Developing and Fielding a QuickStrikebased Air Support Operations Center ASOC Training System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Developing and Fielding a QuickStrikebased Air Support Operations Center ASOC Training System

Description:

C2 systems in theater were different than those systems trained with ... This game was used by US Army Command and General Staff College as a training tool for ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:238
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: danrud
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Developing and Fielding a QuickStrikebased Air Support Operations Center ASOC Training System


1
Developing and Fielding a QuickStrike-basedAir
Support Operations Center (ASOC) Training System
  • Rich Jones, LtCol, USAF (ret), VT MÄK

2
Air Support Operations Center (ASOC)
  • The ASOC
  • Subordinate element of the Air Operations Center
    (AOC) and the principle command and control (C2)
    node in the close air-ground battle
  • Responsible for managing air assets in support of
    ground maneuver and in the execution of Close Air
    Support (CAS)
  • Plays a critical role in ensuring the Army and
    the Air Force operate effectively together

3
Post-deployment Training Review
  • 111th ASOC training prior to deployment was
    intense and rigorous but incorrectly focused
  • Deployment training had focused on a traditional
    linear fight
  • Training available does not accommodate multiple
    models of warfare
  • C2 systems in theater were different than those
    systems trained with
  • Chat was a primary means of communication
  • A training solution was needed so future training
    had the right focus and exposure to correct C2
    tools

4
Leadership Guidance
  • Find a way to capture the experiences we learned
    in theater so we can prepare better for the next
    time.
  • Caveat Ensure the resultant approach was
    flexible enough to allow for a variety of warfare
    models, not just reactionary effort to the
    Afghanistan experience.

5
Preliminary System Design
  • Investigation determined
  • Constructive simulation the most effective method
  • A commercial-off-the-shelf solution was the most
    cost effective
  • Requirements
  • Cheap to purchase
  • No ongoing contractor support required
  • Could be run by an average squadron operator
  • Unclassified for simple fielding and storage

6
Initial Simulation Screening
  • Three viable simulations were evaluated
  • Decisive Action - A Division and Corps level
    simulation that depicts combat with maneuver
    brigades and battalions along with supporting
    artillery, air strikes. This game was used by US
    Army Command and General Staff College as a
    training tool for officers.
  • Joint Conflict and Tactical Sim (JCATS) - A
    simulation sponsored by U.S. Joint Forces Command
    and managed from the commands Joint Warfighting
    Center. The military uses JCATS for training,
    analysis, mission planning and rehearsal.

7
Initial Simulation Screening (cont)
  • 3. Battle Command and its USAF version
    QuickStrike
  • Designed with a game-like feel to support Army
    battalion and brigade commands and their staff
    officers in preparing and executing operations
    orders. The simulation is a military tactical
    trainer that allows commanders and their staffs
    to practice planning and execution skills in a
    simulated environment.
  • QuickStrike was based on Battle Command but
    specifically designed for the US Air Force.

8
Simulation Selection
  • Battle Command was chosen as the best initial fit
    for the simulation engine
  • Unclassified
  • Easily operated with little instruction
  • Provided free by MÄK Technologies (Now VT MÄK)
  • With a minimum of familiarization training,
    squadron staff could drive the simulation as
    well as design and create new scenarios

9
Game-like Interface
  • Windows-like functionality
  • Drag and drop objects
  • Intuitive selection of entities
  • Icon or menu selection of function
  • No server requirement, load sharing
  • LAN or WLAN multi-player capability
  • Simple unit planning
  • Pause and greater then real time capability
  • Unit editor and terrain development tools
  • AAR digital recorder with annotation function

10
(No Transcript)
11
The ASOC Battle Simulation
  • 111th ASOC had created the ASOC Battle
    Simulation. Radios, Joint Automated Deep
    Operations Coordination System (JADOCS), Tactical
    Air Control Party Close Air Support System (TACP
    CASS) were incorporated to provide more fidelity
    to training events.
  • 111th ASOC also experimented with using the
    simulation in conjunction with Joint Terminal
    Attack Controller (JTAC) training events in the
    field.

