Title: Terrestrial Ecology Program
1Terrestrial Ecology Program
Diane E. Wickland William Emanuel 1 May 2008
2The NASA Mission Goals
To pioneer the future in space exploration,
scientific discovery, and aeronautics research.
Strategic Goal 3 Develop a balanced overall
program of science, exploration, and aeronautics
consistent with the redirection of the human
spaceflight program to focus on exploration
Sub-goal 3A Study Earth from space to advance
scientific understanding and meet societal needs.
3CCE Focus Area Goals Objectives
- Quantify global land cover change and terrestrial
and marine productivity, and improve carbon cycle
and ecosystem models. - Three objectives are identified for Carbon Cycle
and Ecosystems research - Document and understand how the global carbon
cycle, terrestrial and marine ecosystems, and
land cover and use are changing - Quantify global productivity, biomass, carbon
fluxes, and changes in land cover and - Provide useful projections of future changes in
global carbon cycling and terrestrial and marine
ecosystems for use in ecological forecasting and
as inputs for improved climate change
predictions.
4Terrestrial Ecology Program
- Goal The goal of NASAs Terrestrial Ecology
research is to improve understanding of the
structure and function of global terrestrial
ecosystems, their interactions with the
atmosphere and hydrosphere, and their role in the
cycling of the major biogeochemical elements and
water. - Science Questions
- How are global ecosystems changing?
- How do ecosystems, land cover and biogeochemical
cycles respond to and affect global environmental
change? - What are the consequences of land cover and land
use change for human societies and the
sustainability of ecosystems? - How will carbon cycle dynamics and terrestrial
and marine ecosystems change in the future?
5Terrestrial Ecology Program Research Topics
- Carbon Cycle Science
- Terrestrial Primary Productivity
- Ecosystem Response to Change (including
Disturbance and Recovery Processes) - North American Carbon Program (NACP)
- Large Scale Biosphere - Atmosphere Experiment in
Amazonia (LBA) - Land-Atmosphere Interactions (physical
chemical) - Remote Sensing Science / Biophysics of Remote
Sensing - Integrated Biogeochemical Cycles
- Other habitats human health, ecosystem
services, fire, biodiversity, agricultural
impacts/responses, invasive species
6 Large Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Experiment in
Amazônia (LBA)
- LBA is an international, multi-disciplinary
cooperative research program led by Brazil. NASA
leads the U.S. participation in LBA, working in
close partnership with the Brazilian leaders and
scientists. (1998 present). - LBA research is focused on producing new
knowledge about the - climatological,
ecological, biogeochemical, and hydrological
functions of Amazônia, - impact of land use
change on these functions - interactions
between Amazônia and the Earth system. LBA is
the largest cooperative international scientific
project ever to study the interaction between
tropical forests and the atmosphere. - NASA completed its field contribution in 2006.
The Amazon region of South America as viewed by
MODIS on NASAs Terra satellite.
The Amazon region of South America as viewed by
MODIS on NASAs Terra satellite.
7LBA-ECO
LBA-ECO is NASAs Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems
Focus Area contribution to LBA. LBA-ECO
research (1998-2008) focuses on this science
question How do tropical forest conversion,
regrowth, and selective logging, influence carbon
storage, nutrient dynamics, trace gas fluxes, and
the prospect for sustainable land use in
Amazônia?
8 LBA Achievements and Results (as of
Summer, 2006)
- Discovered that forests green-up, are more
productive, and store more carbon in the dry
season. Light limitations in the wet season
constrain productivity more than water
limitations do in the dry season. - Discovered that in the wet season, cloud cover
and rain in the western Amazon resemble oceanic
conditions. These green ocean conditions are
controlled by natural particulate emissions from
the vegetation. - Developed new remote sensing methodologies to
detect and quantify selective logging in the
Amazon and quantify its effect on carbon budgets.
- Developed a Brazilian early warning system for
deforestation (DETER) based on NASA MODIS
technology. - Developed a model (now operational in Brazil at
CPTEC) using satellite fire detections to predict
the transport of smoke. - Produced 1154 research publications, including 8
Special Issues. - Trained 932 students, including 241 Ph.D.s.
