Interim Report Small SellerVendor Compensation Task Force - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Interim Report Small SellerVendor Compensation Task Force

Description:

Small Seller/Vendor Compensation Task Force. Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board ... Small Seller Threshold. Revenue impact of various thresholds. Vendor ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: hdun
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Interim Report Small SellerVendor Compensation Task Force


1
Interim ReportSmall Seller/Vendor Compensation
Task Force
  • Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board
  • December 6, 2008

2
Task Force Mission
  • Assist Governing Board with two issues
  • Small Seller Threshold
  • Vendor Compensation
  • Intent
  • Gather information on topics
  • Identify issues relevant to GB duties
  • Provide principles and framework to allow
    Governing Board to develop consensus
  • Not intended to answer specifically, e.g.,
    specific threshold or compensation requirements

3
Task Force Approach
  • Identify information needs
  • Gather information through meetings,
    teleconferences and presentations
  • Develop issue list
  • Answer and refine principles and report through
    in-person meetings and teleconferences

4
Cross Cutting Thoughts
  • Must be considered in tandem
  • Movement in one area can cause movement in the
    other
  • Must be considered in relation also to technology
    and simplifications
  • Board should focus on additional simplifications
    and technology that reduce costs and foster
    participation
  • Both require continuing review

5
Small Seller Threshold
  • Legislation should contain a small seller
    threshold
  • Over time, threshold should gravitate toward an
    occasional seller/sales threshold
  • Achieving this level will require improved
    technology that is proven and readily available
    and additional simplifications

6
Small Seller Cont.
  • Should be plain, simple and straightforward
  • Seller should not be in doubt as to position
  • Based on gross remote sales
  • Differs from current legislation
  • 12-month period
  • At least one calendar quarter to ramp up for
    collection

7
Small Seller Cont.
  • Determined on basis of seller and affiliates
  • Not a separate company threshold as in current
    legislation
  • Phased-in to allow Streamlined to accommodate
    participants and to allow further
    simplifications/technology
  • Question on certification
  • Board should review periodically

8
Vendor Compensation
  • Joint Cost of Collection Study provides a
    reasonable benchmark
  • Identifies drivers of cost
  • Indicates relative levels and differentiation by
    size
  • Still information that is necessary/desirable
  • Greater differentiation of large sellers
  • Effect of Streamlined simplifications
  • Econometrics as in Phase II
  • Relationship of various types of costs to amount
    of tax collected

9
Vendor Compensation Cont.
  • Definition
  • Bear relationship to actual costs incurred solely
    as result of collecting and administering state
    and local sales tax
  • Need to consider those incurred only because of
    sales tax and mixed costs that serve other
    business purpose
  • Need also to consider types of costs and
    relationship to amount of tax collected, e.g.,
    credit card fees v. cash registers v. exemption
    certificate management

10
Vendor Compensation Cont.
  • Compensation should reflect
  • Differences in size of retailers and economies of
    scale that are present
  • Best achieved through differentiation of rates
  • Complexity of different state tax structures
  • Number of local governments
  • Variability of local rates
  • Sourcing rules

11
Difference of Opinion
  • Can a system that has an across-the-board limit
    on total compensation be considered reasonable
  • Retailer Position
  • Some costs (e.g., credit card fees) are not
    capped increase in direct proportion to tax
    collected
  • Violates relationship to actual costs

12
Compensation Limits
  • State Position
  • Limits should not be per se unreasonable
  • Flexibility necessary to accommodate different
    types of costs and variability across sellers
  • Necessary to mitigate over and under-compensation
  • Need is to examine types of costs, effect of
    Streamlined and further work

13
Vendor Compensation
  • Within a state, compensation system should be the
    same for state or local taxes
  • Board should establish standards
  • Board should identify drivers of costs and adopt
    simplifications to drive them down
  • Consider using compensation to offset technology
    implementation costs
  • Not important to differentiate on basis of nexus
    v. non-nexus sellers or in proportion of remote
    sales

14
Additional Simplifications and Technology
  • Simplifications
  • Centralized location of rate and boundary data
    bases
  • Enhanced taxability matrix
  • Clearinghouse for filing of returns and
    remittances
  • Technology
  • Procedures for private sector certification
  • Tax credit for implementation of technology

15
Additional Information Needs
  • Small Seller Threshold
  • Revenue impact of various thresholds
  • Vendor Compensation
  • Impact of Streamlined on costs
  • Differentiation of large seller category
  • Impact of additional simplifications
  • Relationship of various costs to amount of tax
    collected
  • Impact of various structures on costs
  • Variations in proportion of credit card
    transactions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com