Employee%20Involvement%20in%20the%20Disciplinary%20Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Employee%20Involvement%20in%20the%20Disciplinary%20Process

Description:

Results Based on Supervisor's Survey. conducted 6 months after implementation. 46% response rate ... Takes a great deal of time. Better employees feel ignored ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: CindyB9
Learn more at: http://shell.cas.usf.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Employee%20Involvement%20in%20the%20Disciplinary%20Process


1
Employee Involvement in the Disciplinary Process
  • Presented by
  • Pamela Skyrme, PhDSkyrme Associates, Inc
  • Cynthia BenderCity of Clearwater Human Resources

2
Progressive vs. Positive Discipline
  • Progressive
  • Punitive
  • Done to employee
  • Adversarial
  • No follow-up
  • No positive recognition
  • Positive
  • Developmental
  • Done with employee
  • Collaborative
  • Follow-up as necessary
  • Recognizes success

3
Value-Added Outcomes ofPositive Discipline
  • Provides more complete documentation
  • Program generates more understanding, acceptance,
    and support for behavioral change
  • Focuses on correcting problems, not punishing
    employees
  • Recognizes and reinforces good performance

4
Value-Added Outcomes ofPositive Discipline
  • Provides method to confront those not meeting
    standards while maintaining and enhancing the
    employees self-esteem
  • Influences employees to change behavior, accept
    responsibility, and return to fully acceptable
    level of performance
  • Promotes teamwork and communication at all levels
    of the organization

5
PHASE I Development and Implementation - How We
Got Here...
  • In May 1995, HR formed Constructive Action Team
    (CAT) to review disciplinary program
  • CAT conducted focus groups of 10 of employees
  • CAT decided to develop new program
  • Unions became involved
  • Draft of new plan created

6
PHASE I Development and Implementation - How We
Got Here...
  • More focus groups held with 10 of employees
  • Program modified based on feedback
  • Approval!
  • Implemented March 1998

7
Department and Citywide Standards
  • Developed with Employee Input
  • Based on PIE
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Integrity
  • Excellence

8
Changes in Document Retention
  • Action plans kept in departments if they are
    successfully completed
  • Removed and destroyed after 3 years (per records
    retention requirements)

9
Results Based on Supervisors Surveyconducted 6
months after implementation
  • 46 response rate
  • Results revealed
  • 106 action plans implemented
  • 53 of action plans successful
  • 14 terminations or resignations
  • 26 plans still in effect
  • 13 unknown outcomes

10
Benefits of P.B.M.P.Expressed by Supervisors
  • Positive, problem-solving approach
  • Better documentation
  • Can be structured per case
  • Gives more flexibility
  • Puts responsibility on employee to improve
  • Brings intervention and resolution to the
    first-line supervisory level

11
Benefits of P.B.M.P.Expressed by Supervisors
  • Employees seem to feel more comfortable with
    action plans as opposed to old discipline system
  • Forces communication of standards
  • Get direct feedback from employees, rather than
    relying on hearsay
  • Solved problem

12
Difficulties Encountered by Supervisors
  • Coordinating review dates and times
  • Need more understanding of program
  • Told to revise action plan by superior
  • Persistent problems with same employee
  • Too much paperwork

13
Difficulties Encountered by Supervisors
  • Takes a great deal of time
  • Better employees feel ignored
  • Supervisors ignore action plan steps use
    coaching only
  • Some employees dont take program seriously

14
Feedback from Employee Focus Groups
  • Even after mandatory training, many employees
    dont know much about the program
  • Many departments did not include employees in
    standards revisions
  • Need more training and information
  • Other people want to know the outcomes of action
    plans

15
Phase II Where are We Now?
  • Organized new team
  • Began department liaison program
  • Conducted facilitator training
  • Coordinated supervisor training
  • Revising standards
  • Measuring of results

16
From the Citys Perspective
  • Increases accountability
  • Creates partnerships
  • Addresses issues quickly
  • Participation creates buy-in
  • Uses discipline to teach, not to punish
  • Corrects problems and deficiencies
  • Reduces grievances and arbitrations

17
From the Employees Perspective
  • Employee-building
  • Creates team building and communication
  • Employee is accountable
  • Much more positive - not fear-based
  • Employees are taught and coached not punished

18
(No Transcript)
19
For More Information, Contact
  • Pamela Skyrme, PhDSkyrme Associates,
    Inc727-443-3199
  • skyrme_at_mindspring.com
  • Cynthia BenderCity of Clearwater Human
    Resources727-562-4845 cbender_at_clearwater-fl.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com