Title: The Effects of Public Policy on Workplace Diversity
1The Effects of Public Policy on Workplace
Diversity
- Samuel L. Myers, Jr.
- Roy Wilkins Center for Human Relations and Social
Justice - Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs
Multicultural Forum on Workplace Diversity Saint
Paul, Minnesota February 21, 2007
2Overview and Summary
- Affirmative Action as a remedy to racial
disparities is not widely supported by Americans - There is a renewed attempt to dismantle the
apparatus of the Civil Rights Movement - Factors that predict the retrenchment of
Affirmative Action include economic stresses
faced by white males - Race-neutral remedies are one possible solution
- Race and Sports provides one metaphor for
understanding this opposition to Affirmative
Action
3Outline of Talk
- Definitions and Background
- Policy Trends
- The Concept of Race-Neutrality Application to
Public Procurement and Contracting - The Sports Metaphor Merit vs. Social Justice
4Definitions
- Discrimination
- Differential treatment of otherwise equally
qualified individuals
- Suspect Disparity
- Unequal results that cannot be attributed to
unequal representation
- Racism
- Belief in the inherent inferiority of an
individual because of racial group membership
5Examples
- Discrimination
- Black loan applicants are rejected when they have
low credit scores white loan applicants with the
same scores are accepted
- Suspect Disparity
- 1 of state contracts are awarded to women or
minority owned firms 17 of local firms are
women or minority
6Old Racism Examples
- Black loan applicant told not to even bother to
apply -- We dont make loans to niggers.
7New Racism Examples?
- Lender believes that blacks are less reliable and
are poor credit risks - But makes loans to low risk blacks at inflated
interest rates
8Definition Affirmative Action
- Positive steps taken to achieve a specified
outcome - Increase the representation of protected groups
in areas of employment, education, and business
from which they have been historically excluded - Rectify current or prior discrimination
- A remedy for illegal discrimination
9The Problem
- Major retrenchment in affirmative action in three
specific public spheres - a) Public procurement and contracting
- b) Public higher education - admissions and
scholarships - c) Public employment
10The Problem, cont.
- Two major policy responses
- Attempts from many civil rights organizations to
preserve affirmative action - Attempts by many conservative organizations to
assure that the dismantling of affirmative action
is complete and permanent
11Background
- Affirmative Action becomes national policy in
1965 - President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Executive Order
11246 - Mandates that institutions take affirmative
action to assure individuals are treated Awithout
regard to their race, creed, color, or national
origin - Thus is an anti-discrimination effort
12Justifications for Affirmative Action
- Compensation for past discrimination
- Affirmative Action is a remedy for prior wrongs
- Provision of diversity in organizations
- Affirmative action is a means towards achieving
the end of increasing minority employment - Deterrent to workplace discrimination
- Affirmative Action is a prospective remedy to
current or future wrongs
13Central Objections to Continuing Affirmative
Action
- Prior Wrongs have been remedied
- Diversity, while laudable, cannot justify reverse
discrimination - Current Discrimination No Longer Exists
14What do we know about why there is opposition to
AA?
- Widespread belief that things other than
discrimination explain racial inequality - Growing polarization between blacks and other
minorities
15Attitudes Towards Race General Social Survey
- On the average (Negroes/Blacks/African-Americans)
have worse jobs, income, and housing than white
people. Do you think these differences are . . . - Mainly due to discrimination?
- Because most (Negroes/Blacks/African-Americans)
have less in-born ability to learn? - Because most (Negroes/Blacks/African-Americans)
don't have the chance for education that it takes
to rise out of poverty? - Because most (Negroes/Blacks/African-Americans)
just don't have the motivation or will power to
pull themselves up out of poverty?
16Mainly due to discrimination
17Because most have less in-born ability to learn
18Because most don't have the chance for education
that it takes to rise out of poverty
19Because most just don't have the motivation or
will power to pull themselves up out of poverty
20Opposition to Affirmative Action General Social
Survey
- Some people say that because of past
discrimination, blacks should be given preference
in hiring and promotion. - Others say that such preference in hiring and
promotion of blacks is wrong because it
discriminates against whites
21Opposition to Affirmative Action
- What about your opinion -- are you for or against
preferential hiring and promotion of blacks? - IF FAVORS
- A. Do you favor preference in hiring and
promotion strongly or not strongly? - IF OPPOSES
- B. Do you oppose preference in hiring and
promotion strongly or not strongly?
