mental capacity act - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

mental capacity act

Description:

Teaching session – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1849
Slides: 37
Provided by: chris27

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: mental capacity act


1
The mental capacity act.
  • By C Spain

2
INTRODUCTION TO THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT
  • The mental health act was introduced in September
    of 1983 to replace the 1959 act.
  • The mental health act in divided into various
    sections and subsections. These sections help to
    set out what sort of care is made available to
    clients who are placed under these sections.
  • For example sections 2,3,4 and 5 (the most
    commonly used sections) can be remembered using
    the phase I ATE ALREADY as in Assessment,
    Treatment, Emergency and Already in hospital.

3
Common sections.
  • Section 1--This sets out why the act is needed
    and who it is trying to help.
  • Section 2Assessment, usually for no more than 28
    days.
  • Section 3Treatment, This section is for people
    requiring treatment and is for a
  • Maximum period of 6 months.
  • Section 4Emergency treatment, for no more than
    72 hours

4
Common sections.
  • Section 5Already in hospital, This section is
    designed to help with those people who Are in
    hospital informally (Not held under any section)
  • If they are deemed to Be a danger to themselves
    or others and require to be held against their
    will
  • In order to help prevent any harm coming to
    themselves or others.
  • This section is split into two subsections
    section 5/2 refers to the doctors holding power
    whilst section 5/4 refers to the nurses holding
    power.

5
The nurses holding power.
  • This nurses holding power requires that the
    responsible nurse feels that the Client is
  • A-Informal
  • B-Deemed to be a danger to themselves or others
  • C-And no doctor is immediately available.
  • The nurses holding power lasts for up to 6
    hours and during that time a Doctor should be
    advised and then make a decision as to whether to
    section
  • the client or not.

6
The mental health act.
  • There are many other sections within the mental
    health act and if interested further reading is
    advised.

7
The mental capacity act 2005
  • A new part of legislation that has recently come
    into force that we need to be aware of is the
    mental capacity act.
  • This act is underpinned by five key principles,
    these are

8
The mental capacity act 2005
  • A presumption of capacity.
  • This means that every adult has the right to make
    his or her own decisions and must be assumed to
    have the capacity to do so unless it is proved
    otherwise.
  • The right for individuals to be supported to make
    their own decisions.
  • This means that people must be given all
    appropriate help before anyone decides that they
    are unable to make these decisions.

9
The mental capacity act 2005
  • The right to make wrong decisions.
  • This means that the individual must be allowed to
    make decisions which may seem as unwise or
    eccentric.
  • Acting in the individuals best interests.
  • This simply put means that anything done for and
    on behalf of an individual without capacity must
    be in those individuals best interests.

10
The mental capacity act 2005
  • Do not restrict the individuals own rights.
  • That anything done for or on behalf of an
    individual without said capacity should be the
    least restrictive of the individuals basic
    rights and freedoms.

11
What is mental capacity?
  • Mental capacity is the ability to make a decision
  • Capacity can vary depending on the decision to
  • be made
  • Physical conditions, such as location, can
    affect
  • a persons capacity
  • Staff must not assume a lack of capacity
  • because of a persons age, physical
  • appearance, condition or an aspect of
    their
  • behaviour

12
What is lack of capacity?
  • An individual lacks capacity if they are unable
    to make a particular decision
  • This inability must be caused by an impairment or
    disturbance in the functioning of the mind or
    brain, whether temporary or permanent
  • Capacity can vary over time and depends on the
    type of decision

13
The mental capacity act 2005
  • So how do we assess the mental capacity of an
    individual?
  • The act makes it clear that a lack of capacity
    cannot be made merely by reference to a persons
    age, experience or any other condition or aspect
    of a persons behaviour, Which could be deemed
    assumptions and unjustified.

14
The mental capacity act 2005
  • There is a test which can be done with the
    individual which is decision specific. to help
    enable staff to work out whether or not the
    clients have the capacity to make their own
    decisions about their own lives.

15
So what is this Test?
  • The client has to show that they
  • A Understand what is being asked or said to
    them, For example can they repeat it back to you?
  • B Can they retain and remember the information
    given after say 10-15 minuets?
  • C Can the client not only remember but also
    repeat it back to you after a period of time, say
    10-15 minuets?

16
The mental capacity act
  • If they are unable to complete all of these tasks
    then they are deemed not able (not to have the
    capacity) to make their own decisions without
    help and/or guidance.
  • At all times staff should work with the
    individuals best interests at the foremost of
    their care.

17
But remember
  • It may be useful, as in most tests of this type,
    for the client to attempt the test on more than
    on occasion , for example in the morning and
    later on in the evening. This will give a more
    accurate reading.
  • The main thrust of the mental capacity act deals
    with how decisions are made with, and especially
    on behalf of, people who lack full mental
    capacity.
  • These parts of the mental capacity act came into
    force as recently as 1st October 2007.

