Administrative Procedure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Administrative Procedure

Description:

AGENCY: Social Security Administration. ACTION: Proposed rule. ... Example: Social Security Administration. Claimant files for a benefit. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1183
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: BAKE8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Administrative Procedure


1
Administrative Procedure
  • 5 U.S.C. 500-596

2
APA History and Purpose
  • Enacted 1946 as part of the New Deal legislation.
  • Creates a framework for regulating administrative
    agencies.
  • Goal is to strike a balance expand government
    by creating administrative agencies but avoid
    dictatorship and central planning.

3
Purposes of the APA
  • Keep the public informed
  • Provide for public participation in the
    rulemaking process
  • Establish uniform standards for the conduct of
    formal rulemaking and adjudication
  • Define the scope of judicial review

4
Scope of APAs coverage
  • Executive Agencies
  • Department of State Treasury Interior Justice
    Agriculture Commerce Labor Defense HHS HUD
    Transportation Energy Education Veterans
    Affairs Homeland Security
  • Independent Agencies
  • CIA, EPA, EEOC, FCC, FDIC, FTC, GSA, NASA, NEA,
    NEH, NLRB, NSF, NTSB, OPM, Peace Corps, SBA, SEC,
    SSA, TVA, etc.

5
Side Note Agencies and ADA
  • ADA expressly charges some agencies with
    developing regulations
  • EEOC Employment
  • DOJ State and local governments Public
    accommodations
  • DOT Transportation
  • Agencies are also given jurisdiction to enforce
    specified ADA provisions
  • EEOC Employment
  • Agriculture Farming and livestock
  • Education Education
  • HHS Health care and social services
  • HUD Public housing
  • Interior Lands and natural resources museums
  • DOT Transportation
  • Federal agency that funds the entity being
    challenged
  • DOJ Law enforcement public safety public
    accommodations all functions not assigned to
    another designated agency

6
Two Types of Administrative Action
  • Rulemaking
  • Generalized nature
  • Policy orientation
  • Prospective application
  • Adjudication
  • Determination of individual rights or duties
  • Policymaking is incidental to deciding an
    individual controversy

7
Purposes of the APA (review)
  • Keep the public informed
  • Provide for public participation in the
    rulemaking process
  • Establish uniform standards for the conduct of
    formal rulemaking and adjudication
  • Define the scope of judicial review

8
Rulemaking Notice Comment
  • Notice
  • Must be provided before the agency adopts a new
    substantive rule.
  • Must be sufficient to afford interested persons a
    reasonable and meaningful opportunity to
    participate in the rulemaking process.
  • Usually by publication in the Federal Register.
  • Comment
  • Any interested person may participate.

9
Federal Register (8/4/06)
  • Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Immune
    System Disorders
  • AGENCY Social Security Administration.
  • ACTION Proposed rule.
  • SUMMARY We propose to revise the criteria in the
    Listing of Impairments (the listings) that we use
    to evaluate claims involving immune system
    disorders. We apply these criteria when you claim
    benefits based on disability under title II and
    title XVI of the Social Security Act (the Act).
    The proposed revisions reflect our adjudicative
    experience, as well as advances in medical
    knowledge, treatment, and methods of evaluating
    immune system disorders.
  • DATES To be sure your comments are considered,
    we must receive them by October 3, 2006.
  • ADDRESSES You may give us your comments by
    using our Internet facility (i.e., Social
    Security Online) at http//policy.ssa.gov/erm/rule
    s.nsf/RulesOpenToComment or the Federal
    eRulemaking Portal at http//www.regulations.gov
    e-mail to regulations_at_ssa.gov telefax to lefax
    to (410) 966-2830 or, letter to the Commissioner
    of Social Security, P.O. Box 17703, Baltimore, MD
    21235-7703. You may also deliver them to the
    Office of Regulations, Social Security
    Administration, 107 Altmeyer Building, 6401
    Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-6401,
    between 8 a.m. and 430 p.m. on regular business
    days. Comments are posted on our Internet site,
    or you may inspect them physically on regular
    business days by making arrangements with the
    contact person shown in this preamble.

