Cross - cultural and ethical considerations in assessment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Cross - cultural and ethical considerations in assessment

Description:

Raven's Progressive Matrices. Suitable for ages 6-80 - 3 levels of difficulty ... aspects or critiques noted by Raven (based on Spearman reading): So--what ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1000
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Educationa126
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cross - cultural and ethical considerations in assessment


1
Cross - cultural and ethical considerations in
assessment
  • Discuss the culture in cross cultural
    assessment
  • Summarize sources of measurement bias
  • Linguistic considerations in test taking
  • Psychometric Explanation for cultural bias
  • Culture Fair Tests
  • Ethical issues/guidelines in assessment
  • Practice time
  • Course Evaluations

2
What do we mean by culture?
  • 1) To delineate people living in different
    countries
  • To refer to minority groups within a particular
    country, for example Blacks and Latinos living in
    the US
  • a set of shared values and behaviors that include
    beliefs, customs, morals, laws, etc., that are
    acquired by a person, shared in common with other
    members who are typically in close proximity, but
    different from those held by others living in
    same geographical setting

3
Measurement Bias - where can it occur?
  • 1) Before the test
  • 2) In the Test Itself
  • 3) In the decisions that are made on the basis of
    tests scores

4
Measurement Bias
  • 1) Were loaded with items based
  • on white middle class values/experiences
  • 2) Penalized children w/ linguistic
  • styles different from majority culture
  • 3) Assessed cognitive styles often
  • substantially different from those found
  • in low income families
  • 4) Were of no use in formulating
  • instructional programs and
  • 5) Were culturally biased and discriminated
    unfairly against racial and ethnic minorities

5
Understanding Sources of Differences Between
Groups
  • Messck and Anderson (1970) indicated that there
    are 3 possible sources for the typical finding
    that minority children do less well than majority
    children on tests of cognitive abilities
  • 1) The test may measure different things for
    different groups.
  • The test may involve irrelevant difficult
  • The test may accurately reflect ability or
    achievement levels

6
The psychometric perspective on cultural test
bias
  • Psychometrically if a test is biased then that
    test results in systematic error related to one
    group but not to another.
  • Slope Bias
  • Intercept Bias

7
English Speaking Considerations
  • Lam (1993) indicates that test developers, of
    standardized achievement tests, make 5
    assumptions
  • 1) Test takers have no linguistic barriers that
    might interfere with their performance
  • 2) The test content is suitable and of
    appropriate difficulty level for the test taker
  • 3) Test takers have the required test
    sophistication for taking standardized
    achievement tests
  • 4) Test takers are properly motivated
  • 5) Test takers to no have strong negative
    psychological reactions (such as excessive
    anxiety or stress) to testing.

8
Cattells Culture Fair Intelligence Test
  • No verbal content and is designed to reduce the
    effects of educational background Mean of 100 SD
    16
  • Three sections typically involving completion of
    a series, recognition of how patterns have
    changed, mazes.
  • Best considered culturally limited not culture
    free or fair

9
Ravens Progressive Matrices
  • Suitable for ages 6-80 - 3 levels of difficulty
  • Unlimited (20-45 minutes average)
  • Three critical aspects or critiques noted by
    Raven (based on Spearman reading)

10
So--what to do?
  • Recognize and verbalize limitations of testing on
    minority populations
  • Dont necessarily ignore information from tests
  • Work to understand the extent cultural factors
    may be influencing test results
  • Use multiple sources of data (culture free tests)

11
Personality assessment and cultural limitations
  • Less often an issue of concern- but still
    relevant
  • Some examples Asian clients more likely to
    express psych problems in terms of somatic
    complaints (elevated hypochondriasis scale on the
    MMPI). AA clients higher on schizophrenia index
  • In America, African-Americans have what is called
    healthy cultural paranoia Because of the
    oppression experienced by the African-American
    people a healthy and completely normal distrust
    of Euro-Americans has formed (Terrell Terrell,
    1981).  This mistrust is beneficial to
    African-Americans in that it makes an individual
    aware of the negative elements of the
    African-American experience (i.e. racism,
    discrimination)
  • Projective tests are even more problematic in
    terms of cultural limitations

12
Ethics in assessment - Ethical Principles for
assessment
  • 1) Basis and usage for assessment
  • 2) Informed consent - purpose, limitations,
    language, and understandability
  • 3) Release of test data
  • 4) Test construction
  • 5) Interpreting Writing assessment results
  • 6) Assessment by unqualified Persons
  • Example Qualification levels --
  • Can you administer the 16PF???
  • http//www.pearsonassessments.com/top/quallevels.h
    tm

13
Ethical Principles, continued
  • 7) Obsolete tests and outdated test results
  • 8) Test Scoring and Interpretation Services
  • 9) Explaining Assessment Results
  • 10) Maintaining Test Security
  • Penalties for not adhering to these codes? --
    will vary depending on your license, extent of
    violation, and most importantly degree of
    potential harm to client, prospective client, or
    broad test security issues

14
Lets Practice!!!
15
Case 1Referral Statement
  • S.K. was referred for assessment by her mother
    who was curious to find out about her current
    psychological and intellectual functioning. S.K.
    is performing adequately in school, and her
    mother reports no known emotional or behavioral
    difficulties.

16
Case 1Background Information
  • S.K. is a 2nd generation Korean American 10th
    grader at Sunshine High School in Round Rock.
    S.K.s father died when she was five, and S.K.
    has lived with her mother, who works as a dental
    assistant, ever since. S.K.s mother reports a
    history of alcoholism and depression but is
    currently free of both problems.
  • S.K.s teachers have reported that S.K. is
    socially isolated and unenthusiastic about her
    school work. Since beginning her education, S.K.
    has made mostly Cs on her report cards, with a
    few Bs here and there. She has not had any
    conduct problems with her teachers or fellow
    classmates in the past.
  • During her interview, S.K. expressed an interest
    in improving her grades in school so that she
    could go to college and become a doctor. She
    also reported dissatisfaction with life at home
    and with the fact that she lacks a peer group.
    When asked to elaborate on these statements, she
    become quiet and replied, I dont know what I
    meant.

17
Case 1Test Results
  • J.J., a European American female school
    psychologist administered the following tests
    (with the exception of the WRAT) and a clinical
    interview over the course of five hours on a
    Saturday morning in the late spring in her
    private practice office.
  • WRAT, taken at the end of 9th grade, percentile
    scores
  • Spelling 45th
  • Reading 51st
  • Math 60th
  • WAIS-III
  • Verbal IQ 111
  • Performance IQ 140
  • Full Scale IQ 125

18
Case 1Test Results, cont.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com