22Opposition to Affirmative Action
23Trend in Opposition to Affirmative Action
24Mechanisms for Retrenchment of Affirmative Action
- Legislative efforts to dismantle existing state
and local Affirmative Action or to ban race-based
programs - Court decisions that require government entities
to - Show a compelling state justification for
instituting any remedy - Narrowly tailor any race-base program to remedy
identified discrimination - Ballot Initiatives
25Examples of Set-Backs
- Court Decisions
- Croson, 1989
- Hopwood, 1996
- Legislative Efforts
- Between 1992 and 2000
- 108 Anti-AA in Public Employment Bills introduced
- 113 Anti-AA in Public Contracting
- 107 Anti-AA in Higher Education
- Ballot Initiatives
- Washington California
- Proposition 209, 1995
- Eliminates affirmative action programs in all
public contracts, at public state colleges and
universities and hiring within public state
agencies
26Continued Set-Backs
- Despite court upholdings of affirmative action
- Concrete Works v Denver (2003)
- Grutter v Bollinger (2003)
- Equal Protection Clause does not prohibit the Law
Schools narrowly tailored use of race in
admissions to further a compelling interest from
a diverse student body - Proposal 2 (Michigan Civil Rights Initiative)
(November, 2006) - Constitutional amendment prohibiting state and
local government from discriminating against or
granting preferential treatment to any individual
or group based on race, sex, color, ethnicity or
national origin
27The Model
- Factors contributing to legislation restricting
affirmative action - Economic Stress
- Unemployment rates, shift out of manufacturing,
b/w income gaps, state employment - Political Vulnerability
- Black elected officials, democratic voting,
percent voting age population registered - Socio-Demographic Stress
- Immigration, racial diversity, crime, welfare
28(No Transcript)
29The Data
- Legislative Data by House by State 1992-1998
- Bills introduced
- Bills voted out of committee
- Bills passed
- State social, economic and political data --
Census, Joint Center, Statistical Abstracts
30Results
- Economic/Socio-Demographic Models Predict Best
- Political Model Mispredicts Often
31Effects of Race, Crime and Welfare
32Economic/Social Stresses Matter
Percent correctly classified
33Model Predicted Affirmative Action Retrenchment
- California
- Oregon
- Illinois
- Florida
- Michigan
- Mississippi
- Alabama
- Louisiana
- South Carolina.
- Washington
34Findings
- Threats of increased numbers of minorities affect
the likelihood that anti-affirmative action bills
are introduced - But, increased numbers of minorities help to
prevent introduction of ballot initiatives - Ballot initiatives more likely where white males
are unemployed
35Ballot Initiatives White Male Threat
36Case Study Public Procurement and Contracting
- Billions of federal dollars for construction and
highway projects to private firms - FTA guidelines require DBE goals
- But, goals must be met partly through
race-neutral means
37Race-Neutral Means
- Expanding pool of qualified women and
minority-owned firms - Bonding and insurance programs to help DBEs
compete effectively - Outreach activities
- i.e., virtually anything except direct set-asides
or subcontracting goals for prime contractors
38Innovations in Measure Race-Neutrality
- Myers and Ha, Applied Economics Letters show
portion of the overall goal that could be
achieved through race-neutral means is - Amount of dollars that could have been awarded
without a DBE goal. - This amount is often underestimated in
conventional models
39Race and Sports
- Should there be affirmative action in competitive
sports? - What do we know about the opposition to
affirmative action in sports?