10
Agency Website
11
Regulations.gov
12
Notice Is Not Required . . .
  • When the agency issues interpretive rules,
    general statements of policy, or rules of agency
    organization, procedure, or practice. 5 U.S.C.
    553(b)(3)(A).
  • When notice comment is impracticable,
    unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.
    5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).

13
Example
14
Rulemaking Notice Comment
  • Notice
  • Comment
  • Any interested person may participate.
  • Typically, 60 days.
  • Public hearings may be held.

15
Comment Example
16
Example
17
Purposes of the APA (review)
  • Keep the public informed
  • Provide for public participation in the
    rulemaking process
  • Establish uniform standards for the conduct of
    formal rulemaking and adjudication
  • Define the scope of judicial review

18
Adjudication Stages
  • Example Social Security Administration
  • Claimant files for a benefit.
  • Claims representative helps to complete the file.
  • Staff member and doctor make initial
    determination.
  • Local level appeal reconsideration
  • Second level appeal before ALJ
  • Appeal to Appeals Council
  • Review in federal District Court
  • Magistrate produces Report and Recommendation
  • District Judge

19
Administrative Law Judge
  • Presides over the second-level appeal.
  • Responsible for creating a record.
  • Testimony
  • Doctor
  • Vocational expert
  • Detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

20
Purposes of the APA (review)
  • Keep the public informed
  • Provide for public participation in the
    rulemaking process
  • Establish uniform standards for the conduct of
    formal rulemaking and adjudication
  • Define the scope of judicial review

21
Skidmore v. Swift (1944)
  • Agencys view represents a body of experience
    and informed judgment to which courts and
    litigants may properly resort for guidance.
  • The power to persuade, but not the power to
    control.

22
SEC v. Chenery (1943)
  • Where agency action rests upon an exercise of
    judgment in an area which Congress has entrusted
    to the agency, deference is owed.
  • Where agency action rests upon a determination of
    law as to which the reviewing authority of the
    courts comes into play, no deference is owed.

23
SEC v. Chenery (1947)
  • The choice made between proceeding by general
    rule or by individual, ad hoc litigation is one
    that lies primarily in the informed discretion of
    the administrative agency.
  • Our duty is at an end when it becomes evident
    that the Commission's action is based upon
    substantial evidence and is consistent with the
    authority granted by Congress.

24
Scope of Review (Rulemaking)
  • Deference to Agency policy determinations
  • Agency expertise
  • Notice and comment procedures
  • Legislative intent congress has delegated
    authority to the agency (separation of powers)

25
Chevron (1984)
  • Did Congress speak unambiguously to the precise
    question at issue?
  • Is the agencys interpretation based on a
    permissible construction of the statute?
  • Did Congress delegate authority to the agency?
  • If express authority, is the reg arbitrary,
    capricious or manifestly contrary to the statute?
  • If implicit authority, is the agencys
    interpretation reasonable?

26
Modern Cases
  • U.S. v. Mead, 533 U.S. 218 (2001).
  • Even when you dont get Chevron deference, you
    get Skidmore deference.
  • National Cable Telecommunications Association
    v. Brand X Internet Services, 545 U.S. 967
    (2005).
  • When Chevron deference applies, the agencys
    interpretation trumps a prior contrary
    interpretation by a federal court.

27
Summary
  • Chevron deference
  • When Congress has, explicitly or implicitly,
    delegated authority to the agency to make policy
    judgments.
  • Is the statute ambiguous (or is there a gap)?
  • Is the agencys interpretation reasonable?
  • Skidmore deference
  • When Congress hasnt delegated, but the agency
    has expertise.
  • No deference at all (Chenery I)
  • When the agency is applying general legal
    principles.

28
Scope of Review (Adjudication)
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Chevron deference applies. Mead. 5 U.S.C.
    706(2)(A).
  • Factual determinations
  • The District Court must affirm the ALJs
    determination if there is substantial evidence to
    support the factual findings. 5 U.S.C.
    706(2)(E).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com