All Kids Count National Program Office - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

All Kids Count National Program Office

Description:

16 AKC II Projects. Quantitative measures. Timeliness. Database Maturity. Provider Participation ... electronic submissions - average 50% (median 62%) paper ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:88
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: CDC7
Category:
Tags: akc | count | kids | national | office | program

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: All Kids Count National Program Office


1
All Kids CountNational Program Office
  • Quantitative Performance
  • Indicators
  • March, 2000

2
Measuring Progress
  • What and Why?
  • Methodology
  • Results
  • Conclusions

3
What and Why?
  • 16 AKC II Projects
  • Quantitative measures
  • Timeliness
  • Database Maturity
  • Provider Participation
  • Coverage Levels
  • To establish standardized measures to assess
  • registry maturity
  • progress over time

4
Methodology
  • 8 quantitative indicators
  • 7 process
  • 1 outcome-based
  • 6 month intervals
  • Self report survey

5
Results - 1Timeliness of Data Captured
  • births captured within 42 days.
  • electronic transfer - average 61 (median 75)
  • other methods - 9.5 and 43
  • shots captured within 7 days.
  • electronic submissions - average 50 (median 62)
  • paper submissions - average 9 (median 5)
  • even mix - average 19 (median 13)

6
Results - 2Database Maturity
7
Results - 3Provider Participation
8
Results - 4Provider Participation Aggregate
9
Results - 5Private Provider Levels
  • Mandatory reporting legislation - 7 projects
  • average enrolled 85 (median 91)
  • average submitting data 71 (median 84)
  • No reporting legislation - 9 projects
  • average enrolled 51 (median 36)
  • average submitting data 38 (median 25)

10
(No Transcript)
11
Fully Operational StatusRanking
Ranking
Points accumulated
12
Conclusions - 1
  • Anything worthwhile is not easy at first!

13
Conclusions - 2
  • Data Collection and Reporting Issues
  • systems not designed to collect indicator data
  • elusive, fluctuating denominators
  • data source problems - - e.g. vital records
  • data quality/duplicate records
  • low provider participation levels
  • historical data skews results

14
Conclusions - 3
  • Despite difficulties are indicators useful?

15
Conclusions - 4
  • Progress can be measured across projects
  • indicators 2, 4 and 6 are best
  • Weak or problematic areas identified
  • inadequate deduplication
  • data capture delays
  • Indicators can be good internal mgt. tool
  • indicators must be a priority for projects --
    they require some work

16
Conclusions - 5
  • Next steps
  • continue administering survey through June 2000
  • further analysis of data
  • publish results

17
Contact Information
  • KC Edwards
  • (404) 687-5622
  • kcedwards_at_taskforce.org
  • Presentation requests
  • info_at_allkidscount.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com