9LBA Synthesis Integration Phase
- Continued collaboration between Brazilian and U.
S. scientists on LBA data analysis and
interpretation, including - Synthesis of carbon research results that will
quantify the Amazons carbon budget, addressing
interannual variations and whether it is a carbon
source or sink. - An integrated analysis of the meteorological
conditions, ecological, economic, and social
effects of the 2005 drought and forest fires in
Western Amazônia. - Analyses of remote sensing data on natural and
anthropogenic disturbances to constrain the
temporal and spatial variations in forest
turnover and stream biogeochemistry. - A rich, and well-documented archive of LBA data
and data products will be publicly available for
a wide variety of uses. It continues to be
challenging to get investigators to make data
delivery a priority. - Continuation of training and education
activities.
http//www.lbaeco.org
10North American Carbon Program (NACP)
- The NACP has three overarching goals
- Develop quantitative scientific knowledge,
robust observations, and models to determine the
emissions and uptake of CO2, CH4, and CO, the
changes in carbon stocks, and the factors
regulating these processes for North America and
adjacent ocean basins - Develop the scientific basis to implement full
carbon accounting on regional and continental
scales - Support long-term quantitative measurements of
sources and sinks of atmospheric CO2 and CH4, and
develop forecasts for future trends
A major step toward implementing the NACP was
achieved with the publication of The North
American Carbon Program (NACP) in 2002.
11NACP Questions
- What is the carbon balance of North America and
adjacent oceans? What are the geographic
patterns of fluxes of CO2, CH4, and CO? How is
the balance changing over time? (Diagnosis) - What processes control the sources and sinks of
CO2, CH4, and CO, and how do the controls change
with time? (Attribution/Processes) - Are there potential surprises (could sources
increase or sinks disappear)? (Prediction) - How can we enhance and manage long-lived carbon
sinks ("sequestration"), and provide resources to
support decision makers? (Decision support)
12North American Carbon Program (NACP) Integration
The NACP will quantify the magnitudes and
distributions of carbon sources and sinks,
explain the processes controlling them, and
produce a consistent analysis of North Americas
carbon budget.
Observations
Dynamic Maps
Model-Data Fusion
Decision Support
Diagnostic Models
Field Studies
Predictive Models
NACP is a CCSP Interagency Collaboration
Observations Experiments ? Science Results ?
Estimates Uncertainties
13Remote Sensing in the NACP
Net Change in Soil Carbon (30 m) 1991 2000
Leaf Area Index (5 km) June 26 July 3,
2006 MODIS data
R. Nemani, NASA ARC
0
3
6
T. West, ORNL
Landsat inventory data.
U.S. Carbon Biomass 2000 SRTM data
Disturbance Regrowth Dynamics
Aboveground Biomass
1972 2006 Landsat Data Forest inventory
data Ecosystem carbon models
Basal-Area Weighted Height
S. Goward, Univ MD J. Masek G. Collatz, GSFC
J. Kellndorfer, Woods Hole Research Inst.
14North American Carbon Program Issues
- NACP Science Plan and CCRI NACP element call for
a near-term integrated analysis of North
Americas carbon budget and a capacity to
continue this into the future. - Eight agencies are working together to address
NACP goals. - NASA depends on the scientific data and research
results of these partner agencies to achieve NACP
goals. - Expectations about products and time frames
differ substantially. - NASA expects substantial progress by 2010.