12
The ASOC Battle Simulation
  • 111th ASOC hosts training conference
  • ASOC Battle Simulation Demo for all ASOC
    representatives
  • Training gap fill capability recognized by other
    ASOCs
  • AFRL, Mesa, Air Combat Command initiate action to
    place this training capability at all ASOC
    mission squadrons
  • System fielded to all squadrons Turnkey
    approach
  • All hardware laptops, keyboards, additional
    monitors, network, cabling, projector, screen for
    COP
  • All software QuickStrike, C2PC, JADOCS,
    FalconView, mIRC chat and server, MS Open Office
  • On site setup network setup and training,
    operator training, scenario development training,
    control group training
  • Iraq and Afghanistan scenarios and terrain
    provided

13
Initial Configuration
JADOCS / FALCONVIEW / C2PC ALSO
AVAILABLE
C2PC COP
SOF Role-player and OC
Army Fires Role-player and OC
PRC 117f
QS
QS
MIRC
MIRC
MIRC
MIRC
MIRC
FDO
FDT
INTEL
Event Editor
Role Players JTAC/Aircraft Regional Cmds N, S,
E, W
COP
PRC 117f
Projector
QS
QS
QS
MIRC
MIRC
VOIP
MIRC
QuickStrike Facilitator and CAOC role player
QuickStrike Driver
1972S
14
Expanded Configuration
1. TBMCS 2. JARN 3. ESTAT
4. C2PC 5. mIRC 6. UAV VIEW
Projected Screens
C2PC COP
ESTAT FLOW
UAV View
4
4
5
4
3
4
7
1
2
1
5
8
3
PRC 117f
JARN
INTEL
PC
ATOM
ASM
SIPR VOIP
PRC 117f
NIPR VOIP
QS
QS
QS
QS
DSN
1972S
CAOC
CRC
Aircraft
JTAC
15
Fielded at all ASOCs Worldwide
RAF AOCC-L Netheravon UK
4th ASOS Mannheim, Germany
25th ASOS Hickam AFB Hawaii
ASOC - IQC Nellis AFB Nevada
111th ASOC Camp Murray Washington
168th ASOS Peoria Illinois
682nd ASOS Shaw AB South Carolina
712th ASOS Ft. Hood Texas
16
Impact
  • 111th ASOC deployed to Afghanistan in 2007
  • Support to International Security Assistance
    Force (ISAF)
  • ASOC embedded in Joint Operations Center, Kabul
  • Advance team reported back to 111th
  • Operational conditions
  • Tempo
  • C2 structure
  • Tactics / techniques / procedures

16
17
Impact (cont)
  • 111th training managers easily updated scenarios
    and C2 configuration
  • Pre-deployment training was focused
  • Operators trained to combat readiness based on
    ASOC Battle Simulation checkride
  • Spin-up time in theater minimal
  • New arrivals already familiar with the toolsets,
    tempo, and processes
  • Response to Troops-in-Contact situation
    standardized
  • On-the-job training requirement significantly
    reduced
  • Unit preparedness and performance vastly improved

18
Training Shortfalls
  • Modeling of training C2 system overly simplistic
  • Training simulation of C2 based on US doctrine
    rather than NATO system in Afghanistan
  • Understanding finer elements of NATO C2 structure
    required On-the-Job training
  • Constrained by role-playing in stand-alone
    configuration
  • No opportunity to participate in interactive
    exercise with other NATO agencies and understand
    their idiosyncrasies
  • FDOs and FDTs required some time to adapt once
    deployed

19
The Way Ahead
  • Ability to model more complex C2 architectures
  • Ability to integrate into a broader simulation
  • Air Operations Center (AOC)
  • Joint Terminal Attack Controllers (JTAC)
  • Airborne Warning and Control Systerm (AWACS)
  • Control and Reporting Centers (CRC)
  • Wing Operations Centers (WOC)
  • Employ the ASOC Battle Simulation to familiarize
    non-ASOC personnel with the CAS mission
  • Army JOC staff
  • AOC staff
  • Incorporate preplanning aspects of air-ground
    support
  • Ability to stimulate a simulated Army Air Support
    Request structure
  • Integrate actual Army requests in a distributed
    simulation environment
  • Maintain continuity in ASOC training staffs
  • Keep trainers trained and flexible in adapting to
    new battle environments
  • The continued effectiveness of the ASOC Battle
    Simulation rests with those charged with
    designing the training syllabus and developing
    the scenarios

20
Conclusion
  • ASOC Battle Simulation opened new era in ASOC
    training
  • Affordable, mobile, turnkey system
  • Flexible, extensible, game-like simplicity
  • Lessons learned easily incorporated into
    scenarios
  • The ASOC Battle Simulation has given every
    squadron with the ASOC mission the capability to
  • Train to Win

21
Developing and Fielding a QuickStrike-basedAir
Support Operations Center (ASOC) Training System

Rich Jones, LtCol, USAF (ret), VT MÄK
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com