Title: Cross - cultural and ethical considerations in assessment
1Cross - cultural and ethical considerations in
assessment
- Discuss the culture in cross cultural
assessment - Summarize sources of measurement bias
- Linguistic considerations in test taking
- Psychometric Explanation for cultural bias
- Culture Fair Tests
- Ethical issues/guidelines in assessment
- Practice time
- Course Evaluations
2What do we mean by culture?
- 1) To delineate people living in different
countries - To refer to minority groups within a particular
country, for example Blacks and Latinos living in
the US - a set of shared values and behaviors that include
beliefs, customs, morals, laws, etc., that are
acquired by a person, shared in common with other
members who are typically in close proximity, but
different from those held by others living in
same geographical setting
3Measurement Bias - where can it occur?
- 1) Before the test
- 2) In the Test Itself
- 3) In the decisions that are made on the basis of
tests scores
4Measurement Bias
- 1) Were loaded with items based
- on white middle class values/experiences
- 2) Penalized children w/ linguistic
- styles different from majority culture
- 3) Assessed cognitive styles often
- substantially different from those found
- in low income families
- 4) Were of no use in formulating
- instructional programs and
- 5) Were culturally biased and discriminated
unfairly against racial and ethnic minorities
5Understanding Sources of Differences Between
Groups
- Messck and Anderson (1970) indicated that there
are 3 possible sources for the typical finding
that minority children do less well than majority
children on tests of cognitive abilities - 1) The test may measure different things for
different groups. - The test may involve irrelevant difficult
- The test may accurately reflect ability or
achievement levels
6The psychometric perspective on cultural test
bias
- Psychometrically if a test is biased then that
test results in systematic error related to one
group but not to another. - Slope Bias
- Intercept Bias
7English Speaking Considerations
- Lam (1993) indicates that test developers, of
standardized achievement tests, make 5
assumptions - 1) Test takers have no linguistic barriers that
might interfere with their performance - 2) The test content is suitable and of
appropriate difficulty level for the test taker - 3) Test takers have the required test
sophistication for taking standardized
achievement tests - 4) Test takers are properly motivated
- 5) Test takers to no have strong negative
psychological reactions (such as excessive
anxiety or stress) to testing.
8Cattells Culture Fair Intelligence Test
- No verbal content and is designed to reduce the
effects of educational background Mean of 100 SD
16 - Three sections typically involving completion of
a series, recognition of how patterns have
changed, mazes. - Best considered culturally limited not culture
free or fair
9Ravens Progressive Matrices
- Suitable for ages 6-80 - 3 levels of difficulty
- Unlimited (20-45 minutes average)
- Three critical aspects or critiques noted by
Raven (based on Spearman reading)
10So--what to do?
- Recognize and verbalize limitations of testing on
minority populations - Dont necessarily ignore information from tests
- Work to understand the extent cultural factors
may be influencing test results - Use multiple sources of data (culture free tests)
11Personality assessment and cultural limitations
- Less often an issue of concern- but still
relevant - Some examples Asian clients more likely to
express psych problems in terms of somatic
complaints (elevated hypochondriasis scale on the
MMPI). AA clients higher on schizophrenia index - In America, African-Americans have what is called
healthy cultural paranoia Because of the
oppression experienced by the African-American
people a healthy and completely normal distrust
of Euro-Americans has formed (Terrell Terrell,
1981). This mistrust is beneficial to
African-Americans in that it makes an individual
aware of the negative elements of the
African-American experience (i.e. racism,
discrimination) - Projective tests are even more problematic in
terms of cultural limitations
12Ethics in assessment - Ethical Principles for
assessment
- 1) Basis and usage for assessment
- 2) Informed consent - purpose, limitations,
language, and understandability - 3) Release of test data
- 4) Test construction
- 5) Interpreting Writing assessment results
- 6) Assessment by unqualified Persons
- Example Qualification levels --
- Can you administer the 16PF???
- http//www.pearsonassessments.com/top/quallevels.h
tm
13Ethical Principles, continued
- 7) Obsolete tests and outdated test results
- 8) Test Scoring and Interpretation Services
- 9) Explaining Assessment Results
- 10) Maintaining Test Security
- Penalties for not adhering to these codes? --
will vary depending on your license, extent of
violation, and most importantly degree of
potential harm to client, prospective client, or
broad test security issues
14Lets Practice!!!
15Case 1Referral Statement
- S.K. was referred for assessment by her mother
who was curious to find out about her current
psychological and intellectual functioning. S.K.
is performing adequately in school, and her
mother reports no known emotional or behavioral
difficulties.
16Case 1Background Information
- S.K. is a 2nd generation Korean American 10th
grader at Sunshine High School in Round Rock.
S.K.s father died when she was five, and S.K.
has lived with her mother, who works as a dental
assistant, ever since. S.K.s mother reports a
history of alcoholism and depression but is
currently free of both problems. - S.K.s teachers have reported that S.K. is
socially isolated and unenthusiastic about her
school work. Since beginning her education, S.K.
has made mostly Cs on her report cards, with a
few Bs here and there. She has not had any
conduct problems with her teachers or fellow
classmates in the past. - During her interview, S.K. expressed an interest
in improving her grades in school so that she
could go to college and become a doctor. She
also reported dissatisfaction with life at home
and with the fact that she lacks a peer group.
When asked to elaborate on these statements, she
become quiet and replied, I dont know what I
meant.
17Case 1Test Results
- J.J., a European American female school
psychologist administered the following tests
(with the exception of the WRAT) and a clinical
interview over the course of five hours on a
Saturday morning in the late spring in her
private practice office. - WRAT, taken at the end of 9th grade, percentile
scores - Spelling 45th
- Reading 51st
- Math 60th
- WAIS-III
- Verbal IQ 111
- Performance IQ 140
- Full Scale IQ 125
18Case 1Test Results, cont.