- Other agencies, particularly those that limit
their research to the U.S. and neighboring
countries, have a far longer-term view. - Agencies with long-term, in situ monitoring
responsibilities, particularly NOAA, USDA, and
DOE, implement key NACP elements only as budgets
and agency priorities permit. - CCIWG is looking into the possibility of
re-scoping NACP plans, and NASA is adapting its
participation in the NACP to better insure that
important results involving NASA remote sensing
and analyses are achieved within the expected
time frame while also meeting other agencies
needs for remote sensing data products over the
longer term. Â
15Terrestrial Ecology Program Unique Role
- NASA Terrestrial Ecology leads in providing
remote sensing data, remote sensing data
analysis, and modeling also - we are a champion for the global, synoptic
perspective - we are a major player in ecosystem, carbon
cycle, and biogeochemical cycle model
development, both diagnostic and prognostic - we, rather uniquely, are able to organize and
support focused field campaigns and other large,
highly coordinated projects
16Primary External Interfaces
- Interagency
- CCSP Carbon Cycle Science (CCIWG)
- CENR Subcom. on Ecological Systems
- DOE (NACP, AmeriFlux, Carbon Modeling, ORNL DAAC)
- USDA (Joint Working Group, LBA, Fire, NACP,
Forest Cover, field studies) - USGS (Landsat/LDCM, GLMDS, EDC DAAC, invasive
species, NACP) - NOAA (NPP/NPOESS, NACP)
- International
- LBA Brazil
- NACP Canada-Mexico-U.S. collaboration and
cooperation with EU - IGBP/IHDP/WCRP Global Carbon Project, Global
Land Project - CEOS, IGOS-P, GTOS, GOOS, IGOL
- ESSP, GEOSS
17Recent Reviews and Advice
- Visiting Committee Reviewed NASA Earth Science
Division in December 2007 - Noted there is a need for a compelling new vision
to motivate and justify Earth Science (as Earth
System Science did in the past 2 decades) - Recommended NASA prepare ideas for a new
initiative that could be ready to implement by a
new Presidential Administration - Noted that NASAs Earth Science Division is
seriously understaffed for the work it is doing
and identified a few critical areas - NASA Advisory Councils Earth Science
Subcommittee last met in January 2008 - Recommended a study as to why Earth Science
missions cost so much more than Space Science
missions - Recommended studies of DESDynI and ICESat-II
mission configurations to address
incompatibilities - Recommended steps be taken to reduce the time to
implement new research awards
18New Strategic Planning
- NASA Earth Science Division is likely to begin a
new round of strategic planning soon - U.S. Climate Change Science Program (CCSP)
- New national assessment and CCSP Research
Strategy update to be released in May 2008 (to
comply with court orders) - New CCSP Research Strategy to be developed in
2009 IWGs working on building blocks now - CCIWG discussing a new, updated A U.S. Carbon
Cycle Science Plan with its CCSSG - An Ocean Research Priority Plan is being
developed by the Joint Subcommittee on Ocean
Science and Technology (JSOST)
19New Questions for the Focus Area?
- Coming soon from the CCE MOWG . . .
20New Questions for the Focus Area?
- Science Themes for Understanding and Managing
Ecosystems Key Questions - Disruption of the carbon, water and nitrogen
cycles - Changing land and marine resource use
- Changes in disturbance cycles
- Suggestions from Decadal Survey
21CCE Budget Issues
- ESD RA budget (one line for all research program
elements) continues to decline some other budget
lines that support research are declining, and
others are stable or increasing - This year Earth Science received a budget
increase to begin work on the Decadal Survey
missions new starts for SMAP and ICESat-II and
funds to study and advance toward implementation
of others (these funds came at the expense of
NASAs space science divisions . . .) - Full cost accounting implementation at NASA civil
service Centers continues to complicate program
management - Congressionally mandated recission of unobligated
FY2007 funds in December, 2007 - New NASA focus on early commitment and obligation
of funds - FY2007 funds to be obligated by end of March 2008
(or lost) - FY2008 funds to be nearly all obligated by Sept.
30, 2008, but . . . that means much earlier for
most of us! - ? obligation occurs when funds are awarded on a
contract or grant at the Centers, they do not
obligate until the PI acts to spend them - It is very likely that attention will turn back
to costing soon some of the things we do to get
funds obligated could come back to bite in the
form or uncosted carryover. . .
