Environment Education in India - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Environment Education in India

Description:

The Supreme Court wielded the stick twice, responding to ... 'Court Order being shabbily implemented', said environmentalists and academics. Their verdict: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: kin93
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Environment Education in India


1
Environment Educationin India
  • Bringing Environment into Education
  • Driving force The Judiciary
  • The Supreme Court wielded the stick twice,
    responding to Public Interest Litigation

2
First time
  • In 1991, the Apex court in India ruled
  • We would require every State Government and every
    education board to immediately take steps to
    enforce compulsory education on environment in a
    graded way.

3
Post directive scenario
  • In schools, Environment was infused in all
    disciplines.
  • In primary level, EVS (clubbing sciencessocial
    sciences) emerged
  • Nothing much happened in colleges

4
Experts pull the plug
  • After a decade, Survey on status of Environment
    Education, created uproar.
  • Court Order being shabbily implemented, said
    environmentalists and academics.
  • Their verdict
  • Infusion leads to ineffectiveness. Separation is
    the solution

5
Second Time
  • In 2004, the Apex court in India ruled again
  • Environment Education to be taught as a separate
    subject in schools
  • A basic course on Environment to be introduced in
    colleges in all disciplines.

6
Since then
  • Now, a debate rages
  • Infusion model supporters
  • vs
  • Separate subject proponents
  • Prayer to revert to old order pending before the
    Court

7
So, confusion galore
  • No consensus on whether Environment is
    interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary,
    metadisciplinary or a discipline in itself??
  • So despite judicial intervention, it is yet to be
    a mainstream subject. It remains on the fringes.

8
What is missing?
  • Initiative to train teachers on how to teach
    Environment.
  • Books, journals, films or any accessible
    teaching material
  • A platform for educators to share techniques,
    students responses, and experiences.

9
What do we need now??
  • Programmes which offer all these components and
    more
  • Why?
  • Because Environment appeals to students

10
CSEs Survey
11
Gobar Times Green Schools Programme
  • A crucial period
  • One huge threat Environment yet another boring
    subject??
  • So GTGSP. A tool to learn Environment by doing.
  • Now over 3500 schools are using it.

12
Beyond Books
  • The GSP manual A do-it-yourself hand book on
    how to audit water, air, energy, waste, and land,
    within school premises.
  • Students and teachers come out of classrooms to
    do thingscount, weigh, measure, explore and
    analyse.
  • Yet,
  • Fits smoothly into the current curriculum

13
Helping hand
  • Teachers training programme to build up a
    community of empowered adults, who help students
    to use manual on the ground.
  • Thousands in networksome trained directly,
    others via Net

14
School 3
School 1
School 2
School 4
School 5
UPLOADING OF DATA ON THE INTERNET
DATA REPORTING SYSTEM
Analysis of data uploaded and shortlisting of
schools
School 1
School 3
School 5
School 1
School 3
School 5
                                                 
                   
On site visit or Telephonic Interview of the
school
FINAL SCORES SCHOOL 1 297 POINTS SCHOOL 3 305
POINTS SCHOOL5 314 POINTS RANK 3 RANK
2 RANK 1    
GREEN SCHOOLS AWARD
15
Green Schools Network http//www.cseindia.org/prog
ramme/eeu/html/gsp_registration.htm
16
Activity sheets
17
(No Transcript)
18
Leading edge
  • School rated on two parameters
  • How green is it Assessment of the actual status
    of school habitat, and the way it is being
    managed.
  • How effectively has the GSP tool been used
    Evaluation of the level of involvement of
    different sections of the school community in the
    audit process.

19
Under the scanner
Water
Energy
Waste
Air
Land
20
Water
  • The schools rated themselves on
  • How much is being used within the
  • premises?
  • How much is being conserved?
  • What is the technology being used to conserve?

21
Land
  • The schools rated themselves on
  • How much of their land is under green cover?
  • How many types of plants and animal species can
    they identify within premises?
  • Which pesticides do they use?

22
Air
  • The schools rated themselves on
  • How does the school community commute?
  • How eco-friendly are the school-run vehicles?
  • Are all the classrooms well-ventilated?

23
Energy
  • The schools rated themselves on
  • What are the main sources of
  • energyand how eco friendly are they?
  • How much energy do they consume?
  • How much do they save?

24
Waste
  • The schools rated themselves on
  • How much waste do they generate?
  • How do they collect?
  • How much do they recycle?
  • How do they dispose?

25
The 2006 audit said
  • Schools are aware of the importance of wise
    management. But are weak in making linkages with
    real life situations.
  • Innovative methods are applied. But follow-up
    process to measure and quantify the impact does
    not exist.
  • Environment-related programmes are still
    extracurricular. No structured approach is
    evident.

26
2007Second Round
  • 50 per cent 2006 participants
  • repeated the audit.
  • Most improved their scores
  • So not a one-time contest.
  • Adopted as a way of life

27
GSP Second Round
  • Who participated?
  • Rural-Urban ratio Tripled
  • Out of the top 20 schools
  • In 2006 3 rural/semi-urban
  • In 2007 9 rural/semi-urban

28
The 2007 audit said
  • Schools have mastered the art of auditing
  • Outstanding data collection, tabulation, and
    analysis
  • Assessment of impact of resource management
    practices more precise, structured, and
    accurate.
  • Students involved in every step. Sharp increase
    in awareness level.

29
In 2006 Per capita waste generated??No data
832
832
Solai
Only 5 out of 20 could account how much.
30
Waste in 2007
  • All 20 schools have collected data on
  • per capita waste generated.
  • Every school assigned student groups to weigh
    waste.
  • Teams included sweepers,gardeners, waste dealers
  • Used spring balances hand balancesweighing
    machines.
  • Scores have fallen. Quality of data has improved.

31
GTGSP proves
  • The ability of educational institutions to
    conduct and complete such an audit within a
    limited time period, with technically untrained
    teams, is
  • unparalleled.

32
Why GSP is a must
  • It is a tool to teach environment in the right
    perspective. Its not about pretty birds and
    trees. Its about real life and living.
  • It generates data to identify trends and sends
    the right signals. What do we really need to do?

33
CSEs learnings
  • Audit network must cater to 2 different sections
    of Indians
  • ASchools where resource is scarce. Audit is
    needed to ensure basic needs are met.
  • B.Schools where there is plenty. Audit is
    required to prevent wastage.

34
  • It strives to be a
  • A TOOL TO BUILD UP
  • A RESOURCE-LITERATE GENERATION
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com