Research Services presents - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Research Services presents

Description:

The major objective is to support the career development of clinician scientists ... George & Cynthia Mitchell Distinguished Chair in Geriatric Medicine ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:141
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: UTM87
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Research Services presents


1
Research Servicespresents
Study Section TrendsCareer Development
Awards Moderator William G. New, Associate Dean
for Research, SOM
2
Study Section Trends
  • Agenda
  • Welcome, Announcements and Introductions
  • Panelists Presentations
  • Discussion

3
Study Section Trends
  • Problem
  • Early awards often launch research careers
  • New investigators usually do not know what their
    applications should include or emphasize

4
Study Section Trends
  • Observations
  • Review committees tend to look differently on
    career development awards than on research awards
  • Individual
  • Career path
  • Mentors

5
Study Section Trends
  • Panelists
  • Mabel Caban, M.D.
  • Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedic
    Surgery and Rehabilitation
  • James S. Goodwin, M.D.
  • Professor of Medicine and Director of Sealy
    Center on Aging
  • Claire E. Hulsebosch, Ph.D.
  • Vice-Chair and Professor, Neuroscience and Cell
    Biology
  • Slobodan, Bobo Paessler, D.V.M., Ph.D.
  • Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology
  • Scott Weaver, Ph.D.
  • Vice-Chair for Research and Professor, Department
    of Pathology and Director for Tropical and
    Emerging Diseases, Center for Biodefense and
    Emerging Infectious Diseases

6
National Institute for Neurological Disorders and
Stroke (NINDS) K Awards What a Reviewer Requires
  • Claire E. Hulsebosch, Ph.D.
  • Director, Mission Connect
  • Vice Chair and Professor, Neuroscience and Cell
    Biology

7
National Institute for Neurological Disorders and
Stroke (NINDS) K Awards
  • The NINDS supports a broad spectrum of K awards,
    including both mentored and independent awards.
  • Described in the NINDS training and career
    development website http//www.ninds.nih.gov/fund
    ing/research training.htm
  • Awards include the K01, K02, K08, K22, K23, K24
    and K25.

8
NINDS K Awards
  • The major objective is to support the career
    development of clinician scientists (must have MD
    or equivalent AND board certified i.e., able
    to treat patients in the US).
  • This includes research experience and
    grantsmanship.

9
NINDS K22, K24 and K25 Awards
  • K22 Enables outstanding individuals to obtain a
    research training experience in the NINDS
    Division of Intramural Research and facilitate
    successful transition to an extramural
    environment as independent researchers. 2-3 years
    in a NINDS intramural laboratory followed by 2-3
    years of support for an independent research
    project in an extramural institution.
  • K24 Midcareer Investigator Award in
    Patient-Oriented Research
  • K25 Mentored Quantitative Research Career
    Development Award

10
NINDS K01 Awards
  • For investigators at the postdoctoral or early
    faculty development stage to focus their efforts
    on translational research in neurological
    disorders.
  • To promote more extensive interaction among basic
    and clinical researchers.
  • To accelerate the development of interventions
    and effective treatments that will improve the
    quality of life of persons with neurological
    disorders.

11
3 Types of NINDS K01 Awards
  • "NINDS Mentored Research Scientist Development
    Awards in Translational Research"
    (http//grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-0
    2-140.html).
  • "Career Development Award for Minority Scholars
    in Neuroscience" (http//grants.nih.gov/grants/gui
    de/pa-files/PAR-02-106.html).
  • Re-Entry Into the Neurological Sciences Program
    (http//www.ninds.nih.gov/funding/postdoc.htmk01)
    .

12
NINDS K01 Awards
  • Factors of PI Considered in Review
  • Demonstrated the potential for highly productive
    independent research in the period after the
    doctorate.
  • The candidate must identify mentor(s) with
    extensive basic and/or clinical research
    experience.
  • Candidates must be willing to spend a minimum of
    75 percent of full-time professional effort
    conducting research and research career
    development during the entire award period.
  • The candidate must clearly describe the need for
    intensive research supervision for a period
    lasting 3-5 years, leading to research
    independence.

13
NINDS K08 and K23 Awards
  • Both are MENTORED awards (Junior PI with Senior
    Co-I who has successful NIH track record) BUT the
    NINDS encourages applicant institutions to
    demonstrate strong commitment toward the academic
    independence of candidates for these Awards (read
    here MUST HAVE A FACULTY APPOINTMENT AND
    PROTECTED TIME).
  • The level of institutional commitment IS A MAJOR
    FACTOR.
  • 3) K08 is translatable research, K23 is patient
    oriented research.

14
NINDS K08 and K23 Awards
  • Scientific Factors Considered in Review
  • Junior PI must have publication record (4 or 5)
    and evidence of success in research (small
    grants).
  • Senior PIs must be outstanding in terms of
    productivity and grantsmanship recognized leader
    in the research area and have a track record of
    success in training independent investigators .
  • Scientific project must be feasible, translatable
    and be deemed a valuable training experience.
  • Ability of scientific independence of junior PI
    must be addressed.
  • All successful mentored awards have some course
    work included as part of training experience.