22Aligning CCE Research with Missions
- With a strong focus on space-based measurements
and a shrinking budget for research, we are
increasingly challenged to achieve a reasonable
mix of investments in analysis of data from
existing missions, preparing scientifically for
future missions, conducting field programs and
campaigns, and research to answer global change
questions that covers the breadth of science
needed to address our goals and engage our
community. - We depend heavily on other NASA programs for
support of data and information systems, data
record production, technology development,
airborne platforms and some instruments, and
other infrastructure necessary to enable the
scientific research we fund. Priorities in these
areas are evolving and resources are constrained. - Achieving the right balance is a continual
challenge, and given that we are experiencing
difficulties with our missions in development and
facing interesting challenges in responding to
the Decadal Survey, there is a lot at stake.
23New Processes for Research Management in NASA
Science Mission Directorate
- SARA Web site
- NSPIRES enhancements, and move to totally
electronic procurement packages - 4-year awards as a new norm
- Proposal Handling / Peer review Process Changes
- Budgets no loner redacted for peer review (ROSES
2008) - Only Panel Consensus or Summary Review provided
to proposers as feedback/documentation of the
peer evaluation - More standardized procedures in how peer reviews
are run
24Recent Events and Milestones
- Research Opportunities in ROSES-2007
- Carbon Cycle Science
- Terrestrial Ecology (Structure/PFT, Integrative
Studies, Advanced Models) - Land Cover and Land Use Change
- Ocean Biology and Biogeochemistry (pending)
- Decision Support through Earth Science Research
Results (DECISIONS) - New Investigator Program (pending)
- Advancing Collaborative Connections for Earth
System Science - ROSES-2008 Released (LCLUC, TE (tbd), OBB,
Biodiversity, DECISIONS, Applications Feasibility
Studies, AIST) - OCO on schedule for December 2008 launch
- NPP launch revised to June 2010 (OMPS Limb, CERES
added) - New starts for SMAP and ICESat-II and funds for
other decadal survey mission studies - New Web site for CCE Focus Area
http//cce.nasa.gov/ (suggestions for
improvements welcome)
25Carbon Cycle Ecosystems Announcing Our New
Web Site
- Please visit our new Focus Area Web site at
- http//cce.nasa.gov/
- (Comments and suggestions for improvements are
welcome!) - A new Terrestrial Ecology Web Site linked to the
one above is being planned for the near future.
Ideas are welcome!
26CCE Upcoming Meetings
- CCE Management Operations Working Group (MOWG)
to meet Apr. 17-18, 2008 (Greenbelt) - CCE Joint Science Workshop April 28-May 2, 2008
(UMUC) - LBA/GEOMA/PPBio Scientific Conference November
17-21, 2008 (Manaus) - NACP Investigators Workshop February 17-20, 2009
(San Diego) - ASCENDS and HyspIRI Workshops soon . . .
27Terrestrial Ecology Issues to Discuss
- Breakout Discussions Issues Opportunities in
the Context of our Science
28A Terrestrial Ecology Annual Meeting?
- To cultivate a stronger sense of community
- To engage TE researchers in some problem solving
and priority setting for the program - To exchange research results
- Other?
- If so, we think an organizing committee that
includes scientists participating in the TE
research program would be a good idea. Ideas,
volunteers? - Lets discuss in the wrap-up session. . .
29Measurements for the Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems
Focus Area
- Measurements are dominating current NASA
priorities and activities they present both our
greatest problems and opportunities - Delays in both NPOESS Preparatory Project (NPP)
and Landsat Data Continuity Mission (LDCM) - Performance issues with NPPs VIIRS for ocean
color - Launch this year of the Orbiting Carbon
Observatory (OCO) - Identifying our Earth System Data Records (or
Climate Data Records) and how to support them - Preparing to implement the NRCs Earth Science
Decadal Survey recommendations for new
measurements
30CCE Focus Area Missions in Development
- Key missions now in development to address these
objectives - Well-calibrated and validated systematic
observations of moderate-resolution ocean color,
vegetation biophysical properties, fire, and land
cover as well as high-resolution land cover are a
critical foundation. - The National Polar Orbiting Environmental
Satellite System (NPOESS) Preparatory Project
(NPP) and - Landsat Data Continuity Mission (LDCM)
- ?The focus area depends on the continued
availability of these climate-quality systematic
observations. - The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) will
measure atmospheric CO2 concentrations and
advance our ability to locate and quantify
regional carbon sources and sinks by dramatically
increasing the number of global measurements over
what can be provided with ground-based
networks and aircraft.