40Opposition to Affirmative Action in Sports
- Rooney rule requires NFL Clubs to interview at
least one minority candidate for head-coaching
jobs - Blogs dominated by opposition to the Rooney Rule
- Frequent commentary
- Tony Dungys race has nothing to do with it
- The reason there has never been a black coach to
win the Super Bowl is that there has never been a
black coach that a top white player was willing
to play for
- Black coaches owe it all to Rooney rule
41The Interesting Case of Competitive Swimming
- Blacks dominate most Olympic sports
- One of the last outposts of virtual total
exclusion of blacks is swimming - But, great resistance to remedying the problem
42Historical Background
- Evidence of excellent boating and swimming skills
among coastal Africans - Slave traders reported many instances of blacks
who jumped ship and swam ashore - North of Acapulco (Mexico)
- Esmeraldas (Ecuador)
- Slave owners prohibited blacks from swimming
- Public swimming pools denied entrance to blacks
or required separate pools - Medical literature on body mass, bone structure,
buoyancy explaining why blacks cannot swim
43Modern-Day Myths
- Blacks believe that they will catch colds by
swimming (in the winter) - Black males do not want to wear Speedos
- Black females do not want to get their hair wet
- Blacks do not have the money to pay for parking
- Blacks prefer to play basketball
44African-American children ages 5 to 19 years
fatally drowned at 2.3 times the rate of white
children in this age group during 20022003 (CDC
2005)
45(No Transcript)
46USA Swimming Membership
- Of 249,182 members in 2005
- 1,220 black females
- 958 black males
- .9 of total
- The states with the highest disparities in
drowning rates had the lowest numbers of black
competitive swimmers
47Outreach Activities of USA Swimming
- Reduced membership dues
- Outreach camp
- Outreach grants of 2,000
- Differential times for inclusion in elite
training camps - But, substantial opposition from coaches, parents
and athletes to affirmative action efforts
48The compelling state interest in remedying
disparities
49The Minnesota Paradox
- Blacks are 2,700 times more likely to be in the
population than they are to be found among USA
swimming registrants - Virtually all of the 10 and under state records
dating back to 1994 and 1995 are held by two
persons of African American heritage
50MINNESOTA SWIMMING STATE RECORDS LONG COURSE (50
METERS)
51Who is Kris Humphries?
52MINNESOTA SWIMMING STATE RECORDS, SHORT COURSE
(25 YARDS)
53Who is Kaela Humphries?
- 2000 Olympic Trials
- University of Texas, Austin
- Two-time NCAA All-American
- Four-time Big 12 Conference Champion
- 12-time All-Big 12 Conference
- 2004 First-Team Academic All-Big 12 Conference
- Big 12 Commissioners Honor Roll
54Does this provide proof that blacks can swim?
- Collective denial that there is a problem
- Look at Kris. Look at Kaela.
- Blacks prefer basketball
- Reinforcement of biological myths
- Kris and Kaela are bi-racial
- Alison Terry (sprinter) is bi-racial
- Anthony Ervin (sprinter) (gold medal 50 meter
free) is bi-racial - Cullen Jones is sprinter
55Why this metaphor is helpful
- Remedying racial and ethnic inequality requires
an understanding of the nature of the problem - Myths and misconceptions affect beliefs about the
problem - Beliefs about the problem affect private views
about the remedy - Private views affect public action
56Summary and Conclusion
- Widespread opposition to Affirmative Action
- Rise in use of ballot initiatives as vehicle for
dismantling public policies on affirmative action - Opposition to Affirmative Action rooted in real
social and economic factors related to racial
separation - Solutions need to address the underlying factors
of - Racial separation
- Misunderstandings and distrust
57Questions and Answers
58Sources
- GSS 1972-2004 Cumulative Datafile
- http//sda.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/hsda?harcsdagss0
4 - Aquatics International
- http//www.aquaticsintl.com/2005/oct/0510_minorit
y.html - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Injury Prevention and
Control. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and
Reporting System (WISQARS) online. (2005)
cited 2006 April 11. Available from URL
www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars. - Gilchrist J, Sacks JJ, Branche CM. Self-reported
swimming ability in U.S. adults, 1994. Public
Health Reports 2000115(23)1101. - USA Swimming Membership Statistics Report, 2005.
- http//www.hhh.umn.edu/img/assets/9680/multicultu
ralforum.ppt