15
NINDS K08 and K23 Awards
  • Institutional Factors Considered in Review
  • Type of institutional appointment.
  • Sufficiency of funds available to carry out the
    proposed research.
  • Sufficiency of dedicated space for the candidate.
  • Sufficiency of protected time for the candidate
    (75 or so effort).
  • Other resources available to the candidate.

16
NINDS K02 Awards
  • Follows a K08 award to support the continued
    career development of independent
    clinician-scientists for an additional 5 years
    (to obtain an R01 or equivalent).
  • The award provides both Salary and Research costs
    for the first 3 years, and continued salary
    support for years 4 and 5, contingent on receipt
    of an R01 or equivalent award.
  • NINDS considers an R01-equivalent grant to be an
    independent, peer-reviewed, multi-year award with
    the K02 awardee as PI, and the total award must
    be for a minimum of 75,000 per year for 3 years
    or 100,000 per year for 2 years.

17
Thank you for your attention.
  • Claire E. Hulsebosch, Ph.D.
  • Director, Mission Connect
  • Vice Chair and Professor, Neuroscience and Cell
    Biology

18
Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career
Development Award (K08)
  • Mabel Caban, M.D.
  • Dept. Orthopedic Surgery Rehabilitation-SOM
  • Division Rehabilitation Science-SAH
  • National Cancer Institute K08 in 2005 for
    Effects of Disability on the Diagnosis of Breast
    Cancer

19
Choose a Mentor
  • Single most important decision
  • Chemistry
  • Productivity
  • Active grant writers publishing
  • Resources track record of training others
  • Someone with whom you have published
  • Ask if he/she will support your application

20
Participating Organizations
  • Check NIH website
  • http//grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/pa-06-
    512.html
  • Take advantage of your profile
  • Seed funding (search InfoEd)
  • Institution, foundation or national academies
  • Read the Program Announcement
  • Contact the Institute check your eligibility
  • Contact department head UTMB directors

21
Decision Making
  • 75 research
  • 25 clinical

22
The Process
  • Request funded K awards from mentor
  • Writing the grant
  • Mentor
  • Environment institutional support resources
  • Candidate
  • Develop idea from work as research fellow
  • Specific Aims and Model
  • Significance innovative, timely, important
  • Responsible conduct of research
  • Sound methodology

23
Timeline
Apply CIRWH Start K award Draft to
Submit Summary Program NOGA Seed Grant
award Application Program Director
K08 Statement Contact 5/2003 8/2003
8/2003 1/2004
2/2004 8/2004 8/2004 10/2005
24
The Process
  • Start now
  • Meet with mentor and provide drafts q. week
  • Use editors
  • UTMB is the right place
  • You can do it

25
Two Slides Worth of Advice on K Awards
  • James S. Goodwin, M.D.
  • George Cynthia Mitchell Distinguished Chair in
    Geriatric Medicine
  • Director, Sealy Center on Aging

26
Writing a Career Development Proposal General
Advice
  • Thinking straight is immensely difficult for
    everyone. Do not handicap yourself by using
    complex, florid language.
  • An NIH proposal is like a long letter to two or
    three people the only people who will ever read
    it. Your job is to make it easy for those two or
    three individuals to understand your proposal.
  • For example
  • Avoid abbreviations
  • Use frequent summaries
  • Use headings for everything
  • Construct lots of diagrams, figures, tables,
    lists and white space
  • Schedule your efforts so that you produce a
    complete first draft at least four weeks prior to
    submission. Send it out for review.


Sealy
Center on Aging
27
Writing a Career Development Proposal Specific
Advice
  • The major product of a K-Award is the individual,
    not the science.
  • Thus, it is key to
  • Provide a credible career development plan. This
    cannot be an afterthought.
  • Think long and hard about what you want to be
    doing in five years really. Then communicate
    that in a coherent manner and make sure the rest
    of the proposal is consistent with that vision.

Sealy
Center on Aging
28
Thoughts on a K08 Award Application
  • Slobodan, Bobo Paessler, D.V.M., Ph.D.
  • Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
  • Diseases K08 in 2004 for VEE Pathogenesis and
    Vaccine Development

29
Characteristics of a Strong Career Development
Grant Mentor, Basic Sciences
  • Scott Weaver, Ph.D.
  • Vice-Chair for Research and Professor,
  • Department of Pathology
  • Director for Tropical and Emerging Diseases,
    Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious
    Diseases

30
Characteristics of a Strong Career Development
Grant Mentor, Basic Sciences
  • History of strong, stable grant funding,
    preferably including NIH R01s, and preferably
    extending through the proposed training period.
  • Strong publication record, preferably including
    collaborative, interdisciplinary publications
    that have involved past trainees.
  • History of mentoring trainees who have been
    productive and remained in science, ideally in
    academic biomedical research as faculty.
  • Ability to provide trainee with a tailored set of
    training activities to meet their career goals.

31
Research Services
  • Thank you.
  • Questions from the audience.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com