31Terrestrial Ecology Issues to Discuss
- Decadal Survey Recommended Missions Terrestrial
Ecology
32CCE Focus Area Priority New Missions from the
NRC Decadal Survey
- Measurements of vegetation height and profiles
of three-dimensional ecosystem structure to
estimate aboveground biomass and carbon stocks to
characterize species habitats and biodiversity
DESDynI, ICESat-II, LIST - Well-calibrated measurements of the coastal
ocean that allow discrimination and
quantification of dissolved and particulate
organic matter, phytoplankton pigments, and
sediments to deduce the fate of carbon in the
coastal ocean ACE, GEO-CAPE - Measurements of plant groups with important
ecological and physiological functions (e.g.,
nitrogen-fixing species, invasive species, plants
with differing photosynthetic pathways or growth
rates) to be used to improve models and develop
more refined land cover analyses. HyspIRI - Advanced, high resolution measurements of
atmospheric profiles of carbon dioxide and
methane to further refine our ability to quantify
global sources and sinks. ASCENDS - Others of interest soil moisture (SMAP),
lakes/wetlands (SWOT), cold land process (SCLP),
. . .
33NRC Decadal Survey Missions
34Vegetation 3-D Structure DESDynI
Challenges Learning how to use InSAR in
combination with lidar building the community
partnerships.
35Plant Physiology and Functional Types HyspIRI
36Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide ASCENDS
Challenges Being ready scientifically so soon
after OCO addressing policy needs for accuracy
with well-characterized uncertainties.
37Other Key Recommendations of NRC Decadal Survey
- Continuity of existing data records in there
(e.g., land cover also implement re-baselined
NPOESS and GOES), but not addressed fully (was
not in their charge) - Also recommendation to NASA to develop a strategy
for long-term observations distinct from what is
needed for numerical weather prediction . . . - Airborne science should be restored and unmanned
aerial vehicles (UAV) increasingly factored into
the plan for Earth Science - Science questions/rationale posed in panel
chapters (for CCE land-use change, ecosystem
dynamics, biodiversity) - Venture class missions (100-200M) for more
frequent launch opportunities and to demonstrate
innovative ideas and higher-risk technologies
also training future leaders
38Importance of NRC Decadal Survey
- Senior NASA managers are accustomed to using NRC
Decadal Survey recommendations as the science
communitys definitive statement on what
space-based observations are of highest
scientific priority for the nation and expect to
implement them as resources and technical
realities permit. - Other measurements, missions, or science,
lacking the imprimatur of a Decadal Survey, are
not likely to be considered. - Suggestions that a Decadal Survey recommendation
may not represent the highest priorities of the
scientific community are likely to be perceived
as a rationale for not pursuing any new
observations for that scientific area at least
until an new scientific consensus has been
achieved and vetted through the NRC.
39Terrestrial Ecology Issues to Discuss
- Data Records Terrestrial Ecology
40Climate Data Records
- A climate data record is a time series of
measurements of sufficient length, consistency,
and continuity to determine climate variability
and change. (NRC, 2004) - The NRC further segmented satellite-based CDRs
into - fundamental CDRs (FCDRs), which are calibrated
and quality-controlled sensor data that have been
improved over time, and - thematic CDRs (TCDRs), which are geophysical
variables derived from the FCDRs, such as sea
surface temperature and cloud fraction.