18
KEY CONCEPTS.
  • One persons ability to make decisions can vary,
    both over time and depending on exactly what the
    decision is. However, the initial presumption
    must be in favour of mental capacity.
  • Mental capacity needs to be assessed by the
    person who is making the decision, not by some
    one else.

19
KEY CONCEPTS.
  • Decisions that are not urgent should normally be
    deferred to give time for the person to have all
    the options and other issued explained to them in
    a way that they may understand, to help avoid
    other people from making the decision for them.
  • Where a decision is to be made by some one other
    than the resident/client, then the clients own
    views and wishes should also be taken into
    account.

20
KEY CONCEPTS
  • Ultimately, however, the ultimate test is the
    best interests of the client.
  • The process of assessment of capacity and
    decision making should be recorded, in order to
    avoid or limit possible legal liability.
  • Where a person has nobody to speak for them, an
    independent mental capacity advocate (IMCA) may
    be appointed to assist. But they are not the
    decision maker, however.

21
HOW TO LIMIT PROBLEMS UNDER THE MENTAL CAPACITY
ACT.
  • 1Get Trained (all staff)
  • 2---Sort out capacity and any power of attorney
    issues at the same time you would do the Initial
    assessment, for admission. For existing clients,
    do it now.
  • 3---Make sure that the contract is signed, and by
    the right person.

22
HOW TO LIMIT PROBLEMS
  • 4---Make sure you have a care plan for mental
    capacity decision-making, especially where there
    are foreseeable difficulties, for example family
    members with strong or conflicting opinions.
  • 5---Always use best interest as the test, no
    convenience or relatives wishes.
  • 6---Record whenever practical the reasons for the
    decision.

23
INITIAL CONSIDERATIONS
  • 1---What is the decision to be made?
  • 2---When does it need to be made, at the latest?
  • 3---What is the worst that could happen if the
    decision is bad or wrong?
  • 4---What would the client need to be capable of
    understanding, weighing up and Communicating, in
    order to make the decision for themselves?

24
INITIAL CONSIDERATIONS
  • 5---Do I have any objective evidence for
    believing that the client is not capable of
    Understanding or communicating this?
  • 6---Can the decision be delayed until the client
    has recovered capacity, or can the necessary
    information be presented in a way that the client
    can understand?

25
DAY TO DAY CARE
  • 7---If the answer to question 5 is yes and the
    answer to question 6 is no, Does the type of
    decision to be made fall within the day to day
    care of the client, for example help with
    washing, dressing, personal hygiene, eating
    drinking, mobility or personal safety.
  • If the answers yes, then make the
    decision in the clients best interests, taking
    all relevant circumstances and known wishes into
    account, and record the decision and reasons for
    it if practical.

26
POWERS OF ATTORNEY
  • 8---If this is not a day to day care decision,
    is there a registered attorney whose authority
    covers this sort of decision?

27
WHENEVER YOU OR THE HOME ARE THE DECISION MAKERS
  • 9REMEMBERwhatever the method used, ensure that
    the decision is
  • a) The least restrictive option.
  • b) Recorded where ever practical,
  • c) Take advice if unsure.
  • d) In the clients best interests.

28
What is meant by, best interests
  • Any decision or act must be in a persons best
    interests
  • When making decisions, staff should take account
    the following
  • equal consideration and
    non-discrimination
  • considering all relevant circumstances
  • regaining capacity
  • permitting and encouraging participation
  • special considerations for life-sustaining
  • the persons wishes, feelings, beliefs and
  • values
  • the views of other people

29
Question.
  • How can I ensure that an older person who is
    mentally incapacitated gives their consent for
    treatment?

30
  • To ensure that an older person who is mentally
    incapacitated gives their consent, be very clear
    about the means by which the person is
    communicating their consent.
  • Consent to treatment can be communicated in
    writing or verbally. For example, is the person
    nodding their head, smiling or attempting verbal
    utterances?

31
  • Consent can also be implied.
  • Implied consent is usually clear because the
    patient co-operates with the treatment being
    given.
  • In most cases verbal consent or consent by
    implication is sufficient.

32
What to do?
  • Assess each person individually, but consider
    these practical steps
  • 1Does the persons cognitive reasoning fluctuate
    from day to day? Give them time to consider their
    treatment during a period when their cognitive
    reasoning is improved.

33
Practical steps
  • If a person does regain some mental capacity,
    allow them to make an informed choice by
    presenting the information in a meaningful way.
  • Have a sound knowledge of the individual person.
    Knowing their usual behaviours and ways of
    communicating can also aid decision making.

34
Practical steps.
  • Be aware of the people who may consent through
    one means and not consent through another, For
    example, a person may say yes but then try to
    prevent the treatment from taking place.
  • Maintain accurate records of all communications.
  • And finally.

35
FINALLY.
  • All decisions must take into account the older
    persons human rights, regardless of their mental
    incapacity.

  • Royal college of nursing
    2008

36
Thank you for your time.
Mr C Spain
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com