to effect corrective action
including, but not limited to, withholding funds.
10DMFS Assessment
- MFRC Staff Pay, Pension, Benefits ? Governance
Model - Requirement to Fund Raise ? Governance Model
- Achievement of MFSP objectives for families is
currently high amongst MFRC participants - Current MFSP Accountability Framework meets or
exceeds provincial/ federal/ best practice
standards - Individual MFRCs currently meet or exceed MFSP
Accountability Standards
11Current MFSP Accountability Framework
12CF FAMILY SUPPORT TEAM
Chain of Command for Mandated Policy, Program and
Central Funding
13Proposed Way Ahead
- Strengthen existing Military Family Resource
Centre governance model - Maintain current MFRC governance arrangement
- Enhance MFRC accountability and effectiveness
14Enhanced Governance Framework
15Enhanced Governance Framework
16Desired Effects and Strategies
17Desired Effects and Strategies
18Desired Effects and Strategies
19Desired Effects and Strategies
20Desired Effects and Strategies
21Discussion