41Earth System Data Records
- Earth System Data Records (ESDRs) are
observations of a parameter of the Earth system
optimized to meet requirements to address Earth
science questions and to provide for
applications. - Low level and high level products are involved in
ESDRs - Higher level products depend on products such as
reflectance and vegetation index. - Hierarchical organization is useful
- Need to derive priority from the importance of
the end use - Explicit attention to error, uncertainty, and
precision is required in definition and
production. - Issue of consistency between user sub-groups and
ESDRs important for the modeling community - Need to consider what will be needed to create
the retrospective data record (e.g.,
re-processing)
42Earth System Data Records
- The Focus Area has a long list of candidate
CDRs/EDRs - SeaWiFS and MODIS data products
- Landsat data products
- REASoN data products
- New MEaSUREs data products
- Some RA sponsored data products
- How do we decide which are CDRs/ESDRs?
- What level of support is required for each
(calibration, validation, accessibility, multiple
versions/formats, scheduled reprocessings)? - Is periodic review of quality and use desirable,
and if so, how should this be done? - How much of this is NASAs job after the NASA
mission(s) has ended?
43Terrestrial Ecology Issues to Discuss
- Field Campaigns Terrestrial Ecology
44Terrestrial Ecology Field Campaigns
- TE has a long history of sponsoring major field
campaigns that have kept the program vital,
trained our next generation of researchers, and
addressed both important remote sensing
challenges and science questions. - FIFE
- BOREAS
- Supporting role in HAPEX-MOBHILY, HAPEX-Sahel,
EFEDA - LBA-ECO
- More focused multi-sensor airborne campaigns
- Mac-Europe, several hydrological, COBRA
- What should be next? What type of coordinated
program focused on a single question or set of
issues would most advance our science and program?
45LBA Scaling Strategy
100 - 10,000 kmPan-Amazonian Region
1 - 100 kmStudy Areas(e.g., Para, Rondônia)
1 kmFlux Tower Sites
1 - 10 m Process Study PlotsValidation Sites
Validation Sites Process Study Plots
46Terrestrial Ecology Discussion Topics
- Function, including vegetation physiology,
biogeochemistry - Â
- Vegetation structure
- Disturbance (fire and others)
- Ecosystem services
- Â
- Ecosystem climate Interactions
47Breakout Co-Chairs
- Function, including vegetation physiology,
biogeochemistry-- Xiangming Xiao, Steve Prince - Vegetation structure-- Marc Simard, Sassan
Saatchi - Disturbance (fire and others) -- Mark Chopping,
Richard Houghton - Ecosystem services-- Randy Wynne, Stephen OgleÂ
- Ecosystem climate Interactions-- Randy Kawa,
Jeff Richey
48 49 50NASA Focus Areas Climate Change Science Program
(CCSP) Research Elements
NASA
CCSP
Climate Variability Change Atmospheric
Composition Land Use/Land Cover Change Global
Carbon Cycle Ecosystems Global Water
Cycle Human Contributions Responses
- Climate Variability Change
- Weather
- Atmospheric Composition
- Carbon Cycle Ecosystems
- Water Energy Cycle
- Earth Surface Interior
51The NASA Mission Goals
To pioneer the future in space exploration,
scientific discovery, and aeronautics research.
Strategic Goal 3 Develop a balanced overall
program of science, exploration, and aeronautics
consistent with the redirection of the human
spaceflight program to focus on exploration
Sub-goal 3A Study Earth from space to advance
scientific understanding and meet societal needs.
52Other Key Recommendations of NRC Decadal Survey
- Continuity of existing data records in there
(e.g., land cover also implement re-baselined
NPOESS and GOES), but not addressed fully (was
not in their charge) - Also recommendation to NASA to develop a strategy
for long-term observations distinct from what is
needed for numerical weather prediction . . . - Airborne science should be restored and unmanned
aerial vehicles (UAV) increasingly factored into
the plan for Earth Science - Science questions/rationale posed in panel
chapters (for CCE land-use change, ecosystem
dynamics, biodiversity) - Venture class missions (100-200M) for more
frequent launch opportunities and to demonstrate
innovative ideas and higher-risk technologies
also training future leaders
53Climate Data Records Earth System Data Records
- A climate data record is a time series of
measurements of sufficient length, consistency,
and continuity to determine climate variability
and change (NRC, 2004). The NRC further
segmented satellite-based CDRs into - fundamental CDRs (FCDRs), which are calibrated
and quality-controlled sensor data that have been
improved over time, and - thematic CDRs (TCDRs), which are geophysical
variables derived from the FCDRs, such as sea
surface temperature and cloud fraction. - Earth System Data Records (ESDRs) are
observations of a parameter of the Earth system
optimized to meet requirements to address Earth
science questions and to provide for applications.
54Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems
Knowledge of the interactions of global
biogeochemical cycles and terrestrial and marine
ecosystems with global environmental change and
their implications for the Earths climate,
productivity, and natural resources is needed to
understand and protect our home planet.
- Important Concerns
- Potential greenhouse warming (CO2, CH4) and
ecosystem interactions with climate - Carbon management (e.g., capacity of plants,
soils, and the ocean to sequester carbon) - Productivity of ecosystems (food, fiber, fuel)
- Ecosystem health and the sustainability of
ecosystem goods and services - Biodiversity and invasive species
NASA provides the global perspective and unique
combination of interdisciplinary science,
state-of-the-art Earth system modeling, and
diverse synoptic observations needed to document,
understand, and project carbon cycle dynamics and
changes in terrestrial and marine ecosystems and
land cover.
55Integrated global analyses
Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Roadmap
Human-Ecosystems-Climate Interactions (Model-Data
Fusion, Assimilation) Global Air-Sea Flux
Sub-regional sources/sinks
T
Funded
High-Resolution Atmospheric CO2
Unfunded
Process controls errors in sink reduced
Southern Ocean Carbon Program, Air-Sea
CO2 Flux
Partnership
Models w/improved ecosystem functions
T Technology development
Physiology Functional Types
T
Reduced flux uncertainties coastal carbon
dynamics
Coastal Carbon
Field Campaign
Reduced flux uncertainties global carbon
dynamics
Global Ocean Carbon / Particle Abundance
Goals Global productivity and land cover change
at fine resolution biomass and carbon fluxes
quantified useful ecological forecasts and
improved climate change projections
Vegetation 3-D Structure, Biomass, Disturbance
T
Terrestrial carbon stocks species habitat
characterized
CH4 sources characterized and quantified
Global CH4 Wetlands, Flooding Permafrost
Knowledge Base
Global Atmospheric CO2 (OCO)
Regional carbon sources/sinks quantified for
planet
N. American Carbon Program
N. Americas carbon budget quantified
Effects of tropical deforestation quantified
uncertainties in tropical carbon source reduced
Land Use Change in Amazonia
2002 Global productivity and land cover
resolution coarse Large uncertainties in
biomass, fluxes, disturbance, and coastal events
Models Computing Capacity
Process Understanding
Case Studies
Improvements
P
Land Cover (Landsat)
LDCM
Land Cover (OLI)
Systematic Observations
Ocean Color (SeaWiFS, MODIS)
Ocean/Land (VIIRS/NPP)
Ocean/Land (VIIRS/NPOESS)
Vegetation (AVHRR, MODIS)
Vegetation, Fire (AVHRR, MODIS)
IPCC
IPCC
2010
2012
2014
2015
2008
2002
2004
2006
Global C Cycle
Global C Cycle
NA Carbon
NA Carbon
56Vegetation 3-D Structure DESDynI
Challenges Learning how to use InSAR in
combination with lidar building the community
partnerships.
57Plant Physiology and Functional Types HyspIRI
58Aerosol Cloud Properties, Ocean
Biogeochemistry ACE
Challenges cost, need for coincident aerosols,
ocean chemistry
59Short-Duration, Focused Ocean Color GEO-CAPE
Challenges extremely limited spatial and
spectral scope
60Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide ASCENDS
Challenges Being ready scientifically so soon
after OCO addressing policy needs for accuracy
with well-characterized uncertainties.